Tefferi, Ayalew

Abstract Abstract 2918 Background: Monosomal karyotype (MK) is defined as the presence of two or more distinct autosomal chromosome monosomies or a single autosomal monosomy associated with at least one structural abnormality (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), MK has been associated with a worse prognosis than otherwise complex karyotype, regardless of the specific type of autosomal chromosome involved (Breems DA et al. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 4791). Whether or not these observations also hold true for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is currently unknown. Objective: To determine if MDS with complex karyotype can be prognostically sub-stratified further based on the presence or absence of MK and if prognosis in MDS with MK is in addition affected by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 or monosomy 5. Methods: The Mayo Clinic database for MDS was used to identify consecutive patients with complex karyotype, defined as the presence of three or more numerical or structural cytogenetic abnormalities. World Health Organization (WHO) criteria were used for MDS diagnosis and leukemic transformation (Vardiman JW et al. Blood 2009; 114: 937). Overall and leukemia-free survivals were calculated from the time of initial cytogenetic studies documenting complex karyotype. Results: A total of 127 MDS patients (median age 70 years; 79 males) with complex karyotype were identified. Amongst them, 106 (83%) met the above-stipulated criteria for MK and 21 (17%) had complex karyotype without monosomies. The MK in the 106 patients included monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 in 73 cases. The three complex karyotype subsets (i.e. complex without monosomies vs. MK that included monosomy 7 and/or 5 vs. MK excluding monosomy 7 or 5) were not significantly different in terms of age and sex distribution, hemoglobin level, leukocyte or platelet count, bone marrow blast percentage or International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk score. However, survival was significantly inferior in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype without monosomies (p=0.01; HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.3). Multivariable analysis identified MK (p=0.002), advanced age (p=0.0004), increased bone marrow blast percentage (0.04), but not IPSS risk category (p=0.34), as independent risk factors for survival. Interestingly, there was no difference in survival among MK patients further sub-stratified by the presence or absence of monosomy 7 and/or monosomy 5 (Figure 1). Although not statistically significant, leukemia-free survival was also worse in patients with MK compared to those with complex karyotype (p=0.11; HR 2.7, 95% CI 0.8–9.0); none of the aforementioned variables significantly affected leukemia-free survival. Conclusions: Monosomal karyotype in MDS identifies a prognostically worse subgroup of patients with complex karyotype. Furthermore, in the context of MK, autosomal monosomies other than monosomy 7 or monosomy 5 are prognostically as detrimental. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3068 Background: Abnormal cytokine expression accompanies the disease process in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and the levels of proinflammatory cytokines have been shown to be down-regulated by JAK inhibitor therapy. The prognostic relevance of increased cytokine levels in PMF has not been systematically studied. The objectives of the current study were to describe the spectrum of abnormal cytokine expression in PMF and determine its prognostic relevance. Methods: A multiplex biometric sandwich immunoassay (Invitrogen multiplex assays, Invitrogen Corporation-Carlsbad CA, USA) was used for simultaneous analysis of 30 cytokine levels. Diluted plasma was mixed with fluorescently addressed microbeads bound with anti-cytokine antibodies. Biotin anticytokine secondary antibodies were then added and allowed to bind to cytokine-bead complexes. Total surface fluorescence for each bead was then measured using a Luminex (Luminex Corporation, Austin, TX, USA) fluorescent flow-based detection system. Results: Cytokine levels at diagnosis were analyzed for a total of 127 treatment naïve patients with PMF, who had stored sera at the time of diagnosis or first referral to the Mayo Clinic. The circulating levels of 30 cytokines in the multiplex assay were compared between PMF patients (n=127) and normal controls (n=31). Significant differences (p<0.05) were evident for 20 of the 30 cytokines: IL-1b, IL-1RA, IL-2R,IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL- 15, TNF-α, G-CSF, INF-α, INF-γ, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, HGF, CXCL10, MIG, MCP-1 