Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas are the most common adult, malignant primary brain tumors diagnosed in patients younger than 50, constituting an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the molecular pathogenesis and biology of these tumors, sparking multiple efforts to improve their diagnosis and treatment. In this consensus review from the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), the current diagnosis and management of IDH-mutant gliomas will be discussed. In addition, novel therapies, such as targeted molecular therapies and immunotherapies, will be reviewed. Current challenges and future directions for research will be discussed.
Translational significance of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion in isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant astrocytoma
Abstract Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 or 2 mutations confer a favorable prognosis compared to IDH-wildtype in astrocytoma, frequently denoting a lower grade malignancy. However, recent molecular profiling has identified specific aggressive tumor subgroups with clear clinical prognostic implications that are independent of histologic grading. The homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B is the strongest implicated independent indicator of the poor prognosis within IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and the identification of this alteration in these lower histologic grade tumors transforms their biology toward an aggressive grade 4 phenotype clinically. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion is now sufficient to define a grade 4 tumor in IDH-mutant astrocytomas regardless of histologic appearance, yet there are currently no effective molecularly informed targeted therapies for these tumors. The biological impact of CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion in IDH-mutant tumors and the optimal treatment strategy for this molecular subgroup remains insufficiently explored. Here we review the current understanding of the translational significance of homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B gene expression in IDH-mutant astrocytoma and associated diagnostic and therapeutic implications.
Typical, atypical and cryptic t(15;17)(q24;q21) (
PML::RARA
) observed in acute promyelocytic leukemia: A retrospective review of 831 patients with concurrent chromosome and
PML::RARA
Abstract The diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) relies on the identification of PML::RARA fusion. While the majority of APL cases harbor a typical t(15;17)(q24;q21), atypical genetic mechanisms leading to the oncogenic PML::RARA fusion have been reported yet their frequency and scope remain poorly characterized. We assessed the genetic findings of 831 cases with APL investigated with concurrent chromosome banding analysis and dual‐color dual‐fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D‐FISH) analysis at our institution over an 18.5‐year timeframe. Seven hundred twenty‐three (87%) cases had a typical balanced t(15;17) with both testing modalities. Atypical karyotypic results including complex translocations, unbalanced rearrangements and insertional events occurred in 50 (6%) cases, while 6 (0.7%) cases were cryptic by conventional chromosome studies despite PML::RARA fusion by D‐FISH evaluation. Atypical FISH patterns were observed in 48 (6%) cases despite apparently balanced t(15;17) on chromosome banding analysis. Two hundred fifty (30%) cases displayed additional chromosome abnormalities of which trisomy/tetrasomy 8 (37%), del(7q)/add(7q) (12%), and del(9q) (7%) were most frequent. Complex and very complex karyotypes were observed in 81 (10%) and 34 (4%) cases, respectively. In addition, 4 (0.5%) cases presented as an apparently doubled, near‐tetraploid stemline clone. This report provides the largest appraisal of cytogenetic findings in APL with conventional chromosome and PML::RARA D‐FISH analysis. By characterizing the frequency and breadth of typical and atypical results through the lens of these cytogenetic testing modalities, this study serves as a pragmatic source of information for those involved in the investigation of APL in both the clinical and research laboratory settings.
Inherited genetics of adult diffuse glioma and polygenic risk scores—a review
Abstract Knowledge about inherited and acquired genetics of adult diffuse glioma has expanded significantly over the past decade. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) stratified by histologic subtype identified six germline variants that were associated specifically with glioblastoma (GBM) and 12 that were associated with lower grade glioma. A GWAS performed using the 2016 WHO criteria, stratifying patients by IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion (as well as TERT promoter mutation), discovered that many of the known variants are associated with specific WHO glioma subtypes. In addition, the GWAS stratified by molecular group identified two additional novel regions: variants in D2HGDH that were associated with tumors that had an IDH mutation and a variant near FAM20C that was associated with tumors that had both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. The results of these germline associations have been used to calculate polygenic risk scores, from which to estimate relative and absolute risk of overall glioma and risk of specific glioma subtypes. We will review the concept of polygenic risk models and their potential clinical utility, as well as discuss the published adult diffuse glioma polygenic risk models. To date, these prior genetic studies have been done on European populations. Using the published glioma polygenic risk model, we show that the genetic associations published to date do not generalize across genetic ancestries, demonstrating that genetic studies need to be done on more diverse populations.
