Back to Authors

Cisak, Kamila I.

0000-0002-9451-0321

Mayo Clinic

University of Louisville

Citations 6

Utility of Procalcitonin in Differentiating Acute Chest Syndrome from Vaso-Occlusive Crisis in Sickle Cell Disease
Chang, Simone , Shaikh, Marwan , Cisak, Kamila I. , Maharaj, Satish Stephen , Seegobin, Karan

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10-11

10.1182/blood-2020-143454 Get It

Background: Acute chest syndrome (ACS) frequently complicates sickle cell disease (SCD) and is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality. Many factors have been implicated in ACS, including infections, thrombosis, fat and pulmonary emboli. However, a clear etiology is not defined in 50% of the cases and ACS is considered a clinical endpoint for different pathogenic processes (Vichinsky et al 2000). The non-specific nature of ACS makes diagnostic tests challenging, and there are no serum tests clinical used to aid diagnosis. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a prohormone of calcitonin and serum PCT rises within hours of an inflammatory stimulus. PCT has clinical utility as a marker of severe systemic inflammation, infection, and sepsis (Becker et al. 2008). Few studies have evaluated PCT as a biomarker for ACS in patients presenting with vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). Two studies have reported no difference in PCT (Biemond et al. 2018 and Stankovic et al 2011), while one study reported higher PCT between ACS and VOC (Patel et al 2014). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 106 patients with SCD who presented to the emergency department with fever and painful crises during 2015-2019. The patients were divided into two categories based on discharge diagnoses - patients with VOC only (n=88) and patients with ACS (n=18). Inclusion criteria for both groups were patients with SCD, 17 years and older and PCT measurement on presentation. Exclusion criteria were defined as patients who had received empiric antibiotics prior to PCT testing. Data collected on presentation included genotype, age, gender, complete blood count, PCT, creatinine, total bilirubin and hydroxyurea use. Length of stay was recorded. Data was analyzed between the two groups using descriptive statistics and accounting for unequal variances, withp-value set at 0.05 for significance. Results: Demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1 (Figure). The sample included primarily adult males (77%), with about two-thirds on hydroxyurea. Genotype HbSS (73.6%) was most prevalent followed by HbSC (22.6%) and HbSβ (3.8%). The ACS group had a higher percentage of HbSS, lower use of hydroxyurea and higher mean bilirubin. Mean PCT for the ACS group was 0.52 ng/mL (range, 0.05-2.04), compared to 0.31 ng/mL (range, 0.02-6.82) in the VOC group; withp=0.084. ROC analysis showed a PCT>0.5ng/mL had 39% sensitivity and 85% specificity for ACS in this sample. Conclusion: In this sample, PCT on presentation was higher in those with ACS compared to VOC, but this difference did not achieve statistical significance. Further study in a larger population would be useful to evaluate this finding. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Utility of Procalcitonin in the Early Diagnosis of Patients with Sickle Cell Disease Presenting with Fever
Chang, Simone , Shaikh, Marwan , Cisak, Kamila I. , Maharaj, Satish Stephen , Seegobin, Karan

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 9-9

10.1182/blood-2020-143441 Get It

Background: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are at increased risk of developing bacterial infections as a result of functional asplenia. Fever, a common symptom in SCD often occurs with other sickle cell related conditions and viral infections. This poses a diagnostic challenge and early use of empiric antibiotics is recommended while awaiting cultures. The widespread administration of antibiotics to all patients with SCD with fever can result in problems such as antibiotic resistance and increased medical costs. An early and reliable biomarker is therefore needed to help distinguish between bacterial and non-bacterial causes for fever in SCD. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been shown to be elevated in bacterial but not viral infections. In SCD, few studies have looked at the role of PCT in predicting bacterial infections. Unal et al reported vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) with or without fever did not increase PCT levels in relation to patients with no crisis and no fever. However, Rincón-López et al reported a PCT < 0.6ng/mL had a negative predictive value of 97.2% and potentially could be used to identify bacterial infection early. Methods: We retrospectively studied 122 patients with SCD who presented to the emergency department with fever from 2015-2019. Inclusion criteria were defined as patients with SCD, 17 years and older and PCT measurement on presentation to the emergency department. Exclusion criteria were defined as patients with SCD and fever who had received empiric antibiotics prior to labs being drawn in the emergency department. The cohort was divided into groups of patients with Confirmed Bacterial Infection (CBI, n=18), Suspected Bacterial Infection (SBI, n=6), Viral Infections (n=10) and Vaso-Occlusive Crises (VOC, n=88) only. CBI was defined as a positive bacterial culture (blood, body fluid, urine, respiratory or cerebrospinal fluid) or C.difficile toxin assay. Viral infections were defined as a negative bacterial culture in the presence of a virus found on PCR obtained with nasopharyngeal swab. Characteristics including genotype, age, gender, complete blood count, PCT, creatinine, total bilirubin, hydroxyurea use and length of stay were examined. Data was analyzed between the groups using descriptive statistics and accounting for unequal variances, with p-value set at 0.05 for significance. Results: Demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1 (Figure). The mean age was 34.6 years with predominantly males (64.8%). Almost two-thirds were on hydroxyurea (62.3%). The most common genotype was HbSS (70.5%) followed by HbSC (26.2%) and HbSβ (3.3%). The mean PCT for patients with CBI was 8.99 ng/mL (range, 0.03-78.36) as compared to 0.31 ng/mL (range, 0.02-6.82) in the VOC group. The most common organisms detected were E.coli, C.difficile, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Enterobacter. There was a significant difference between median PCT for patients with CBI and those with VOC (p=0.036) and between patients with CBI and viral infections (p= 0.045). Using a PCT of >0.5ng/mL resulted in 81% Sensitivity and 85% Specificity for CBI. Conclusion: In patients with SCD presenting with fever, PCT on presentation was significantly higher in those with CBI compared to VOC only or Viral Infection. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Incidence and Outcomes of Cardiovascular Disease in Hemophilia Patients: An Analysis of National Inpatient Sample Database
Singh, Sunny , Malapati, Sindhu Janarthanam , Khurana, Sharad , Cisak, Kamila I. , Kumar, Rohit , Bhandari, Shruti