and VEGF. On univariate analysis, increased levels of 9 of these 20 cytokines were associated with shortened survival (p<0.05): IL-1RA, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-15, MIP-1α, CXCL10 and MIG. On multivariable analysis, 4 of these 9 cytokines maintained their prognostic value for survival: IL-2R (p=0.0011), IL-8 (p<0.0001), IL-15 (p=0.0124) and CXCL10 (p=0.0031). The independent prognostic value of these 4 cytokines was sustained during additional multivariable analysis that included the Dynamic International Prognostic System Score and cytogenetic risk category. Next, we divided the 127 patients into three cytokine risk categories based on the serum levels of IL-2R, IL-8, IL-15 and CXCL10: none elevated, one or two elevated and three or four elevated. The respective median survivals were 69, 37 and 19 months (p=0.01; Figure 1) and such cytokine risk categorization was both DIPSS and cytogenetic risk independent; p values for multivariable analysis including cytokine, DIPSS, cytogenetic risk groups were 0.02, 0.0001 and 0.004, respectively. Conclusions: Elevated serum levels of IL-2R, IL-8, IL- 15 and CXCL10 independently predict shortened survival in PMF and such prognostication appears to be independent of DIPSS and cytogenetic risk category. The current study suggests clinical relevance of multiple cytokines in PMF that could be therapeutically targeted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1904 Poster Board I-927 BACKGROUND: Pomalidomide is an IMiDsó immunomodulatory drug that was created by chemical modification of thalidomide with the intent to reduce toxicity and enhance therapeutic activity. In a phase-2 randomized study of patients with myelofibrosis (MF), treatment with pomalidomide alone or in combination with a short course of prednisone was shown to be well tolerated and active in alleviating anemia ( JCO 2009). Herein, we report observations during the longer-term follow-up of those patients who had responded to a pomalidomide-containing treatment regimen. METHODS: Both primary and post polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia MF were included in the current study. Protocol eligibility criteria included absolute neutrophil count of × 109/L, platelet count of 50 × 109/L and hemoglobin level of < 10 g/dL. Patients with prior thalidomide or lenalidomide therapy were excluded from study participation. Response was assessed by the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria (IWG-MRT) (Blood. 2006). Pomalidomide was administered daily and continued indefinitely in responding patients. Prednisone was given for the first 3 months only, in a tapering dose schedule, starting at 30 mg/day. RESULTS: A total of 84 patients were enrolled from April 2007 through May 2008 and received treatment with pomalidomide alone 2 mg/day (n=22), pomalidomide 2 mg/day + prednisone (n=19), pomalidomide 0.5 mg/day + prednisone (n=22) or prednisone alone (n=21). Short-term toxicity details have previously been published (Tefferi et al. JCO 2009) and were remarkable for the lack of neuropathy and low prevalence of grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression (5–16%). Based on an intent-to-treat analysis, 16 (25%) of the 63 patients receiving pomalidomide alone or with a 3-month course of prednisone responded at a median of 1.8 months (range 0.9–6.9) from treatment initiation; all responses represented improvement in anemia with little or no effect on splenomegaly. Specifically, 12 of the 16 treatment responders became transfusion independent and the remaining 4 had a hemoglobin increase of > 2 g/dL (median best hemoglobin response = 11.9 g/dL; range 8.5–15.9). Responding patients usually displayed increases in platelet count but there was no consistent change in serum lactate dehydrogenase level. As of August 2009, ten (63%) of the 16 treatment responders were still in anemia remission and receiving pomalidomide therapy; median time on treatment was 19 months (range, 14–26) and median response duration was 17 months (range, 13-24). No new side effects emerged during this period. Six patients discontinued treatment because of either loss of response (n=5) or progressive splenomegaly/leukocytosis (n=1); 3 patients with continued anemia remission have had substantial increases in their spleen size, which qualifies as spleen progression per IWG-MRT. Among 9 patients with available cytogenetic information, all 3 with unfavorable karyotype relapsed while none of the 6 with favorable karyotype did. A small number of patients (n=7) had follow-up bone marrow examination at 1 to 2 years, at the discretion of their treating physician; none of these patients displayed