Yuen, Leslie C.

Objectives: To report the minimum two-year outcomes of trans-tendinous repairs of Partial Thickness Undersurface Tears of the Abductor (PUSTA) tendon using patient reported outcomes (PROs), visual analog scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction scores. Methods: All patients who underwent endoscopic trans-tendinous gluteus medius repair between October 2009 and May 2013 at one institution were prospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria consisted of less than two-year follow-up, previous hip surgery, inflammatory arthritis, open surgery, full thickness abductor tear, and worker’s compensation patients. All patients had a documented pre-operative physical exam with strength testing (0-5) and observation of their gait. Patient satisfaction and PRO scores were recorded preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The PRO scores collected were mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, NAHS, and VAS. Preoperative strength and gait were compared to latest follow-up. Results: There were 25 patients that fit our criteria. Significant improvement in PRO scores were demonstrated for mHHS, HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, NAHS, and VAS from 54.9-76.2, 50.2-80.6, 30.1-67.3, 51.9-82.4, and 7.1-2.7 respectively (p<0.001). There were 11 patients with objective weakness prior to surgery; seven of these patients moved up at least one strength grade by final follow-up. There were 14 patients who had a Trendelenbrug gait pre-operatively, 12 of them had a normal gait at latest follow-up (p-<0.001). Average patient satisfaction was 7.5. There were no revision surgeries, and no complications noted. Conclusion: PUSTA lesions can be treated successfully with endoscopic trans-tendinous repair preserving the intact attachment of superficial fibers of the gluteus medius. We recommend this treatment for partial undersurface tears recalcitrant to non-operative treatment, as patients demonstrated clinical benefit at greater than 2 years follow up that exceeds substantial clinical benefit and minimally clinical important difference.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify radiographic risk factors (RRFs) and radiographic signs of abductor tendon tears. Methods Between April 2008 and October 2015, patients with intraoperative diagnosis of partial‐ or full‐thickness abductor tear noted at the time of open or endoscopic treatment were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included lack of preoperative standard supine pelvic radiograph, lack of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or abductor tear not present at the time of operative intervention. Patients were matched by age ±5 years, gender, and body mass index ±5 with patients with no abductor pathology by clinical exam and MRI. A standardized supine anterior‐posterior pelvis radiograph was performed on all patients. The radiographs were evaluated for RRF (pelvic width, body weight moment arm, abductor moment arm, abductor angle, pelvic height) and signs of abductor tendon pathology (greater trochanteric enthesophyte). Femoral version was measured on MRI when images were available. Statistical analysis was performed and included bivariate and multivariate analyses. Results There were 152 patients with abductor tears identified at the time of surgery out of 2,838 eligible patients matched with 125 patients without abductor tendon pathology. The study institution was unable to perform a 1:1 match because of the advanced age of the abductor tendon group, which led to a greater age in the abductor group ( n = 58) versus the control group ( n = 54; P = .01. In abductor group the average age was 58, and 137 of 152 (90%) patients were female; in the control group the average age was 54, with 111 of 125 (89%) patients being female. Abductor tear patients were treated with surgical repair. The RRFs found with bivariate analysis were an increased pelvic width (14.8 cm for abductor tears vs 14.3 cm for control; P < .001), body weight moment arm (11.1 cm vs 10.9 cm; P < .001), and abductor moment arm (7.8 cm vs 7.6 cm; P < .001); decreased femoral anteversion (7.6° vs 10.6°; P = .045); and enthesophyte presence (41% vs 3%; P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis of all variables showed that teardrop distance and enthesophyte presence were the 2 variables most predictive of abductor tears, and other variables did not significantly increase or decrease the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered. The presence of an enthesophyte on the greater trochanter was notable for an odds ratio of 20.7 of having an abductor tear. Conclusions Patients with abductor tears have a wider pelvis, longer abductor moment arm, and longer body weight moment arm and have greater trochanteric enthesophyte as noted on nearly half of patients with an abductor tear. Presence of an enthesophyte was noted to have an odds ratio of 20.7 and a positive predictive value of 94% for having an abductor tendon tear. The 2 variables predictive of abductor tendon tear when controlling for all variables were enthesophyte presence and teardrop distance, with no other variables significantly increasing or decreasing the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Purpose To report the minimum 2‐year outcomes of transtendinous repair of partial‐thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon using patient‐reported outcomes (PROs), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and patient satisfaction scores. Methods All patients who underwent endoscopic transtendinous gluteus medius repair between October 2009 and May 2013 at 1 institution were prospectively evaluated. The exclusion criteria consisted of less than 2 years' follow‐up, previous hip surgery, inflammatory arthritis, open surgery, full‐thickness abductor tear, and Workers' Compensation patients. All patients underwent a documented preoperative physical examination with strength testing (scale of 0‐5) and observation of their gait. Patient satisfaction and PRO scores were recorded preoperatively; at 3 months postoperatively; and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery. The PRO scores collected were the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sports‐Specific Subscale, Non‐arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score. Preoperative strength and gait were compared with latest follow‐up. Results There were 25 patients who fit our criteria. Significant improvement in PRO scores were shown for the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score–Sports‐Specific Subscale, Non‐arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score from 54.9 to 76.2, from 50.2 to 80.6, from 30.1 to 67.3, from 51.9 to 82.4, and from 7.1 to 2.7, respectively ( P < .001). Before surgery, 11 patients had objective weakness; 7 of these patients moved up at least 1 strength grade by final follow‐up. Preoperatively, 14 patients had a Trendelenburg gait; 12 of them had a normal gait at latest follow‐up ( P < .001). The average patient satisfaction rating was 7.5. There were no revision surgical procedures, and no complications were noted. Conclusions Partial‐thickness undersurface tears of the abductor can be treated successfully with endoscopic transtendinous repair preserving the intact attachment of the superficial fibers of the gluteus medius. We recommend this treatment for partial undersurface tears recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment because patients showed clinical benefit at greater than 2 years' follow‐up that exceeded substantial clinical benefit and the minimal clinically important difference. Level of Evidence Level IV, case series.

Background: Femoral retroversion has been noted as a possible risk factor for poor clinical results after hip arthroscopic surgery. Purpose: To compare the outcomes of the arthroscopic treatment of hip abnormalities in patients with femoral retroversion to patients with femoral anteversion between 10° and 20°. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Between November 2011 and September 2013, 790 hip arthroscopic procedures were performed at a single institution. Of these, 59 hips (7.5%) were located in patients with femoral version ≤0°, calculated using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. These patients were pair matched, based on body mass index ±5 kg/m 2 , age ±5 years, and Tönnis grade, with 59 patients with femoral anteversion between 10° and 20°. Exclusion criteria included Perthes disease, inflammatory arthritis, slipped capital femoral epiphysis, previous hip surgery, abductor repair, lateral center-edge angle <20°, Tönnis grade >1, and acetabular profunda or protrusio. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The PROs utilized were the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and Hip Outcome Score–Sports-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). The visual analog scale (VAS) was collected to assess the patients’ pain; patient satisfaction scores (0-10) were also collected. Radiographs were collected at the above time intervals as well. Results: Two patients from the control group and 1 patient from the retroverted group required total hip arthroplasty at a mean 19.5 and 26.3 months, respectively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement from their preoperative state in all PRO and VAS scores ( P < .001). No differences in preoperative, postoperative, or change in PRO and VAS scores between the groups were noted. Conclusion: Patients with femoral retroversion reported similar outcomes compared to patients with normal femoral version when undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Both groups had similar improvements from the preoperative state.