Jin, Zhaohui

Over the past 20 years, rates of early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC), defined as <50 years of age at diagnosis, have increased, with 16–25% associated with a pathogenic germline variant (PGV) resulting in a hereditary cancer syndrome. In the present study, we sought to further characterize PGVs observed in patients with eoCRC. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a history of CRC referred for genetic counseling at Mayo Clinic Rochester between April 2019 and April 2022. Three hundred and three CRC patients were referred to medical genetics, including 124 with a history of eoCRC. Only 84 patients (68%) with eoCRC referred for genetic counseling completed genetic testing, with an average of 48 genes evaluated. PGVs were identified in 27.4% with eoCRC, including 8.3% with Lynch syndrome (LS). Other detected PGVs known to increase the risk of CRC included MUTYH (4.8%), CHEK2 (3.6%), APC, BMPR1A, and TP53 (1.3% each). Among those with aoCRC, 109 patients (61%) completed genetic testing, among which 88% had either a dMMR tumor, personal history of an additional LS malignancy, or family history of LS malignancy, with PGVs detected in 23% of patients. This study reinforces the importance for all patients with CRC, especially those with eoCRC, to undergo germline testing.

Abstract Background We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in combination with irinotecan in a phase II trial setting for refractory, advanced unresectable biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). Methods A total of 28 patients (27 were evaluable) with advanced BTCs who progressed on at least one prior systemic therapy were enrolled and were treated with trifluridine/tipiracil 25 mg/m2 (days 1-5 of 14-day cycle) and irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (day 1 of the 14-day cycle). The primary endpoint for the study was 16-week progression-free survival (PFS16) rate. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were pre-specified secondary endpoints. Results Of 27 patients, PFS16 rate was 37% (10/27; 95% CI: 19%-58%), thereby meeting the criteria for success for the primary endpoint. The median PFS and OS of the entire cohort were 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.5-7.4) and 9.1 months (95% CI: 8.0-14.3), respectively. In the patients evaluable for tumor response (n = 20), the ORR and DCR were 10% and 50%, respectively. Twenty patients (74.1%) had at least one grade 3 or worse adverse event (AE), and 4 patients (14.8%) had grade 4 AEs. A total of 37% (n = 10/27) and 51.9% (n = 14/27) experienced dose reductions in trifluridine/tipiracil and irinotecan, respectively. Delay in therapy was noted in 56% of the patients while 1 patient discontinued the therapy, primarily due to hematologic AEs. Conclusion The combination of trifluridine/tipiracil plus irinotecan is a potential treatment option for patients with advanced, refractory BTCs with good functional status and no targetable mutations. A larger randomized trial is needed to confirm these results. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072445)

3595 Background: PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine containing 12 immunogenic epitopes derived from 7 tumor-specific antigens frequently expressed in patients with mCRC. Following early evidence of clinical activity of PolyPEPI1018 in first-line MSS mCRC, here we report the results of a phase Ib study of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine plus trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in late-stage mCRC patients. Methods: Patients with MSS mCRC who have progressed on ≤2 lines of prior chemotherapy regimen for mCRC received PolyPEPI1018 subcutaneously on days 1 and 15 and TAS-102 orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-15 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment continued for up to 7 cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Immunomonitoring was performed at both blood and tumor levels prior to and on study treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was safety and tolerability. Data on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation studies will be presented. Results: 15 patients started treatment. Median age was 55 years (range 31–71), 73% had liver metastases (mets), 73% had KRAS mutant tumors. The most common side effect related to PolyPEPI1018 was Grade (Gr) 1-2 local skin reactions in 93% of patients. Gr 3 events (n = 15) at least possibly related to treatment were fatigue, decreased white blood cell, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, nausea, diarrhea, myalgia, and maculo-papular rash. There were no Gr 4 or 5 events. The ORR was 0%. The DCR was 53.3% in the overall population and 36% and 100% for the patients with liver mets and without liver mets, respectively. The mPFS was 4 months (95%CI 2.2-6.1) in the overall population and 2.3 months (95%CI 2.1-NE) and 7.6 months (95%CI 4.4-NE) for the patients with liver mets and without liver mets, respectively (HR = 5.73 (95%CI 1.21, 27.06); p = 0.015). At the data cut-off date (Feb 10, 2023), the mOS was 8.7 months (95%CI 6.9-NE; not mature) in the overall population and it was not reached in patients without liver mets. Patients with increased PFS (≥ 24 weeks) had more robust vaccine-specific humoral and T cell responses induced by higher number of vaccine peptides than patients with PFS < 24 weeks. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating combination of a cancer vaccine with TAS-102 chemotherapy in advanced MSS mCRC. Our results show that PolyPEPI1018 plus TAS-102 was well-tolerated with few grade 3 AEs beyond what is expected with TAS-102 monotherapy. Despite no objective tumor responses could be detected, correlative data suggest contribution of PolyPEPI1018-induced immunological responses to the improved clinical benefit and the combination warrants further testing. Clinical trial information: NCT05130060 .