any change in bone marrow fibrosis or JAK2V617F mutational status. Suppression of a monosomy 7 clone was documented in two patients. In one, the percentage of abnormal metaphases decreased from 90% to 15% after 11 months of treatment with pomalidomide but increased back to 100% four months later, when the patient relapsed while still on treatment. In the second patient, the percentage of abnormal metaphases was 65% at baseline, remained at 75% after 10 months of pomalidomide therapy, but decreased to 7% after one month of treatment discontinuation for relapse; a repeat examination in this patient after another 3 months (still off therapy) showed monosomy 7 and new additional abnormalities (including 4q21q25 deletion) in 65% of metaphases evaluated. CONCLUSION: Longer-term follow-up of pomalidomide-treated patients with myelofibrosis confirm the drug's favorable side effect profile. Also, the majority of treatment responders maintain their remission, which is exclusively anemia remission, for at least one year and several remain in remission after 2 years of therapy. The drug has limited effect on splenomegaly and progressive splenomegaly might occur in some patients despite continued remission in anemia. The presence of unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities predicts relapse. Disclosures: Gale: Celgene: Employment.

Abstract Background : Gene mutations are common (~90%) in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and involve epigenetic regulators (TET2 ~ 60%, ASXL1 ~40%), spliceosome components (SRSF2 ~40%) and signal pathways (RAS ~30%). Of these, thus far, only ASXL1 mutations have been shown to adversely impact overall survival (OS). In the current study, we used a 27-gene panel assay to identify additional prognostically-relevant mutations in CMML and to also determine if number of mutations carries prognostic relevance. Methods : 175 patients with WHO-defined CMML were included in the study. All patients had bone marrow (BM) biopsies and cytogenetics performed at diagnosis. Targeted capture assays were carried out on BM DNA specimens obtained at diagnosis for the following genes; TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, ASXL1, EZH2, SUZ12, SRSF2, SF3B1, ZRSR2, U2AF1, PTPN11, Tp53, SH2B3, RUNX1, CBL, NRAS, JAK2, CSF3R, FLT3, KIT, CALR, MPL, NPM1, CEBPA, IKZF, and SETBP1. Paired-end indexed libraries were prepared from individual patient DNA using the NEBNext Ultra Library prep protocol on the Agilent Bravo liquid handler. Capture libraries were assembled according to Nimblegen standard library protocol. Base-calling was performed using Illumina's RTA version 1.17.21.3. Genesifter software was utilized to analyze targeted sequence data. Specific variants were deemed as mutations if they were associated with a hematological malignancy (as identified by COSMIC database), or if they were not associated with a dbSNP Results: Among the 175 study patients, 66% were males and median age was 70 years. 146 (83%) patients were subclassified as CMML-1. At a median follow-up of 23 months, 146 (83%) deaths and 25 (14%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survivals were 24 months for CMML-1 and 16 months for CMML-2 (p=0.38). Mutational frequencies were; TET2 46%, ASXL1 45%, SRSF2 45%, SETBP1 19%, CBL 14%, RUNX1 14%, NRAS 12%, U2AF1 8%, SF3B1 6%, ZRSR2 6%, Tp53 5%, DNMT3A 5%, IDH2 5%, PTPN11 5%, SH2B3 5%, JAK2 4%, NPM1 3%, CSF3R 2%, IDH1 2%, EZH2 1%, SUZ12 1%, KIT 1%, FLT3 1%, CALR 1%. 172 patients (98%) had at least one mutation, 21 (12%) had 2, 24 (14%) had 3, 20 (11%) had 4, 9 (5%) had 5, while one (1%) patient had 6 concurrent mutations. Risk stratification was based on Mayo prognostic model: 25% high, 32% intermediate and 43 % low risk. In univariate analysis, presence of ASXL1 mutations (p=0.01), absence of TET2 mutations (p=0.005) and presence of DNMT3A mutations (p=0.02) were associated with inferior survival; in multivariable analysis, ASXL1 (p=0.01) and TET2 (p=0.03) mutations remained significant. In order to determine prognostic interaction between these two mutations, patients were stratified into four mutational categories: ASXL1wt/TET2wt (n =56), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (n =31), ASXL1mut/TET2mut (n =50) and ASXL1wt/TET2mut (n =38). Survival data in these four groups showed significant difference in favor of ASXL1wt/TET2mut (median survival 38 months; p=0.016), compared to those with ASXL1wt/TET2wt (19 months), ASXL1mut/TET2wt (31 months)and ASXL1mut/TET2mut (16 months); there was no significant difference in survival among the latter three groups (p=0.3) (Figure). The number of mutations per patient did not affect outcome (p=0.3). In multivariable analysis, presence of ASXL1 