Kreofsky, Beth L.

Introduction Teleneonatology (TN) allows neonatologists to use real-time, audio–video telemedicine to manage critically ill neonates located in community hospitals (CHs). The California Transport Risk Index of Physiologic Stability (Ca-TRIPS) score is a validated metric that predicts the risk of 7-day mortality for neonates undergoing medical transport. We hypothesized that neonates born in CHs who received TN consults would have lower (better) Ca-TRIPS scores upon arrival of the transport team than those who did not. Methods Neonates born in CHs between 8 December 2018 and 31 July 2022 who were transported to the neonatal intensive care unit were screened for eligibility. TN was available at 50% (12/24) of CHs, where care teams decided when to activate the service. Study data were abstracted from the electronic health record and used to calculate Ca-TRIPS scores. Scores were evaluated using zero-inflated negative binomial regression. Results Forty-two percent (161/385) of neonates received a TN consult. Neonates that received TN had lower birth weight, gestational age, and Apgar scores and were more often admitted with respiratory distress syndrome and respiratory failure. Neonates who received TN were less likely to have a Ca-TRIPS score of zero (odds ratio 0.51; 95% confidence interval 0.33, 0.78). When adjusted for baseline characteristics, this difference was no longer significant. Non-zero Ca-TRIPS scores were not different between groups. Discussion In this observational study, neonates that received TN did not have lower (better) Ca-TRIPS scores. Findings may be limited by confounding bias given between-group differences in baseline patient characteristics. Randomized studies are needed to determine whether TN impacts the physiologic stability of neonates requiring medical transport.

Introduction: Teleneonatology (TN) allows remote neonatologists to provide real-time audio-video telemedicine support to community hospitals when neonates require advanced resuscitation or critical care. Currently, there are no published economic evaluations of U.S. TN programs. Objective: To evaluate the cost of TN from the perspective of the health care system. Methods: We constructed a decision tree comparing TN to usual care for neonates born in hospitals without a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) who require consultation. Our outcome of interest was total cost per patient, which included the incremental cost of a TN program, the cost of medical transport, and the cost of NICU or non-NICU hospitalization. We performed threshold sensitivity analyses where we varied each parameter to determine whether the base-case finding reverted. Results: For neonates requiring consultation after birth in a hospital without a NICU, TN was less costly ($16,878) than usual care ($28,047), representing a cost-savings of $11,168 per patient. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that at least one of the following conditions would need to be met for TN to no longer be cost saving compared to usual care: transfer rate with usual care <12% (base-case = 82%), TN reducing the odds of transfer by <8% (base-case = 52%), or TN cost exceeding $12,989 per patient (base-case = $1,821 per patient). Conclusions: Economic modeling from the health system perspective demonstrated that TN was cost saving compared to usual care for neonates requiring consultation following delivery in a non-NICU hospital. Understanding the cost savings associated with TN may influence organizational decisions regarding implementation, diffusion, and retention of these programs.

Background: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine use for outpatient pediatric specialty care was low. Stay-at-home orders (SHO) prompted rapid upscaling of telemedicine capabilities and upskilling of providers. This study compares telemedicine usage before and after the SHO and analyzes how a Children's Center addressed challenges associated with a rapid rise in telemedicine. Methods: Data on outpatient visits across 14 specialty divisions were abstracted from the institutional electronic medical record. The 12-week study period (March 9, 2020–May 29, 2020) spanned three epochs: pre-SHO; post-SHO; reopening to in-person visits. Changes in in-person visits, video visits, and completed, cancelled, and no-show appointments were compared between three epochs. Results: A total of 4,914 outpatient pediatric specialty visits were completed, including 67% (3,296/4,914) in-person and 33% (1,618/4,914) through video. During the first two epochs encompassing the SHO, video visits increased by 4,750%. During the third epoch when the SHO was lifted, video visits decreased by 66%, with 19.4% of visits conducted through video in week 12. Overall, for outpatient video appointments, 82.8% (1,618/1,954) were completed, 9.1% (178/1,954) were cancelled, and 8.1% (158/1,954) were no-shows. The percentage of completed and no-show appointments did not differ between epochs. However, the cancellation rate decreased significantly from Epochs 1 to 3 (p = 0.008). Conclusion: A SHO was associated with a large increase in pediatric specialty video visits. Post-SHO, the percentage of pediatric specialty visits conducted through video decreased but remained higher than before the SHO. Frequent, content-rich communications, self-directed tutorials, and individualized coaching may facilitate successful increases in telemedicine use.