BackgroundPreoperative prediction of tumor recurrence is important in the management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).PurposeTo investigate whether tumor stiffness derived by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) could predict early recurrence of HCC after hepatic resection.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 99 patients with pathologically confirmed HCCs after surgical resection.Field Strength/Sequence3.0T; preoperative MRE with 60‐Hz mechanical vibrations using an active acoustic driver.AssessmentRegions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn in the tumors to measure mean tumor stiffness. Surgical specimens were reviewed for histological grade, capsule, vascular invasion, and surgical margins. The early recurrence of HCC was defined as that occurring within 2 years after resection.Statistical TestsCox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate risk factors associated with the time to early recurrence.ResultsHCCs with recurrence had higher tumor stiffness, higher rate of advanced T stage, vascular invasion, lower rate of capsule formation, larger tumor size, higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA level and aspartate aminotransferase / alanine aminotransferase ratio (P = 0.031, 0.007, 0.01, <0.001, 0.015, 0.034, 0.01, and 0.014, respectively) than HCCs without recurrence. Vascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.922; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.079, 7.914], P = 0.035) and mean tumor stiffness (HR = 1.163; 95% CI: [1.055, 1.282], P = 0.002) were risk factors associated with early recurrence. Each 1‐kPa increase in tumor stiffness was associated with a 16.3% increase in the risk for tumor recurrence.Data ConclusionThe mean stiffness of HCCs may be a useful, noninvasive, quantitative biomarker for the prediction of early HCC recurrence after hepatic resection.Level of Evidence: 4Technical Efficacy: Stage 5J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:719–730.
Assessment of advanced hepatic MR elastography methods for susceptibility artifact suppression in clinical patients
PurposeTo assess the success rate, image quality, and the ability to stage liver fibrosis of a standard 2D gradient‐recalled echo (GRE) and four different spin‐echo (SE) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) sequences in patients with different liver iron concentrations.Materials and MethodsA total of 332 patients who underwent 3T MRE examinations that included liver fat and iron quantification were enrolled, including 136 patients with all five MRE techniques. Thirty‐four patients had biopsy results for fibrosis staging. The liver stiffness, region of interest area, image quality, and success rate of the five sequences were compared in 115/136 patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the accuracies for diagnosing early‐stage fibrosis and advanced fibrosis were compared. The effect of BMI (body mass index), the R2* relaxation time, and fat fraction on the image quality and liver stiffness measurements were analyzed.ResultsThe success rates were significantly higher in the four SE sequences (99.1–100%) compared with GRE MRE (85.3%) (all P < 0.001). There were significant differences of the mean ROI area between every pair of sequences (all P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the AUC of the five MRE sequences for discriminating advanced fibrosis (10 P‐values ranging from 0.2410–0.9171). R2* had a significant effect on the success rate and image quality for the noniron 2D echo‐planar imaging (EPI), 3D EPI and 2D GRE (all P < 0.001) sequences. BMI had a significant effect on the iron 2D EPI (P = 0.0230) and iron 2D SE (P = 0.0040) sequences.ConclusionAll five techniques showed good diagnostic performance in staging liver fibrosis. The SE MRE sequences had higher success rates and better image quality than GRE MRE in 3T clinical hepatic imaging.Level of Evidence: 3Technical Efficacy: Stage 5J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:976–987.