Bergan, Raymond C.

11503 Background: Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs) are a recently described circulating stromal cell subtype commonly found in the peripheral blood of patients in all stages of solid malignancies and in a variety of cancer subtypes. However, while their biological association to cancer is being studied, their clinical utilization as it relates to cancer prognosis has not been evaluated. Methods: A two year prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship of CAMLs and overall survival (OS) in 6 solid tumor types. The single blind multi-institutional study consisted of 269 stage I-IV patients; breast (n = 57), esophageal (n = 21), prostate (n = 43), pancreatic (n = 59), lung (n = 54), and renal cell (n = 35), in treatment (n = 134) and untreated baseline (n = 135). 7.5mL of whole blood was filtered by CellSieve microfiltration assay and CAMLs enumerated, as previously described. Patients were grouped by CAML number ( < 6 or ≥6) and by size ( < 49 or ≥50 µm) to evaluate hazard ratios (HR) by censored univariate & multivariate analysis. Results: CAMLs were identified in 93% of samples, averaging 8.2 CAMLs/7.5mL blood sample, and found in all 6 cancers at baseline and during treatment. Average CAML number was associated with disease stage and CAML positivity was 4.4 & 80% (Stage I), 4.7 & 93% (Stage II), 9.3 & 98% (Stage 3), 12.1 & 97% (Stage IV). Univariate analysis of patients (n = 269) stratified by ≥6 CAMLs had reduced OS (HR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-2.9, p = 0.03). Further, CAML size also had reduced OS in patients with ≥50 µm CAMLs (HR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.8-4.0, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our data suggests that in solid malignancies, CAML number and size appear to clinically correlate with OS in early and late stage disease. Given these results relating CAMLs with OS, further analysis is warranted to determine if CAMLs can serve as a clinically-relevant blood-based marker.

Abstract Background: Blood-based biomarkers (PSA, CEA, CA125) are used to track real-time progression of disease in parallel with imaging. However, while numerous blood biomarkers exist, they are specific to cancer type (i.e., PSA to prostate and CEA to colon) and may not appear in all diseased individuals. Recently, cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs), a circulating stromal cell subtype, were identified in various solid cancer types, which were observed increasing in size and in hyperploidy during progressive disease. To assess whether CAML enlargement is a biomarker of progression/response, we tracked CAML growth/shrinkage in a pilot study of patients (n=34). Blood was drawn from patients with lung, prostate, or breast cancers over a 3-month period, baseline through 2 treatment cycles, followed by continued monitoring for 2 years. These data suggest that morphologic assessment of CAMLs (growth/hyperploidy) appear to parallel cancer progression, or response to treatment, in multiple solid tumors. Methods: A prospective multi-institutional study used anonymized peripheral blood samples from 34 cancer patients undergoing therapy [stage I (n=2), II (n=3), III (n=8) & IV (n=21)] with breast (n=10), lung (n=16), & prostate (n=8). Samples were taken prior to therapy (BL), at 1 month (FU1) follow-up and a 3-month (FU2) follow-up, after induction of therapy. Blood was processed by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique at 4 institutions and stained for cytokeratin 8, 18 and 19, CD14 and CD45. After identification and quantification, CAMLs were measured based on their hyperploidy and cell size. Results: CAMLs were found in 97% of cancer patients at BL, 97% at FU1 and 91% of FU2. Over the 2-year follow-up, 7 patients showed no signs of clinical disease progression, while 27 patients had observable progression. Of the 7 patients who did not progress, only two had CAMLs of ≥50µm at BL and at FU1, but whose CAMLs shrunk to &lt;50 µm by FU2. Of the 27 patients who progressed, 22 patients had ≥50µm CAMLs at all time points, while 5 patients had small &lt;50µm CAMLs at BL. Interestingly, CAMLs in these 5 patients had enlarged to ≥50µm by the FU2 time point. Conclusions: We show that increased polynucleation and CAML enlargement indicate shorter progression-free survival in a number of cancer types after baseline. By monitoring CAML changes over time for the 34 individual patients, we demonstrated correlation of ongoing progression, or response, in tumors to the enlargement or shrinkage in CAMLs at follow-up time points from treatment induction. This pilot study suggests that CAMLs have the potential to monitor the progression/regression of malignancy in real time and suggests the need for larger validation studies. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, Raymond Bergan, Martin J. Edelman, Stuart S. Martin, Rena Lapidus, Saranya Chumsri, Cha-Mei Tang, Steven H. Lin. Real-time monitoring of solid tumor progression by circulating stromal cells from early- to late-stage disease [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1560.

Abstract Background: We previously demonstrated that cancer associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are cancer specific giant polyploid cells circulating in the blood of patients with solid tumors. Building on our initial discovery, others have shown that these hyperploidy cells are an innate immune response that is associated with decreased survival. However to date, no studies have been done to elucidate their clinical significance as in relation to the various stages of malignant disease. We established a 4 year prospective study of 315 patients from a variety of solid tumors (breast, prostate, lung, renal cell, pancreas, and esophageal) comparing the morphological properties of CAMLs in both early and late stage disease as they relate to progression free and overall survival (PFS/OS). These data suggest that CAML size appears have a strong negative correlation with progression and survival of cancer patients, irregardless of stage of disease, indicating their possible use as a non-invasive blood based biomarker in solid tumors. Methods: A prospective multi-institutional study used anonymized peripheral blood from 315 cancer patients [stage I (n=62), stage II (n=72), stage III (n=69) & stage IV (n=106)] from subjects with breast (n=59), esophageal (n=27), lung (n=59), renal cell carcinoma (n=37), prostate (n=74), pancreas cancers (n=59). CAMLs were isolated by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique at 5 institutions and stained for cytokeratin 8, 18, & 19, CD14 and CD45. After imaging, a size based threshold ≥50µm was used to separate the patient cohorts, based on previously published assessments. Results: At least one CAML was found in 92% of cancer patients (n=289/315), with the lowest sensitivity in stage 1 (86%), followed by stage 2 (90%), stage 3 (97%) and stage 4 (95%). The property of CAML size was then evaluated. Overall, CAMLs of &lt;50µm in size had superior PFS (HR: 3.8; 95% CI 2.8-5.3; p&lt;0.001) and OS (HR=3.8; 95% CI 2.6-5.7;p&lt;0.001) than those with ≥50 µm CAMLs. By each stage individually, stage 1 (PFS HR=7.5; 95% CI 3.2-17.7; p&lt;0.001), stage II (PFS; HR=4.1; 95% CI 1.9-8.8; p&lt;0.001), stage III (PFS HR=3.1; 95% CI 1.7-5.7; p=0.007), and stage IV (PFS HR=2.7; 95% CI 1.6-4.4; p&lt;0.001). Conclusions: In this first large scale prospective study of the clinical utility of CAMLs, it appears that they are present in every stages of invasive solid tumor malignancies, with prevalence increasing with stage. Interestingly decreased CAML size was found to be associated with improved outcome and longer PFS. These data suggest that CAML detection and size assessment constitute a new real time predictor of progression, and survival in both early and late stage disease indicating the need for additional validation studies. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, Steven H. Lin, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Thai Ho, Jeffrey R. Marks, Stuart S. Martin, Susan Tsai, Saranya Chumsri, Cha-Mei Tang, Massimo Cristofanilli, Raymond Bergan. Cancer associated macrophage-like (CAMLs) cells in blood predict progression and survival for all stages of solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2631.

Abstract Background: Tumor endothelial cells (ECs) are a population of stromal cells required for tumor growth that cooperate with tumors to form angiogenic structures. In blood, circulating ECs (CECs) are normal constituents of healthy individuals, although a Cancer Associated Vascular Endothelial cell (CAVE) subtype has been observed in cancer patients. The CAVE population has been isolated and identified using their large size or multicellular clustering and a pooled mixture of classical EC markers (i.e. CD31 and CD146). However, there has been no attempt to differentiate CAVEs from the many EC subtypes. This is not surprising as in-depth phenotyping of ECs requires an array of biomarkers that until recently has not been feasible. A multi-phenotypic screening of EC markers was tested on CAVEs from 116 blood samples in 3 types of solid tumors. This data suggests that CAVEs exist as a common and diverse subtype of tumor derived CECs that may express cytokeratin (CK) and various EC biomarkers, correlating to disease stage. Methods: Peripheral blood samples from 116 cancer patients (stage I-IV) were drawn from 2012-2014 including breast (n=42), lung (n=39) and prostate (n=35), as well as blood from 34 healthy controls. Blood was processed by an established filtration approach, i.e. the CellSieveTM microfiltration technique (Creatv MicroTech), filtering blood by size exclusion and staining cells for CK 8, 18 & 19, EpCAM and CD45. After identification and imaging, the QUAS-R (Quench, Underivatize, Amine-Strip and Restain) technique was used to remove fluorescence signal and restain all cells with CD31, CD146, CD144, & DAPI. After reimaging, QUAS-R was again used to remove fluorescence and restain the cells for CD14, CD105, CD34, & DAPI. Results: Out of 116 patient samples, we identified CAVEs in 63 patients (54%) based on positivity of CD31, CD144 or CD146, but none were found in healthy controls. CAVEs per 7.5mL sample in patients averaged 5.1 (breast), 5.6 (prostate) and 7.9 (lung). Presence of CAVEs appeared related to stage with 26% in stage 1, 61% in stage 2, 68% in stage 3, and 74% in stage 4 patients. No CAVEs were positive for CD14 or CD45. CD31 was the most present marker, found on 93% of CAVEs, followed by CD144 (85%), CD34 (64%), CD146 (45%), & CD105 (4%). In contrast with the previous study on this topic, CK was found in 67% of CAVEs, but was not a universal marker. Conclusions: It has been reported that CK+ and CD45- CECs are isolated from the blood of cancer patients in colon and lung cancers, prompting some to classify them as circulating tumor cells. However, subtyping these CECs is incomplete when characterized with only 3-4 biomarkers. A multi-phenotypic subtyping technique was used to properly identify and subtype these CECs in cancer patients. This data suggest that a subset of CECs, e.g. CAVEs, are found in circulation as CK+/CD45-, but exist as a heterogeneous population of cancer specific circulating cells that require further study. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R. Katherine Alpaugh, Steven H. Lin, Jeffrey R. Marks, Raymond Bergan, Stuart S. Martin, Sarany Chumsri, Massimo Cristofanilli, Cha-Mei Tang, Steingrimur Stefansson. Identifying, subtyping and classifying tumor associated circulating endothelial cells in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 778. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-778

Abstract Background: Circulating cancer associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) are cancer specific giant cells circulating in the blood of patients with solid tumors. Since their discovery, few studies have been done to elucidate their lineage or phenotypic identity. The difficulty in classifying CAMLs is exemplified by their expression of multiple heterogeneous markers that defy conventional identification. Recently, we described a restaining method (QUAS-R) to screen individual cells using an array of up to 15 biomarkers. We used this method to screen CAMLs isolated from 152 cancer patient samples in 4 types of solid tumors to classify CAMLs by phenotypic immunostaining. These data suggest that CAMLs are a morphologically diverse and phenotypically heterogeneous population of cancer specific giant cells with overlapping myeloid, epithelial, and endothelial phenotypes. Methods: This multi-institutional study used peripheral blood samples from 152 cancer patients (stage I-IV) from breast (n=42), lung (n=39), renal cell carcinoma (36) and prostate (n=35). Blood was processed by the CellSieve™ microfiltration technique at 5 institutions and stained for cytokeratin 8, 18 & 19, EpCAM, and CD45. After identification/imaging, the QUAS-R (Quench, Underivatize, Amine-Strip and Restain) technique was used to quench fluorescence signal of cells and then restain with vimentin/CD146/CD144, CD14/CD11b/CD41, CD11c/CD68/TIE2, or CD34/CD41/CD61. After staining, QUAS-R was again used to remove the fluorescence and samples restained with a third panel. Each patient sample was stained, quenched and restained with the above mentioned panels. Results: In agreement with a number of studies, CAMLs were found in 86% of cancer patients (n=131/152), with increased detection from stage 1 (71%), followed by stage 2 (94%), stage 3 (88%) to stage 4 (88%). Breast cancer had the most CAMLs per sample (14.1 cells/7.5mL), followed by prostate (6.8), renal cell carcinoma (4.9) and lung (3.2). CD34 was most prevalent, found on 88% of CAMLs, followed by cytokeratin (81%), CD41 (79%), CD61 (78%), CD45 (75%), CD14 (72%), vimentin (63%), EpCAM (56%), CD146 (53%), CD68 (44%), CD11c (38%), TIE-2 (25%) and CD11b (0%). Based on our results, CAMLs seem to express overlapping phenotypes from a variety of lineages i.e. macrophage (CD14/CD68/CD11c), epithelial (cytokeratin/EpCAM), endothelial (CD146/TIE-2) and megakaryocyte (CD41/CD61). Conclusions: Although identification of CAMLs is straightforward by morphological criteria (size and nuclear profile), their identification and lineage remains undetermined. We report the first mass screening of CAMLs to determine phenotypic expression. These data suggest that CAMLs cannot be grouped into any known cell subtype based on their expression profiles and represent a heterogeneous and variably differentiated population whose biological consequences in cancer remain under investigation. Citation Format: Daniel L. Adams, R Katherine Alpaugh, Thai H. Ho, Steven H. Lin, Jeffrey R. Marks, Raymond Bergan, Stuart S. Martin, Saranya Chumsri, Cha-Mei Tang, Massimo Cristofanilli. Multiplex phenotyping of circulating cancer associated macrophage-like cells in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3798. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3798