Deletion 13 by FISH Provides Prognostic Information on Overall Survival and Time to Progression Independent of Serum Beta 2 Microglobulin and Bone Marrow Plasma Cell Labeling Index in Myeloma Patients Undergoing Stem Cell Transplantation.
Abstract INTRODUCTION The bone marrow plasma cell labeling index (PCLI) and the beta 2 microglobulin (β2M) when combined provide a powerful staging system highly predictive of outcomes in myeloma patients (Greipp et. al., Blood, 81:3382–87, 1993). This staging system lacks information on cytogenetics and it has been demonstrated that deletion 13 (Δ13) by conventional cytogenetics is associated with poor outcomes. In conventionally treated patients Δ13 by FISH is an independent prognostic variable. We analyzed the importance of Δ13 by FISH in a cohort of patients receiving high dose therapy and assessed its value relative to known prognostic parameters, PCLI and β2M. PATIENTS AND METHODS 238 patients undergoing high dose therapy between January 1990 and September 2001 were studied. The minimum follow-up of patients was 34 months. The median age of the cohort 56 years. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization with Probes LSI13/D13S319 was performed with simultaneous immunofluorescent detection of bone marrow plasma cells by the presence of cytoplasmic immunoglobulin. PCLI was done by a slide-based immunofluorescence method with antibodies to bromodeoxyuridine. RESULTS Of the 238 patients studied 215 had a successful FISH analysis and 212 of these had a bone marrow labeling index. Deletion 13 was absent in 104 patients (48%) and present in 111 patients. The overall survival and time to progression for patients lacking and having deletion 13 was 47.8 vs 26.4 (OS) and 19.0 vs 11.7 (TTP)months respectively. A Cox model was constructed with the PCLI, the presence or absence of deletion 13 and serum β2M. Although all three variables were independently predictive of survival and time to progression, the β2M was the weakest of these three variables. The hazard function for survival for PCLI, deletion 13 and β2M was 1.4, 1.6 and 1.1 respectively. A staging system was constructed assigning 1 point for the presence of deletion 13 or a PCLI ≥ 1%. Patients fell into 3 categories of 0 points (N=69), 1 point (N=104) and 2 points (N=39). The overall survival for the three groups respectively were 56.5, 36.6 and 13.7 months (figure). The time to progression for the three groups were 22.3, 15.4 and 8 months (P<0.001). When analysis was limited to those patients transplanted within 12 months of diagnosis the results remained significant (P<0.003) with median survivals of stage 0, 1 and 2 of 72.5, 59.1 and 15.4 months respectively. TTP for stage 0, 1 & 2 in this same cohort of patients transplanted < 12 mos after diagnosis is 30.6, 21.5 & 8.2 months respectively. CONCLUSION Deletion 13 by FISH is an independent predictor of survival and time to progression providing information independent of the β2M and the PCLI. Combining the PCLI with FISH del 13 identifies patients who following transplant have a median time to progression of 8 months and a median OS of 13.7 months. This group may not benefit from autologous transplant and are candidates for novel therapeutic approaches. Figure Figure
Activation of MYC Pathway Is a Unifying Pathological Event in the Progression from Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) to Myeloma (MM).