mutations (P=0.01) and absence of TET2 mutations (p=0.003) remained significant when risk factors used in the Mayo prognostic model (HB <10 gm/dl, AMC >10 x 10(9)/L, platelets <100 x 10(9)/L, circulating IMC) were added to the model; the same was true for ASXL1wt/TET2mut (p=0.036). In a separate multivariable analysis that included the Mayo prognostic model as a single variable along with presence of ASXL1 and absence of TET2 mutations; or absence of ASXL1wt/TET2mut mutational status, the respective hazard ratios were 1.4 (95% CI 1.07-2.1; p=0.012), 1.5 (95% CI 1.07-2.1; p=0.03) and 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.7; p=0.001). Leukemia-free survival was worse in ZRSR2 -mutated cases (p=0.03). Conclusions: Almost 100% of patients with CMML express one or more myeloid neoplasm-relevant mutations. The current study suggests a favorable prognostic impact from TET2 mutations, unless accompanied by ASXL1 mutations. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1887 Poster Board I-910 Background: Chromosomal translocations involving 8p11.2 give rise to diverse oncogenic fusion genes including FGFR1 and MYST3. FGFR1 rearrangements have been associated with the stem cell leukemia/lymphoma (SCLL) syndrome, which is a mixed myeloid-lymphoid malignancy characterized by eosinophilia, monocytosis and rapid disease progression into acute myeloid leukemia or lymphoblastic lymphoma. MYST3 is a histone acetyltransferase whose rearrangement has been associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; usually monocytic). Methods: The Mayo Clinic cytogenetic database spanning the years 1988–2009 was screened for 8p11.2 translocations. Bone marrow (BM) pathology and cytogenetic results were re-reviewed and relevant clinical information was retrospectively obtained. Archived BM specimens were analyzed by FISH to identify FGFR1 and/or MYST3 rearrangements. BAC clones used for direct-labeled break-apart FISH probes for FGFR1 were CTC-497A2, RP11-90P5 and RP11-513D5 for the 5' portion and RP11-675F6 and RP11-495O10 for the 3' portion; those used for direct-labeled dual color, dual fusion FISH probes for MYST3 were RP11-589C21, CTD-2532C15, RP11-45I11 and RP11-411A18 and for CREBBP (16p13.3) were RP11-737F1, RP11-136I22, Rp11-962J17 and CTD-2514E9. Results: Out of 24,262 unique patient cytogenetic studies, 8p11.2 translocations were identified in 14 (∼0.06%) patients; 6 constituted sole abnormalities. BM specimens for FISH analysis were available in 13 patients (age range 52–75 years; 8 males). Twelve of these 13 patients had myeloid neoplasms and one had lymphoma; the latter patient had a t(8;10)(p11.2;p13) translocation as a subclone of a 14q32 abnormality and neither FGFR1 nor MYST3 were involved. Among the 12 patients with myeloid neoplasms, FISH analysis revealed abnormalities of MYST3 in 4 patients, FGFR1 in 4 patients, and neither in 4 patients. The MYST3 abnormalities included MYST3-CREBBP in 2 patients, MYST3-EP300 in one patient and MYST3 amplification in one patient; specific diagnoses included AML with or without antecedent chronic myeloid malignancy. Only one of the 4 patients with FGFR1 rearrangements displayed peripheral blood eosinophilia; specific diagnoses included chronic myeloid malignancy and AML. Three of the remaining 4 patients with neither FGFR1 nor MYST3 abnormalities had highly complex cytogenetic abnormalities except one who had sole t(8;13)(p11.2,q12) and presented with lymphadenopathy (precursor-T cell lymphoblastic lymphoma), marked leukocytosis, eosinophilia, monocytosis, and a BM morphology consistent with MPN (marked myeloproliferation with granulocytosis and eosinophilia). Survival was uniformly poor in all 8p11.2 translocations. Conclusions: 8p11.2 translocations are rarely encountered in routine clinical practice and are usually associated with aggressive myeloid malignancies. In the current unselected series of patients, peripheral blood eosinophilia was not a typical feature of the myeloid neoplasm phenotype associated with FGFR1 translocation. Conversely, at least by FISH, FGFR1 was not involved in an 8p11.2-associated myeloid neoplasm that exhibited SCLL-like features. Additional molecular studies are planned to validate the current findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Peripheral blood (PB) JAK2V617F testing is ordered in routine clinical practice in several different clinical scenarios. Interpretation of the mutation level/allele burden information is however challenging given lack of a standardized assay and lack of adequate information to permit data interpretation in a non-research setting. Objectives: To describe: (i) disease distribution in unselected JAK2V617F-positive patients seen in routine