TMOD-18. DIRECT IN VIVO CRISPR SCREEN IDENTIFIES COOPERATING TUMOR SUPPRESSORS THAT DRIVE PROGRESSION OF IDH1-MUTANT LOW-GRADE GLIOMA TO AGGRESSIVE GLIOBLASTOMA
Abstract Low-grade glioma (LGG) are generally slowly growing brain cancers, that frequently undergo malignant progression to aggressive, secondary glioblastoma with a dismal prognosis. By combining genetically engineered Idh1-mutant mice with in vivo CRISPR gene editing we generated a mouse model faithfully recapitulating the founder mutations of LGG. Clonal activation of the neomorphic Idh1 R132H mutation cooperates with Trp53 and Atrx mutations to trigger development of brain tumors but only with ~30% penetrance and very long latency. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the malignant progression of IDH1-mutant LGG, we devised and deployed a direct in vivo CRISPR screen targeting genes commonly mutated in human IDH-mutant secondary glioblastoma. Stereotaxic delivery of a lentiviral sgRNA library targeting the mouse orthologs of these genes into the brain of Idh1 R132H ;Trp53;Atrx;Cas9 and control Idh1 wt ;Trp53;Atrx;Cas9 compound mutant mice resulted in rapid formation of tumors that recapitulate human Idh1-mutant glioblastoma. Deconvoluting the screen showed that PI3K pathway members Pten and Pik3ca as well as Notch1, Smarca4 and Fat1 are preferentially enriched in Idh1 R132H-tumors, while Rb1 and NF2 were enriched in Idh1 wt tumors. Co-mutation analysis further identified additional co-occurring driver combinations such as Bcor-Met, Olig2-Met, Olig2-Med12 or Bcor-Olig2. We validated the tumor suppressive function of Notch1 and Pten using conventional floxed knock-out alleles and found that Notch1 functions in a haploinsufficient manner. Interestingly, Idh1 R132H did not alter tumor latency or pathology in a high grade p53;Pten;Rb1 mutant background, indicating that the neomorphic IDH-mutations can drive low but not high grade glioma development. Our study provides a functional landscape of gliomagenesis suppressors in vivo.
EPID-18. USING GERMLINE VARIANTS FOR DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF INDETERMINATE BRAIN LESIONS: EVALUATING THE EFFECT OF TUMOR TYPE AND RACE ON SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF GLIOMA polygenic risk models
Abstract Abnormalities on brain MRI may be identified in ~15% of individuals aged 50-66. It can be difficult to discriminate glioma, CNS lymphoma, Inflammatory Demyelinating Disease (CNSIDD) and solitary metastasis, and misdiagnosis may expose patients to unnecessary anxiety, surgery, or radiotherapy. CNS lymphoma requires only biopsy, solitary metastasis may be resected and radiated or radiated empirically, and high-grade glioma requires maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiation. CNSIDD should only be biopsied when diagnostic uncertainty requires it, and resection and radiotherapy are unnecessary, introducing unwarranted morbidity. Polygenic risk models can identify patients at the highest risk of developing glioma; we hypothesized that these polygenic models could help with differential diagnosis of indeterminate brain lesions. We also hypothesized that race would be an important contributing factor in the models. In the initial discovery and validation European (EUR) cohorts the mean probability of glioma for IDHmut non-codeleted glioma was 0.55 and 0.52, respectively, and in healthy controls was 0.19 and 0.21, respectively. To further evaluate sensitivity, we analyzed additional genotype data from 867 gliomas (764 EUR, 54 AFR, 24 AMR, 15 EAS, 10 SAS) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Across 764 EUR IDHmut non-codeleted glioma, the mean probability 0.53, whereas across 54 AFR and 24 AMR the mean was 0.22 and 0.32, respectively. To evaluate specificity, we analyzed 3200 TCGA patients with primary tumor types that commonly metastasize to the brain (2676 EUR, 365 AFR, 46 AMR, 95 EAS, 18 SAS), and 236 AFR healthy controls. For patients with non-CNS primary tumors, the mean probability ranged from 0.09-0.18 for EUR and 0.04-0.07 for AFR. For AFR healthy controls, the mean was 0.05. Overall, race is a significant factor for polygenic risk models. Further work entails evaluating polygenic risk models in IDHwt glioma, CNS lymphoma and CNSIDD cohorts as well as in additional races.
CBIO-18. TP53-MUTANT OLIGODENDROGLIOMA: A SINGLE INSTITUTION CASE SERIES
Abstract TP53 mutations are frequent in IDH-mutant astrocytomas but unusual in oligodendroglioma and the clinical significance of TP53 mutations in oligodendroglioma are not well characterized. We reviewed genetically defined oligodendroglioma (i.e., IDH-mutant, whole-arm 1p/19q-codeleted diffuse glioma) cases that were molecularly profiled (2017-2020) at our institution and identified 7 cases with TP53 mutation (9%; n=76). Molecular testing was performed using targeted neuro-oncology NGS panel (50-gene mutation and/or 187-gene mutation/rearrangement) and OncoScan™ microarray. Four (of 7) patients were female. Median age at diagnosis was 43 years (range, 23-63). Most common presenting symptom was seizures (3 of 7). All tumors were supratentorial. Histologically, 3 tumors were WHO grade II and 4 were WHO grade III. Two (of 3) patients with a WHO grade II tumor underwent biopsy and radiotherapy at diagnosis followed by temozolomide at recurrence (progression at 67 and 157 months after diagnosis; overall survival of 124 and 201 months). Three (of 4) patients with a WHO grade III tumor were diagnosed within the last two years and are currently progression-free after standard therapy. Molecularly, in addition to TP53 mutation(s), all cases had an IDH1 and TERT promoter mutation as well as other gene mutation(s) including FUBP1 (n=5), SETD2 (n=4), PIK3R1 (n=4), PIK3CA (n=3), NF1 (n=3) and CIC (n=3). In 3 (of 7) cases, the mutational profile with high mutation count enriched for C >T/G >A transitions was highly suggestive of a hypermutation phenotype (2 cases were recurrent tumors treated with temozolomide; a recurrent and a treatment-naïve tumor had mismatch repair gene mutation). Five (of 7) cases, including the 3 hypermutant cases, lacked functional TP53 (1 case with 2 mutations, 2 cases with 1 mutation plus loss of other copy, 2 cases with 1 mutation plus copy neutral loss-of-heterozygosity). TP53 mutations are uncommon in oligodendroglioma and appear enriched in hypermutant tumors.
