Back to Authors

Abu-Bonsrah, Nancy

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8195-1622

Mayo Clinic

Johns Hopkins University

Citations 2

Promoting diversity in neurosurgery through a virtual symposium
Charles, Antoinette J. , Seas, Andreas , Corley, Jacquelyn, Duvall, Julia B. , Owolo, Edwin , Abu-Bonsrah, Nancy , Elsamadicy, Aladine A. , Simpson, Venita M., Sanusi, Olabisi , Holly, Langston T. , Levi, Allan D. , Quiñones‐Hinojosa, Alfredo , Karikari, Isaac O. , Fuller, Anthony T. , Rodriguez, Analiz , Nduom, Edjah Kweku-Ebura , Liau, Linda M. , Grant, Gerald A. , Goodwin, C. Rory

Journal of Neurosurgery | March 10, 2023 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1101-1108

10.3171/2023.1.jns221743 Get It

OBJECTIVE The rates of women and underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (UREM) students successfully matching into neurosurgical residency are extremely low and do not reflect the makeup of the general population. As of 2019, only 17.5% of neurosurgical residents in the United States were women, 4.95% were Black or African American, and 7.2% were Hispanic or Latinx. Earlier recruitment of UREM students will help to diversify the neurosurgical workforce. Therefore, the authors developed a virtual educational event for undergraduate students entitled "Future Leaders in Neurosurgery Symposium for Underrepresented Students’’ (FLNSUS). The primary objectives of the FLNSUS were to expose attendees to 1) neurosurgeons from diverse gender, racial, and ethnic backgrounds; 2) neurosurgical research; 3) opportunities for neurosurgical mentorship; and 4) information about life as a neurosurgeon. The authors hypothesized that the FLNSUS would increase student self-confidence, provide exposure to the specialty, and reduce perceived barriers to a neurosurgical career. METHODS To measure the change in participant perceptions of neurosurgery, pre- and postsymposium surveys were administered to attendees. Of the 269 participants who completed the presymposium survey, 250 participated in the virtual event and 124 completed the postsymposium survey. Paired pre- and postsurvey responses were used for analysis, yielding a response rate of 46%. To assess the impact of participant perceptions of neurosurgery as a field, pre- and postsurvey responses to questions were compared. The change in response was analyzed, and a nonparametric sign test was performed to check for significant differences. RESULTS According to the sign test, applicants showed increased familiarity with the field (p < 0.001), increased confidence in their abilities to become neurosurgeons (p = 0.014), and increased exposure to neurosurgeons from diverse gender, racial, and ethnic backgrounds (p < 0.001 for all categories). CONCLUSIONS These results reflect a significant improvement in student perceptions of neurosurgery and suggest that symposiums like the FLNSUS may promote further diversification of the field. The authors anticipate that events promoting diversity in neurosurgery will lead to a more equitable workforce that will ultimately translate to enhanced research productivity, cultural humility, and patient-centered care in neurosurgery.
The Challenges of Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to the Spine: A Systematic Review of Survival and Treatment
Goodwin, C. Rory , Boone, Christine , Abu-Bonsrah, Nancy , Germscheid, Niccole, Fourney, Daryl R. , Laufer, Ilya , Fisher, Charles G. , Sciubba, Daniel M. , Clarke, Michelle, Fisher, Charles G , Goodwin, C Rory , Ahmed, Ali Karim , Xu, Risheng , Clarke, Michelle J. , Bettegowda, Chetan

Global Spine Journal | November 20, 2017 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 517-526

10.1177/2192568217737777 Get It

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to answer 2 key questions: (1) What is the clinical presentation and probability of symptomatic improvement following treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the spine? (2) What is the overall survival of patients diagnosed with spinal metastases from RCC? Methods: A literature review was performed to identify articles that reported on survival, clinical outcomes, and/or prognostic factors in the RCC population with spinal metastases from 1986 to 2016. Results: Forty-eight articles (807 patients) were included. The Fuhrman Nuclear Grade has been significantly associated with survival in previous studies but was underpowered in the current study. The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Score (MSKCC/Motzer) was also underpowered in the current study. From the time of spinal metastasis, the mean and median survival for patients with previously diagnosed primary RCC was 8.75 and 11.7 months, respectively, whereas synchronously diagnosed patients (primary RCC and spinal metastasis) had a mean and median survival of 6.75 and 11 months, respectively. Patients with a “low” (0-8), “intermediate” (9-11), or “high” (12-15) revised Tokuhashi score at initial presentation had a median survival of 5.4, 11.7, and 32.9 months, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with either a synchronous or latent diagnosis of RCC survived greater than 6 months from the time of presentation. Initial Furhman grade, Tokuhashi score, and MSKCC/Motzer can be useful tools in informing patient-specific prognosis for those with metastatic RCC of the spine.