Abstract Events mediating transformation from the pre-malignant MGUS to MM is largely unknown. Previous studies have highlighted RAS mutation as a progression event. However, this abnormality is present in only a small subset of patients. Global gene expression differences between MGUS and MM have been reported but provided little coherent biological insights. To define progression events, we examined the differences in gene expression profiles (GEP, Affymetrix U133A genechip) between 101 MM and 22 MGUS using a powerful functional genomic tool, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (Subramanium et al PNAS 2005), that allow extraction of biological information based on enrichment of genes associated with a phenotype within gene-sets derived experimentally or extracted from database. We found that a predominant theme relating to MM progression is the over-expression of proliferation related genes in MM highlighted by the enrichment of cell cycle related gene-sets. Another common theme is the enrichment of gene-sets relating to MYC activation. Seven of eight gene-sets related to MYC activation in the database are significantly enriched (p-value <0.05 and false detection rate <0.05). Leading edge (enriched genes) analysis of enriched MYC-related and proliferation-related gene-sets revealed a core, overlapping signature of 8 genes specific to MYC and not proliferation. These genes are further verified as MYC transcriptional targets using Metacore, a network analysis tool. In addition, 7 of the 8 genes had been validated as MYC target genes by chromatin immunoprecipitation previously (www.myccancergene.org). We validated this signature in independent publicly available cell lines and mouse gene expression experiments where this signature is present in mammary epithelial cell lines engineered to over-express MYC but not E2F3, SRC and BCAT, and mouse embryonic fibroblast over-expressing MYC but not HER2 or with RB knocked-out. In addition, analysis of proliferation index in these datasets showed that there is dissociation of proliferation from this signature. This showed conclusively that our signature is MYC specific and not related to proliferation. Of interest, the signature is also present in cell lines with activating RAS mutation, which also have high expression of MYC, suggesting that MYC activation is a downstream effect of activated RAS signaling. Indeed, in our patient cohort, most patients with RAS mutation express this signature. When applied to 2 large GEP MM patient cohorts, this signature was not present in normal plasma cells, rarely present in MGUS, and present in a significant proportion of MM and almost all the human myeloma cell lines. When analyzed in the context of other B-cell malignancies, the signature is very strong in Burkitt’s lymphoma, present in most myeloma but absent in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia, and normal B-cells. Our analysis therefore suggests that MYC activation may be a unifying pathological event in MGUS to MM progression. As MYC translocations occur in only about 13% of newly diagnosed MM patients, activating RAS mutations and other trans-mechanisms may mediate MYC activation. Our recent demonstration that sporadic MYC activation in a mouse strain prone to monoclonal gammopathy led to MM development provides important functional proof.
Clinical Implications of t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) and -17p13 (p53) Deletions in Myeloma Patients Treated with High Dose Therapy.
Abstract Introduction: FISH is able to recognize chromosomal deletions and translocations with a greater sensitivity than conventional cytogenetics. Specific abnormalities have been associated with prognosis. Initial observations suggest a poor outcome for patients with -17p13.1, chromosome 13 abnormalities (Δ13) and t(4;14)(p16.3;q32). In contrast a good outcome has been shown in some series for patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32). We analyzed the value of FISH in patients receiving high dose therapy . Patients and Methods: We studied by cIg-FISH 226 patients undergoing high dose therapy at Mayo Clinic between 1/1990 and 9/2001. All patients had a pretransplant cIg-FISH done on cytospin slides from marrow aspirates for t(11;14)(q13;q32), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32), and -17p13.1(p53). Information was available regarding Δ13 for all patients (+ in 52%). Results: The prevalence of the abnormalities were: t(11;14)(q13;q32) 17% (n=197), t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) 13% (n=153), and -17p13.1 11% (n=168). The overall survival (OS)was significantly shortened in patients with t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) (18.2 vs. 43.3 mo, p=0.001) (figure) and patients with -17p13.1 (14.7 vs. 38.6 mo, p=.01). OS was not different for patients with the t(11;14)(q13;q32) (36.2 vs. 34.8 mo, p=ns). Likewise time to progression (TTP) was shortened in patients with t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) (8.5 vs 17.7 mo, p=.001) and -17p13.1 (8.3 vs. 16.2 mo, p=0.005). TTP was also not