Back to Authors

Aroori, Somaiah

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5613-6463

Mayo Clinic

Derriford Hospital

Citations 2

The Role of the Multiparametric MRI LiverMultiScanTM in the Quantitative Assessment of the Liver and Its Predicted Clinical Applications in Patients Undergoing Major Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis
Chouari, Tarak , Merali, Nabeel , Costa, Francesca La, Chapman, Shelley, Horton, Alex, Aroori, Somaiah , Connell, John , Rockall, Timothy , Welsh, Fenella K.S., Rees, Myrddin, Frampton, Adam E. , Connell, John , Frampton, Adam E , Santol, Jonas , Chapman, Shelley, Mole, Damian J. , Starlinger, Patrick

Cancers | October 6, 2023 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 4863

10.3390/cancers15194863 Get It

Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for the histological assessment of the liver. With clear disadvantages and the rise in the incidences of liver disease, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and an explosion of surgical management options available, non-invasive serological and imaging markers of liver histopathology have never been more pertinent in order to assess liver health and stratify patients considered for surgical intervention. Liver MRI is a leading modality in the assessment of hepatic malignancy. Recent technological advancements in multiparametric MRI software such as the LiverMultiScanTM offers an attractive non-invasive assay of anatomy and histopathology in the pre-operative setting, especially in the context of CRLM. This narrative review examines the evidence for the LiverMultiScanTM in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis, steatosis/steatohepatitis, and potential applications for chemotherapy-associated hepatic changes. We postulate its future role and the hurdles it must surpass in order to be implemented in the pre-operative management of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis. Such a role likely extends to other hepatic malignancies planned for resection.
The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery
Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Aldrighetti, Luca , Dagher, Ibrahim, Troisi, Roberto , Alikhanov, Ruslan , Aroori, Somaiah , Belli, Giulio, Besselink, Marc G. , Briceño, Javier , Gayet, Brice, D’Hondt, Mathieu , Lesurtel, Mickaël , Menon, Krishna , Lodge, Peter, Rotellar, Fernando , Santoyo, Julio Santoyo , Scatton, Olivier , Sutcliffe, Robert P. , Dam, Ronald M. van , White, Steve, Halls, Mark , Cipriani, Federica , Poel, M. van der, Ciria, Rubén , Barkhatov, Leonid , Gomez-Luque, Yrene, Ocana-Garcia, Sira, Cook, Andrew , Buell, Joseph F. , Clavien, Pierre‐Alain , Dervenis, Christos, Fusai, Giuseppe , Lang, Hauke , Primrose, John , Taylor, Mark , Gulik, Thomas van , Wakabayashi, Go , Asbun, Horacio J. , Cherqui, Daniel , Asbun, Horacio, Ciria, Ruben , Aldrighetti, Luca , Edwin, Bjørn , Besselink, Marc G , Soubrane, Olivier , Poel, Marcel J. van der , Geller, David A. , Rotellar, Fernando , Lesurtel, Mickaël , Cipriani, Federica

Annals of Surgery | October 24, 2017 | Volume: 268 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 11-18

10.1097/sla.0000000000002524 Get It

Objective: The European Guidelines Meeting on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery was held in Southampton on February 10 and 11, 2017 with the aim of presenting and validating clinical practice guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery. Background: The exponential growth of laparoscopic liver surgery in recent years mandates the development of clinical practice guidelines to direct the speciality's continued safe progression and dissemination. Methods: A unique approach to the development of clinical guidelines was adopted. Three well-validated methods were integrated: the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology for the assessment of evidence and development of guideline statements; the Delphi method of establishing expert consensus, and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument for the assessment of the methodological quality and external validation of the final statements. Results: Along with the committee chairman, 22 European experts; 7 junior experts and an independent validation committee of 11 international surgeons produced 67 guideline statements for the safe progression and dissemination of laparoscopic liver surgery. Each of the statements reached at least a 95% consensus among the experts and were endorsed by the independent validation committee. Conclusion: The European Guidelines Meeting for Laparoscopic Liver Surgery has produced a set of clinical practice guidelines that have been independently validated for the safe development and progression of laparoscopic liver surgery. The Southampton Guidelines have amalgamated the available evidence and a wealth of experts’ knowledge taking in consideration the relevant stakeholders’ opinions and complying with the international methodology standards.