Chen, M

Abstract Introduction: Previously, we detected amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PDL1, PDL2, and JAK2 (the PDJ amplicon) in up to 25% of triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) using oligonucleotide CGH arrays (aCGH). Amplification was associated with poor outcome and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. Here, we have developed a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for detection of the JAK2/PDL1 amplification. Methods: We selected five 9p24.1-amplified and five non-amplified paraffin embedded TNBC tumor samples, defined by aCGH log2ratio>2.0 as amplified for FISH validation. 5' JAK2 DNA labeled with SpectrumGreen dUTP, 3' JAK2 DNA labeled in SpectrumOrange dUTP and a commercially available chromosome 9 centromeric probe (Spectrum Aqua) were combined as one probe set. The break-apart (BAP) probe set was applied to individual slides, hybridized, and washed, 50 events/sample were counted. We defined 9p24.1 amplification by FISH as the ratio of average JAK2 score/ average centromere 9 (CEN 9) score >1.1. Nonparametric student's t-test was used for statistical analysis. Results: In the amplified subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 1.89 to 21.0 (mean, 6.76). To adjust for aneuploidy, the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 1.02 to 9.21 (mean ratio, 2.9). The sample with highest level of amplification (aCGH log2ratio =4) detected by aCGH also scored highest by FISH (FISH ratio=9.21). One case with JAK2 amplification (aCGH log2ratio =3) was not detected by FISH (ratio, 1.02), but had low tumor cell content. In the non-amplification subgroup (n=5), JAK2 amplification was detected by FISH with the range from 0.98 to 3.54 (mean, 1.8), the ratio of JAK2 to CEN 9 was measured with the range from 0.48 to1.05 (mean, 0.73). Of note, two tumors with copy number loss by aCGH were confirmed by FISH (ratio 0.48, 0.56). In total, the 9p24.1 amplification was detected in 4 out 5 (80%) amplified samples defined by aCGH and 5 out 5 not amplified. A significant difference in JAK2: CEN 9 ratio (p=0.03) was observed between the amplified and non-amplified subgroups but not in JAK2 absolute scores (p=0.095). Conclusion: In this study, we have developed a novel FISH assay for detection of the 9p24.1 amplification in TNBC, encoding JAK2, PD-L1, and PD-L2. The FISH assay correlates with detection of the amplification by aCGH, but is less sensitive, in particular in tissue with lower tumor cell content. We predict that 9p24.1 amplification will be a clinically relevant biomarker in TNBC. Citation Format: Chen M, Andreozzi M, Pockaj B, Barrett MT, Ocal IT, McCullough AE, Anderson KS. A novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay to detect 9p24.1 amplification in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-17.

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease. Amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding JAK2 and PD-L1 has been reported in up to 25% of TNBC and is associated with poor clinical outcome. In lymphoma, JAK2 is a transcriptional activator of both PD-1 ligands, and chromosome 9p copy number gain has been associated with therapeutic activity of nivolumab. We evaluated the interaction of JAK2 and PD-L1 expression in TNBC. Methods: 9p24.1 amplification in 4 TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, HCC1937, and HCC70) was measured using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Amplification was defined as aCGH log2ratio>2.0. Cell surface expression of PD-L1 was detected by flow cytometry and compared with the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of isotype control Ig. To selectively inhibit JAK2, lentiviral vectors encoding two different shRNA were generated. JAK2, pSTAT1 and pSTAT3 expression were measured by immunoblot. The effects of the anti-JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) induction of PD-L1 was measured. Results: 9p24.1 copy number loss was measured in MDA-MB-231 (log2ratio =-1), neutral in HCC1937 ((log2ratio =0), gained in MDA-MB-436 ((log2ratio =+1) and amplified in HCC70 ((log2ratio =+2). No correlation was observed between PD-L1 expression and the 9p24.1 amplification, with the MFI ratio range from 5 to 16.5, mean 8.3 by flow cytometry. TNBC cell lines had higher baseline expression of PD-L1 compared to the ER+ cell lines T47D and MCF-7 (ratio, 0 p=0.1). Low dose IFN-γ (1.0-10.0 ng/ml) rapidly induced expression of PD-L1 in MDA-MB-231 (1.5 fold increase) and HCC70 (3.3 fold increase) with significant activation of the JAK2/STAT1 pathway. The induction of pSTAT1 and PD-L1 expression by IFN-γ was blocked with low dose (1mM) JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. Knockdown of JAK2 with shRNA (>80%) did not impact PD-L1 baseline expression in MDA-MB-231 and HCC70 but abrogated IFN-γ –mediated induction of PD-L1 and the phosphorylation of STAT1. Conclusion: These data suggest that TNBC cell lines have baseline PD-L1 expression, but the cells with 9p24.1 amplification are highly sensitive to PD-L1 induction with IFN-γ which can be abrogated with inhibition with a JAK1/2 inhibitor or shRNA. Synergistic inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 and JAK2 may have therapeutic efficacy in the subset of TNBC with 9p24.1 amplification, and the dynamic effects of tumor PD-L1 expression in response to local inflammation should be considered in the evaluation of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade. Citation Format: Chen M, Pockaj B, Andreozzi M, Barrett MT, Ocal IT, McCullough AE, Krishna S, Anderson KS. JAK2 and PD-L1 amplification enhance the dynamic expression of PD-L1 in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-04-18.