Back to Authors

Amin, Shailja B

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8379-7064

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Hospital

Citations 9

Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients with Coexisting Lymphoma and Diabetes: A Case–Control Analysis
Rice, Bria , Buras, Matthew , Kosiorek, Heidi , Coppola, Kyle , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Karlin, Nina J. , Rice, Bria J , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi E , Coppola, Kyle E , Cook, Curtiss B

Future Science OA | October 27, 2020 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.2144/fsoa-2020-0100 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients With Coexisting Melanoma and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Mangold, Aaron R. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Mangold, A R , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2018-0084 Get It

Implications of pancreatic cancer with diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: A matched case-control study.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Buras, Matthew , Kosiorek, Heidi , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 2, 2019 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 239-239

10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.239 Get It

239 Background: The aim of this case-control study was to determine the impact of DM on survival in pancreatic cancer patients, and to examine the impact of pancreatic cancer on glycemic control in DM. Methods: Ninety-two patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer from 2007 to 2015 with DM were identified from the institutional Cancer Registry and matched to ninety-two pancreatic cancer patients without DM according to age, gender, and year of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. The file was linked to the electronic medical record to obtain information on DM and pancreatic cancer therapies, and laboratory results. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox regression analysis. Mixed models were used to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose over time. Results: Mean age of the entire pancreatic cancer cohort was 70 years, most (92%) were white, most common (88%) histology was adenocarcinoma, and majority (41%) were stage IV. No differences in age, race/ethnicity, histology, or tumor stage were detected between patients with and without DM, although DM patients had higher body mass index (P = 0.014). Mean ca 19-9 (U/ml) was 804 for diabetics, and 395 for non-diabetics. Among those with DM the mean HbA1c during the year following cancer diagnosis was 7.3%. Time (days since diagnosis) was significant in DM patients (p = 0.014) as HbA1c decreased over time. Mean glucose during the year following diagnosis among DM patients was significantly higher compared to non-DM patients [160.6 (SD = 38.0) versus 117.2 (SD = 19.0); p < 0.001]. Both groups had a decline in glucose over time (p = 0.008). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (median follow-up time of 11.9 months), 2 year overall survival was estimated at 15% [95% CI: 8-24%] for DM patients versus 26% [95% CI: 17-36%] in non-DM patients. Hazard ratio (for matched pairs) was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.75-1.77; p = 0.51). Conclusions: DM did not adversely impact survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer did not affect glycemic control. Elevated ca 19-9 in diabetic patients may be an unreliable marker for gauging disease progression.
Implications of melanoma with diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Kosiorek, Heidi , Buras, Matthew , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e21595-e21595

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e21595 Get It

Survival and glycemic control in patients with colorectal cancer and diabetes mellitus.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Kosiorek, Heidi , Buras, Matthew , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18755-e18755

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e18755 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | August 15, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2018-0044 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control Outcomes Among Patients with Coexisting Pancreatic Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | February 21, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2017-0144 Get It

Patient Outcomes from Lung Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus: A Matched Case–Control Study
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | September 26, 2017 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2017-0081 Get It

Implications of prostate cancer with diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: A matched case-control study.
Karlin, Nina J. , Verona, Patricia M , Amin, Shailja B , Kosiorek, Heidi , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 29, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 101-101

10.1200/jco.2017.35.6_suppl.101 Get It

101 Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an increased risk of mortality among patients with many types of cancers. The aim of this case-control study was to determine the impact of DM on short-term overall survival in prostate cancer patients, and to examine the impact of prostate cancer on glycemic control in DM. Methods: 276 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer from 2007-2014 with DM were identified from the Institutional Cancer Registry and matched to 276 prostate cancer patients without DM according to age and year of prostate cancer diagnosis. The file was linked to the electronic medical record to obtain information on DM and cancer therapies, and laboratory results. Results: The mean age of the entire prostate cancer cohort was 72 years, most (93%) were white, the most common Gleason score (in 52%) was 7, and the majority (56%) were tumor stage 2. No differences in age, race/ethnicity, Gleason score, or tumor stage were detected between patients with and without DM, although DM patients had higher body mass index (P = .031). Among those with DM the mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 6.7%. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (median follow-up time of 43.7 months), 5-year overall survival was estimated at 88% for DM patients versus 93% in non-DM patients. Hazard ratio (for matched pairs) was 1.64 (95% CI: 0.77-3.46, P = .20). Moreover, mean HbA1c and glucose values among DM cases did not significantly change over 1 year (P ≥ .13). Mean glucose among DM patients was significantly (p < 0.01) higher compared to non-DM patients. Conclusions: DM did not adversely impact survival in prostate cancer patients. In addition, prostate cancer or its treatment does not appear to affect glycemic control. Both patients and their providers can be reassured that the two concurrent diagnoses do not adversely interact to worsen short term outcomes.