clinical practice: (ii) disease-specific dispersion of JAK2V617F allele burden in these patients; and (iii) correlation of JAK2V617F allele burden with patient clinical characteristics both between and within specific diseases. Methods: The current study was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. Myeloid neoplasms were classified as per World Health Organization criteria. Clinical, laboratory and pathology results were centrally reviewed to confirm the reported diagnoses. JAK2V617F testing was done as part of routine clinical care; testing included allele burden measurement by a quantitative allele-specific PCR assay (sensitivity 0.01%) that is in clinical use at our institution (http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/Overview/31155); reporting of allele-burden data started in January 2012. The current analysis was restricted to PB samples from adult patients seen at our institution who consented to use of their medical records for research use; results of consecutive samples tested from January 2012 to April 2015 were collected. The PCR assay calibrator is a mixture of DNA from a JAK2V617F-positive cell line (HEL) and a -negative cell line (HL60). The final result is reported as % JAK2 V617F of total JAK2 (ie, [mutated/(mutated + wild-type)] x 100%). Results: We studied 349 patients (166 female; median age 65 years, range 18-92) who met eligibility criteria. The disease distribution was: polycythemia vera (PV) 146 patients (42%), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) 63 (18%), essential thrombocythemia (ET) 55 (16%) , post-PV MF 34 (10%), post-ET MF 12 (3%), myeloproliferative neoplasm-unclassified (MPN-u) 10 (3%), refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (RARS-T) 8 (2%), post-MPN acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 6 (2%), MPN-myelodysplastic syndrome-unclassified (MPN/MDS-u) 4 (1%), no identified hematological disease 2 (0.5%), and 'other' 9 (2.5%). The median (range) %JAK2V617F was as follows: PV 10.5% (0.5-86%), PMF 8% (0.5-88%), ET 2% (0.5-21%), post-PV MF 24% (0.8-95%), post-ET MF 14.5% (1-88%), MPN-u 4% (0.7-11%), RARS-T 2.5% (0.5-9%), post-MPN AML 31.5% (9-92%), MPN/MDS-u 14.5% (7-74%), no hematological disease 0.7% (n/a), and other 0.9% (0.5-19%) (p<0.0001). Distribution of patients in the following 7 JAK2V617Fallele burden strata: <1%, 1-2% , 3-5%, 6-10%, 11-20%, 21-50%, and 51-100% was: 42 patients (12%), 44 (13%), 61 (17%), 61 (17%), 49 (14%), 50 (15%) and 42 (12%), respectively. PV patients were identified across the entire allele burden spectrum, namely 3%, 12%, 16%, 19%, 14%, 20% and 16% in the aforementioned strata, respectively. Disease distribution in the 42 patients with <1% allele burden was: ET 14 patients, PMF 12, PV and 'other' 5 each, RARS-T and no hematological disease 2 each, and post-PV MF and MPN-u 1 each. JAK2V617F allele burden in ET (peak 21%) was significantly lower than PMF or PV (peak 86-88%) (p<0.0001). Mutation levels in post-ET (p<0.0001) and post-PV (p=0.004) MF were significantly higher than in ET and PV, respectively. Levels in post-PV/post-ET MF were also significantly higher than in PMF (p<0.0001). In contrast, JAK2V617F levels in ET and RARS-T were comparable (p=0.8). Finally, levels in post-MPN AML were significantly higher than in ET (p=0.0001) and PMF (p=0.007), marginally higher relative to PV (p=0.05), but not significantly higher relative to post-ET/post-PV MF. Conclusions: The current study provides guidance for the interpretation of peripheral blood JAK2 V617F allele burden, in routine clinical practice: i) levels below 1% are not infrequently reported, even in phenotypically classic PV, and do not imply low likelihood of a myeloid neoplasm, ii) allele burden per se is not diagnostically specific, but a threshold of greater than 20% might be used to question a diagnosis of ET or RARS-T, and iii) the highest allele burdens are seen in fibrotic and/or leukemic transformation of chronic-phase myeloproliferative neoplasm. Disclosures Pardanani: Stemline: Research Funding.

