Back to Authors

McGrath, Cody

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0176-4240

Mayo Clinic

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Citations 3

Low‐Dose Tamoxifen Induces Significant Bone Formation in Mice
McGrath, Cody , Sankaran, Jeyantt Srinivas , Styner, Maya , Little, Sarah E , Dudakovic, Amel , Wijnen, André J. van , Rubin, Janet , Sen, Buer , Styner, Maya , Dudakovic, Amel , Rubin, Janet , Sen, Buer , van Wijnen, Andre J , Xie, Zhihui

JBMR Plus | December 10, 2020 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jbm4.10450 Get It

ABSTRACT Use of the selective estrogen receptor modulator Tamoxifen (TAM) is a mainstay to induce conditional expression of Cre recombinase in transgenic laboratory mice. To excise β‐catenin fl/fl in 28‐day‐old male and female Prrx1‐CreER/β‐catenin fl/fl mice (C57BL/6), we utilized TAM at 150 mg/kg; despite β‐catenin knockout in MSC, we found a significant increase in trabecular and cortical bone volume in all genders. Because TAM was similarly anabolic in KO and control mice, we investigated a dose effect on bone formation by treating wild‐type mice (WT C57BL/6, 4 weeks) with TAM (total dose 0, 20, 40, 200 mg/kg via four injections). TAM increased bone in a dose‐dependent manner analyzed by micro–computed tomography (μCT), which showed that, compared to control, 20 mg/kg TAM increased femoral bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume [BV/TV]) (21.6% ± 1.5% to 33% ± 2.5%; 153%, p < 0.005). With TAM 40 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, BV/TV increased to 48.1% ± 4.4% (223%, p < 0.0005) and 58% ± 3.8% (269%, p < 0.0001) respectively, compared to control. Osteoblast markers increased with 200 mg/kg TAM: Dlx5 (224%, p < 0.0001), Alp (166%, p < 0.0001), Bglap (223%, p < 0.0001), and Sp7 (228%, p < 0.0001). Osteoclasts per bone surface (Oc#/BS) nearly doubled at the lowest TAM dose (20 mg/kg), but decreased to <20% control with 200 mg/kg TAM. Our data establish that use of TAM at even very low doses to excise a floxed target in postnatal mice has profound effects on trabecular and cortical bone formation. As such, TAM treatment is a major confounder in the interpretation of bone phenotypes in conditional gene knockout mouse models. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Knockdown of formin mDia2 alters lamin B1 levels and increases osteogenesis in stem cells
Sankaran, Jeyantt Srinivas , Sen, Buer , Dudakovic, Amel , Paradise, Christopher R. , Perdue, Tony D., McGrath, Cody , Styner, Maya , Newberg, Joshua, Uzer, Gunes , Wijnen, André J. van , Rubin, Janet , Sankaran, Jeyantt S , van Wijnen, Andre J , Rubin, Janet , van Wijnen, Andre J , Styner, Maya , Xie, Zhihui

Stem Cells | October 24, 2019 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 102-117

10.1002/stem.3098 Get It

AbstractNuclear actin plays a critical role in mediating mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) fate commitment. In marrow-derived MSCs, the principal diaphanous-related formin Diaph3 (mDia2) is present in the nucleus and regulates intranuclear actin polymerization, whereas Diaph1 (mDia1) is localized to the cytoplasm and controls cytoplasmic actin polymerization. We here show that mDia2 can be used as a tool to query actin-lamin nucleoskeletal structure. Silencing mDia2 affected the nucleoskeletal lamin scaffold, altering nuclear morphology without affecting cytoplasmic actin cytoskeleton, and promoted MSC differentiation. Attempting to target intranuclear actin polymerization by silencing mDia2 led to a profound loss in lamin B1 nuclear envelope structure and integrity, increased nuclear height, and reduced nuclear stiffness without compensatory changes in other actin nucleation factors. Loss of mDia2 with the associated loss in lamin B1 promoted Runx2 transcription and robust osteogenic differentiation and suppressed adipogenic differentiation. Hence, mDia2 is a potent tool to query intranuclear actin-lamin nucleoskeletal structure, and its presence serves to retain multipotent stromal cells in an undifferentiated state.
Intranuclear Actin Structure Modulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation
Sen, Buer , Uzer, Gunes , Samsonraj, Rebekah M. , McGrath, Cody , Styner, Maya , Dudakovic, Amel , Wijnen, André J. van , Rubin, Janet , van Wijnen, Andre J, Xie, Zhihui , van Wijnen, Andre J , Styner, Maya , Sen, Buer

Stem Cells | April 5, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1624-1635

10.1002/stem.2617 Get It

Abstract Actin structure contributes to physiologic events within the nucleus to control mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) differentiation. Continuous cytochalasin D (Cyto D) disruption of the MSC actin cytoskeleton leads to osteogenic or adipogenic differentiation, both requiring mass transfer of actin into the nucleus. Cyto D remains extranuclear, thus intranuclear actin polymerization is potentiated by actin transfer: we asked whether actin structure affects differentiation. We show that secondary actin filament branching via the Arp2/3 complex is required for osteogenesis and that preventing actin branching stimulates adipogenesis, as shown by expression profiling of osteogenic and adipogenic biomarkers and unbiased RNA-seq analysis. Mechanistically, Cyto D activates osteoblast master regulators (e.g., Runx2, Sp7, Dlx5) and novel coregulated genes (e.g., Atoh8, Nr4a3, Slfn5). Formin-induced primary actin filament formation is critical for Arp2/3 complex recruitment: osteogenesis is prevented by silencing of the formin mDia1, but not its paralog mDia2. Furthermore, while inhibition of actin, branching is a potent adipogenic stimulus, silencing of either mDia1 or mDia2 blocks adipogenic gene expression. We propose that mDia1, which localizes in the cytoplasm of multipotential MSCs and traffics into the nucleus after cytoskeletal disruption, joins intranuclear mDia2 to facilitate primary filament formation before mediating subsequent branching via Arp2/3 complex recruitment. The resulting intranuclear branched actin network specifies osteogenic differentiation, while actin polymerization in the absence of Arp2/3 complex-mediated secondary branching causes adipogenic differentiation.