3536 Background: Early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC, initial CRC diagnosis at age < 50 years) has been increasing in the past two decades especially in Western countries. This study evaluates somatic and germline profiles in eoCRC compared to average-onset CRC (aoCRC, initial CRC diagnosis at age ≥ 50 years). Methods: This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study utilizing data from de-identified records of colorectal cancer patients tested with the Tempus xT assay from 2017 to 2022. Briefly, the assay is a targeted panel that detects single nucleotide variants, insertions and/or deletions, and copy number variants in 598-648 genes, as well as chromosomal rearrangements in 22 genes with high sensitivity and specificity. Baseline characteristics and immunologic markers were compared between eoCRC and aoCRC by Wilcoxon Rank Sum or Chi-squared test (reporting p-values). Somatic and germline mutations were compared between two age groups with false discover rate adjustments (reporting q-values). Results: In this study, 2,379 eoCRC and 8,627 aoCRC patients were included, with the majority diagnosed with stage IV disease. Additionally, germline alterations were assessed on a subset of 6,311 patients with tumor/normal match testing (eoCRC = 1,413 and aoCRC = 4,898). Left-sided primaries were more common in eoCRC (85% left/rectum in eoCRC vs. 75% left/rectum in aoCRC (p < 0.001), and rates of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) were lower compared to aoCRC (4.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). eoCRC has a unique somatic mutation profile compared to aoCRC. A higher prevalence of germline mutations was observed in eoCRC overall (6.9% vs. 5%, p = 0.006); however, no statistically significant differences were observed in individual germline genes compared to aoCRC, likely due to relatively small numbers. Conclusions: eoCRC has a unique mutational profile and presence of germline mutations in 6.9% of eoCRC, indicating a potential role for universal germline testing in CRC. [Table: see text]

e14576 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid malignancies. ICI appears particularly effective when tumors exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) status. Although the response is typically quite good in this setting, there are scenarios where benefit is less than anticipated. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs in patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients (pts) with PM from primary MSI-H/dMMR cancers treated with immunotherapy between 2010 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic. Data was collected to include pt demographics, tumor characteristics, pathology, tumor markers, imaging, mutational profile, and previous and subsequent treatments. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as objective response rate (RECIST v1.1 criteria) or stable disease. Results: Forty-six pts with MSI-H/dMMR and PM treated with ICIs. Most of our cohort were female (61%) with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. Colorectal cancer was the most common primary site (69.6%), followed by endometrial (6.5%). Most pts received treatment with PD-1 antibodies as second-line therapy following systemic chemotherapy. DCR of the PM was 71.6 % (n= 13 PR, 9 CR, and 9 SD), with a median duration of response of 12.6 months. Thirteen pts (28.4%) had progressive peritoneal disease on ICI with a median PFS of 2.2 months. Ascites was a poor prognosticator and predicted a lack of benefit from ICI (HR 6.6, 95% CI=2.24-19.9, p= 0.006). Mucinous and signet ring histology were common in pts with peritoneal progression (61.5%); however, this was not statistically significant (HR=1.6; 95%CI= 0.4383 to 3.899, p 0.5). Multivariate analysis for the presence or absence of BRAF and/or RAS mutations was not statistically significant in predicting response. Neither was the specific MMR gene mutation(i.e., MLH1 or PMS2). Interestingly, discordant responses between the peritoneum and other sites of metastasis to immunotherapy were seen in 13 pts (28.4%), primarily as primary peritoneal progression compared to other tumor sites. Conclusions: In our cohort, the DCR of metastatic peritoneal disease in MSI-H/dMMR tumors was approximately 71%. The presence of ascites was identified as a poor prognosticator in this setting and was associated with a lack of response/benefit from ICIs. Histologic subtype (i.e., mucinous/signet ring) did not show statistical significance in predicting ICI response. The subpopulation with discordant response to ICI suggests that peritoneal immunobiology may differ from other sites. Further research on immunotherapy response in the peritoneum is needed for this special subset of pts.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are tumor cells shed from the primary tumor into circulation, with clusters of CTCs responsible for cancer metastases. CTC detection and isolation from the bloodstream are based on properties distinguishing CTCs from normal blood cells. Current CTC detection techniques can be divided into two main categories: label dependent, which depends upon antibodies that selectively bind cell surface antigens present on CTCs, or label-independent detection, which is detection based on the size, deformability, and biophysical properties of CTCs. CTCs may play significant roles in cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment navigation, including prognostication and precision medicine, and surveillance. In cancer screening, capturing and evaluating CTCs from peripheral blood could be a strategy to detect cancer at its earliest stage. Cancer diagnosis using liquid biopsy could also have tremendous benefits. Full utilization of CTCs in the clinical management of malignancies may be feasible in the near future; however, several challenges still exist. CTC assays currently lack adequate sensitivity, especially in early-stage solid malignancies, due to low numbers of detectable CTCs. As assays improve and more trials evaluate the clinical utility of CTC detection in guiding therapies, we anticipate increased use in cancer management.

