Adelson, P. David

The rapid adoption of telemedicine has transformed healthcare delivery in the US, enhancing access and communication for surgical patients across wide geographic areas. However, a critical challenge persists: the need to define and standardize quality metrics specifically for telemedicine in surgery. Existing studies suggest that telemedicine can yield equivalent or improved outcomes compared with in-person visits. Nevertheless, literature remains limited in evaluating patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and diagnostic accuracy. Through expert consensus within the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors Telehealth Pillar, we propose a structured framework for defining and implementing quality metrics for surgical telemedicine. This is based on the Donabedian model, addressing structure, process, and outcome, while also considering the distinct phases of surgical care: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. This framework identifies unique domains of telemedicine in surgical care, emphasizing hospital and organizational structure, patient and provider readiness, and policy alignment. A comparative analysis with existing AHRQ and WHO frameworks highlights gaps in surgical applicability. Finally, we propose an implementation roadmap prioritizing immediate, feasible metrics while identifying areas for future validation. Collaboration among researchers, clinicians, and policymakers will be essential to establish these metrics and ensure that telemedicine delivers on its potential to improve surgical care delivery while addressing disparities in access and outcomes.

Purpose: Cranial defects in children have been repaired with various materials ranging from autologous bone to synthetic materials. There is little published literature on the outcomes of titanium mesh cranioplasty (TMC) in calvarial reconstruction in the pediatric population. This study evaluates a pediatric cohort who underwent calvarial defect reconstruction with titanium mesh and assesses the efficacy and outcomes of TMC. Methods: An Institutional Review Board approved retrospective review of patients ≤18 years of age who underwent cranioplasty from 1999 to 2014 at 2 centers was performed. The cohort undergoing TMC was studied. Results: A total of 159 cranioplasties were performed. Autologous reconstruction included 84 bone flap replacements and 36 split calvarial bone graft reconstructions. Six patients underwent PEEK implant reconstruction. Titanium mesh cranioplasty was performed on 33 patients. Two patients underwent 2 separate cranioplasties. The median age of patients was 6 years (19 months to 18 years). The most common underlying etiologies were congenital syndromes/craniosynostosis (13 patients), and trauma (11). The majority of patients had prior cranial surgeries (85%). Various types of titanium mesh were used with sizes ranging from 2×3 cm to 19×20 cm, with some patients requiring distinct areas of defect reconstruction. Perioperative complications were noted in 2 patients that subsequently improved. Two patients had late soft tissue problems with complications of wound infections requiring resection of a portion of the mesh. Patients were followed an average of 4 years (range 13 days to 6.8 years), with 2 patients lost to follow-up. Overall, all patients with follow-up achieved a cranial contour with good symmetry to the unaffected side, as well as effective protection to the brain. Conclusions: Titanium mesh cranioplasty is an effective option for correcting pediatric cranial defects when autologous bone availability is limited and soft tissue coverage allows placement of an implant. The interim outcome for these patients is favorable with few complications and no evidence of growth restriction in the authors’ series. Follow-up will be ongoing for these patients.