Galanis, Evanthia

Abstract Background: Aurora-A (AURKA) belongs to the family of serine-threonine kinases that are crucial for cell cycle control. In particular, AURKA controls centrosome function, mitotic spindle formation, and proper chromosome segregation. In contrast to the well-defined function of AURKA in normal cells, the role of AURKA in malignant transformation and cancer progression is still under investigation. Here, we report that AURKA directly interacts with MEK1/2 kinase and induces chemotaxis of breast cancer cells. Results: We demonstrated that overexpression of AURKA in luminal ER+ MCF-7 cells (MCF-7AURKA) resulted in over 10-fold increase in the number of cells displaying chemotactic response upon stimulation with growth factors when compared to parental MCF-7 cells. Both AURKA inhibitor MLN8237 and MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 reduced migratory properties of MCF-7AURKA cells. In contrast, treatment with the pan RAF inhibitor TAK-632 did not affect chemotactic response of MCF-7AURKA cells. We demonstrated colocalization of AURKA and MEK1/2 immunofluorescence signals in MCF-7AURKA and triple-negative BT549 cells. In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) revealed the presence of AURKA-MEK1/2 complexes in MCF-7AURKA and BT549 cells, and the notion that AURKA and MEK1/2 formed cellular complexes was confirmed with co-immunoprecipitation experiments. In vitro kinase assays with recombinant AURKA and MEK1 proteins showed that AURKA kinase could directly phosphorylate MEK1. Incubation of MCF-7AURKA and BT549 cells with the AURKA-specific inhibitors MLN8237 or MK8745 resulted in over a 2-fold increase in the level of pERK1/2 compared to the untreated controls. Treatment with the pan RAF inhibitor TAK-632 did not diminish MLN8237-induced pERK1/2, whereas treatment with the MEK1/2 specific inhibitor PD0325901 completely abrogated MLN8237-induced activation of ERK1/2. Conclusions: Our data present a novel AURKA-MEK1/2 interaction that contributes to the increased chemotaxis of breast cancer cells. The results suggest that AURKA negatively regulates MEK1 through a novel, direct phosphorylation event, possibly leading to constitutive activation of MEK2 and increased chemotaxis. The combined treatment of AURKA and MEK1/2 inhibitors represents a new therapeutic approach to decrease metastatic potential of breast cancer cells and delay tumor progression. The in-depth analysis of the AURKA-MEK1/2 complexes as well as in vivo studies testing the efficacy of combining AURKA and MEK1/2 inhibitors on patient-derived xenografts are currently in progress. Citation Format: Malgorzata Gil, Archana Chidambaram, Thaer Khoury, Kazuaki Takabe, Igor Puzanov, Irwin H. Gelman, Antonino B. D’Assoro, Evanthia Galanis, Mateusz Opyrchal. AURKA interaction with MEK1/2 complex and its role in promoting breast cancer cell metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A60.

Important advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of brain tumors have resulted in a rapid evolution in the taxonomy of central nervous system (CNS) tumors, which culminated in the revised 2016 World Health Organization classification of CNS tumors that incorporates an integrated molecular/histologic diagnostic approach. Our expanding understanding of brain tumor genomics and molecular evolution during the disease course has started to impact clinical management. Furthermore, incorporation of genomic information in ongoing and planned neuro-oncology clinical trials is expected to lead to improved outcomes and result in personalized treatment options for patients with CNS malignancies.

The authors present the case of a man with a papillary craniopharyngioma, first diagnosed at 47 years of age, who experienced multiple recurrences. Review of the pathologic specimen from his first resection demonstrated the BRAF V600E mutation. With his most recent recurrence following previous surgery and radiotherapy, at 52 years of age, the decision was made to initiate treatment with the BRAF V600E inhibitor dabrafenib. Imaging following initiation of dabrafenib demonstrated reduction in tumor size. He remained on dabrafenib therapy for approximately 1 year and continued to demonstrate a good clinical result. At that time the decision was made to discontinue dabrafenib therapy and follow up with serial imaging. After more than 1 year of follow-up since stopping dabrafenib, the patient has continued to do well with no radiographic evidence of tumor progression and continues to be monitored with frequent interval imaging.

BACKGROUNDMitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)‐dependent signaling are hallmarks of glioblastoma. In the current study, the authors conducted a phase 1/2 study of sorafenib (an inhibitor of Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 [VEGFR‐2]) and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.METHODSPatients with recurrent glioblastoma who developed disease progression after surgery or radiotherapy plus temozolomide and with ≤2 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. The phase 1 endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), using a cohorts‐of‐3 design. The 2‐stage phase 2 study included separate arms for VEGF inhibitor (VEGFi)–naive patients and patients who progressed after prior VEGFi.RESULTSThe MTD was sorafenib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily and temsirolimus at a dose of 20 mg weekly. In the first 41 evaluable patients who were treated at the phase 2 dose, there were 7 who were free of disease progression at 6 months (progression‐free survival at 6 months [PFS6]) in the VEGFi‐naive group (17.1%); this finding met the prestudy threshold of success. In the prior VEGFi group, only 4 of the first 41 evaluable patients treated at the phase 2 dose achieved PFS6 (9.8%), and this did not meet the prestudy threshold for success. The median PFS for the 2 groups was 2.6 months and 1.9 months, respectively. The median overall survival for the 2 groups was 6.3 months and 3.9 months, respectively. At least 1 adverse event of grade ≥3 was observed in 75.5% of the VEGFi‐naive patients and in 73.9% of the prior VEGFi patients.CONCLUSIONSThe limited activity of sorafenib and temsirolimus at the dose and schedule used in the current study was observed with considerable toxicity of grade ≥3. Significant dose reductions that were required in this treatment combination compared with tolerated single‐agent doses may have contributed to the lack of efficacy. Cancer 2018;124:1455‐63. © 2018 American Cancer Society.