Tefferi, Ayalew

6513 Background: PTPN11 (Ch12q24) is a proto-oncogene that codes for SHP2, a regulatory protein tyrosine phosphatase that impacts RAS/MAPK signaling. Germline variants have been described in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, while somatic variants have been associated with inferior survival in acute myeloid leukemia. PTPN11 variants are infrequent in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and their impact on disease phenotype and survival remains unclear. Methods: After IRB approval, 396 molecularly annotated CMML patients at Mayo Clinic were screened for somatic PTPN11 variants within 12 months of diagnosis while still in chronic phase disease. Overall (OS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival (LFS), and predictors of survival were estimated using standard statistical measures. Results: 396 patients (median age 71 years; males 67%) with CMML were considered; pathogenic PTPN11 variants were seen in 12 (3%) with a median VAF of 20.5% (range: 4-50): A72T (n = 2), F285S (n = 2), and A72S (n = 2). Variants were most likely to be seen in the N-terminal SH2 domain (n = 7), followed by the PTP domain (n = 6), and the C-terminal SH2 domain (n = 1). PTPN11 variants clustered with CMML-2 (p = 0.02), higher absolute neutrophil count (p = 0.04), peripheral blood (p = 0.06) and bone marrow (p = 0.02) blast %, older age (p <0.01), and were less likely to have SRSF2 comutations (p = 0.02). After a median follow-up of 18 months (range 0-193), 253 (64%) deaths and 68 (17%) AML transformations were recorded. PTPN11 variants negatively and independently impacted both OS (median 13 vs. 31 months; p <0.01) and LFS (AML events: 42% (5/12) vs. 16% (63/384); p <0.01). In age-adjusted multivariate analysis restricted to genetic risk factors, survival was negatively affected by abnormal karyotype and mutations involving PTPN11, DNMT3A, and SETBP1, and positively by TET2 mutations. All but SETBP1 retained significance in the presence of additional independent risk factors, namely male sex (p <0.01) and leukocyte count (p <0.01); HR in the latter analysis was 4.3 for PTPN11, 2.8 for DNMT3A, and 1.6 for abnormal karyotype. A similar analysis for LFS identified, as risk factors, PTPN11 (p = 0.01), DNMT3A (p <0.01), and ASXL1 (p = 0.03) mutations, as well as bone marrow blast % (p <0.01), absolute monocyte count ≥10 (p = 0.02), and immature circulating myeloid cells (p <0.01). Conclusions: The current study identifies PTPN11 and DNMT3A mutations as independent risk factors for both OS and LFS in CMML. In regard to additional genetic risk factors, OS was positively affected by TET2 mutations and negatively by abnormal karyotype, while LFS was negatively affected by ASXL1 mutations.

SummaryWe describe the clinical phenotype, management strategies and outcomes of 22 patients with autoimmune myelofibrosis (AIMF); median age: 45 years; 77% females; 83% with autoimmune disease, pancytopenia in 32% and transfusion‐requiring anaemia in 59%. All informative cases were negative for JAK2 (n = 18) and CALR/MPL mutations (n = 12). Fourteen of nineteen (74%) evaluable patients achieved complete response (CR) based on the resolution of cytopenias. First‐line treatments included steroids +/− immunosuppressive agents, cyclosporin and mycophenolate with CR in 7 of 13 (54%), 1 of 2 (50%) and 1 of 2 (50%) respectively. Rituximab salvage therapy yielded CR in 4 of 5 (80%) cases. The current study provides information on steroid‐sparing treatments for AIMF.

AbstractChronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare BCR::ABL1‐negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis and bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) (myelodysplastic “[MDS]/MPN with neutrophilia” per World Health Organization [WHO]) is a MDS/MPN overlap disorder featuring dysplastic neutrophilia and circulating myeloid precursors. Both manifest with frequent hepatosplenomegaly and less commonly, bleeding, with high rates of leukemic transformation and death. The 2022 revised WHO classification conserved CNL diagnostic criteria of leukocytosis ≥25 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥80% with <10% circulating precursors, absence of dysplasia, and presence of an activating CSF3R mutation. ICC criteria are harmonized with those of other myeloid entities, with a key distinction being lower leukocytosis threshold (≥13 × 109/L) for cases CSF3R‐mutated. Criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/L, dysgranulopoiesis, circulating myeloid precursors ≥10%, and at least one cytopenia for MDS‐thresholds (ICC). In both classifications ASXL1 and SETBP1 (ICC), or SETBP1 ± ETNK1 (WHO) mutations can be used to support the diagnosis. Both diseases show hypercellular bone marrow due to a granulocytic proliferation, aCML distinguished by dysplasia in granulocytes ± other lineages. Absence of monocytosis, rare/no basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions, are mandated. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in ~1/3 of CNL and ~15–40% of aCML patients. The molecular signature of CNL is a driver mutation in colony‐stimulating factor 3 receptor—classically T618I, documented in >80% of cases. Atypical CML harbors a complex genomic backdrop with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, SRSF2, EZH2, and less frequently in ETNK1. Leukemic transformation rates are ~10–25% and 30–40% for CNL and aCML, respectively. Overall survival is poor: 15–31 months in CNL and 12–20 months in aCML. The Mayo Clinic CNL risk model for survival stratifies patients according to platelets <160 × 109/L (2 points), leukocytes >60 × 109/L (1 point), and ASXL1 mutation (1 point); distinguishing low‐ (0–1 points) versus high‐risk (2–4 points) categories. The Mayo Clinic aCML risk model attributes 1 point each for: age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, and TET2 mutation, delineating low‐ (0–1 risk factor) and high‐risk (≥2 risk factors) subgroups. Management is risk‐driven and symptom‐directed, with no current standard of care. Most commonly used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, Janus kinase inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents, though none are disease‐modifying. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative modality and should be considered in eligible patients. Recent genetic profiling has disclosed CBL, CEBPA, EZH2, NRAS, TET2, and U2AF1 to represent high‐risk mutations in both entities. Actionable mutations (NRAS/KRAS, ETNK1) have also been identified, supporting novel agents targeting involved pathways. Preclinical and clinical studies evaluating new drugs (e.g., fedratinib, phase 2) and combinations are detailed.

Abstract Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) is defined by a myeloid driver mutation in the context of otherwise unexplained cytopenia. CCUS has an inherent risk of progressing to myeloid neoplasm. However, it is unknown how exposure to previous cytotoxic therapy may impact the risk of progression and survival. We stratified patients with CCUS by prior exposure to DNA-damaging therapy. Of 151 patients, 46 (30%) had received cytotoxic therapy and were classified as therapy-related CCUS (t-CCUS), whereas 105 (70%) had de novo CCUS. A lower proportion of t-CCUS had hypercellular marrows (17.8% vs 44.8%, P = .002) but had higher median bone marrow blast percentages. After a median follow-up of 2.2 years, t-CCUS had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 1.8 vs 6.3 years; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; P = .007) and median overall survival (OS; 3.6 years vs not reached; HR, 2.3; P = .007) compared with CCUS. Univariable and multivariable time-to-event analyses showed that exposure to cytotoxic therapy independently accounted for inferior PFS and OS. Despite the similarities in clinical presentation between CCUS and t-CCUS, we show that exposure to prior cytotoxic therapies was an independent risk factor for inferior outcomes. This suggests that t-CCUS represents a unique clinical entity that needs more stringent monitoring or earlier intervention strategies.

AbstractDisease OverviewChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%–20% over 3–5 years).DiagnosisNewly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable).Risk StratificationSeveral risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high‐risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4‐tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate‐2 (2 risk factors), intermediate‐1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being “myeloproliferative (MP‐CMML)” or “myelodysplastic (MD‐CMML),” based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L.TreatmentASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long‐term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate‐2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease‐modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase‐3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high‐risk MP‐CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%).Unique Disease AssociationsThese include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme‐induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.