Back to Authors

Alese, Olatunji B.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8079-4725

Mayo Clinic

Winship Cancer Institute

Citations 26

Blood-based next-generation sequencing analysis of neuroendocrine neoplasms
Zakka, Katerina , Nagy, Rebecca J. , Drusbosky, Leylah , Akce, Mehmet , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , Kasi, Pashtoon Murtaza , Mody, Kabir , Starr, Jason S. , Shaib, Walid L. , Starr, Jason, El-Rayes, Bassel F , Kasi, Pashtoon Murtaza , Wu, Christina , Alese, Olatunji B.

Oncotarget | May 12, 2020 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 1749-1757

10.18632/oncotarget.27588 Get It

A Phase 2 Multi-institutional Study of Nivolumab for Patients With Advanced Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer
Chung, Vincent , El-Rayes, Bassell F., Al‐Toubah, Taymeyah , Zhou, Jun-Min, Kim, Dae Won , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , El-Rayes, Bassel F , Chung, Vincent , Kim, Richard D. , Alese, Olatunji B. , Li, Daneng , Schell, Michael J. , Mahipal, Amit , Kim, Baek‐hui

JAMA Oncology | April 30, 2020 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 888

10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0930 Get It

Clinical and molecular markers of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts).
Das, Satya , Chen, Zhengjia , Akce, Mehmet , Shaib, Walid L. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Ciombor, Kristen K. , Draper, Amber , Şahin, İbrahim Halil , Goyal, Subir , Pumpalova, Yoanna S , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Haraldsdóttir, Sigurdís , Alese, Olatunji B. , Berlin, Jordan D. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Lesinski, Gregory B , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , Wu, Christina

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 225-225

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.225 Get It

225 Background: ICIs induce durable responses in dMMR CRC patients. However, clinical and molecular biomarkers of response to ICIs have not been well-established. In this study, we investigated impact of specific MMR gene loss, BRAF V600E mutation and clinical characteristics of pts on clinical outcomes of ICIs. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had confirmed dMMR CRC by IHC or MSI-H by PCR and received ICIs between 01/01/2012 and 05/01/2019 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Mayo Clinic, Vanderbilt or Stanford University. Due to the functional dependency, the groups were categorized as protein loss of MLH1+PMS2 vs MSH2+MSH6. Log-rank test, Cox hazard model and Fisher’s exact test were used for survival outcomes, the best response and the distribution of variables among the subgroups. Results: A total of 66 pts with dMMR CRC were identified and BRAF status was available for 41 pts. ORRs in MLH1+PMS2 and MSH2+MSH6 groups were 72.9% and 56.5% respectively (P = 0.189). At 2 years, PFS rates were 55.6% and 78.2% for MLH1+PMS2 and MSH2+MSH6 groups respectively (P < 0.001). Pts with BRAF V600E mutations had significantly worse outcomes as compared to pts with wild-type BRAF (2-year PFS rate of 35.0% and 73.3% respectively; P < 0.001). Notably pts < 65 had better 2-year disease control rates when compared to > 65 (71.1% and 41.5% respectively; P < 0.001). We also observed worse 2-year PFS rates in pts with liver metastases (P = 0.014). CRC side and tumor volume did not impact 2-year PFS rates in our cohort. Conclusions: Our data suggest that pts with loss of function in MSH2+MSH6 may have better 2 year-PFS rates compared pts with MLH1+PMS2 even though ORR favored MLH1+PMS2 group suggesting that ORR may not reflect the durability of ICI response in dMMR CRC patients. Consistently, pts with BRAF V600E mutation which is associated with MLH1 promoter methylation had significantly worse 2-year PFS rates. Overall, our findings suggest that BRAFV600E mutation, the affected MMR proteins, pt age, and site of metastasis may impact durability of ICI response in dMMR CRC patients.
Blood-based next-generation sequencing analysis of neuroendocrine tumors.
Shaib, Walid L. , Roberts, Ali, Zakka, Katerina , Akce, Mehmet , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , Starr, Jason S. , El-Rayes, Bassel F , Wu, Christina , Alese, Olatunji B. , Kasi, Pashtoon Murtaza

