Ainsworth, Alessandra J.

AbstractThere is no approved medical therapy for adenomyosis and limited evidence to guide treatments in part due to the complexity of nonhistologic diagnosis and the prevalence of concomitant gynecologic conditions. Most available evidence focuses on the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding, painful menses, and pelvic pain. Data evaluating fertility outcomes, sexual function, and quality of life following treatment are lacking. Additionally, there is no disease-specific measure of quality of life for adenomyosis. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system appears to be the most effective first-line therapy based on efficacy compared with oral agents, maintenance of steady-state hormonal levels, and contraceptive benefit. In areas where it is marketed, the progestin dienogest appears superior to combined oral contraceptives. Long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists are effective and should be considered second-line therapy but are limited by hypogonadal effects. Additional data regarding oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists are required. While aromatase inhibitors demonstrate improvement in heavy menstrual bleeding and pelvic pain, further research is needed to determine their role in the management of adenomyosis. Progesterone receptor modulators may have a role for this disease if released again to market with appropriate safety parameters. Finally, modulation of prolactin and/or oxytocin may provide novel nonsteroidal treatment options.

INTRODUCTION: Leiomyomas are benign uterine smooth muscle tumors. After menopause, most women have a reduction in size and number of leiomyomas. Conversely, uterine sarcomas present as a rapidly enlarging pelvic mass in postmenopausal women. The distinction of uterine leiomyoma from sarcoma is difficult and definitive diagnosis requires pathologic examination. METHODS: A 74 year-old multiparous female with a history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast presented with significant postmenopausal bleeding, requiring blood transfusion, and a rapidly enlarging pelvic mass. Abdominal imaging including ultrasound and computerized tomography confirmed a 15 cm uterine mass. The patient underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with concern for uterine sarcoma. Grossly, the uterus contained a 15.5 cm well demarcated intramural mass. Microscopically, the tumor was a spindle cell neoplasm with anastomosing fascicles interrupted by thick-walled blood vessels or fibrous regions. The cells exhibited uniformly mild to moderate cytologic atypia. Immunohistochemically, the tumor strongly and diffusely expressed desmin and h-caldesmon and exhibited patchy, strong expression of CD10. RNA-seq, confirmed by RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing, revealed a gene fusion involving KAT6B and KANSL1. The fusion joins exon 3 of KAT6B to exons 11 and 12 of KANSL1. The final diagnosis was a benign uterine leiomyoma. The patient remains without evidence of disease six months post-operatively. CONCLUSION: This is the first case, to our knowledge, that has identified the KAT6B-KANSL1 fusion in a uterine leiomyoma. Further efforts to classify the pathologic characteristics and prevalence of this fusion may contribute to understanding of tumorigenesis of uterine smooth muscle tumors.

INTRODUCTION: The Pregnancy Reasonably Excluded Guide (PREG) questionnaire is based on traditional methods of excluding pregnancy including sterilization, menopause, and the World Health Organization criteria. The PREG has been validated and shows a 99-100% negative predictive value for pregnancy (Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013: adapted from the world health organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep 2013; 62:1‒60.). Pregnancy testing in our outpatient surgical settings varied by provider. This study compared utilization of pregnancy tests in the outpatient gynecologic surgery setting after implementation of universal PREG administration. METHODS: All women undergoing outpatient gynecologic surgery were prospectively evaluated between March and September 2016. Administration of the PREG to women 18-49, excluding those undergoing procedures related to pregnancy, was implemented in July and rates of pregnancy testing pre- and post-implementation were compared using Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS: 369 patients underwent an outpatient gynecologic procedure during the study period (excluding a two week washout period after implementation). In the pre-implementation group, 136 met inclusion criteria with 45 pregnancy tests performed (33.1%). After implementation, 80 patients met inclusion criteria and 17 pregnancy tests were performed as indicated by PREG response (21.3%), demonstrating over one third reduction in pregnancy test administration (p = 0.086). No pregnancy tests were positive and no false negative evaluations were identified. Physician and nursing staff requested continued use of the PREG after the trial. CONCLUSION: PREG administration on admission for outpatient gynecologic surgery consistently and effectively identifies patients in whom pregnancy testing improves the value of care.

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum hemorrhage is the leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide. There are multiple known risk factors, including induction of labor. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was completed with review of nulliparous women undergoing labor induction at term, from July 2006 to May 2011. Baseline maternal variables and risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were assessed. All combinations of methods of induction were sequential rather than concurrent. The need for additional uterotonics (beyond routine oxytocin) was used as a surrogate for postpartum hemorrhage. Variables were evaluated for an association with additional uterotonic use based on fitting logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 785 women were included in the study. Additional uterotonics were required for 84/785 (11%) of women. Based on univariate analysis, only birth weight and presence of meconium were significantly (p < 0.05) associated with additional uterotonic use, while method of induction approached statistical significance (p=0.06). The mean (SD) birth weight was 3668 (584) vs. 3463 (500) grams in those with and without additional uterotonic use. Multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of additional uterotonics with higher birth weight (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.44 per 500 gram increase in birth weight; 95% CI 1.15, 1.82) and use of Foley plus oxytocin (aOR 4.40; 95% CI 1.36, 14.23). CONCLUSION: In our model, higher birth weight and induction method of Foley followed by oxytocin were associated with increased need for additional uterotonics. This data adds detail to previous studies that have broadly identified induction of labor as a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage.