D’Andrea, Alan D.

5512 Background: The multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 NCI-9944 study (NCT02595892) demonstrated that addition of ATR inhibitor (ATRi) berzosertib to gemcitabine increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared to gemcitabine alone (HR = 0.57, one-sided log-rank p = 0.044, which met the one-sided significance level of 0.1 used for sample size calculation). Final overall survival (OS) and corresponding biomarker analyses are reported here. Methods: Patients (pts) with platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer and unlimited previous lines of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-sensitive setting but no more than one line of cytotoxic therapy in the platinum-resistant setting, were randomized 1:1 to gemcitabine/berzosertib versus gemcitabine alone. Randomization was stratified based on platinum free interval (PFI), PFI≤3 months versus > 3 months. Crossover from gemcitabine to gemcitabine/berzosertib was allowed upon disease progression by RECIST 1.1. OS was a secondary endpoint while preplanned exploratory correlative studies included assessment of DNA repair pathways and replication stress (RS) alterations by targeted gene sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Seventy pts were randomly assigned to treatment with gemcitabine/berzosertib (34 pts) or gemcitabine alone (36 pts); 15 pts crossed over from gemcitabine to gemcitabine/berzosertib. At the final OS analysis (92.9% maturity), median follow-up was 53.2 weeks in the gemcitabine/berzosertib and 43 weeks in the gemcitabine alone groups. Median OS in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 59.4 weeks in the gemcitabine/berzosertib group versus 43.0 weeks in the gemcitabine alone group (HR 0.79, 90% CI 0.52-1.2, one-sided p = 0.18). However, when patients who crossed over to gemcitabine/berzosertib were excluded from analysis, a significant OS benefit was observed with gemcitabine/berzosertib (HR 0.60, 90%CI 0.37−0.97); HR was 0.26 (90% CI 0.1−0.7) in pts with PFI≤3 months and 0.89 (90%CI 0.50−1.59) in pts with PFI > 3 months. Furthermore, significant OS benefit was observed in pts with RS-low tumors (HR 0.39, 90%CI 0.17−0.91, defined as tumors harboring no genomic RS alterations related to loss of RB pathway regulation and/or oncogene-induced RS) but not in pts with RS-high tumors (HR 0.74, 90%CI 0.35−1.56). Additional targeted gene sequencing and IHC analyses as well as analyses adjusting for patient crossover will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: In the ITT population, gemcitabine/berzosertib did not significantly improve OS versus gemcitabine alone. Pts with PFI≤3 months and pts with RS-low tumors may derive a survival advantage from addition of berzosertib to gemcitabine in the platinum-resistant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02595892 .

Abstract Introduction: Rapid cell proliferation requires intact and faithful DNA damage repair mechanisms. DNA polymerase theta (POLQ) plays a key role in repairing DNA double-strand breaks through the microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ), which is one of the three main pathways involved in repairing replication-induced double-strand breaks. Limited data have suggested that concurrent depletion of POLQ and ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) could be embryonic lethal. Hence, this phenomenon has the potential to be exploited for therapeutic benefit in cancers where ATM mutations are commonly seen. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma marked by (11;14) translocation with ATM alterations seen in 40-50% of patients. There is an unmet need to find novel therapeutic strategies, especially in relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) MCL. Here, we investigated whether targeting POLQ and ATM could be a potential therapeutic strategy in MCL. Methods: In vitro studies were conducted by using MCL cell lines. CRISPR-Cas9 system was used to genetically deplete POLQ and ATM genes and sgRNAs co-expressing fluorescence markers were used to track the cell population with respective genotypes over time. Cell viability was assessed by CellTiter-Glo assay and flow cytometry. All cell lines were profiled for ATM expression and activity. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The combination index of <1 was defined as synergistic. Results: CRISPR-Cas9-mediated depletion of POLQ significantly decreased cell proliferation in multiple MCL cell lines. In particular, Granta-519, which possesses a single copy of kinase-dead ATM that is reduced in expression, was most sensitive to POLQ depletion. Concurrent genetic depletion of ATM and POLQ resulted in a synergistic antiproliferative effect in ATM-proficient MCL cell lines. Subsequently, this cellular phenotype caused by the genetic intervention was recapitulated by using two POLQ inhibitors (novobiocin and ART558) and an ATM inhibitor (AZD0156). In vitro, single-agent treatment with novobiocin or ART558 caused a significant cytotoxic effect at physiologically relevant concentrations in ATM-deficient cells and co-treatment of novobiocin or ART558 with AZD0156 was synergistic in killing ATM-proficient MCL cells. Importantly, POLQ inhibitors significantly decreased the cell viability of MCIR1, which is an ibrutinib-resistant MCL cell line. Mechanistically, novobiocin or ART558 treatment induced gH2AX and cleaved PARP upregulation, which was further enhanced by ATM depletion, suggesting that co-inhibition of POLQ and ATM caused apoptosis due to the accumulation of unrepaired DNA damage. Conclusion: POLQ is a promising target in MCL, especially in ATM-deficient setting. In ATM-proficient MCL, targeting ATM and POLQ is synergistic. Our data has the potential to uncover novel biomarker-driven drug therapy of POLQ inhibitors in R/R MCL. Citation Format: Jithma Prasad Abeykoon, Shuhei Asada, Kalindi Parmar, Xiaosheng Wu, Thomas Witzig, Geoffrey Shapiro, Alan D. D'Andrea. Targeting DNA polymerase theta and ATM leads to synergistic killing of mantle cell lymphoma cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6208.