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4110-4110

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.4110 Get It

4110 Background: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) comprise around 2% of all malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal system. The genomic landscape of NET has not been well studied. The aim of this study was to confirm the feasibility of next generation sequencing (NGS) using ctDNA in NET and characterize common alterations in the genomic profile. Methods: Molecular alterations in 114 plasma samples from 114 patients with NET using clinical-grade NGS of ctDNA (Guardant360Ò) across multiple institutions were evaluated. The test detects single nucleotide variants in 54-73 genes, copy number amplifications, fusions, and indels in selected genes. Results: A total of 114 NET patients were evaluated, of which 64 (56.1%) were female. Mean age was 59.7 years with a range between 23-89 years. ctDNA NGS testing was performed on 114 plasma samples; 1 patient had testing performed twice. Genomic alterations were defined in 94 (n = 94/114, 82.5%) samples with a total of 289 alterations identified after excluding variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) and synonymous mutations. Alterations were identified in at least one sample from 83 patients; TP53 associated genes were most commonly altered (n = 83/289, 28.7%), followed by KRAS (n = 22, 7.6%), PI3CA (n = 15, 5.2%), CCNE1 (n = 15, 5.2%), BRAF (n = 13, 4.5%), MYC (n = 12, 4.1%), ERBB2 (n = 11, 3.8%), APC (n = 10, 3.5%), EGFR (n = 10, 3.5%), MET (n = 10, 3.5%), PTEN (n = 9, 3.1%), RB1 (n = 9, 3.1%), CDK6 (n = 7, 2.4%), AR (n = 5, 1.7%), ARID1A (n = 5, 1.7%), FGFR1 (n = 5, 1.7%), and PDGFRA (n = 5, 1.7%). Other genomic alterations of low frequency, but clinical relevance included: CDK4 (n = 4, 1.3%), NF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), RAF1 (n = 4, 1.3%), GNAS (n = 3, 1.0%), KIT (n = 3, 1.3%), BRCA2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CCND2 (n = 2, 0.7%), CTNNB1 (n = 2, 0.7%), JAK2 (n = 2, 0.7%), NRAS (n = 2, 0.7%), SMAD4 (n = 2, 0.7%), and TERT (n = 2, 0.7%). Alterations in AKT1, ALK, ATM, BRCA1, CCND1, CDKN2A, FGFR2, MTOR, RHOA, SMO and STK11 were all reported once (n = 1, 0.3%). Conclusions: Evaluation of ctDNA is feasible among individuals with NET. Liquid biopsies are not invasive and can provide personalized options for targeted therapies in NET patients.
Analysis of age, tumor-sidedness, and mismatch repair (MMR) genes with response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in MMR-deficient (dMMR) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts): A multi-institutional study.
Chen, Wanqi , Chen, Zhengjia , Akce, Mehmet , Shaib, Walid L. , Ahn, Daniel H. , Ciombor, Kristen K. , Draper, Amber , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , El-Rayes, Bassel F , Şahin, İbrahim Halil , Sonbol, Mohamad Bassam , Das, Satya Narayan , Alese, Olatunji B. , Borad, Mitesh J. , Berlin, Jordan D. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Wu, Christina

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 27, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e15029-e15029

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15029 Get It

e15029 Background: ICIs induce durable responses in dMMR CRC pts with overall response rates (ORR) of 30-50%. Even though the loss of expression of any MMR gene predicts ICIs response, it is unknown if ORRs are similar across all MMR genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6). In this study, we analyzed the impact of each specific MMR gene loss and clinical characteristics of pts with best response to ICIs. Methods: Pts were eligible if they had confirmed dMMR CRC by IHC or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) by PCR, and received ICIs between 01/01/2012 and 10/01/2018 at Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Mayo Clinic or Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Due to the pattern of frequent concurrent loss and functional dependency, the groups were categorized as MLH1 ±PMS2 vs. MSH2 ±MSH6. Cox proportional hazard model and Fisher’s exact test were used for the best response and the distribution of variable among the subgroups. Results: A total of 45 pts with dMMR CRC were identified. ORRs in MLH1 ±PMS2 and MSH2 ±MSH6 groups were 68% and 57.1% respectively without statistical difference (Table). Pts with age < 50 and 50-65 years old had better ORRs compared to pts with age >65 (58.3%, 85.7% and 42.1% respectively, P=0.036). Left-sided tumors had a trend toward higher ORRs compared to right-sided tumors (83.3% vs 51.5% P=0.086). Gender and BRAF status were not predictors of response. BRAF mutations were more common in right-sided tumors (29.6% vs 11.1% respectively) and in older patients. Conclusions: Our data suggest that MSI-H CRC pts aged 50-65 treated with ICIs, have improved ORR compared to pts > 65; pts with left-sided tumors have a trend toward improved ORR compared to those with right sided tumors. [Table: see text]
Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Management
Shaib, Walid L. , Assi, Rita , Staley, Charles A., Memiş, Bahar , Adsay, Volkan , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , El‐Rayes, Bassel F. , Shamseddine, Ali I. , Alese, Olatunji B. , El-Rayes, Bassel F , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Adsay, N Volkan

The Oncologist | June 30, 2017 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1107-1116

10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0081 Get It

Abstract Objective Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMNs) are a rare and heterogeneous disease for which clinical management is challenging. We aim to review the literature regarding modalities of treatment to guide the management of AMNs. Methods and Review Criteria We conducted a PubMed search in February 2016 for English-language publications, using the terms “appendiceal,” “appendix,” “carcinoma,” “cancer,” “mucinous,” “treatment,” “genes,” “target,” “genomic,” and terms listed in the articles' subheadings. Published reports and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were also searched. Results In this review, we summarize current data and controversies in AMN classification, clinical presentation, molecular alterations, treatment outcomes with regard to cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), and the role of systemic chemotherapy. Conclusion Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms are a heterogeneous group of tumors with a rising incidence. Treatment is based on stage and histology. Low-grade tumors are treated surgically with resection of the primary site in early stage disease, or peritoneal debulking and HIPEC in patients with advanced stage disease. Treatment of high-grade tumors requires further prospective trials, and options include debulking surgery and HIPEC with or without preoperative chemotherapy. Trials evaluating novel therapies based on the molecular profiling of AMN tumors are needed to evaluate therapeutic options in patients who are not surgical candidates.