affected significantly by the t(11;14)(q13;q32) (20.7 vs. 14.9 mo, p=NS). To dissect the specific contribution of t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) we did a subset analysis of patients who also had Δ13, since 85% of patients with t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) are expected to have Δ13. Of 84 studied for both abnormalities 22 had both Δ13 and t(4;14)(p16.3;q32). The OS was significantly shorter in patients with both abnormalities versus those with Δ13 alone (26.6 vs. 18.2 months, p=0.001). When a multivariable analysis of the impact of Δ13 and t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) were placed into a Cox model the hazard function for t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) was greater than Δ13 (2.6 versus 1.6). Δ13 had only borderline significance in this model (p=0.06). Conclusion: We have been unable to corroborate the improved outcome after transplant for patients with t(11;14)(q13;q32). As has been reported in patients with conventional and high dose therapy -17p13(p53) and t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) have clinical importance for estimation of OS and TTP. In this patient group the t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) carried a greater adverse impact than did Δ13, and identifies a subset of patients whose time to progression is 8.5 months. These patients likely do not benefit from autologous transplant and are candidates for novel therapeutic approaches. Outcome Successful determination Patients with translocation or deletion Survival (months) with/without abnormality Time to Progression (months) with/without abnormality * p<0.01;**p<0.001 t(11;14)(q13;q32) 197 34(17%) 36.2/34.8 20.7/14.9 p53 168 18(11%) 14.7/38.6 * 8.3/16.2 * t(4;14)(p16.3;q32) 153 26(17%) 18.2/43.3 **figure 8.5/17.7 ** t(4;14)(p16.3;q32)/Δ13+ patients 84 22(26%) 18.2/26.6 8.2/12.8 * Figure Figure
Abstract 2021: Characterization of myeloma tumors from a multi-ethnic cohort using cytogenetics and genomic analysis.
Abstract The plasma cell malignancy Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a rare but deadly form of cancer with 5 year survival rates of ∼30%. Epidemiological studies have suggested that MM exacts an especially heavy burden on African American (AA) patients. We examined a multi-ethnic cohort of MM tumors to assess potential differences in the frequency of molecular events in tumors derived from either African American (AA) or European American (EA) patients. The frequency of 14q32 translocation breakpoints at the IgH locus was compared among a series of data from 115 AA MM patients from three studies and EA MM from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). In addition, we analyzed matching genome-wide copy number and transcriptional data among 45 AA MM tumors and 196 EA MM tumors to determine differences in the frequency of molecular events in tumors from these populations. No differences were found for specific translocation subtypes; however, we detected a statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of IgH translocations between the two groups, which occurred more frequently in EA patients (52% vs. 40%; p = 0.032). When assessing genomic copy number events previously shown to be associated with poor outcome in MM, frequencies of alterations were not significant after correcting for multiple testing. Furthermore, there was not a significant difference in the association of high-risk disease using expression profiling. Our study represents the first comprehensive assessment of the frequency and distribution of molecular alterations in MM tumors from both AA and EA patients and could help shed light on possible biological features associated with population differences in incidence and outcome in MM. Citation Format: Angela S. Baker, Esteban Braggio, Susana Jacobus, Sungwon Jung, Dirk Larson, Terry Therneau, Angela Dispenzieri, Scott A. Van Wier, Gregory Ahmann, Joan Levy, Louise Perkins, Seungchan Kim, Kim Henderson, David Vesole, S. Vincent Rajkumar, Dianne F. Jelinek, John Carpten, Rafael Fonseca. Characterization of myeloma tumors from a multi-ethnic cohort using cytogenetics and genomic analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2021. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-2021
Abstract 5064: Cytogenetic and somatic characterization of myeloma tumors from a multi-ethnic cohort
