Bernheim, Alain

Background: Although a gradual increase in heart rate (HR) during dobutamine stress testing (DST) is desired, few data exists regarding whether this is similarly achieved in patients of widely varying body mass index (BMI). Whether difference in BMI contributes to variation in the hemodynamic and symptomatic response to dobutamine is also unknown. Methods: From prospectively acquired data of 2776 consecutive patients who underwent DST according to standard weight-based clinical protocol, we classified patients into 4 groups of BMI (kg/m 2 ): <25 (normal), 25 to 29.9 (overweight), 30 to 39.9 (obese), and ≥40 (severely obese) and compared the rate of increase of HR, mean blood pressure, and development of symptoms for the groups. Results: Age was 68 + 12 years, 52% were men, BMI was 29.8 + 6.6 kg/m 2 (range 14.5-81.4), 198 (7%) had BMI ≥40, and target HR was achieved in 2433 (88%). The rate of increase in HR was similar for each group of BMI after adjustment for age, gender, baseline HR, negative chronotropic use, and atropine administration. The percentage of patients in each group who achieved target HR was similar and the percentage of target HR achieved at each stage of dobutamine was essentially equivalent. Blood pressure responses and development of symptoms were similar in the 4 groups of BMI. Independent predictors of failure to achieve target HR included age, diabetes mellitus, treatment with negative chronotropic medications, and baseline HR; BMI was not a predictor (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, P = .086). Conclusion: The current weight-based protocol of dobutamine dosing for DST results in similar increases in HR and blood pressure for patients of widely varying BMI.

Background— The long-term prognosis of patients who develop carcinoid heart disease and the effect of cardiac surgery on outcome are not well established. Methods and Results— In this retrospective study, we identified 200 patients with carcinoid syndrome referred for echocardiography in whom the diagnosis of carcinoid heart disease was confirmed. Patients were divided into 3 groups of similar size according to the date from first diagnosis of carcinoid heart disease. Group A comprised patients diagnosed from 1981 through June 1989; group B, diagnosed July 1989 through May 1995; and group C, June 1995 through 2000. The end point was all-cause mortality. Median survival was significantly lower in group A (1.5 years, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.9 years) compared with groups B (3.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.1 years) and C (4.4, 95% CI 2.4 to 7.1 years; P =0.009). In a multivariate model adjusted for treatment and clinical characteristics, the risk of death in groups B (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99, P =0.04) and C (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92, P =0.006) was significantly reduced relative to group A. Cardiac surgery was performed in 87 patients. When cardiac surgery was included as a time-dependent covariate in a multivariate analysis, it was associated with a risk reduction of 0.48 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.73, P <0.001), whereas the time period of diagnosis was no longer significant. Conclusions— The prognosis of patients with recognized carcinoid heart disease has improved over the past 2 decades at our institution. This change in survival may be related to valve replacement surgery.