Abstract Background Tunneled central venous catheters have traditionally been used for administration of chemotherapy (chemo) for acute leukemia treatment. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are increasingly being used, but there is an increased risk of PICC-associated thrombosis (PAT). There is limited information on management of PAT in this subgroup of patients (pt). Methods In this retrospective cohort study we investigated the primary management of PICC related upper extremity venous thrombosis (TB) in pt with hematologic malignancy undergoing chemo at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Eligible pt were 18 years and older, had documentation of PICC placement at our institution, initiation of chemo within a week of PICC placement, and the TB was objectively documented by compression venous ultrasound (CVU). Superficial venous TB (SVT) was defined as TB of subcutaneous veins (basilic and cephalic) and deep venous TB (DVT) defined as TB of brachial, axillary, subclavian, or innominate superior vena cava and internal jugular veins. We retrospectively stratified initial management (IM) into 1) PICC removal alone (PR), 2) PR and therapeutic anticoagulation (AC), 3) AC alone, and 4) conservative management (CM) consisting of symptomatic care and observation. We also investigated factors influencing IM of PAT. Long term outcomes including incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), post phlebitic syndrome and recurrence of TB were noted. Results Between 2006 and 2012, 190 pt with AML (n=160), MDS or MDS/MF (n=10), or ALL (n=20) met our study criteria. Overall, 40/190 (21.6%) developed PAT: AML n=38, ALL n=1, MDS/MF n=1. SVT occurred in 16/40 (40%) pt and DVT occurred in 24/40 (60%) pt. IM is shown in Table 1. One pt with SVT received AC for 6 weeks as well as PR. In this pt, IM included AC because of proximity of TB to deep veins. 7 pt had a follow up (f/u) CVU within 3 months demonstrating: TB progression (prog, n=1, IM with PR alone but with prog AC was started); TB stability (stab, n=2, both IM with PR alone) and TB resolution/improvement (R/I, n= 4, 2 IM with PR and 2 IM with CM) In the 5 pt with CM, 2 pt had f/u CVU demonstrating improvement, one pt had charted clinical improvement , and 2 pt had no charted clinical f/u. Of DVT pt on AC (n=14), 5 pt completed at least 2 months of AC. Reasons for early cessation (n=9) of AC included thrombocytopenia (tcp, n=4), hematoma (n=1), hematuria (n=1), subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=1), and unknown (n=1). One pt died 2 days after presence of DVT was noted. Two pt initially treated with PR alone developed a second TB with placement of a new PICC on contralateral arm and AC was subsequently initiated (duration: 3 months (n=1), and 8 days (n=1)). 14 pt with DVT had f/u CVU within 3 months which demonstrated prog (n=2), stab (n= 8), or R/I ( n=4) of TB (Table 2). The 2 pt with TB prog subsequently received longer term AC guided by platelet count. In 5 pt with PICC not initially removed, 3 pt had PR after completion of chemo. (1-4 days), one pt had PR at discharge (27 days from TB), and one pt had PICC in place on discharge. One pt with DVT experienced a PE within one year f/u. This pt had initially completed 3 days of AC which was stopped because of tcp. Conclusion In this cohort of patients with PAT, the most common IM consisted of PR, which appeared to result in a low recurrence rate among pt with SVT. In pt with DVT, the role of AC remains to be defined given the abbreviated course of AC in most pt. Though, the lack of CVU followup in all pt limits conclusions, there appeared to be a low rate of symptomatic prog. Initiation of AC was largely guided by platelet count and degree of occlusive symptoms. Thrombocytopenia was also the most commonly cited reason for discontinuing AC. Close clinical follow up aided by the use of CVU was integral to ensure that PAT did not lead to further adverse events. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background In the recent International Prognostic Score for Thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia (IPSET-thrombosis), age and history of thrombosis were confirmed as independent risk factors for future thrombosis and the study also identified independent prothrombotic role for cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and JAK2 V617F mutation (Barbui et al. Blood 2012). Methods In the current study, we re-analyzed the original IPSET-thrombosis data in 1019 patients with WHO-defined ET in whom JAK2 mutational status was available, in order to quantify the individual contributions of JAK2 mutations and CV risk factors in conventionally-assigned low and high risk ET, as well as in age- versus thrombosis-defined high risk status. Results After a median follow-up of 6.8 and 5.0 years in conventionally-assigned low- and high-risk patients, respectively, the overall annual rate of total thrombosis (108 events) in conventionally-assigned low- and high-risk patients was 1.11%-pt/y (CI 0.81-1.52) and 2.46%-pt/y (CI 1.94-3.11) respectively (p=0.001), and the difference was mainly due to a higher frequency of arterial thrombosis in high-risk patients (p<0.001).The influence of JAK2 mutational status and CV-risk factors on the rate of thrombosis in conventionally assigned low- and high-risk groups is presented in the table. Table 1. Additional risk factors N (%) Event Rate % pts/yr (95% CI) P-value P-value P-value trend Low risk 506 (50) 39 1.11 (0.81-1.52) None 200 (40) 7 0.44 (0.21-0.92) ref Cardiovascular risk factor 36 (7) 3 1.05 (0.34-3.25) 0.220 0.227 JAK2V617F 213 (43) 21 1.59 (1.04-2.44) 0.001 0.217 Both 52 (10) 8 2.57 (1.29-5.15) <0.001 ref <0.001 High risk 513 (50) 69 2.46 (1.94-3.11) None 111 (22) 10 1.44 (0.78-2.68) ref Cardiovascular risk factor 44 (9) 4 1.64 (0.62-4.37) 0.909 0.067 JAK2V617F 222 (43) 30 2.36 (1.65-3.38) 0.168 0.082 Both 136 (27) 25 4.17 (2.82-6.17) 0.011 ref 0.005 The number of major arterial and venous thrombosis was reported as rates per 100 patient-years and the difference among groups was assessed by Mantel Cox log-rank test i) Conventionally-assigned low-risk group. Amongst 506 patients, 200 (40%) displayed neither JAK2 mutation nor CV risk factors and their annual rate of thrombosis was 0.44%, as opposed to 1.05% in the presence of CV risk factors (P=NS), 1.59% in the presence of JAK2 mutation (p=0.001) and 2.57% in the presence of both CV risk factors and JAK2 mutation (P<0.001). There was no significant difference when low-risk patients with both JAK2 mutation and CV risk factors were compared with either those with CV risk factors only (p=0.227) or those with JAK2 mutation only (p=0.217). ii) Conventionally assigned high-risk group: The absence or presence of one or both of the aforementioned additional risk factors for thrombosis were documented in 111 (22%), 44 (9%), 222 (43%) and 136 (27%) patients, respectively, with corresponding annual rates of thrombosis at 1.44%, 1.64%, 2.36% and 4.17% (Table). High-risk patients with both risk factors had a significantly higher risk of thrombosis compared to their counterparts with the absence of JAK2 mutations and CV risk factors (p=0.011). Additional analysis revealed limited enhancement of thrombosis risk by either JAK2 mutations or CV risk factors or both in patients whose high-risk status was defined by the presence of thrombosis history, regardless of age (P=NS). In contrast, the presence of JAK2 mutations, with or without CV risk factors, might have affected thrombosis risk in patients where high-risk status was defined by age alone (p=0.05). Conclusions The current study suggests the possibility of considering four risk categories in ET: "very low risk" group (age ≤60 years and without thrombosis history, JAK2 mutations or CV risk factors); "low risk" (age ≤60 years and without thrombosis history but with JAK2 mutations or CV risk factors); "intermediate risk" (age>60 years but without thrombosis history or JAK2 mutations); and "high risk" (thrombosis history at any age or JAK2 -mutated patients who are older than 60 years of age). Treatment recommendations for each one of the above-mentioned new risk categories should be examined in the context of prospective controlled studies. Disclosures Barbui: Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Vannucchi:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Buxhofer-Ausch:AOP Orphan: Research Funding. De Stefano:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen Cilag: Research Funding; Shire: Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Bruno Farmaceutici: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Gisslinger:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AOP ORPHAN: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Geron: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Abstract 1909 Poster Board I-932 Background: The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) utilizes five independent predictors of inferior survival; of these, a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL has the highest impact on survival (Cervantes et al. Blood 2009;113:2895). In the current study, we examined the additional prognostic impact of transfusion need at diagnosis or becoming transfusion-dependent in the first year of diagnosis. These events were also correlated with JAK2 or TET2 mutational status. Methods: Patients were selected from the Mayo Clinic PMF database based on availability of bone marrow histology and IPSS-relevant information at diagnosis and follow-up transfusion history at one year from diagnosis. WHO criteria were used for PMF diagnosis. Patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation were censored at time of transplant. Patient records were updated in July, 2009. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariable survival was analysed using Cox regression model. Results: A consecutive cohort of 254 patients was studied (median age 59 years; range 28-87; 159 males). IPSS risk category was low, intermediate (int)-1, int-2 and high in 75, 71, 62 and 46 patients, respectively. JAK2V617F was present in 118 (62%) of 192 patients and TET2 mutations in 6 (13%) of 45 patients evaluated. Transfusion need at diagnosis was documented in 62 patients whereas an additional 22 patients became transfusion-dependent during the first year of their diagnosis. The remaining 170 patients remained transfusion-independent for at least one year post-diagnosis. To date, 139 patients have died. In patients who are alive, median follow-up was 5.3 years. Median survivals in IPSS high, Int-2, Int-1 and low risk patients were, 3, 3.9, 6.8 and 12.8 years, respectively (p<0.0001). Median survival for patients requiring transfusions at diagnosis was similar to that of patients who became transfusion-dependent in their first year of diagnosis, and both were significantly shorter than the median survival seen in patients who remained transfusion-free during the first year post-diagnosis: 2.9, 2.2 and 9.7 years, respectively (p<0.0001; figure). Multivariable analysis confirmed the IPSS-independent prognostic value of transfusion status-based risk stratification. Neither JAK2 nor TET2 mutational status correlated with transfusion need. Conclusions: In PMF, becoming transfusion-dependent in the first year of diagnosis is prognostically as detrimental as requiring transfusions at initial presentation. These events are not affected by JAK2 or TET2 mutational status and confer an IPSS-independent adverse prognosis. The ability to identify Int-1 risk patients with shortened survival (Figure) holds major treatment implications. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1280 Poster Board I-302 Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocytosis (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are defined as clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. These disorders show an inherent tendency for transformation into leukemia (MPN-blast phase) which is hypothesized to be accompanied by acquisition of additional genomic lesions. We, therefore, obtained a comprehensive profile of genomic alterations associated with leukemic transformation by using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array in 88 MPN patients, as well as 71 cases with MPN-blast phase, and correlated these findings with their clinical parameters. A relatively high number of genomic alterations was found in MPN after leukemic transformation with 4.6 ± 0.6 abnormalities per sample compared to only 1.4 ± 0.2 changes per patient in chronic phase (p<0.001). Compared to the cytogenetic data, SNP-chip analysis detected about 47% additional chromosomal changes in the MPN samples, and 31% more in the MPN-blast phase cases, whereas SNP-array allelokaryotyping practically captured all cytogenetic abnormalities in our study population. Several additionally altered regions were detected in patients with MPN-blast phase compared to chronic phase, including both deletion and copy-number neutral-loss of heterozygosity (CNN-LOH) on chromosome 12p (9%) and 21q (9%), involving ETV6 and RUNX1. Notably, deletion and CNN-LOH on 17p involving TP53 were diagnosed in 18% of MPN-blast phase samples, which was highly associated with preceding treatment with alkylating agents (p=0.016). Moreover, trisomy 8, as well as amplification of 8q24.21 involving the MYC gene, were detected in 13% of patients with MPN-blast phase who were almost exclusively negative for the JAK2V617F mutation. Genome-wide inspection of further critical regions with promising new candidate genes involved in the evolution to the MPN-leukemic phase included deletion and CNN-LOH on 7q22.1 (SH2B2) in 18%, duplication/amplification on 19p13.2 (PIN1, ICAM1, CDC37) in 13% and 21q22.2 (ERG) in 9% of MPN patients with blast crisis. In contrast, we detected a decreased frequency of JAK2V617F in MPN-blast phase samples (52%) compared to chronic phase (71%). Also, the percentage of patients with homozygous mutant JAK2 as a result of CNN-LOH was lower in the MPN-blast phase (43%) compared to the chronic phase (53%). Taken together, the data suggest that gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 is not a perquisite for leukemic transformation. Remarkably, CNN-LOH on either 7q or 9p was related to decreased survival after leukemic transformation (p=0.02 and p=0.012, respectively). Given the variety of allelic imbalances, our data suggest that MPN-blast phase appears to be a heterogeneous disease prone to have evolved multiple mechanisms to provide a proliferative advantage to the abnormal leukemic clone. Our analysis of MPN genomes in the chronic compared to the leukemic stage provided new prognostic insights, as well as novel causative genes which might be involved in the transformation to MPN-blast phase. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.