Abstract Background: Oncogenic alterations (gene amplification, mutation, and fusion/rearrangements) of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) are rare and occur at varying frequencies across solid tumor types and have become critical therapeutic targets in drug development. First generation FGFR pan-kinase inhibitors non-selectively inhibit FGFR1-4 and are associated with dose limiting toxicities and narrow therapeutic windows. Off-isoform toxicity (FGFR1-hyperphosphatemia; FGFR4-diarrhea) and on-target acquired resistance have led to limited efficacy, which is primarily seen in FGFR2-fusion+ intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Therapies that selectively target FGFR2 remain an unmet need in advanced breast cancer as well as other solid tumor types. RLY-4008 is a novel, oral FGFR2 inhibitor designed to overcome the limitations of pan-FGFR inhibitors (FGFRi) by potently and selectively targeting primary oncogenic FGFR2 alterations and acquired resistance mutations. RLY-4008 is &gt; 200-fold selective over FGFR1, &gt; 80- and &gt; 5000-fold selective over FGFR3 and FGFR4 respectively. Here we describe a phase 1/2 study to investigate the safety and antitumor activity in advanced FGFR2 altered cancers, including breast cancer. Methods: ReFocus is a phase 1/2 open label global study evaluating the safety and efficacy of RLY-4008 (NCT04526106) in adult patients with advanced unresectable and/or metastatic cancers harboring an FGFR2 alteration. Key eligibility criteria include: documented FGFR2 alteration in blood or tissue per local assessment, ECOG performance status of 0-1, disease that is refractory or not adequately responding to standard therapy, has no available standard therapy, or patient is intolerant of, or declined standard therapy (including pan-FGFRi), and measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1. FGFR2 alteration will be confirmed retrospectively by central laboratory assessment. Part 1 dose escalation employed the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design to determine the MTD/RP2D of RLY-4008. Part 2 dose expansion is presently enrolling patients at the RP2D of RLY-4008 and includes 5 cohorts comprised of patients with: 1. FGFR2 fusion+ cholangiocarcinoma previously treated with an FGFRi; 2. FGFR2 fusion+ cholangiocarcinoma not previously treated with an FGFRi; 3. FGFR2 fusion+ solid tumors; 4. FGFR2 mutation+ solid tumors and 5. FGFR2 amplified solid tumors. Solid tumors in cohorts 3, 4 and 5 will have a focus in breast cancer. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR); key secondary endpoints include: duration of response, safety and tolerability, correlation of FGFR2 genotype by central tissue assessment with antitumor response, characterization of PK profile, and quality of life. US enrollment began September 2020 and has expanded into Europe and Asia. Clinical trial information: NCT04526106. Citation Format: Suneel Kamath, David Tai, Irene Moreno, Hani Babiker, Zhaohui Jin, Changhoon Yoo, Fabien Ricard, Kai Yu Jen, Jim Coward, Jia Liu, Frans Opdam, Michael Millward, Mariano Ponz-Sarvise, Jeffrey Yachnin, Richard Kim, Joon Oh Park, Vivek Subbiah, Alison M. Schram. ReFocus: A Phase 1/2 Study of the Highly Selective FGFR2 Inhibitor, RLY-4008, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Including Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-24-01.

Importance Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) shows frequent and durable responses to programmed cell death 1 blockade. While most of these tumors are sporadic and observed in older patients, first-line pembrolizumab data are limited to findings from the KEYNOTE-177 trial (A Phase III Study of Pembrolizumab [MK-3475] vs Chemotherapy in Microsatellite Instability-High [MSI-H] or Mismatch Repair Deficient [dMMR] Stage IV Colorectal Carcinoma). Objective To investigate outcome with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy in mostly older patients with dMMR mCRC at a multisite clinical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included consecutive patients with dMMR mCRC who received pembrolizumab monotherapy between April 1, 2015, and January 1, 2022, at Mayo Clinic sites and the Mayo Clinic Health System. Patients were identified from review of electronic health records at the sites, which included the evaluation of digitized radiologic imaging studies. Intervention Patients with dMMR mCRC received first-line pembrolizumab, 200 mg, every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary study end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable stepwise Cox proportional hazards regression model. Clinicopathological features, including metastatic site and molecular data ( BRAF V600E and KRAS ), were also analyzed along with tumor response rate, which was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Results The study cohort included 41 patients (median [IQR] age at treatment initiation, 81 [76-86] years; 29 females [71%]) with dMMR mCRC. Of these patients, 30 (79%) had the BRAF V600E variant and 32 (80%) were classified as having sporadic tumors. Median (range) follow-up was 23 (3-89) months. Median (IQR) number of treatment cycles was 9 (4-20). Overall response rate was 49% (20 of 41 patients), including 13 patients (32%) with complete responses and 7 (17%) with partial responses. Median (IQR) PFS was 21 (95% CI, 6-39) months. Liver as a site of metastasis was associated with significantly poorer PFS vs nonliver metastasis (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.27-9.13; adjusted P = .01). Complete and partial responses were observed in 3 patients (21%) with liver metastasis vs 17 patients (63%) with nonliver metastases. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 8 patients (20%), 2 of whom discontinued therapy; there was 1 treatment-related death. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found a clinically significant prolongation of survival in older patients with dMMR mCRC who were treated with first-line pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, liver vs nonliver metastasis was associated with poorer survival in this patient population, which suggests that the metastatic site has implications for survival outcome.

