Hogeling, Marcia

ABSTRACTPatients with vascular anomalies (VAs) require expert multidisciplinary care. No prior studies have characterized the sociodemographic characteristics across multiple VA centers. We collected data on 5783 patients receiving care at 20 VA centers between July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022. Male patients were underrepresented compared to the state‐level census data at 17/20 centers. Black and Asian patients were underrepresented at 14/20 and 12/20 centers, respectively. The median distance to the hospital was 48 miles, and median age was 12.0 years. These data suggest that race, sex, age, and distance from the hospital could impede the ability to access expert VA care.

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesThe COVID‐19 pandemic prompted a rapid expansion in the use of telemedicine. This study aimed to assess the experiences of hemangioma specialists utilizing telemedicine during the COVID‐19 pandemic to evaluate and manage infantile hemangiomas (IH), including perceived effectiveness of different modalities and barriers to care delivery.MethodsMulticenter cross‐sectional study asking providers to describe their experiences using telemedicine for initial evaluation of IH from March to September 2020.ResultsThe study included 281 patients from 15 medical centers internationally. Median time from referral to evaluation was 17 days. Median physician confidence in performing evaluations via telemedicine was 95.0 (IQR 90.0–100.0). Most evaluations were performed via video communication with photographs or audio communication with photographs; when not initially available, photographs were requested in 51.4%. Providers preferred follow‐up modalities that included photographs.ConclusionsPhysicians with extensive expertise in managing IH are confident in their abilities to assess and manage IH via telemedicine including initiating treatment in patients without risk factors for beta‐blocker therapy. There was a preference for hybrid modalities that included photographs. The data suggest that telemedicine can be effective for managing IH and may decrease wait times and improve specialist reach to underserved areas.

AbstractBackgroundSystemic sirolimus (rapamycin) has recently been found effective in treating complex vascular anomalies by reducing the size and associated complications. Many vascular anomalies have a cutaneous component, and thus, we sought to determine whether topical administration of sirolimus may be an effective therapy, as data on the use of topical sirolimus are limited.ObjectiveWe reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of topical formulations of sirolimus in the treatment of various simple and combined vascular malformations and tumors.MethodsEighteen patients with any vascular anomaly treated exclusively with topical sirolimus were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsEleven patients had combined venous lymphatic malformations, three had tufted angiomas, two had a lymphatic malformation, one had a venous malformation, and one had a verrucous venous malformation. All (100%) patients reported some degree of improvement and 50% of patients reported marked improvement in one or more symptoms, most commonly blebs and lymphatic drainage, and bleeding.LimitationsThe retrospective nature, small number of patients, and differences in topical preparations limit the broad application of the results.ConclusionTopical sirolimus appears to be a safe and useful non‐invasive therapy that is well‐tolerated in the treatment of the cutaneous portion of a variety of vascular anomalies.