Kohorst, Mira A.

Background: Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabbing is a technique that is commonly used to test pediatric patients for viral infections with increased use during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Complications from NP swabbing are rare and seem to occur more frequently in patients at risk of bleeding. Little is known about institutional or individual practices and experiences with NP swab testing in pediatric patients with risk factors for bleeding. Methods: We conducted a survey study of pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) attending physicians to assess practices and experiences with NP swab testing in pediatric patients with thrombocytopenia and/or on anticoagulation. Results: There were 130 total respondents (5.6%, n = 130/2327) from 6 countries. Relatively few respondents (n = 17/130, 13.1%) reported that their institution had a policy specifying a lower-level platelet cutoff for patients undergoing NP swabbing. The median platelet cutoff below which NP swabs are not performed according to existing policies is 30,000×10(9)/L (interquartile range: 20,000 to 40,000). The median cutoff based on the opinion of the respondents was 10,000 (interquartile range: 10,000 to 20,000). There were 24 episodes of epistaxis among PHO patients that were NP swabbed; many adverse events (56.5%, n = 13/23) were described as persistent, severe, and/or required intervention. Three reported cases of epistaxis with anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy occurred in patients with concomitant thrombocytopenia. Only 1 respondent (n = 1/130, 0.7%) reported an institutional policy for limiting NP swabs in patients on anticoagulant therapy. NP (66.9%) and nares (33.1%) were the most common sources of coronavirus disease 2019 testing that were reported. Conclusion: A small percentage of institutions in this survey have a policy restricting NP swabs in PHO patients. The discrepancy between lower platelet cutoffs proposed by experts and institutional policy suggests that existing policies may be too conservative. Expert guidelines are needed on this topic. Other bleeding risk factors (eg, aspirin use and von Willebrand disease) should be considered in policies and guidelines.

Abstract Background Large β-globin gene cluster deletions (hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin [Hb] or β-, δβ-, γδβ-, and ϵγδβ-thalassemia), are associated with widely disparate phenotypes, including variable degrees of microcytic anemia and Hb F levels. When present, increased Hb A2 is used as a surrogate marker for β-thalassemia. Notably, ϵγδβ-thalassemias lack the essential regulatory locus control region (LCR) and cause severe transient perinatal anemia but normal newborn screen (NBS) results and Hb A2 levels. Herein, we report a novel deletion of the ϵ, Aγ, Gγ, and ψβ loci with intact LCR, δ-, and β-regions in 2 women and newborn twins. Methods Capillary electrophoresis (CE), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), DNA sequencing, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), gap-polymerase chain reaction (gap-PCR), and long-read sequencing (LRS) were performed. Results NBS showed an Hb A > Hb F pattern for both twins. At 20 months, Hb A2 was increased similarly to that in the mother and an unrelated woman. Unexplained microcytosis was absent and the twins lacked severe neonatal anemia. MLPA, LRS, and gap-PCR confirmed a 32 599 base pair deletion of ϵ (HBE1) through ψβ (HBBP1) loci. Conclusions This deletion represents a hemoglobinopathy category with a distinct phenotype that has not been previously described, an ϵγ-thalassemia. Both the NBS Hb A > F pattern and the subsequent increased Hb A2 without microcytosis are unusual. A similar deletion should be considered when this pattern is encountered and appropriate test methods selected for detection. Knowledge of the clinical impact of this new category will improve genetic counselling, with distinction from the severe transient anemia associated with ϵγδβ-thalassemia.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a complication of immunosuppressive therapy following solid organ or hematopoietic cell transplantation. Initial treatment typically includes a reduction of immunosuppression with or without rituximab. However, the optimal therapy for PTLD with plasmacytic differentiation is unclear. We present 3 cases of pediatric patients with plasmacytic PTLD. Two patients received a standard rituximab-based approach and relapsed, prompting additional chemotherapy. The third patient was treated with a novel regimen of bortezomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab. This regimen was safe, well-tolerated, and resulted in a 2-year remission. Larger studies are needed to further explore this regimen.

AbstractCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) infection causes a variety of extrapulmonary complications in pediatric patients. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) are related to hypercytokinemia in COVID‐19 patients. HLH is a disorder of exaggerated inflammation resulting in a cytokine storm and unrestricted hemophagocytosis. HLH can be primary (familial) or secondary (acquired). Secondary HLH (sHLH) can occur in patients with rheumatologic, oncologic, or infectious diseases. The link between COVID‐19 and HLH has been reported in pediatric patients. Here we report a case of a pediatric patient who developed refractory sHLH secondary to COVID‐19 infection and required a hematopoietic cell transplant for the cure.

Abstract The εγδβ thalassemias (EGDBT) are infrequently occurring deletions of the β globin gene cluster on chromosome 11. EGDBTs can be an unsuspected cause of severe neonatal anemia that resolves during the first year of life into a normal Hb A2 thalassemic phenotype, presumed to be due to an imbalance of β-like chains during development. First described in 1972, they are categorized into two groups, both with loss of the five DNase I hypersensitivity sites upstream of the β gene (HBB) called the locus control region (LCR). In group 1 deletions, all or most of the β globin gene cluster including HBB is deleted; in group 2 deletions, removal of the LCR silences an intact HBB. Large deletions that do not involve LCR but remove the embryonic (HBE) and fetal genes (HBG2/HBG1) [LCR(ε Gγ Aγ) 0δβ] have not been reported. It is not known whether a deletion with intact LCR as well as δ and β genes would similarly manifest as neonatal anemia that resolves into a normocytic phenotype with normal hemoglobin fraction percentages after infancy. Four individuals with an LCR(ε Gγ Aγ) 0δβ deletion have been evaluated. These include monochorionic, diamniotic twin girls whose newborn screen (NBS) returned significant for Hb A percentage greater than Hb F for both twins. NBS was repeated two weeks later with the same result. The newborns were induced late pre-term (36 weeks and 6 days) after an uncomplicated pregnancy, including no features of twin to twin transfusion. Both infants had no anemia and bilirubin levels remained in the low to low-intermediate risk zones. Neither twin received transfusions or phototherapy during admission. At a follow up visit at 20 months of age a hemoglobin electrophoresis was performed which showed borderline Hb A2 and no Hb F in both twins (Table 1). Ferritin levels were low-normal in Twin A (14 µg/L) and low in Twin B (9 µg/L). Both infants were found to have a heterozygous large deletion affecting HBE, HBG2, HBG1, and HBBP1 loci by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a method that uses multiple DNA probe pairs to determine the size of the DNA segment deleted. MLPA deletion/duplication testing on the α genes was negative. No β globin variants were identified by DNA sequencing. An evaluation was performed on the 25 year-old healthy mother and showed similar findings including the heterozygous large deletion. Mother and infants continue to be asymptomatic with normal red cell indices for age (Table 1). The fourth was an unrelated 40-year-old female with mild anemia screened by hemoglobin electrophoresis for obstetric evaluation who was found to have borderline Hb A2 (see table 1). MLPA showed a heterozygous deletion involving the same loci. Again, no β globin variants were identified by DNA sequencing. All four cases showed the same MLPA pattern except one non-specific probe commonly altered in common gamma gene conversion events. Long range sequencing performed on one case confirmed a single contiguous 32,599 bp deletion that matched the MLPA data (g.5262276-5294875). The detected deletion has not been reported in literature and differs from EGDBT mutations in that the LCR is intact. As the LCR controls expression of the entire gene cluster, this mutation is expected to display different phenotypic features than classic EGDBT. HBD and HBB are not deleted and therefore adequate transcription of Hb A2 and Hb A are expected with no imbalance of α/β chains after the neonatal period. It is postulated this finding explains the decreased Hb F levels in the NBS test result. The Hb A2 increase is likely a product of this deletion and does not indicate β-thalassemia. The heterozygous absence of HBE and HBG2/HBG1 may result in upregulation of HBD and HBB expression through loss of FKLF and FKLF-2 binding. In addition, HBB-EKLF binding would have less competition as the gamma promoter elements have been heterozygously deleted. In summary, in contrast to classic EGDBTs which cause transient severe neonatal anemia and resolve to normal Hb A2 thalassemic indices, this novel LCR(ε Gγ Aγ) 0δβ deletion was associated with normal CBC values with an absence of severe neonatal anemia, inverted Hb F/Hb A percentages at birth and borderline Hb A2 levels. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: CD19 CAR T cell therapies have demonstrated high initial complete remission (CR) rates of 70-80% in relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with durable remissions observed in a subset of patients. Despite the remarkable initial CR rate, relapses occur in 20-45% of patients and with increasing use of CD19 CAR T cell therapies in ALL, a key remaining clinical question is the role of post-CAR HCT. Methods: Patients up to 26 years treated with the commercial (i.e., tisagenlecleucel) or investigational CD19 CAR T cell products from 2014 to 2019 in the United States were included. The objectives were to examine the impact of post-CAR HCT on mortality, disease-free survival (DFS), leukemia relapse, GVHD and transplant related mortality among HCT recipients. The intent of HCT was analyzed as consolidation when there was no evidence of post-CAR T cell relapse prior to HCT. Cox regression multivariable analysis used HCT as time-dependent variable along with age, performance status and time from diagnosis to CAR-T cell infusion to evaluate its impact on outcomes. Results: We identified 347 patients who received CD19 CAR T cells from 86 centers. Median age was 13 (range, 0.4-26 years) with 39% of patients from Hispanic or Latino ethnic origin. Patients were high risk and heavily pretreated; 56% had poor cytogenetics, 51% had ≥3 line of prior therapies and 34% had prior HCT. Most of the patients (74%) received tisagenlecleucel. Disease burden at the time of CAR T cell infusion included morphologic disease (≥5% bone marrow blasts) (65%), measurable residual disease (MRD) positive (16%) and negative CR (18%). CRS of all grades was observed in 57.6% and grade 3-4 CRS in 13%; neurotoxicity of all grades was observed in 25% and grade 3-4 in 8%. With a median follow-up of 12.7 months (range, 2.2-60.3), DFS at 3, 6 and 12 months following CAR T cell infusion was 80.9% % (95% CI: 76.6%-84.9%), 71.2% (95% CI: 66.1%-76.0%) and 57.6% (95% CI: 51.8%-63.3%), respectively. OS at 3, 6 and 12 months was 93.6% (95% CI: 90.8%-96.0%), 89.8% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.8%) and 79.4% (95% CI: 74.7%-83.6%), respectively. Incidences of relapse without censoring at subsequent HCT at month 3, 6 and 12 were 18.5% (95% CI: 14.5%-22.8%), 28.2% (95% CI: 23.5%-33.3%), and 40.6% (95% CI: 35.0%-46.3%), respectively. Of the 347 patients who received CD19 CAR therapy, 62 patients (18%) had subsequent HCT in CR as a consolidation post-CAR with a median time from CAR T to HCT of 4.7 months (range, 1.1-18.6). 36% had a prior HCT (i.e., pre-CAR), 87% received myeloablative regimen and among the 57 patients with MRD evaluation 56 were negative (98%). Frequencies of post-CAR HCT did not change during the 5-year study period. Overall, transplant related mortality (TRM) at month 6 was 8.9% (95% CI: 3.6-16.1), and grade 2-4 acute GvHD was observed in 38.0% (95% CI: 28.4-48.2) of patients at month 6. Post-CAR HCT used as a consolidation was associated with lower relapse (hazard ratio (HR) 0.37; p=0.037) but no significant impact on mortality (HR 0.75, p=0.51) or DFS (HR=0.46, p=0.057). When accounting for any HCT performed after CAR T cell, HCT was associated with higher mortality (Figure). Conclusions: This is the largest clinical series to date examining the impact of post-CAR HCT on clinical outcome of R/R B-ALL patients. We found that 18% of the patients had post-CAR HCT as a consolidation therapy with a favorable safety profile of 8.9% TRM rate despite a prior transplant rate of 36%. Consolidation HCT after CAR T cell resulted in significant reduction in leukemia relapse with a trend towards better DFS. Consolidation HCT seem safe and incurred a benefit by reducing disease relapse. Further studies in understanding the role of consolidation HCT as planned, or post-CAR T cell response-based strategy or treatment for early B-cell recovery are needed to further define the best candidates for HCT after tisagenlecleucel . Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Park: BMS: Consultancy; Affyimmune: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Curocel: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Minerva: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; PrecisionBio: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Artiva: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy. Nikiforow: Kite/Gilead: Other: ad HOC Advisory Boards; Novartis: Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards; Iovance: Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards; Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK): Other: ad Hoc Advisory Boards. Hu: Kite/Gilead: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ahmed: Merck: Research Funding; Tessa Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Seagen: Research Funding; Xencor: Research Funding. Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cairo: Servier: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceutical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Omeros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nektar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dholaria: Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; MEI: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Angiocrine: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Grover: Kite: Other: Advisory Board; Genentech: Research Funding; ADC: Other: Advisory Board; Tessa: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Locke: Gerson Lehrman Group: Consultancy; Emerging Therapy Solutions: Consultancy; Moffitt Cancer Center: Patents & Royalties: field of cellular immunotherapy; Calibr: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; BMS/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Wugen: Consultancy, Other; Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Other; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Iovance Biotherapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Novartis: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; GammaDelta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Takeda: Consultancy, Other; EcoR1: Consultancy; Cowen: Consultancy; Umoja: Consultancy, Other; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding; Cellular Biomedicine Group: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role; Allogene Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: Scientific Advisory Role, Research Funding. Murthy: CRISPR Therapeutics: Research Funding. Mussetti: GILEAD: Other: Clinical trials participation, Research Funding; TAKEDA: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Other: Clinical trials participation. Pulsipher: Jasper Therapeutics: Honoraria; Adaptive: Research Funding; Equillium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qayed: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Medexus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mesoblast: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Other. Reshef: Gilead, BMS, Precision, Immatics, Atara, Takeda, Shire, Pharmacyclics, Incyte: Research Funding; Gilead and Novartis: Honoraria; Bayer, BMS, Regeneron, TScan, Synthekine, Atara, Jasper: Consultancy. Rizzieri: Kite: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acrotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AROG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celltrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mustang: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Sharma: Vertex Pharmaceuticals/CRISPR Therapeutics: Other: Salary support paid to institution; Medexus Inc: Consultancy; CRISPR Therapeutics: Other, Research Funding; Vindico Medical Education: Honoraria; Spotlight Therapeutics: Consultancy; Novartis: Other: Salary support paid to institution. Schultz: BMS DSMB: Other: payment; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Turtle: Century Therapeutics Ad hoc advisory boards (last 12 months): Nektar Therapeutics, Allogene, PACT Pharma, Astra Zeneca, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eureka Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribou Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; T-CURX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Myeloid Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ArsenalBio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Minerva: Other; Nektar Therapeutics: Other; Juno Therapeutics/BMS: Other: Payments, Patents & Royalties: Patent licensed to Juno Therapeutics.; Precision Biosciences, Eureka Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, Myeloid Therapeutics, ArsenalBio: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Pasquini: Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Perales: MorphoSys: Honoraria; Cidara: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Miltenyi Biotec: Honoraria, Other; Sellas Life Sciences: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Omeros: Honoraria; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Other; Equilium: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other; NexImmune: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Other; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Other; Merck: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Medigene: Honoraria.