Back to Authors

Ilyas, Muneeb

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-4267

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 3

Prevalence of skin cancer in Native American kidney transplant recipients
Ilyas, Muneeb , Ginsberg, Zachary , Temkit, M’hamed , Keddis, Mira T. , Keddis, Mira, Ginsberg, Zachary , Sharma, Amit

International Journal of Dermatology | December 19, 2017 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 406-409

10.1111/ijd.13863 Get It

AbstractBackgroundSkin cancer prevalence is well‐characterized for white solid organ transplant recipients. Although the prevalence of skin cancer in non‐white (Black, Asian, Hispanic) kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) has been assessed, no study has reported the prevalence of skin cancer in Native American (NA) KTRs. The aim of this study is to determine if the prevalence of skin cancer in NAKTRs is the same as in white KTRs.MethodsWe conducted a case‐controlled retrospective review from a single transplant center. One hundred thirteen NAKTRs who received a transplant between 2001 and 2011 were age‐ and transplant‐year matched with 113 white controls.ResultsThe 226 KTRs consisted of 141 (62.4%) men and 85 (37.6%) women, with a mean age of 50.2 ± 10.8 years. There was no skin cancer found in NAKTRs prior to or post transplantation, while seven (6.2%) white KTRs had eight skin cancers prior to transplantation, and 28 (24.8%) white KTRs developed 66 skin cancers post transplantation. Twenty‐two (19.5%) NAKTRs did not follow‐up with dermatology at this institution. The median follow‐up in NAKTRs was 3.3 years compared to 3.0 years in white KTRs.ConclusionNAKTRs have a decreased prevalence of skin cancer compared to their white counterparts.
Residual Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Shave Biopsy in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Ilyas, Muneeb , Zhang, Nan , Sharma, Amit

Dermatologic Surgery | December 15, 2017 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 370-374

10.1097/dss.0000000000001340 Get It

BACKGROUND After histopathological confirmation of a biopsy sample, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is often treated surgically; yet, residual tumor within the excision sample is not always found. The prevalence of residual cSCC after shave biopsy in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) is unknown. OBJECTIVE Determine the prevalence of residual cSCC after shave biopsy in SOTRs. METHODS A retrospective case-controlled review was performed from a single center. Data were collected for 117 SOTRs and 117 age-matched nonimmunosuppressed controls diagnosed with shave biopsy–proven cSCC who underwent subsequent wide local excision from January 2004 to December 2016. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to determine variables associated with residual tumor in the combined population. Univariate logistic regression was used to investigate if transplant-related variables were associated with residual tumor in the SOTR group. RESULTS Of the 117 SOTRs, 57 (48.7%) had residual tumor within the excisional specimen. Of the 117 controls, 31 (26.5%) had residual tumor within the excisional specimen. Solid organ transplant recipients have 2.59 times greater odds of having residual cSCC after shave biopsy (95% confidence interval: 1.29–5.22, p = .0076). CONCLUSION Solid organ transplant recipients have a higher prevalence of residual cSCC after shave biopsy when compared with nonimmunosuppressed controls and should be prioritized for margin-controlled surgery.
Skin-Limited Graft-versus-Host Disease after Pancreatic Transplantation
Ilyas, Muneeb , Hoss, Elika, DiCaudo, David J. , Khamash, Hasan , Pittelkow, Mark R. , Sharma, Amit

Case Reports in Transplantation | July 18, 2017 | Volume: 2017 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-3

10.1155/2017/4823870 Get It

Introduction. The phenomenon of graft-versus-host disease, a solid organ transplant recipient, is a rare development with a very poor prognosis. Case Presentation. A 40-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes developed cutaneous graft-versus-host disease following second pancreas transplantation. Conclusion. The development of a nonspecific rash in the early posttransplant period following a pancreas transplant warrants suspicion for graft-versus-host disease.