Litzow, Mark R.

Background: Despite recently approved novel targeted therapies, most patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) still require allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to achieve long-term survival. However, older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML are often unable to undergo HCT due to the toxicity of myeloablative pre-conditioning. Since higher doses of chemotherapy and radiation are associated with prolonged myelosuppression or infectious complications, targeted radiotherapy with Iomab-B, employed in the SIERRA trial, was designed to minimize toxicities in a patient population unable to tolerate standard high-dose myeloablative HCT pre-conditioning. We hypothesize that Iomab-B, which spares non-hematologic organs such as the GI tract, exhibits a favorable toxicity profile with respect to mucositis, febrile neutropenia (FN), and sepsis. Methods: The SIERRA trial is a prospective trial for patients ≥55 years of age with R/R AML (≥5% blasts) and 8/8 HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. Patients were randomized (1:1) to Iomab-B or Conventional Care (CC). Those in the Iomab-B group received a dosimetric infusion of Iomab-B followed by nuclear imaging to determine the personalized therapeutic dose to be delivered to the bone marrow and to other sites of disease. Therapeutic dose calculations, utilizing the Olinda software (Version 2.1, Hermes Medical) to determine the delivery of a maximum of 24 Gray (Gy) dose to the liver, were performed based on the imaging results. HCT is performed 12-14 days following the infusion of a therapeutic dose of Iomab-B, and a non-myeloablative conditioning backbone of fludarabine (30 mg/m2 x 3) and low-dose Total Body Irradiation (TBI 2 Gy x 1 dose). CC patients received the investigator's choice of salvage therapy. Safety data was evaluated from randomization and up to 100 days after HCT in the patients randomized to the Iomab-B group. We specifically evaluated AE variables of mucositis (Gr 2-4), FN (Gr3,4) and sepsis. An analysis was performed with both total activity of Iomab-B as well as with the radiation dose delivered to the bone marrow, stomach wall, small and large intestinal walls. For each of the 3 AEs of interest, a multivariate analysis was performed, allowing each of the predictor variables to be included in the model. Results: A total of 106 patients were randomized at the time of analysis. For those randomized to Iomab-B, data is available for 45 patients that received a therapeutic dose of Iomab-B and HCT. The median dose of Iomab-B administered was 603 mCi (range 313-1027 mCi) and the median radiation dose delivered to the marrow in the Iomab-B group was 14.7 Gy (range 4.6 - 32 Gy). All patients (median age 64) treated with a therapeutic dose of Iomab-B achieved neutrophil engraftment after a median of 14 days post-HCT (range 9-22), despite presenting with a median 26% marrow blasts prior to initiation of therapy. Rates of mucositis, FN, and sepsis are shown in Table 1. No correlation between AEs (FN, mucositis, sepsis) and administered Iomab-B activity (p=0.08), nor with dose delivered to GI tract (p=0.09) was observed. Furthermore, these AEs were not related to the dose of radiation received by the small intestine (median 2.7 Gy range 1.1-6.8 Gy) large intestine (median 2.6 Gy range 0.9-6.5 Gy), nor an average of all 4 GI sites (median 2.8 Gy range 1.6-6.8 Gy). Conclusions: Unlike cases involving treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy and external beam radiation where mucositis, infections and sepsis increase along with the administered dose, targeted myeloablative conditioning with Iomab-B resulted in low incidences of severe mucositis, FN, and sepsis. These AEs do not appear to be related to the total dose of Iomab-B administered nor to the specific radiation dose delivered to the bone marrow. Furthermore, a low dose of radiation (2.8 Gy) was received by the GI tract compared to the larger dose of radiation (14.7 Gy) delivered to the marrow. Taken together, these results represent potentially significant improvements in the safe delivery of myeloablative therapy with high-dose targeted radioimmunotherapy, prior to HCT in older patients with R/R AML. This SIERRA trial is currently enrolling patients (www.sierratrial.com or clinicaltrials.gov NCT02665065). Disclosures Gyurkocza: Actinium: Research Funding. Nath:Actinium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stiff:Kite, a Gilead Company: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Atara: Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Delta-Fly: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hari:Amgen: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy. Al-Kadhimi:Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Gilead Science: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novavax: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Abboud:Ryvu: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; BMS: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbott Labs: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AbbVie Inc: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; AlloVir: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding. Magalhaes-Silverman:Kadmon Holdings: Research Funding; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Foran:Xencor: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Aptose: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; H3Biosciences: Research Funding. Schuster:Amgen, Abbvie, Gilead, Takeda, Celgene, Pharmacyclics, Astellas, Verastem, Merck, Novartis, Takeda, Genentech,, Seattle Genetics: Other: Personal Fees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kebriaei:Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Jazz: Consultancy. Levy:Karyopharm,Takeda, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Giralt:KITE: Consultancy; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; OMEROS: Consultancy, Honoraria; ACTINUUM: Consultancy, Research Funding; MILTENYI: Consultancy, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Research Funding; CELGENE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ: Consultancy, Honoraria; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding. Liang:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Berger:Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Reddy:Actinium Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

