Guha, Paulami

INTRODUCTION: Study Objective: To determine the payments made to Obstetricians and Gynecologists (OBGYNs) compared to other surgical specialties by the makers of the Da Vinci robot-Intuitive Surgical, Inc. in 2014. METHODS: Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study (Canadian Task force classification- II-3). Setting: Payments to OBGYNs in the United States compared to the total Intuitive Surgical payment amount in each state as analyzed from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)’ Open Payments website. Subjects: General OBGYNs, OBGYN subspecialists (Gynecologic Oncology, Reproductive Endocrinology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Gynecology), and providers in other specialties nationwide. Interventions: Compare Intuitive Surgical Inc. payments to OBGYNs versus other surgical specialties as analyzed from publicly available CMS Open Payments database. RESULTS: A total of 50 states received money from Intuitive Surgical Inc. in 2014. Payments to general OBGYNs totaled $5,061,439, OBGYN subspecialties received $1,591,556, and other surgical specialties that use the Da Vinci platform received $33,011,657. Total payments per state can be represented in a map diagram. The state of Texas got the highest amount. Payments to OBGYNs divided by total payments in each state can be depicted in a similar fashion, Wyoming state had the highest value. CONCLUSION: OBGYNs received a significant proportion of funding from Intuitive Surgical Inc. as compared to other surgical specialties in 2014. We recommend that OBGYNs update or declare any conflicts when required.

INTRODUCTION: Female patients being evaluated for liver transplantation (LT) routinely undergo a gynecologic exam including cervical cancer screening. The prevalence of cervical cytologic abnormalities in this high risk population is unknown. Our study determines prevalence of cervical cytologic abnormalities, HPV positive status, and risk factors for abnormal cervical screening for this population. METHODS: With Institutional review board approval, we reviewed 375 charts of women undergoing evaluation for LT from 2008‒2013 at Mayo Clinic Florida. We recorded demographics, Pap smear results, High risk HPV positive results, and co-morbid conditions. Univariate analysis was done to determine risk factors. We compared the result of the LT group to the general female population getting cervical cancer screening during the same time period. RESULTS: 37 of 375 (9.86%) LT patients had abnormal Pap smear, compared to 1784 of 26118 (6.83%) of the general population patients (p < 0.01). Among LT patients with cervical cytologic abnormalities, 40.5% were ASCUS, HPV positive (64.8% for non-LT patients), 29.7% were LSIL (28.1% for non-LT patients), 5.4% were HSIL (6.7% for non-LT patients) and 24.3% were cytology negative with HPV positive (0.2% for non-LT patients, p < 0.05). Younger age and presence of hypertension were associated with higher risk of having an abnormal cervical cytology or positive HPV status among LT patients. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing evaluation for LT have increased prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology, or a positive High risk HPV test. Gynecologic surveillance for this high risk population is recommended.