Boustani, Malaz

Objectives: The delirium course of critically ill adults can be classified into trajectories based on the severity and duration of delirium as shown by a recent study. It is unknown whether these trajectories and associated outcomes are reproducible. We aimed to define delirium severity trajectories using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and delirium duration and evaluate the association of trajectory membership with clinical characteristics and 30-day post-discharge mortality. Design: Population-based retrospective cohort. Setting: Fourteen medical-surgical ICUs in Alberta, Canada from January 1, 2014, to December 21, 2019. Patients: We included adult patients (≥ 18 yr old) with an ICU length of stay of greater than or equal to 24 hours, an ICDSC score indicating delirium (≥ 4), and 30-day follow-up data were included. Group-based trajectory modeling identified trajectories over a 7-day period with SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic (age, sex) and clinical data (2 × d ICDSC score, comorbidities, illness severity, admission reason, procedures, length of stay, in-hospital, and 30-d post-discharge mortality) were captured from electronic medical records. In total, 21,071 patients were included, with a median age of 59 years (interquartile range, 46–70 yr), 59% male (n = 12,547), and 3% died at 30 days (n = 541). The five-trajectory model was selected. These trajectories followed previously defined patterns: 1) Mild-Brief (19.4%); 2); Severe-Rapid Recovers (18.5%); 3) Severe-Slow Recovers (31%); 4) Mild-Accelerating (14.1%); and 5) Severe-Nonrecovers (16.9%). Trajectory membership was not significantly associated with 30-day post-discharge mortality; however, clinically relevant trends were observed. Conclusions: The current study substantiates the proof-of-concept model of five delirium severity trajectories. Trajectory membership did not predict 30-day post-discharge mortality. Further research is needed to understand the associations between trajectory membership, biological-based biomarkers, and patient-relevant outcomes.

Abstract Effective mentorship relationships increase mentee academic success and satisfaction. However, existing mentorship models are limited by miscommunication, undefined roles, and mismatched goals. The agile mentorship process aims to address these limitations by leveraging insights from agile science and the existing evidence on effective mentorship models to support effective mentoring relationships in healthcare environments. To illustrate the agile mentorship process and the growth of a mentored clinician–scientist (H.L., first author), we describe the model and share qualitative findings generated from the independent analysis of 18 months of mentee reflections. In two iterative cycles, reflections (n = 56) were analyzed using exploratory content and relational analysis. Coauthors C.S. and B.T. employed inductive and deductive coding approaches to explore the data using an ontological lens. We discuss and share quotes representing the identified four main themes. Identification of shortcomings, adaptive perspective, managing relationships, and personal growth. In addition, personal growth had three subthemes: Awareness, continual reflection, and toolkit development. In summary, the reflections of one mentee within the agile mentorship process illustrated the growth process which occurred within an effective mentorship relationship. The agile mentorship process is a scalable and sustainable framework that is adaptable to various career development processes. Further evaluation is needed to understand the longitudinal impact of the model on mentee performance and satisfaction.

Background Management of delirium in intensive care units is challenging because effective therapies are lacking. Music is a promising nonpharmacological intervention. Objectives To determine the feasibility and acceptability of personalized music (PM), slow-tempo music (STM), and attention control (AC) in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit, and to estimate the effect of music on delirium. Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed in an academic medical-surgical intensive care unit. After particular inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, patients were randomized to groups listening to PM, relaxing STM, or an audiobook (AC group). Sessions lasted 1 hour and were given twice daily for up to 7 days. Patients wore noise-canceling headphones and used mp3 players to listen to their music/audiobook. Delirium and delirium severity were assessed twice daily by using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the CAM-ICU-7, respectively. Results Of the 1589 patients screened, 117 (7.4%) were eligible. Of those, 52 (44.4%) were randomized, with a recruitment rate of 5 patients per month. Adherence was higher in the groups listening to music (80% in the PM and STM groups vs 30% in the AC group; P = .01), and 80% of patients surveyed rated the music as enjoyable. The median number (interquartile range) of delirium/coma-free days by day 7 was 2 (1-6) for PM, 3 (1-6) for STM, and 2 (0-3) for AC (P = .32). Median delirium severity was 5.5 (1-7) for PM, 3.5 (0-7) for STM, and 4 (1-6.5) for AC (P = .78). Conclusions Music delivery is acceptable to patients and is feasible in intensive care units. Further research testing use of this promising intervention to reduce delirium is warranted.

Objectives: Delirium severity is independently associated with longer hospital stays, nursing home placement, and death in patients outside the ICU. Delirium severity in the ICU is not routinely measured because the available instruments are difficult to complete in critically ill patients. We designed our study to assess the reliability and validity of a new ICU delirium severity tool, the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 delirium severity scale. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Medical, surgical, and progressive ICUs of three academic hospitals. Patients: Five hundred eighteen adult (≥ 18 yr) patients. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Patients received the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, and Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 assessments. A 7-point scale (0–7) was derived from responses to the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale items. Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.85) and good correlation with Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 scores (correlation coefficient = 0.64). Known-groups validity was supported by the separation of mechanically ventilated and nonventilated assessments. Median Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores demonstrated good predictive validity with higher odds (odds ratio = 1.47; 95% CI = 1.30–1.66) of in-hospital mortality and lower odds (odds ratio = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.72–0.9) of being discharged home after adjusting for age, race, gender, severity of illness, and chronic comorbidities. Higher Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 scores were also associated with increased length of ICU stay (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 is a valid and reliable delirium severity measure among ICU patients. Further research comparing it to other delirium severity measures, its use in delirium efficacy trials, and real-life implementation is needed to determine its role in research and clinical practice.