Blood | November 14, 2019 | Volume: 134 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: 2176-2176

10.1182/blood-2019-127628 Get It

INTRODUCTION Hemophilia A and B are rare X-linked disorders that result in bleeding due to reduced activity of coagulation factor VIII and IX, respectively. With the availability of better medical care and prophylactic treatment modalities, the life expectancy of patients with hemophilia is approaching that of the general population. Patients with hemophilia were initially thought to be protected from cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to hypocoagulable state but this aging population is now known to be at risk for CVD. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incidence of CVD and associated mortality in hospitalized male patients with hemophilia. METHOD: We reviewed National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 01/2012 to 09/2015 for admissions due to CVD, defined as acute myocardial infraction (AMI) or ischemic cerebrovascular accident (CVA), as a primary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, and Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 410.XX for AMI and 433.XX-437.1 for CVA in males age ≥18 years. Hospitalizations with associated diagnosis of hemophilia A or B were identified using ICD-9CM codes 286.0 or 286.1, respectively. We calculated age-, race- and comorbidities- standardized incidence rate of CVD in hospitalizations with or without associated hemophilia using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Baseline clinical characteristics was also compared between the 2 groups in the overall NIS population. Pearson's Chi-square test and t-test was used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. A propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed to determine the effect of hemophilia on mortality rate in hospitalizations due to CVD. A trend analysis was done to determine the variation in incidence of CVD over the study period. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Approximately 50 million (weighted) hospitalizations during the study period were analyzed. A total of 20,845 (0.04%) hospitalizations had associated diagnosis of hemophilia. The baseline clinical characteristics of the overall population is described in table 1. The standardized incidence rate of CVD was significantly lower in hemophilia group 2.9% vs 5.5% (AMI 1.1% vs 2.8% and CVA 1.8% vs 2.7%) compared to non-hemophilia group (p<0.001 for all comparisons). The annual incidence of CVD did not change over the study period in the hemophilia group (trend p=0.906). On PSM analysis, the mortality rate in the CVD associated hospitalizations was not different between the hemophilia and non-hemophilia group, 3.3% vs 4% respectively (OR 0.81 95%CI 0.20-3.3, p=0.772). CONCLUSION: We present a large-scale analysis of CVD incidence and outcomes in hospitalized hemophilia (A or B) patients. Although, CVD and its risk factors are statistically less common in patients with hemophilia compared to general hospitalized population, the incidence is still clinically comparable. Moreover, the CVD associated mortality rate is similar. As patients with hemophilia are at higher risk of CVD treatment related adverse effects, further studies on optimal cardio- prevention and treatment strategies are warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Portal Hypertensive Cholangiopathy, Which Masquerades as an Acute Portal Vein Thrombosis
Cisak, Kamila I. , Macedo, Thanila A. , Sheedy, Shannon P. , Kamath, Patrick S. , Ashrani, Aneel A.

Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography | October 17, 2019 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 182-185

10.1177/8756479319882016 Get It

Portal hypertensive cholangiopathy is a rare complication of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction and portal cavernoma. It is usually asymptomatic but may be associated with jaundice, biliary colic, and fever. Abdominal sonography and Doppler are ideal initial diagnostic modalities, followed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. These imaging modalities are important if an intervention is planned for the management of portal hypertension and for relieving biliary obstruction. If computed tomography (CT) is performed in isolation, it may be challenging to distinguish this entity from acute on chronic portal vein thrombosis. The diagnostic results should be interpreted cautiously. This case report of an abdomen CT performed on a patient with a history of portal vein thrombosis masqueraded as an acute on chronic portal vein thrombosis with cavernous collaterals. Doppler confirmed the diagnosis of portal hypertensive cholangiopathy. Correlation with clinical symptoms and Doppler may be necessary to distinguish portal hypertensive cholangiopathy from acute portal vein thrombus.
Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cirrhosis— Single Institution Experience
Cisak, Kamila I. , Asante, Dennis, Grill, Diane E. , Ashrani, Aneel A.

Blood | October 14, 2019 | Volume: 132 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 2525-2525

10.1182/blood-2018-99-117607 Get It

Abstract Introduction Anticoagulant therapy in individuals with cirrhosis is challenging, as their risk of hemorrhage is significant due to concomitant alterations in primary hemostasis, secondary hemostasis and fibrinolysis. For many years, warfarin and heparin (including low molecular weight heparin) were the only treatment options for patients with thrombosis. Since 2010, novel, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) that inhibit either thrombin (dabigatran) or factor Xa (e.g., rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban) are available. These direct-acting oral anticoagulants do not require laboratory monitoring and have minimal food and drug interactions, which makes them appealing to use for many patients. Unfortunately, there is inadequate data about efficacy and safety of these direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhotic patients as this group was commonly excluded from clinical trials evaluating these medications. In our study we aim to describe a large single institution experience with use of DOACs in patients with cirrhosis and explore clinical characteristics as potential predictors for bleeding and thrombosis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis who were seen in our institution between September 1, 2010 and June 30, 2017 and were treated with a DOAC utilizing a database search tool, called the Advanced Cohort Explorer that allows electronic records to be reviewed in a time efficient manner through text search or code search functionality. Only patients with cirrhosis diagnosed by histopathologic evaluation or with clinical presentation consistent with cirrhosis and confirmed by a gastroenterologist or by radiologic imaging (MRI, CT) were included in the study. Results: In our study, 106 individuals (male=72) met the inclusion criteria. Ninety three (88%) patients were treated with an anti-Xa inhibitor (rivaroxaban or apixaban), and remaining 13 (12%) with direct thrombin inhibitor (dabigatran). Median age at starting anticoagulant was 66 (range 24-89) years. The most common indication for anticoagulation was atrial fibrillation/flutter (54%), followed by pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis (19%) and splanchnic vein thrombosis (15%). At the time of DOAC initiation, the median Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 7 (range 3-15); MELD score was 10 (range 6-24); and platelet count 150,000/ul (range 50,000-432,000). Thirty six (34%) patients had objectively diagnosed varices. Median follow up was 563 days (range: 7-2646). Bleeding requiring medical evaluation occurred in 32 (30.2%) patients. Major bleeding as defined by ISTH was experienced by 12 (11.3%) individuals. The most common source of bleeding was gastrointestinal tract (21.7%); other organs were less commonly affected (table 1). Hemorrhagic complication usually occurred early after starting anticoagulation (median 101 days; range 4-1356), and was the most common reason for discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment (14%), followed by completion of treatment (10%). On Cox proportional hazard modeling, rising BMI (HR: 1.032 per unit increase in BMI; p<0.05) and elevated bilirubin (HR: 1.223 per 1 mg/dL increase) were associated with increased risk of bleeding. Other clinical factors, including sex, type of anticoagulant used, platelet count, PT/INR, albumin, MELD score, varices, portal hypertension, concomitant aspirin use, and Charlson comorbidity index were not associated with bleeding risk. Thrombotic events while on DOAC affected 7 (6.7%) individuals, which included venous thrombosis in 4 (3.8%) and arterial thrombosis in 3 (2.9%) patients. No clinical factors were associated with increased risk of thrombosis. Conclusions: Our study is the largest series of patients with cirrhosis treated with DOACs. Bleeding complications with DOAC use in this population is high. Providers considering starting DOACs in patients with cirrhosis should consider the risk of bleeding in this population. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Ruxolitinib as first‐line treatment in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: A single patient experience
Slostad, Jessica , Hoversten, Patrick , Cisak, Kamila I. , Paludo, Jonas , Tefferi, Ayalew , Cisak, Kamila, Paludo, Jonas , Tefferi, Ayalew , Haddox, Candace L.

American Journal of Hematology | November 14, 2017 | Volume: 93 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.24971 Get It