Xu, Bo

4147 Background: Retrospective studies of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3, a regulator of gene expression) in cancer-lineage cells have suggested it is a biomarker of poor prognosis. We analyzed data from 3 phase 3 RCTs (BRIGHTER [T1; NCT02178956], CO.23 [T2; NCT01830621], CanStem111P [T3; NCT02993731]) to evaluate the prognostic impact of pSTAT3 on OS in GI cancer patients (pts). Methods: pSTAT3 was evaluated in archival tumor tissue from pts with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (T1), colorectal cancer (T2), or pancreatic cancer (T3) who received standard of care in the control arms (CTL) of their respective trials. pSTAT3 positive (+) or negative (−) status was determined by detecting pSTAT3 in both tumor and tumor microenvironment (TME) cells in a laboratory-developed immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay (T1; T2), later developed into the investigational pSTAT3 IHC D3A7 assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) (T3). The positivity cutoff requires a sample have both a TME score of 2 and ≥5% of tumor cells staining positively for pSTAT3. Pre-analytical variables (eg, specimen collection, handling, and processing), tumor indication, and slight differences in the assays used for each study may contribute to relative differences in evaluable rates between studies. In an exploratory analysis, OS was compared in pSTAT3+ vs pSTAT3− pts via an unstratified log-rank test. Results: In each study, intent-to-treat pts with evaluable pSTAT3 results were considered pSTAT3-evaluable. This abstract includes pSTAT3-evaluable pts randomized to the CTL arms (T1: n/N=248/357, 69.5%; T2: n/N=110/144, 76.4%; T3: n/N=243/569, 42.7%). Baseline characteristics are presented in the table. Median (m) OS was shorter in pts with pSTAT3+ tumors across all studies (T1 hazard ratio [HR]=1.32 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.74]; T2 HR=2.40 [1.50, 3.83]; T3 HR=1.08 [0.77, 1.50]). Conclusions: In pSTAT3-evaluable populations from 3 RCTs across GI cancers, CTL pts with pSTAT3+ (vs pSTAT3−) tumors had shorter mOS. These results suggest that pSTAT3 positivity may be a biomarker of poor clinical outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02178956; NCT01830621; NCT02993731. [Table: see text]

677 Background: Napabucasin a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinically, potent and broad-spectrum anti-cancer activity was observed in vitro and in vivo, alone and in combination with other agents. In a phase 1 study, napabucasin monotherapy was well tolerated with encouraging signs of anti-tumor activity at the RP2D of 500 mg BID. Methods: The current open-label, multi-center study includes phase II expansion in pts with refractory, K- Raswt mCRC to confirm safety and anti-tumor activity of napabucasin administered orally at 480mg BID in combination with panitumumab (6mg/kg bi-weekly). Results: 72 pts were enrolled, 48 pts were evaluable by RECIST of which 7 (15%) and 41 (85%) had 2 or >3 prior treatment lines, respectively. Of the 48 evaluable pts, 64.6% (31/48) were previously treated with an anti-EGFR agent. No new adverse events (AEs) were observed and most common AEs included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. Among 48 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, Disease Control Rate (DCR) was observed in 25 pts (52.1%) of which 3 pts achieved PR (6%) and 22 pts achieved SD (45%). Among 31 pts previously treated with anti-EGFR therapy, DCR was observed in 15 pts (48%) compared with DCR of 59% observed in 10 out of 17 anti-EGFR naïve pts receiving a scan. Conclusions: This phase II study confirmed that napabucasin can be safely combined with panitumumab at full dose and shows encouraging anti-tumor activity in pts with K- Ras wt mCRC, regardless of prior anti-EGFR exposure, suggesting that napabucasin may sensitize pts to repeat anti-EGFR therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01776307. [Table: see text]