Somatic variants in TET2 and DNMT3A are founding mutations in hematological malignancies that both affect the epigenetic regulation of DNA methylation. Although the proteins antagonistically regulate the epigenetic mark of 5-methylcytosine (5-mC), where DNMT3A catalyzes addition of 5-mC while TET2 oxidizes 5-mC as a first step in DNA demethylation, mutations in both genes appear in a similar spectrum of human hematopoietic malignancies. Mutations in both genes often co-occur with activating mutations in oncogenic tyrosine kinases (OTKs) such as FLT3ITD, BCR-ABL1, JAK2V617F, MPLW515L or mutations affecting related signaling pathways such as NRASG12D and CALRdel52. Moreover, while the mutations exert divergent effect on primitive hematopoietic progenitor cells, they lead to similar disease phenotypes, suggesting the roles of these mutations in hematopoietic malignancies may relate to mechanisms outside of DNA methylation. OTK-positive malignant cells accumulate high numbers of spontaneous and drug-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in comparison to normal cells, but they manage to survive because of their enhanced/altered ability to repair these breaks. DSBs, the most lethal DNA lesions, are repaired by two major mechanisms, BRCA1/2-dependent homologous recombination (HR) and DNA-PK -mediated non-homologous end-joining (D-NHEJ). Both HR and D-NHEJ repair DSBs in proliferating cells, while D-NHEJ plays a major role in quiescent cells. PARP1 -dependent alternative NHEJ (Alt-NHEJ) serves as back-up in both proliferating and quiescent cells. The existence of these redundant pathways creates the opportunity to employ a phenomenon called "synthetic lethality", which was originally applied to eliminate cancer cells with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 by PARP inhibitor (PARPi). Our previous report [M. Nieborowska-Skorska et al., Gene expression and mutation-guided synthetic lethality eradicates proliferating and quiescent leukemia cells. J Clin Invest 127, 2392-2406 (2017)] suggested that certain leukemias are sensitive to PARPi-triggered synthetic lethality. Here we show that TET2 and DNMT3A mutations exert divergent roles in regulating DNA repair activities in leukemia cells expressing OTKs. Malignant TET2-deficient cells display downregulation of BRCA1 and LIG4 resulting in reduced activity of HR and D-NHEJ, respectively, and rely on Alt-NHEJ to protect them from the toxic effects of replication stress and drug-induced DSBs. Conversely, DNMT3A-deficient cells favor HR/D-NHEJ owing to downregulation of PARP1 and reduction of Alt-NHEJ. Consequently, malignant TET2-deficient cells are sensitive to PARPi treatment in vitro and in vivo, whereas DNMT3A-deficient cells were resistant. Disruption of TET2 dioxygenase activity and/or TET2 - Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) binding ability were responsible for DNA repair defects and sensitivity to PARPi associated with TET2 deficiency. Moreover, mutation or deletion of WT1 mimicked the effect of TET2 mutation on DSB repair activity and sensitivity to PARPi. Our findings reveal that TET2 and WT1 mutations may serve as biomarkers of synthetic lethality triggered by PARPi, which should be explored therapeutically. Disclosures Valent: Allcyte GmbH: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tallman:Abbvie: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding; Orsenix: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; BioSight: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Rafael: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioline rx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi-Sankyo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Delta Fly Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Patents & Royalties. Martinelli:Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vassiliou:Kymab Ltd - Monoclonal antibody company. Currently not working in myeloid cancers or clonal haematopoiesis.: Consultancy.