EPCO-02. GERMLINE SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM rs55705857 AT 8q24 INTERACTS WITH SOMATIC IDH1 MUTATION TO ENHANCE HUMAN GLIOMA FORMATION
Abstract BACKGROUND Determination of the causation of germline single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in non-coding regions of the genome is challenging. The genomic region of 8q24 has been identified as important in many kinds of cancer, linked to a topologically associated domain (TAD) encompassing MYC; this TAD contains a GWAS SNP (rs55705857) associated with IDH-mutant glioma. METHODS Germline genotyping data from 622 IDH-mutant glioma and 668 controls were used to fine map the rs55705857 locus by detailed haplotype analysis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) of histone markers H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac and H3K36me3 was performed on normal brain samples (n=8) and human glioma samples (n=11 IDH-wt and 52 IDH-mut). RNAseq from 9 normal and 83 brain tumors (n=26 IDH-wt and 55 IDH-mut) were used to assess differential gene expression. RESULTS Fine-mapping identified rs55705857 SNP as the most likely causative allele (OR=8.69; p<0.001) within 8q24 for the development of IDH-mutant glioma. At rs55705857, both H3K27ac and H3K4me1 in IDH-mutant vs IDH-wt tumors were increased 3.05- and 1.58-fold, respectively (DiffBind; p=5.81×10-7 and p=2.31×10-3). ChromHMM analysis of the marks indicated that promoter and enhancer functions were significantly increased, and the activity broadened at rs55705857 in IDH-mut gliomas compared to IDH-wt tumors and normal brain samples. This enhancement correlated with significant increased MYC expression in IDH-mut gliomas (p=3.1×10-13), as well as alterations of Myc signaling targets. Publicly available ATACseq, ChIPseq and long-range DNA interaction data demonstrated that the rs55705857 locus is open and interacts with the MYC promoter. CONCLUSIONS Fine-mapping of the 8q24 locus provided strong evidence that rs55705857 is the causative 8q24 locus associated with IDH-mut glioma. Functional experiments suggest that IDH mutation facilitates rs55705857 interaction with MYC to alter downstream MYC targets.
EPCO-22. INHERITED POLYMORPHISM IN CHROMOSOME 8Q24 COOPERATES WITH MUTANT IDH1, Trp53 AND ATRX LOSS TO INDUCE LOW-GRADE GLIOMA
Abstract Establishing causal links between genetic polymorphisms and increased heritable risk of developing brain cancer is a major challenge. The non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism rs55705857 (A >G) is associated with a ~6-fold increased risk to develop IDH-mutant low-grade glioma (LGG). The rs55705857 G allele has a minor allele frequency of only ~5% in the general population but is found in ~40% of patients with IDH-mutant LGG and patients carrying risk-alleles are diagnosed on average 7-12 years earlier than those carrying non-risk A alleles. This makes rs55705857 one of the highest reported genetic associations with cancer, comparable with inherited BRCA1 gene mutations and the risk of developing breast cancer or other familial glioma genes such as NF1/2, CDKN2A or p53. To generate a LGG mouse model, we combined clonal activation of IDH1R132H with mutations of Trp53 and Atrx, which resulted in the development of LGG-like brain tumors in 25% of mice. Mutating the highly conserved, orthologous mouse rs55705857 locus to mimic the human risk allele dramatically accelerated tumor development from 463 to 172 days and increased penetrance to 75%. The resulting tumors exhibit elevated R-2-hydroxyglutarate levels, well-differentiated fibrillary neoplastic histology and metabolic rewiring, recapitulating histopathological and molecular hallmarks of human LGG. Mechanistically, we show that the rs55705857 locus resides within a brain-specific enhancer, which shows enhanced activity in IDH-mutant tumors. In addition, we found that the risk allele disrupts OCT2/4 binding, allowing increased interaction with the Myc promoter and increased Myc expression. The hyperactive chromatin status combined with the tissue specificity of this enhancer explains the cooperativity between mutant IDH and rs55705857 and why rs55705857 is associated specifically with IDH-mutant glioma, but not other cancers. Overall, we generated new LGG mouse models, which provide insights into the pathophysiology of this deadly disease and shed light into the heritable predisposition to LGG development.