Back to Authors

Essandoh, L. K.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Reflex constriction of human limb resistance vessels to head-down neck flexion
Essandoh, L. K., Shepherd, John T., Duprez, Daniel A.

Journal of Applied Physiology | December 21, 2017 | Volume: 64 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 767-770

10.1152/jappl.1988.64.2.767 Get It

The effect of head-down neck flexion on forearm and calf blood flow was determined in 10 healthy male subjects. The subject lay prone, with the neck slightly extended and the chin resting on a soft-padded support at the edge of the table. The chin support was then removed, and the subject maximally flexed and lowered the neck. This was followed by return to the initial position. Neck flexion caused a rapid decrease in blood flow in both forearm and calf; at 30 s this averaged 39 and 35%, respectively. The flow in both forearm and calf gradually recovered as the neck flexion was sustained and approached the control values at the end of 10 min. The blood flow at the ankle was unchanged, indicating that the decrease occurred in the skeletal muscles. The arterial blood pressure and heart rate were unchanged; thus the decrease in flow was due to vasoconstriction. The fact that the decrease was evident as soon as the head was lowered indicated that it was nervously mediated. Neither contraction of the flexor muscles of the neck nor venous congestion of the head, in the absence of the head-down position, altered the blood flow. Although the mechanism of the decrease in flow has not been determined, the studies demonstrate that in response to certain stimuli, the resistance vessels in the skeletal muscles of the forearm and calf undergo a similar nervously mediated vasoconstriction.
Vascular responses in forearm and calf to contralateral static exercises
Essandoh, L. K., Vanhoutte, P. M., Shepherd, John T., Duprez, Daniel A.

Journal of Applied Physiology | December 21, 2017 | Volume: 66 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 669-674

10.1152/jappl.1989.66.2.669 Get It

Ten normal subjects performed a 90-s isometric exercise [20, 30, and 40% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the flexor muscle of the right index finger or quadriceps muscle of the right leg. Contralateral forearm and calf blood flows (strain gauge plethysmography) and arterial blood pressure (auscultation) were measured simultaneously. Each exercise caused a decrease in forearm vascular resistance and a progressive increase in calf resistance. These changes were greatest with the 40% MVC. With finger exercise at 20 and 40% MVC, the percentage decreases in forearm vascular resistance from control were 12.3 and 22.7%, respectively (P less than 0.01). Similar decreases (9.5 and 24.9%, respectively; P less than 0.01) were noted with exercise of the quadriceps muscle. By contrast, the corresponding increases in calf vascular resistance were greater (P less than 0.01) with quadriceps exercise (13.3 and 55.4%, respectively) than with finger exercise (6.0 and 36.0%). Arrest of the circulation to the exercising muscles just before the exercise ended caused an abrupt increase in forearm vascular resistance and a decrease in calf resistance. These studies provide further evidence of the heterogeneity of responses of forearm and calf resistance vessels to certain cardiovascular stimuli.
Postural cardiovascular reflexes: comparison of responses of forearm and calf resistance vessels
Essandoh, L. K., Shepherd, John T., Duprez, Daniel A.

Journal of Applied Physiology | December 21, 2017 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1801-1805

10.1152/jappl.1987.63.5.1801 Get It

Simultaneous measurements were made of changes in vascular resistance in the forearm and calf in response to moving from supine to sitting or to head-down tilt. The subjects were healthy male volunteers, 21–63 yr. Blood flows were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography using mercury-in-Silastic strain-gauges. The gauges were maintained at the same level relative to the heart during the postural changes. Arterial blood pressure was measured by auscultation; heart rate was counted from the plethysmograms. Changing from supine to sitting caused a decrease in forearm blood flow from 4.13 +/- 0.14 to 2.16 +/- 0.19 ml.100 ml-1.min-1. Corresponding calf flows were 4.21 +/- 0.32 and 4.40 +/- 0.59 ml.100 ml-1.min-1. There was no change in mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate increased by 8.0 +/- 1.5 beats/min. Arrest of the circulation of both legs with occlusion cuffs on the thighs before sitting, to prevent pooling of blood in them, reduced the degree of forearm vasoconstriction. Neck suction (40 Torr) during sitting, to oppose the decrease in transmural pressure at the carotid sinuses, inhibited the vasoconstriction. During a 30 degrees head-down tilt, there was a dilatation of forearm but not of calf resistance vessels. A Valsalva maneuver caused a similar constriction of both vascular beds. Thus, when changes in vascular resistance in forearm and calf are compared, the major reflex adjustments to changes in posture take place in the forearm.