1506 Background: Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is preventable when genetic risk is identified. We aimed to test whether pre and/or post-test genetic counseling is needed to optimally deliver online accessible genetic testing. Methods: MAGENTA (Making GENetic Testing Accessible) is a four-arm non-inferiority trial evaluating electronic genetic education and results delivery alone or combined with pre-test only, or post-test only telephone genetic counseling compared to mandatory pre- and post-test counseling (control arm) in women at risk of HBOC (NCT02993068). Regardless of assigned arm, all subjects with a pathogenic mutation received post-test telephone counseling. All subjects were enrolled electronically as part of either a family history cohort (FHC) or a cascade cohort (CC, known familial mutation). The primary outcome was cancer risk distress at 3 months and the trial was powered for the FHC. Secondary outcomes included completion of testing (i.e., received results), anxiety, depression, quality of life, and decisional regret, all measured by standardized scales. Results: Enrollment is complete and a total of 3,822 participants were randomized, 3,111 in FHC and 711 in CC. Participants were enrolled from all 50 states, but most were white/non-Hispanic (88%). Among participants that completed genetic testing, 173 (7.2%) had a mutation in a breast or ovarian cancer gene, with 114 (5.7%) of FHC and 59 (14.2%) of CC. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis of FHC, each of the three experimental arms was non-inferior to the control arm for distress at 3 months (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). In the CC, no and pre-test only counseling were also non-inferior (p < 0.025/3 = 0.0083). Distress was lowest in the arm with neither pre nor post-test counseling. Overall, 318 (18%) participants had very high distress at three month follow-up, and this rate was not significantly different across arms. Anxiety, depression and decisional regret did not have statistically significant differences across arms at follow-up. Test completion was highest in the no counseling arm (86.4%) and lowest in the control arm (60.6%). Conclusions: Electronic genetic education and results release without genetic counseling was non-inferior with regard to patient distress and was associated with higher test completion and lower distress. These results support use of a genetic testing paradigm providing individualized genetic counseling only for patients with positive test results. Clinical trial information: NCT02993068.

Abstract DUB-2 is a T-cell specific de-ubiquitinating enzyme whose expression is induced by IL-2. Expression of DUB-2 results in prolonged STAT5 phosphorylation, enhanced IL-2 induced gene expression, and resistance to apoptosis resulting from cytokine withdrawal. The molecular basis of DUB-2s effects, however, is not understood. In order to better understand the role of DUB-2 in the IL-2 response, we performed a systematic analysis of DUB-2 catalytic activity, subcellular localization, and domain organization. Subcellular localization of DUB-2 was examined using a C-terminal DUB-2-Cherry (enhanced red fluorescence) fusion and live-cell imaging. When expressed in HeLa cells, wild-type DUB-2-Cherry is predominantly localized to the cytoplasm, although 8–10% of cells have a strong nuclear accumulation. Strikingly, the nuclear localization is entirely eliminated by a mutation in the catalytic cysteine (c60s). This effect on DUB-2s localization is not due to changes in cell cycle progression, as we observe identical cell cycle profiles (DNA content) in wt or c60s expressing cells. Conversely, enhanced DUB-2 nuclear localization is seen following nocodazole-induced cell cycle synchronization and with mutant DUB-2-Cherry fusions lacking a duplicated 8-residue sequence within the C-terminal domain. We next analyzed the catalytic activity of DUB-2 toward ubiquitin and other ubiquitin-like (UbL) molecules using a series of semi-synthetic activity-based probes. These probes consist of full-length Ub or UbL molecules equipped with a C-terminal electrophilic group. These probes act as suicide substrates, forming a covalent bond with the active site cysteine of catalytically active (but not inactive) Ub(L) isopeptidases. Unexpectedly, DUB-2 forms adducts not only with the Ub-based probe, but also the probe derivative of the UbL molecule ISG15, which suggests that it has dual-specificity. The activity towards Ub and ISG15 is abrogated by a mutation in the catalytic cysteine (c60s) of DUB-2, but is not affected by deletions of the poly-lysine or hypervariable domains. Taken together, these results suggest that DUB-2 is a bi-specific (Ub and ISG15) isopeptidase which shuttles between the cytoplasm and the nucleus in a manner dependent on its catalytic activity. This work, and the ultimate elucidation of the molecular target of DUB-2, will further increase our understanding of DUB-2’s role in IL-2-dependent T-cell proliferation and immunologic tolerance.