Acute leukemia is a constellation of rapidly progressing diseases that affect a wide range of patients regardless of age or gender. Traditional treatment options for patients with acute leukemia include chemotherapy and hematopoietic cell transplantation. The advent of cancer immunotherapy has had a significant impact on acute leukemia treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents including antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies have efficacy and have recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop a clinical practice guideline composed of consensus recommendations on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia.

Background. Experience with sequential hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) is limited. Methods. We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients who underwent both HSCT and KT at our center, with a median follow-up of 11 y. Results. In our 54 patients cohort (94% autologous HSCT), 36 (67%) patients received HSCT first followed by KT, while 18 (33%) received KT before HSCT. In both groups, AL amyloidosis represented 50% of hematologic diagnosis. Only 4 patients expired due to hematologic disease relapse (2 patients in each group) and only 3 allografts were lost due to hematologic disease recurrence (HSCT first n = 1 and KT first n = 2). Overall 1, 5, and 10 y death-censored graft survival rates were 94%, 94%, and 94%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 89%, 89%, and 75%, respectively, for the KT first group. Overall 1, 5, and 10 y patients survival rates were 100%, 97% and 90%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 100%, 76%, and 63%, respectively, for the KT first group. Conclusions. Our study supports safety of sequential KT and HSCT, with improved overall patient survival compared to recipients of HSCT remaining on dialysis and good long-term kidney allograft outcome.

Abstract Comparative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for BCR-ABL1− myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in blast phase (MPN-BP) vs de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and AML with prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs; post-MDS AML), are unknown. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we compared HCT outcomes in 177 MPN-BP patients with 4749 patients with de novo AML, and 1104 patients with post-MDS AML, using multivariate regression analysis in 2 separate comparisons. In a multivariate Cox model, no difference in overall survival (OS) or relapse was observed in patients with MPN-BP vs de novo AML with active leukemia at HCT. Patients with MPN-BP in remission had inferior OS in comparison with de novo AML in remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.76]) due to higher relapse rate (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.69-2.80]). MPN-BP patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.00-1.43]) and increased relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.31-1.96]) compared with post-MDS AML. Poor-risk cytogenetics were associated with increased relapse in both comparisons. Peripheral blood grafts were associated with decreased relapse in MPN-BP and post-MDS AML (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar between MPN-BP vs de novo AML, and MPN-BP vs post-MDS AML. Total-body irradiation–based myeloablative conditioning was associated with higher NRM in both comparisons. Survival of MPN-BP after HCT is inferior to de novo AML in remission and post-MDS AML due to increased relapse. Relapse-prevention strategies are required to optimize HCT outcomes in MPN-BP.

