Back to Authors

Harris, Joshua D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7606-2473

Mayo Clinic

Houston Methodist

Citations 2

Evaluating the Need for Preoperative MRI Before Primary Hip Arthroscopy in Patients 40 Years and Younger With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Multicenter Comparative Analysis
Berrier, Ava S., Helm, J. Matthew , Koolmees, Dylan S. , Pareek, Ayoosh , Nwachukwu, Benedict U. , Ramkumar, Prem N. , Krych, Aaron J. , Makhni, Eric Chugh , Harris, Joshua D.

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine | January 12, 2023 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1177/23259671221144776 Get It

Background: Routine hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before arthroscopy for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) offers questionable clinical benefit, delays surgery, and wastes resources. Purpose: To assess the clinical utility of preoperative hip MRI for patients aged ≤40 years who were undergoing primary hip arthroscopy and who had a history, physical examination findings, and radiographs concordant with FAIS. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included were 1391 patients (mean age, 25.8 years; 63% female; mean body mass index, 25.6) who underwent hip arthroscopy between August 2015 and December 2021 by 1 of 4 fellowship-trained hip surgeons from 4 referral centers. Inclusion criteria were FAIS, primary surgery, and age ≤40 years. Exclusion criteria were MRI contraindication, reattempt of nonoperative management, and concomitant periacetabular osteotomy. Patients were stratified into those who were evaluated with preoperative MRI versus those without MRI. Those without MRI received an MRI before surgery without deviation from the established surgical plan. All preoperative MRI scans were compared with the office evaluation and intraoperative findings to assess agreement. Time from office to arthroscopy and/or MRI was recorded. MRI costs were calculated. Results: Of the study patients, 322 were not evaluated with MRI and 1069 were. MRI did not alter surgical or interoperative plans. Both groups had MRI findings demonstrating anterosuperior labral tears treated intraoperatively (99.8% repair, 0.2% debridement, and 0% reconstruction). Compared with patients who were evaluated with MRI and waited 63.0 ± 34.6 days, patients who were not evaluated with MRI underwent surgery 6.5 ± 18.7 days after preoperative MRI. MRI delayed surgery by 24.0 ± 5.3 days and cost a mean $2262 per patient. Conclusion: Preoperative MRI did not alter indications for primary hip arthroscopy in patients aged ≤40 years with a history, physical examination findings, and radiographs concordant with FAIS. Rather, MRI delayed surgery and wasted resources. Routine hip MRI acquisition for the younger population with primary FAIS with a typical presentation should be challenged.
Is There an Association Between Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Decreased Hip Internal Rotation or Radiographic Femoroacetabular Impingement? A Systematic Review
Boutris, Nickolas , Byrne, Rory A. , Delgado, Domenica A. , Hewett, Timothy E. , McCulloch, Patrick C. , Lintner, David M. , Harris, Joshua D.

Arthroscopy | November 21, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 943-950

10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.302 Get It

Purpose To perform a systematic review to determine if there is (1) an association between decreased hip internal rotation and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear rates; (2) an association between radiographic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and ACL tear rates; and (3) biomechanical evidence demonstrating increased strain in the ACL of patients with decreased hip internal rotation. Methods A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies investigating relationships between hip motion, hip radiographs, and ACL tear were sought. Studies with Levels of evidence I‐IV were eligible for inclusion. Study methodology/evidence were evaluated using Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies (MINORS), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results Eleven studies were analyzed (2 cadaveric in vitro models, 8 clinical studies measuring hip internal rotation (2 concurrently assessing radiographic FAI), and 1 clinical study assessing radiographic FAI alone). Mean MINORS, STROBE, and GRADE for the studies was 82.4%, 20.9 out of 22, and “low,” respectively. A total of 959 subjects (84.8% male; mean age 23.6 ± 3.8 years) were analyzed. Overall, 378 subjects sustained 427 ACL tears (399 primary ACL ruptures, 28 reruptures). Six of 8 clinical studies identified a significant association between limited rotation (internal rotation [IR; loss greater than 10°‐20°], external rotation [ER], or combined IR + ER [loss greater than 20°]) and ACL tears. Two studies found an association between ACL ruptures and radiographic cam/pincer impingement. Two cadaveric models found a significant association between ACL strain and limited hip internal rotation. Conclusions This systematic review identified a significant association between ACL tear and both limited hip rotation and radiographic FAI. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Levels II‐IV studies.