Abstract Background: In vivo synergy with concurrent PI3-Kinase inhibition and PARP inhibition has been observed in BRCA-deficient and BRCA-proficient preclinical models of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and ovarian cancer (OC). A phase I trial of the oral pan-class I PI3-Kinase inhibitor BKM120 and the PARP inhibitor olaparib demonstrated anti-cancer activity in TNBC and OC, both in patients with and without germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations. However, CNS toxicity (depression) and liver function test abnormalities limited dose escalation of BKM120 prompting evaluation of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 (which has no CNS toxicity) in combination with olaparib. Methods: Olaparib was administered twice daily (tablet formulation) and BYL719 daily on a 28-day cycle, both orally. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was employed with primary objectives of defining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose of the combination of BYL719 and olaparib, and secondary objectives of defining toxicity, activity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of both agents. Eligibility included recurrent TNBC or high grade serous (HGS) OC, or any histology OC or breast cancer (BC) with presence of a known germline BRCA mutation, performance status of 0-1 and measurable/evaluable cancer. Patients with platinum sensitive or resistant or refractory OC were eligible and prior PARP inhibitor use was allowed. Dose-expansion cohorts at the MTD were enrolled for both BC and OC. Results: 46 patients (16 BC and 30 OC) have been enrolled in the study; 28 patients participated in the dose escalation portion of the study (4 BC and 24 OC). Two patients with OC did not receive study drugs because of ineligibility. MTD was defined as BYL719 200mg once daily and olaparib 200mg twice daily. Dose limiting toxicities included hyperglycemia, rash and fever with decreased neutrophil count. Four patients (3 OC and 1 BC) discontinued protocol therapy because of toxicity (2 for hyperglycemia, 1 for nausea and 1 for allergic reaction). Most common toxicities included nausea, hyperglycemia, fatigue, diarrhea and vomiting. At the MTD, 6 patients with OC and 12 patients with BC were enrolled into a dose expansion cohort. The OC expansion cohort has completed enrollment, while the BC cohort is still enrolling. Among patients with OC who received study drugs (28 patients, 26 (93%) with platinum resistant disease), objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 was 36% (10/28 patients, all partial responses (PRs)). Median duration of response was 167 days (range 16-398 days); 5 of 10 patients with PR remain on treatment. ORR was 33% for patients with germline BRCA mutations and 31% for patients without germline BRCA mutations. Among patients without germline BRCA mutations with platinum resistant OC, ORR was 29%. Conclusions: Combined BYL719 and olaparib is feasible, and similar clinical benefit was observed in patients with and without germline BRCA mutations. The activity of this combination in OC patients without germline BRCA mutations and with platinum resistant disease was higher than expected from olaparib monotherapy and warrants further investigation. This work was funded in part by the Stand Up To Cancer Ovarian Dream Team. Clinical trial: NCT01623349. Citation Format: Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, William T. Barry, Michael Birrer, Shannon N. Westin, Sarah Farooq, Karen Cadoo, Christin Whalen, Weixiu Luo, Hui Liu, Carol Aghajanian, David B. Solit, Gordon B. Mills, Barry S. Taylor, Helen Won, Michael F. Berger, Sangeetha Palakurthi, Joyce F. Liu, Lew Cantley, Scott H. Kaufmann, Elizabeth M. Swisher, Alan D. D'Andrea, Eric Winer, Gerburg M. Wulf, Ursula A. Matulonis. Phase I study of the alpha specific PI3-Kinase inhibitor BYL719 and the poly (ADP-Ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib in recurrent ovarian and breast cancer: Analysis of the dose escalation and ovarian cancer expansion cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT008. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT008