Aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway, through which the GLI family of transcription factors (TF) is stimulated, is commonly observed in cancer cells. One well-established mechanism of this increased activity is through the inactivation of Suppressor of Fused (SUFU), a negative regulator of the Hh pathway. Relief from negative regulation by SUFU facilitates GLI activity and induction of target gene expression. Here, we demonstrate a novel role for SUFU as a promoter of GLI activity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In non-ciliated PDAC cells unresponsive to Smoothened agonism, SUFU overexpression increases GLI transcriptional activity. Conversely, knockdown (KD) of SUFU reduces the activity of GLI in PDAC cells. Through array PCR analysis of GLI target genes, we identified B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) among the top candidates down-regulated by SUFU KD. We demonstrate that SUFU KD results in reduced PDAC cell viability, and overexpression of BCL2 partially rescues the effect of reduced cell viability by SUFU KD. Further analysis using as a model GLI1, a major TF activator of the GLI family in PDAC cells, shows the interaction of SUFU and GLI1 in the nucleus through previously characterized domains. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay shows the binding of both SUFU and GLI1 at the promoter of BCL2 in PDAC cells. Finally, we demonstrate that SUFU promotes GLI1 activity without affecting its protein stability. Through our findings, we propose a novel role of SUFU as a positive regulator of GLI1 in PDAC, adding a new mechanism of Hh/GLI signaling pathway regulation in cancer cells.
Hedgehog/GLI Signaling Pathway: Transduction, Regulation, and Implications for Disease
The Hh/GLI signaling pathway was originally discovered in Drosophila as a major regulator of segment patterning in development. This pathway consists of a series of ligands (Shh, Ihh, and Dhh), transmembrane receptors (Ptch1 and Ptch2), transcription factors (GLI1–3), and signaling regulators (SMO, HHIP, SUFU, PKA, CK1, GSK3β, etc.) that work in concert to repress (Ptch1, Ptch2, SUFU, PKA, CK1, GSK3β) or activate (Shh, Ihh, Dhh, SMO, GLI1–3) the signaling cascade. Not long after the initial discovery, dysregulation of the Hh/GLI signaling pathway was implicated in human disease. Activation of this signaling pathway is observed in many types of cancer, including basal cell carcinoma, medulloblastoma, colorectal, prostate, pancreatic, and many more. Most often, the activation of the Hh/GLI pathway in cancer occurs through a ligand-independent mechanism. However, in benign disease, this activation is mostly ligand-dependent. The upstream signaling component of the receptor complex, SMO, is bypassed, and the GLI family of transcription factors can be activated regardless of ligand binding. Additional mechanisms of pathway activation exist whereby the entirety of the downstream signaling pathway is bypassed, and PTCH1 promotes cell cycle progression and prevents caspase-mediated apoptosis. Throughout this review, we summarize each component of the signaling cascade, non-canonical modes of pathway activation, and the implications in human disease, including cancer.
TFII-I-mediated polymerase pausing antagonizes GLI2 induction by TGFβ
AbstractThe modulation of GLI2, an oncogenic transcription factor commonly upregulated in cancer, is in many cases not due to genetic defects, suggesting dysregulation through alternative mechanisms. The identity of these molecular events remains for the most part unknown. Here, we identified TFII-I as a novel repressor of GLI2 expression. Mapping experiments suggest that the INR region of the GLI2 promoter is necessary for GLI2 repression. ChIP studies showed that TFII-I binds to this INR. TFII-I knockdown decreased the binding of NELF-A, a component of the promoter–proximal pausing complex at this site, and enriched phosphorylated RNAPII serine 2 in the GLI2 gene body. Immunoprecipitation studies demonstrate TFII-I interaction with SPT5, another pausing complex component. TFII-I overexpression antagonized GLI2 induction by TGFβ, a known activator of GLI2 in cancer cells. TGFβ reduced endogenous TFII-I binding to the INR and increased RNAPII SerP2 in the gene body. We demonstrate that this regulatory mechanism is not exclusive of GLI2. TGFβ-induced genes CCR7, TGFβ1 and EGR3 showed similar decreased TFII-I and NELF-A INR binding and increased RNAPII SerP2 in the gene body post-TGFβ treatment. Together these results identify TFII-I as a novel repressor of a subset of TGFβ-responsive genes through the regulation of RNAPII pausing.
Recent Advances in the Clinical Targeting of Hedgehog/GLI Signaling in Cancer
The Hedgehog/GLI signaling pathway plays an important role in normal embryonic tissue development and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various human cancers. In this review article, we summarize pre-clinical evidence supporting the suitability of targeting this signaling pathway in cancers. We review agents blocking both the ligand-dependent and ligand-independent cascades, and discuss the clinical evidence, which has led to the FDA approval of Hedgehog receptor Smoothened inhibitors, vismodegib, and sonidegib, in different malignancies. Finally, we provide an overview of published and ongoing clinical trial data on single agent or combination therapeutic strategies, targeting Hedgehog/GLI signaling pathway, in both advanced solid tumors and hematologic malignancies.
Targeting Epigenetic Aberrations in Pancreatic Cancer, a New Path to Improve Patient Outcomes?
Pancreatic cancer has one of the highest mortality rates among all types of cancers. The disease is highly aggressive and typically diagnosed in late stage making it difficult to treat. Currently, the vast majority of therapeutic regimens have only modest curative effects, and most of them are in the surgical/neo-adjuvant setting. There is a great need for new and more effective treatment strategies in common clinical practice. Previously, pathogenesis of pancreatic cancer was attributed solely to genetic mutations; however, recent advancements in the field have demonstrated that aberrant activation of epigenetic pathways contributes significantly to the pathogenesis of the disease. The identification of these aberrant activated epigenetic pathways has revealed enticing targets for the use of epigenetic inhibitors to mitigate the phenotypic changes driven by these cascades. These pathways have been found to be responsible for overactivation of growth signaling pathways and silencing of tumor suppressors and other cell cycle checkpoints. Furthermore, new miRNA signatures have been uncovered in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, further widening the window for therapeutic opportunity. There has been success in preclinical settings using both epigenetic inhibitors as well as miRNAs to slow disease progression and eliminate diseased tissues. In addition to their utility as anti-proliferative agents, the pharmacological inhibitors that target epigenetic regulators (referred to here as readers, writers, and erasers for their ability to recognize, deposit, and remove post-translational modifications) have the potential to reconfigure the epigenetic landscape of diseased cells and disrupt the cancerous phenotype. The potential to “reprogram” cancer cells to revert them to a healthy state presents great promise and merits further investigation.
Abstract 1391: The epigenetic regulator, G9a, is a KRAS-inducible protein and its inactivation inhibits PanIN formation by this oncogene
Abstract Pancreatic ductular adenocarcinoma (PDAC) ranks fourth as a cause of cancer death in the USA and is almost universally fatal, with the annual number of deaths equivalent to the number of newly diagnosed cases. Valuable research in the field has revealed genetic aberrations that contribute to PDAC development and progression, with KRAS being one of the most frequent mutations in more than 90% of patient samples. However, to date, any efforts to directly target KRAS have failed in the clinic. Thus, there is indisputably an urgent need to further improve our understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying PDAC development as to identify novel therapeutic targets, including druggable important downstream targets and nodes orchestrated by oncogenic KRAS. In particular, we are interested in epigenetic pathways involved in PDAC development and progression due to the potential reversibility of any alteration, unlike genetic mutation. In the current study, using a cell model that allows inducible expression of mutant KRASG12D, we find that protein levels of the dimethyl-K9H3 histone methyl transferase (HMT), G9a, and its complex partners are increased in response to activation of the oncogenic Kras pathway. Furthermore, the activation of this oncogenic pathway results in the formation of the G9a-GLP-Wiz trimer complex, as determined by affinity protein purification, combined with mass spectrometry. In vivo experiments involving the cross of the Pdx1-CRE/LSL-KRASG12D mice with G9afl/fl animals demonstrate that a loss of the H3K9Me2 mark in the nucleus of exocrine cells is accompanied by a significantly reduced number of PanIN lesions. RNA-Seq experiments from these animals reveal that these mice have reduced levels of typical molecular markers of PanINs. In addition, these experiments show changes in the levels in several genes, which have been previously been shown to synergize with Kras to mediate pancreatic cancer initiation. Congruently, pharmacological inhibition of G9a using BRD4770 displays an inhibitory effect on KRASG12D-induced cell proliferation. Combined, these data provide evidence for a key role of the meK9H3-G9a pathway as a mediator of the oncogenic Kras response and defines a novel point of potential therapeutic intervention for PDAC. Citation Format: Angela Mathison, Ann Salmonson, Brooke Paradise, Mckenna Missfeldt, Juan Iovanna, Daniel Billadeau, Raul Urrutia, Gwen Lomberk. The epigenetic regulator, G9a, is a KRAS-inducible protein and its inactivation inhibits PanIN formation by this oncogene [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1391. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1391