7039 Background: Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are known to increase the risk for VTE events, especially in patients with underlying malignancies. However, there is a paucity of information on other hematopoietic growth factors such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GSCF) granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) AMD 3001 and risk for VTE. Methods: Between January 2000 and October 2008, a total of 631 patients underwent peripheral blood stem cell mobilization (PBSCM) using either GCSF, GMCSF, cyclophosphamide, AMD 3100, or with any of the above combination. We included only patients with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (AL), multiple myeloma (MM) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Patients’ demographic details and diagnosis of VTE were collected from electronic medical records. Results: Of the 631 patients who underwent PBSCM the median age of the patients was 57 years (range 17–77). 448 patients (71%) received single agent GCSF, 82 (13%) received combination of GMCSF and cyclophosphamide, 52 (8%) received cyclophosphamide and GCSF, 30 patients received a combination of GMCSF and GCSF, 10 (1.5%) patients received GCSF and AMD 3100. Of the 631 patients, 278 (44%) MM, 209 (33%) NHL, 114 (18%) AL, and 20 (3%) had HL. We found 7 (1.1%) patients with symptomatic VTE occurring between administration of growth factors and stem cell transplant. The median duration from the administration of growth factors to detection of VTE was 5 days (range 1–30). Two AL,3 MM and 2 NHL. Of the 7 patients, 2 patients had pulmonary embolism and 1 patient developed deep vein thrombosis. Two patients with AL developed heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The remaining 4 patients developed symptomatic catheter related thrombosis. Only 1 patient had past history of VTE. Of the 7 patients, 5 received GCSF alone, 1 received GMCSF, and cyclophosphamide, 1 received GCSF and cyclophosphamide. Of the 4 patients who developed catheter related thrombosis, catheter was removed in 2 patients. None of the patients developed VTE related morality. Conclusions: The risk for symptomatic VTE during PBSCM is low. HIT should be considered as a possible cause for VTE in patients undergoing PBSCM. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7003 Background: In younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), anthracycline dose intensification during induction may improve complete remission (CR) rates; however, an improvement in overall survival (OS) in a randomized trial has not been demonstrated. This unresolved issue led the ECOG to compare standard dose (SDD) to high-dose daunorubicin (HDD) in induction. Methods: Adult patients with previously untreated AML were randomized to receive either SDD (45 mg/m2/d) or HDD (90 mg/m2/d) each for 3days combined with standard-dose cytarabine (100 mg/m2/d) for 7 days by continuous intravenous infusion. Those achieving a CR were allocated to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or high-dose cytarabine (with or without a single dose of gemtuzumab ozogamicin) prior to autologous HSCT. Intravenous busulfan and cyclophosphamide was the preparative regimen for both allogeneic and autologous HSCT. The primary end point of this study was OS from the time of induction randomization. Results: 633 patients, age 18 to 60 (median 48) years, were entered in this study. There were no differences in patient demographics or disease characteristics between the two groups at presentation. In an intention-to-treat analysis, HDD resulted in a significantly higher CR rate (63.3% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.0003) than SDD. Induction deaths were similar between the two groups (5.4 vs. 5.0%, p = ns). 334 (52.8%) patients entered the consolidation phase. 57.4% of HDD and 48.1% of the SDD patients, received consolidation therapy on study, and 28.7% and 23.1% proceeded to HSCT respectively. Median OS was superior for the HDD (23.7 months) over the SDD (15.1 months) group (p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis, patients with favorable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics or age <55 years benefited from the HDD. Conclusions: We demonstrate for the first time in a prospective randomized trial that intensifying induction therapy through a higher daily anthracycline dose, in the setting of identical intensive consolidation therapy, results in a higher CR rate as well as prolonged OS. In younger AML patients a higher dose of anthracycline in induction should be considered the new standard of care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

AbstractVenetoclax and hypomethylating agent (HMA) combination therapy is FDA‐approved for elderly or unfit acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unable to withstand intensive chemotherapy. The primary objective of the current study was to impart our institutional experience with the above regimen, outlining response, survival outcomes, and its determinants amongst 86 treatment‐ naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients. A total of 44 treatment‐naïve AML patients, median age 73.5 years, enriched with secondary, therapy related and ELN adverse risk disease (n = 27) were studied. The CR/CRi rates of 50% (22 of 44 patients) were superior to 23% in a matched AML cohort treated with HMA alone (P = .005). Response rates were similar with TP53, FLT3, NPM1 and IDH mutations (P = .31). Moreover, CEPBA mutations (P = .03) and neutropenia (P = .05) emerged as predictors of complete response. Survivalwas prolonged in patients achieving CR/CRi (17 vs 3 months without CR/CRi, P < .001; conversely adverse ELN risk portended inferior survival. Amongst 42 relapsed/refractory AML patients, half received ≥2 prior therapies excluding transplant, and 15 (35.7%) had received HMA. A group of 14 patients (33.3%) attained CR/CRi; age > 65 years, AML with myelodysplasia, JAK2, DNMT3A, and BCOR mutations predicted complete response. Survival distinctions were based on CR/CRi (median survival 15 vs 3 months with/without CR/CRi; P < .001), and TP53 mutation status (P = .04). In summary, we corroborate existing reports demonstrating superior response and prolonged survival with venetoclax and HMA in treatment ‐naïve and relapsed/refractory AML patients regardless of genotype. Additionally, we identify unique predictors of response to therapy which require validation.