Rajkumar, S. Vincent

8516 Background: There is consensus that light chain amyloidosis (AL) patients with CRAB criteria (abnormal calcium or renal function, anemia or lytic bone lesions) also have multiple myeloma (MM). These patients are typically excluded from AL trials; however, AL patients with >= 10% bone marrow plasma cells (BMPC) in the absence of CRAB are included in trials along with AL with < 10% BMPC. We postulated that the currently used dichotomy may be incorrect and examined the spectrum of AL with and without MM. Methods: We identified 1,272 patients with AL seen within 90 days of diagnosis, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010. We defined the population of patients with coexisting MM based on the existence of CRAB (AL-CRAB-MM). Patients without CRAB were divided into two groups, AL-only (<10% BMPC) and AL-PC-MM (>=10% BMPC). Results: Among the 1,272 patients, 117 (9%) had AL-CRAB-MM, 476 (37%) had AL-PC-MM, and 679 (53%) had AL only. Their respective median overall survivals (OS) were 16.2, 15.8, and 28.4 months (p<0.0001). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 203 (30%), 138 (29%) and 23 (20%) patients respectively. Since the outcomes of AL-CRAB-MM and AL-PC-MM were similar, they were pooled for univariate and multivariate analyses. On multivariate analysis, AL-CRAB-MM and AL-PC-MM retained negative prognostic value independent of age, cardiac stage, prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), beta 2 microglobulin, and dFLC. We next considered whether patients received ASCT as part of their treatment. For those patients who never received ASCT, the 5-year OS were 19%, 14%, and 31%, p<0.001, for AL-CRAB-MM, AL-PC-MM, and AL only respectively. In contrast, for those patients who received ASCT, the respective 5-year OS were 46%, 56%, and 73%, p<0.001. Conclusions: AL patients with >=10% BMPCs have a poor prognosis similar to patients with AL-CRAB-MM and should therefore be considered as AL with MM.

e19517 Background: Investigators cite complicated test (T) schedules as barriers to the conduct of clinical trials, especially T that do not contribute to outcome or pt safety. In MM protocols, some T are prone to being done inaccurately (e.g. UPEP, 24 hour urine collections), or are not useful (e.g. uric acid, AST/ALT) in determination of response (R) or safety. These T lead to increased cost, protocol violations, and do not enhance outcome. Methods: We analyzed data submitted for pts on E4A03 to examine frequency of missing data for R T: serum and urine (U) PEP, immunofixation (IFE) bone surveys (BS), and safety labs for C1-4. Results: Table outlines % pts with completed T. Most had T for serum M protein, as well as heme T but serum and U PEP, and IFE dropped off by C4. Other T e.g. uric acid were completed in 77%. Only 79% of pts had a BS repeated at C4. Incorrect or missing U data led to categorization of 16/445 (3.6%) pts as ineligible and was most frequent reason for ineligibility (69%). Missing U data led to 13/26 pts not evaluable. Analysis of SAE during the C1-4 revealed no SAE for hyperuricemia and < 5 SAE for AST/ALT. Only 5% of pts had lab-based SAE filed in 4 C. Conclusions: Required U T and BS to assess R in E4A03 were missing or completed inadequately and caused pts to be ineligible and or not evaluable. Such T need to be eliminated or replaced. Strategies to monitor data submission in real time may reduce subject loss due to T error. The requirement for routine T should be reassessed to create simpler trial design. Clinical trial information: NCT00098475. [Table: see text]

TPS8116 Background: Eukaryotic translation initiation Factor 5A (eIF5A) has been implicated in the regulation of apoptosis and is the only known protein to be modified by hypusination. Hypusinated eIF5A is the predominant form of eIF5A in cancer cells. However, in its unhypusinated form, eIF5A is pro-apoptotic. SNS01-T, designed to treat myeloma, consists of two components: a plasmid DNA expressing eIF5AK50R (human eIF5A containing a lysine to arginine substitution at position 50) which remains pro-apoptotic because it cannot be hypusinated, and an siRNA against an untranslated region of native eIF5A mRNA. When these two components are combined with linear polyethyleneimine (PEI), the nucleic acids are condensed into nanoparticles for protection from degradation in the blood and enhanced delivery to tissues. The eIF5AK50R transgene is under the control of the B29 promoter and enhancer, which restricts expression to B cells. The mode of action of SNS01-T is to use an eIF5A-specific siRNA to deplete the pool of hypusinated eIF5A in myeloma cells while simultaneously adding pro-apoptotic eIF5AK50R. In vitro cell studies and in vivo xenograft studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. Methods: Eligible patients are enrolled sequentially into four cohorts of increasingly higher doses. Each cohort will receive SNS01-T by intravenous infusion twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks and then be observed every 4 weeks during a 24-week follow-up period. Eligible patients must have been diagnosed with multiple myeloma according to IMWG criteria, have measurable disease, have relapsed disease after two or more prior treatment regimens, have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, and not be eligible to receive any other standard therapy known to extend life expectancy. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple escalating doses of SNS01-T. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity studies, proinflammatory cytokine quantitation, and therapeutic efficacy. Two of the planned 15 patients have been enrolled. (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01435720.)

8105 Background: Tumor stage migration can artifactually inflate cancer survival rates and overestimate benefits of newer therapies. We have previously shown a favorable impact of widely used novel agents in MM patients. However, it is not known whether use of well tolerated and easily administrable novel agents results in their introduction at lower levels of MM burden (and therefore add to improved outcome). Our goal was to assess for stage migration in newly diagnosed active MM patients. Methods: We reviewed records of 1,467 patients with active MM at Mayo Clinic, at initiation of therapy from 3 consecutive 5-year intervals: 01/1996-12/2000 (Group 1), 01/2001-12/2005 (Group 2), 01/2006- 12/2010 (Group 3). These intervals reflect the practice changing approaches at our center transitioning from the use of alkylator-based to novel agent-based initial therapy. Traditional parameters and staging systems were used to estimate tumor burden. We performed one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to assess for differences in these parameters among the groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Group 3 shows an upward trend for hemoglobin (Hgb), and lower creatinine and bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) percent. Compared to other groups, a greater proportion of Group 3 patients are assigned to lower Durie Salmon (DS) stages (Table) suggesting reduced tumor burden at therapy initiation. In contrast, the International Staging System (ISS) which is not used for decisions regarding therapy initiation divides cohorts in similar proportions. Conclusions: Stage migration is evident in our cohort of active MM patients presenting in the time periods of evolving initial therapeutic strategies. Future studies should take into account the bias introduced by this phenomenon in interpreting survival analysis of MM patients. [Table: see text]

8096 Background: The combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Len-Dex) is a commonly used initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. While the short-term outcomes with respect to response and toxicity is well-known, long-term outcome with this combination as initial therapy is not well described. Methods: We studied 286 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed MM seen at our institution, who received initial therapy with Len-Dex, and who had complete follow up records. Data regarding the clinical course was obtained from medical records. Results: The median (range) age at diagnosis was 63 (28-92) yrs; 166 (58% were ≤ 65 yrs and175 (61%) were male. The median estimated follow-up was 3.9 yrs (95% CI, 3.4, 4.2) and 203 (71%) pts were alive at the time of last follow up. The median estimated duration on Len-Dex was 5.3 mos (95% CI, 4.6, 6.4). The best overall response (≥PR) was 72%, including 26% with VGPR or better and 14 (5%) not being evaluable for a response. At last follow up, 41 (14%) patients were continuing on therapy. There were 93 pts (32%) who stayed on therapy for 12 months or more. Among these patients, the ORR was 86%, including 45% with VGPR or better. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort from diagnosis was 7.4 yrs (95% CI; 5.8, NR) and the estimated 5-yr survival was 67%. There were 16 (5.5%) pts who died within a year of diagnosis. The median time to first disease progression, irrespective of transplant status, was 30.2 mos (95% CI, 25, 42). Overall, 143 (50%) of the patients have gone to stem cell transplant. Censoring those patients who proceeded to SCT prior to relapse at the time of BMT, the median TTP was 25.5 mos (95% CI, 22, 29). The median OS was 7.4 yrs for those ≤65 yrs, compared with 6.2 yrs for the older patients (P=0.01). The 5-yr OS estimate for patients in ISS stage 1, 2 and 3 were 82, 65, and 44 months respectively. Conclusions: The current study provides long-term estimates of responses and survival in a series of patients treated initially with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The median survival of nearly 8 years reflects the efficacy of the novel agents both at diagnosis and at relapse and confirms the survival improvements seen in MM in the last decade.

7621 Background: Thalidomide (Thal) in combination with dexamethasone (Dex) is an effective therapy for myeloma (MM). Though initially evaluated in MM because of its anti-angiogenic properties, it is not clear how much this contribute to its anti-MM effects. We examined whether the degree of angiogenesis influences response to Thal + Dex, as well as effect of therapy on marrow angiogenesis. We also examined whether expression of angiogenic cytokines by MM cells affect response to therapy. Methods: A total of 207 pts with newly diagnosed MM were randomized on the ECOG phase III trial (E1A00) to either Thal-Dex or Dex alone. Bone marrow microvessel density (MVD) was determined on 88 pts at diagnosis and at 4 mos after therapy in 25 pts. Expression of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by MM cells was determined by RTPCR on 60 pts at diagnosis and on 22 pts at 4 mos. In addition, the percentage of marrow PCs in apoptosis was determined at diagnosis and 4 mos in 43 pts. A decrease in the serum M protein by 50% or in its absence, a decrease in urine M protein by 50% was considered a response. Results: The median BM MVD at diagnosis was 33 (3–118), and was similar in the pts responding to therapy (36.4) and in the non responders (45.4). We also separately looked at those receiving the combination vs. Dex alone, and did not find any correlation. The expression of FGF and VEGF in the PCs did not predict response to therapy with either the combination or Dex. Among the 17 responding pts, MVD decreased by a mean of 12 compared to an increase in the mean MVD of 3 among the non responders (P = NS). There was no significant correlation between the level of FGF or VEGF expression and the marrow MVD. There was no correlation between the percentage of myeloma cells in apoptosis at baseline and response to therapy. Conclusion: While the anti-angiogenic activity of Thal may play a role in its anti-myeloma effect, baseline MVD or tumor cell expression of angiogenic cytokines do not predict resistance or response to Thal-Dex or Dex alone. The findings here confirm previous observations that marrow angiogenesis is not related to the degree of secretion of angiogenic cytokines by individual cells, but rather the cumulative effect of the tumor mass. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7522 Background: Lenalidomide (len), an analog of thalidomide (thal) is a novel, oral immunomodulatory agent that is effective against multiple myeloma (MM). Two randomized, Phase III trials (MM009 and MM010) have recently demonstrated superior responses and overall survival (OS) for patients (pts) treated with len and dexamethasone (dex) in comparison with dex-placebo. This is a prospective subgroup analysis to assess the impact of prior therapy with thal on the sensitivity of MM to subsequent lenalidomide. Methods: We evaluated 692 pts from both trials (MM009 and MM010). The pts had relapsed/refractory MM, were not refractory to dex and were randomized to receive either len (25 mg daily for 3 weeks (wks) every 4 wks) plus dex (40 mg on days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 every 4 wks for 4 cycles, then 40 mg on days 1–4 every subsequent cycle) or placebo plus dex. Standard criteria were used to evaluate response and TTP. Results: Pooled data from 692 pts showed superior median TTP (48.1 vs 20.1 wks) and OR (59.2% vs 22.5%) in pts treated with len/dex compared to dex-placebo (p <0.001). Although subgroup analysis of pts with prior thal therapy revealed that pts who received len/dex had significantly improved OR, PR CR and median TTP than pts who received dex-placebo, OR, CR and TTP were highest in len/dex pts not previously treated with thal. Multivariate analysis indicates that after controlling for the treatment factor and baseline disease characteristics, whether or not pt had prior exposure to thal is a marginally significant variable to predict TTP. The risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in these subgroups will be updated on further analysis. Conclusions: Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone is more effective than dexamethasone-placebo regardless of prior thalidomide in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

7517 Background: Thalidomide plus dexamethasone (Thal/Dex) yields superior response rates versus dexamethasone (Dex) but its impact as primary therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) is unknown. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated, symptomatic MM were eligible and were randomized in this double-blind trial to Thal/Dex (Arm A) or placebo plus Dex (Arm B). Pts in Arm A received Thal 50 mg PO daily, escalated to 100 mg on day 15, and to 200 mg from day 1 of cycle 2; Dex 40 mg PO was given on days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20. Pts in Arm B received placebo instead of Thal, and Dex as in Arm A. Cycles were 28 days long, repeated until progression or undue toxicity. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP) defined using EBMT criteria. All analyses were intent to treat. Planned sample size was 218 eligible pts in each arm. Full information for one-sided log rank test with significance level of 0.025 (allowing for 1interim analysis) to have 80% power to detect a 40% improvement in TTP (16.8 mo in Arm A vs. 12 mo in Arm B) would be achieved when 282 pts have progressed. A pre-planned interim analysis of the primary endpoint and safety was performed by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC). P value < 0.0015 at this interim analysis would indicate that Arm A is superior to Arm B based on an alpha-spending function of the O’Brien-Fleming type. The DMC recommended release of results. Results: 470 pts were enrolled: 235 randomized to Thal/Dex and 235 to placebo/Dex. Median follow-up was 25 months. Median age was 65 yrs. TTP was significantly superior with Thal/Dex vs placebo/Dex, median TTP 17.4 months (95% CI: 8.1 months-NE) vs 6.4 months (95% CI: 5.6–7.4 months), respectively, P < 0.000065, crossing the upper boundary for superiority. DVT was higher with Thal/Dex vs placebo/Dex, 15.4% vs 4.3%, respectively. Median survival was not reached in either arm. Conclusions: Thal/Dex is significantly superior to Dex alone as first-line therapy for multiple myeloma. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

AbstractObjectivesIn the TOURMALINE‐MM1 phase 3 trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (IRd) showed different magnitudes of progression‐free survival (PFS) benefit vs placebo‐Rd according to number and type of prior therapies, with greater benefit seen in patients with >1 prior line of therapy or 1 prior line of therapy without stem cell transplantation (SCT).MethodsRNA sequencing data were used to investigate the basis of these differences.ResultsThe PFS benefit of IRd vs placebo‐Rd was greater in patients with tumors expressing high c‐MYC levels (median not reached vs 11.3 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.42; 95% CI, 0.26, 0.66; P < .001) compared with in those expressing low c‐MYC levels (median 20.6 vs 16.6 months; HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.42, 1.2). Expression of c‐MYC in tumors varied based on the number and type of prior therapy received, with the lowest levels observed in tumors of patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy including SCT. These tumors also had higher expression levels of CD19 and CD81.ConclusionsPFS analyses suggest that lenalidomide and ixazomib target tumors with different levels of c‐MYC, CD19, and CD81 expression, thus providing a potential rationale for the differential benefits observed in the TOURMALINE‐MM1 study. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as: NCT01564537