Abstract Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that African Americans (AA) are twice as likely to be diagnosed with and to die from Multiple Myeloma (MM) as compared to European Americans (EA). In recent years, however, mortality rates have become more comparable between these groups. Although socioeconomic factors could play a major role to this potential disparity, biological factors may also be responsible for influencing these differences in either incidence and/or mortality. Here we examined a multi-ethnic cohort of MM tumors to assess potential differences in the frequency of molecular events in tumors derived from either African American (AA) or European American (EA) patients. First, we compared the frequency of 14q32 translocation breakpoints at the IgH locus among a series of data from 115 AA MM patients from three studies and EA MM from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG). Furthermore, we analyzed matching genome-wide copy number and transcriptional data among 47 AA MM tumors and 196 EA MM tumors to determine differences in the frequency of molecular events in tumors from these populations. Univariate analyses were conducted using the Fisher's Exact Test and p-values were calculated to measure statistical significance. We observed statistically significant differences in the frequency of IgH translocations and somatic copy number alterations. Although we did not detect differences for specific translocation subtypes, we saw a statistically significant difference in the overall frequency of IgH translocations between the two groups, which occurred more frequently in EA patients (p = 0.032). When assessing genomic copy number events previously shown to be associated with poor outcome in MM, chromosome 13 monosomy was more frequent in hyperdiploid MM from AA patients and significant after correcting for multiple testing using the Bonferoni correction method (p = 0.001). Moreover, when using the Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction method, chromosome 13 monosomy remained significantly different among hyperdiploid AA patients (p = 0.0121). Chromosome 1q amplification was also significant among hyperdiploid tumors from EA patients when using this correction method (p = 0.036). No differences in the frequency of hyperdiploid status or gene expression-based subtypes were detected when comparing tumors from AA and EA patients. Our study represents the first comprehensive assessment of the frequency and distribution of molecular alterations in MM tumors from both AA and EA patients and could help shed light on possible biological features associated with population differences in incidence and outcome in MM. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5064. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5064
Molecular Dissection of Hyperdiploid Multiple Myeloma by Gene Expression Profiling
Abstract Hyperdiploid multiple myeloma (H-MM) is the most common form of myeloma. In this gene expression profiling study, we show that H-MM is defined by a protein biosynthesis signature that is primarily driven by a gene dosage mechanism as a result of trisomic chromosomes. Within H-MM, four independently validated patient clusters overexpressing nonoverlapping sets of genes that form cognate pathways/networks that have potential biological importance in multiple myeloma were identified. One prominent cluster, cluster 1, is characterized by high expression of cancer testis antigen and proliferation-associated genes. Tumors from these patients were more proliferative than tumors in other clusters (median plasma cell labeling index, 3.8; P < 0.05). Another cluster, cluster 3, is characterized by genes involved in tumor necrosis factor/nuclear factor-κB signaling and antiapoptosis. These patients have better response to bortezomib as compared with patients within other clusters (70% versus 29%; P = 0.02). Furthermore, for a group of patients generally thought to have better prognosis, a cluster of patients with short survival (cluster 1; median survival, 27 months) could be identified. This analysis illustrates the heterogeneity within H-MM and the importance of defining specific cytogenetic prognostic factors. Furthermore, the signatures that defined these clusters may provide a basis for tailoring treatment to individual patients. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):2982–9]
Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm
The mechanisms underlying aneuploidy in multiple myeloma (MM) are unclear. Centrosome amplification has been implicated as the cause of chromosomal instability in a variety of tumors and is a potential mechanism causing aneuploidy in MM. Using immunofluorescent (IF) staining, centrosome amplification was detected in 67% of monoclonal gammopathies, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We also investigated the gene expression of centrosome proteins. Overall, gene expression data correlated well with IF-detected centrosome amplification, allowing us to derive a gene expression-based centrosome index (CI) as a surrogate for centrosome amplification. Clinically, MM patients with high CI (> 4) are associated with poor prognostic genetic and clinical subtypes (chromosome 13 deletion, t(4; 14), t(14;16), and PCLI > 1%, P < .05) and are shown here to have short survival (11.1 months versus 39.1 months, P < .001). On multivariate regression, a high CI is an independent prognostic factor. Given that centrosome amplification is already observed in MGUS and probably integral to early chromosomal instability and myeloma genesis, and patients with more extensive centrosome amplification have shorter survival, the mechanisms leading to centrosome amplification should be investigated because these may offer new avenues for therapeutic intervention.