Harrison, Kimystian L.

ABSTRACT Background Driving supports independence and quality of life in later life but is vulnerable to age‐related and/or disease‐related decline. While cognitive impairment is a well‐recognized risk for unsafe mobility, the contribution of sensorimotor function is less understood. Methods We studied 374 cognitively normal older adults (Clinical Dementia Rating = 0 at baseline) enrolled in the DRIVES Project. A SensoryMotor Impairment Index (SMI) was constructed from six domains (grip strength, gait speed, reaction time, hearing, vision, olfaction) and categorized as 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 impairments. Naturalistic driving was continuously monitored using in‐vehicle GPS dataloggers between 2019 and 2025. Linear mixed‐effects models tested whether longitudinal driving trajectories differed by baseline SMI, adjusting for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, and cognition (Preclinical Alzheimer's Cognitive Composite). Results At baseline, participants with higher SMI burden were older and had lower cognitive scores (both p < 0.01). Over time, greater sensorymotor impairment was associated with faster declines in driving exposure and spatial range. Compared with SMI = 0, participants with SMI ≥ 3 showed steeper reductions in nighttime trips (−0.050 vs. −0.037 trips/month), long‐distance trips (> 20 miles; p < 0.001), and maximum trip distance ( p = 0.009), and greater contraction of driving space (entropy and radius of gyration; p < 0.001). Self‐reported driving behaviors showed that participants with higher SMI drove fewer days per‐week and were more likely to avoid night driving ( p < 0.01). Rates of self‐reported adverse driving events (e.g., crashes or citations) did not differ significantly across SMI groups, consistent with compensatory self‐regulatory behaviors. Conclusion Greater sensorymotor impairment predicts accelerated decline in naturalistic driving among cognitively normal older adults, independent of cognition. A composite SMI may provide a feasible, low‐cost approach to identify older drivers at risk for declining mobility and support timely interventions to prolong safe driving.

AbstractIntroductionThe aim was to examine associations between midlife cardiovascular health (CVH) and 20‐year cognitive decline among blacks and whites.MethodsMidlife CVH metrics (American Heart Association's Life's Simple 7) were calculated and examined in relation to midlife and 20‐year change in cognitive function among 13,270 whites and blacks from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Cohort Study. We used linear mixed models to estimate adjusted associations of midlife CVH with midlife cognitive status and change.ResultsHigher midlife (Life's Simple 7) scores and individual metrics, particularly blood pressure and glucose, were associated with better midlife cognition and reduced 20‐year decline. Midlife CVH 20‐year neuroprotection was more pronounced among whites than blacks.DiscussionBetter midlife CVH was associated with higher midlife and reduced decline in cognitive function 20 years later. However, the benefits of midlife CVH on cognition were stronger for whites than for blacks. Our findings suggest that improved midlife CVH may promote enduring cognitive health.