57 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) show frequent and durable responses to programmed cell death -1 (PD-1) blockade. While the majority of these tumors are sporadics and observed in elderly patients, first-line data are limited to the KEYNOTE-177 study. Here, we report a consecutive series of elderly patients with dMMR mCRC treated with pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice that includes analysis of clinical outcome based on metastatic site. Methods: Patients with dMMR mCRC received first-line pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) (N = 41) at Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Health System (2015-2022). Clinicopathological features including metastatic site and molecular data ( BRAFV600E, KRAS) were analyzed in relationship to tumor response rate (RECIST version 1.1). Furthermore, these variables were also analyzed in relationship to patient progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier methodology and multivariable stepwise Cox regression. Results: Among patients with dMMR mCRC, 29/41 (70.7%) were female, 30 (78.9%) harbored BRAFV600E, and 32 (80%) were sporadic. Median age at start of treatment was 80.6 years (IQR of 75.9, 85.9) and median number of treatment cycles was 9 (IQR: 4, 20). At a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 3.0 to 88.5), patient median PFS was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.4, 38.5). An overall response was observed in 48.8% (20 of 41) of patients including 13 (31.7%) complete (CR) and 7 (17.1%) partial responses (PR). The median duration of response was 42.2 months (95%CI: 8.6, NR). Patients with metastases that included liver had significantly poorer PFS compared to those with non-liver metastases (HRadj 3.40 (95%CI: 1.27-9.13); Padj= 0. 01). In this regard, responses (CR, PR) to pembrolizumab were observed in 3 (21.4%) patients with liver metastasis compared to 17 (62.9%) of those with non-liver metastases. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 9 (22.0%) patients of whom two discontinued therapy, and there was one treatment-related death. Conclusions: First-line therapy with pembrolizumab for dMMR mCRC significantly prolonged survival in an elderly patient population with manageable toxicity in routine clinical practice. Moreover, the survival benefit of pembrolizumab was significantly attenuated in patients with liver vs non-liver metastases.

559 Background: Cabozantinib, a multikanase inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. The CELESTIAL study which demonstrated benefit from cabozantinib following sorafenib included only patients with Child Pugh class A liver function. Recently, bevacizumab plus atezolizumab has replaced sorafenib as the first line treatment for HCC. It is unclear whether there is benefit from using Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy as CELESTIAL trial included very few patients who received prior immunotherapy. We describe the outcomes of individuals with advanced stage HCC treated with Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010-2021 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival analysis were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified a total of 26 patients with advanced stage HCC who received cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. The median age of patients was 61 years (range, 39 – 81) and the majority were male (85%). Eighteen (72%) patients had Child Pugh A at initiation of cabozantinib therapy. Four (15%) patients received cabozantinib as second line therapy, the rest received it as third line or later. PFS on cabozantinib was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.9) and median overall survival from time of cabozantinib initiation was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.3 – 14.9). PFS was shorter with Child Pugh Class B, 1.3 months (95% CI: 0.9 – NE) compared to those with Child Pugh Class A, 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5 – 4); although this difference was not significant (p=0.55). Common adverse events included fatigue (50%), anorexia (35%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (35%), and diarrhea (31%); 7 (26%) patients experienced Grade 3 or greater adverse events including hypertension, diarrhea, anorexia, and bowel obstruction. Two patients discontinued cabozantinib due to side effects including one for uncontrolled blood pressure elevations and the other due to fatigue. Conclusions: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy is unknown. Treatment with cabozantinib may improve clinical outcomes following progression on immunotherapy with similar adverse event profile. This study included patients with Child Pugh class B liver disease (28%) and heavily pretreated population and demonstrated mPFS and mOS similar to other work examining outcomes of cabozantinib in real world setting after progression on sorafenib. Further studies to determine optimal treatment sequencing for this patient population are needed.