Habermann, EB

Abstract Background The 21-gene (Oncotype DX) Recurrence Score (RS) is a multi-gene expression assay that is both prognostic and predictive of adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjCT) benefit in estrogen receptor (ER) positive/HER2 negative breast cancer (BC). Use of the RS in TNBC and HER2+ BC is not recommended by national guidelines. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to evaluate whether oncologists use the RS in these subtypes. Additionally, we assessed the prognostic effects of the RS in node negative patients (pts) who did or did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods Pts with TN and HER2+ BC diagnosed from 2010-2015 in the NCDB were analyzed. Pts with neoadjuvant therapy or stage IV were excluded. Cases with RS testing were classified as low (RS 0-17), intermediate (RS 18-30) or high (RS 31+). Analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression; overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests. Results 142,330 pts were evaluable: 64,830 TNBC and 77,500 HER2+ (21,768 ER-/HER2+ and 55,732 ER+/HER2+). In these subtypes, RS was performed in 5,369 (3.8%) pts as follows: 1,479 (2.3%) TNBC, 185 (0.8%) ER-/HER2+, and 3,705 (6.6%) ER+/HER2+. Given the small ER-/HER2+ cohort, we focused on TNBC and ER+/HER2+. Within these subtypes, factors associated with RS testing included lower grade, smaller pathologic tumor size, pathologic N0 status, white race, age 60-69, and ILC or IMC histology (each p<0.005). Of the TNBC pts tested, the RS distribution was: low 16.3%, intermediate 13.1% and high 70.6%, while for ER+/HER2+ it was low 30.5%, intermediate 30.7% and high 38.8% (p<0.001). AdjCT was less frequently recommended in pts with low RS; however, this varied by tumor subtype with AdjCT recommended for 66.8% of TNBC with low RS and 37.9% of ER+/HER2+ with low RS. For intermediate RS, rates of AdjCT recommendation were 74.3% and 73.7%, and for high RS were 94.0% and 93.2% for TNBC and ER+/HER2+ respectively. In a multivariable analysis among pts with low RS, factors associated with AdjCT recommendation included younger age, larger pathologic tumor size, node positive disease, and higher grade. In AdjCT untreated TNBC, 5 yr OS did not differ for low RS (96.5%) vs intermediate RS (95.2%, p=0.82). In contrast OS was significantly worse for high RS (76.7%) than the other two groups, each p≤0.04. In AdjCT untreated ER+/HER2+, 5 yr OS was significantly better for low RS (96.7%) vs intermediate RS (92.5%, p=0.03) and vs high RS (92.1%, p=0.003), with no difference between intermediate RS vs high RS (p=0.32). Evaluating pts who did receive AdjCT, there was no significant difference in 5 yr OS for either subtype according to RS (p=0.46 and p=0.83). Interestingly, in patients with low RS, 5 yr OS was similar with or without AdjCT in both TNBC (89.5% vs 96.5%, p=0.25) and ER+/HER2+ (97.6% vs 96.7%, p=0.47). Conclusions RS testing is being conducted in a small fraction of pts with TN and HER2+ BC with lower clinical risk features. The observation that RS is prognostic for survival in AdjCT untreated patients is hypothesis generating, and suggests that further evaluation of the RS and other multigene assays in ER negative and HER2+ BC is warranted. Citation Format: Boughey JC, Hoskin TL, Cocco D, Day CN, Leon-Ferre R, Habermann EB, Goetz MP. The 21-gene recurrence score and chemotherapy use in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive breast cancer: A National Cancer Database study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-09.

Abstract Background Metaplastic breast cancer (MBC), characterized by a mixture of epithelial, squamous or mesenchymal elements and a usually triple-negative (TN) phenotype, accounts for <1% of breast cancer diagnoses. MBC has a poor prognosis with frequent distant spread, but, paradoxically, a lower than expected rate of nodal positivity (6 to 40%). Due to its rarity there is little data on how best to evaluate and manage the axilla in women with these tumors. Thus we undertook this study to evaluate axillary management and oncologic outcomes. Methods With IRB approval, we identified adult patients diagnosed with MBC at our institution from 2001 to 2011 from our prospective surgical pathology database. Patient, pathology, imaging, treatment and outcome data were obtained from electronic medical record, tumor registry, pathology slide and imaging review. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 66 months. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 10.0 software. Results We identified 41 MBC patients, median age 60 years (range 33-89 years), with a median tumor size of 2.7 cm; 33 (80%) were TN. 23 patients (56%) had a preoperative axillary ultrasound (AUS): 9 (39%) showed at least one suspicious axillary lymph node (LN) of whom 6 had a preoperative fine needle LN biopsy (FNA) of which 3 were positive for metastasis. 6 patients, including the 3 LN+ on FNA, had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Operation included axillary dissection (ALND) in 14, sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) in 23, and SLNB followed by ALND in 1, while 3 patients had no axillary surgery. 10 patients were LN+ at operation. Among 22 patients who had both an AUS and axillary surgery, AUS had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 78%. Patient and tumor variables in association with pathologic LN status are summarized in the table. LN positivity correlated with increasing tumor size, T stage, grade and angiolymphatic invasion. 16 patients recurred, most with distant disease (10/16, 63%), although there was a solitary axillary recurrence 8 months after a negative SLNB in one patient who did not have a preoperative AUS. Thus the accuracy of SLNB was 96% (23/24) overall, but among those without preoperative AUS, 1/7 (14%) SLNBs were falsely negative. 5-year disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival estimates were 49% and 63%. LN- N=28 (74%)LN+ N=10 (26%)p-valueSize, median (IQR), cm2.7 (1.6-4.6)6.6 (2.5-16.5)0.001T stage 0.03T19 (100%)0 (0%) T214 (78%)4 (22%) T33 (60%)2 (40%) T42 (33%)4 (67%) Grade 0.04Low6 (16%)0 (0%) Intermediate/High22 (58%)10 (26%) Estrogen Receptor 0.61Positive (>1%)5 (71%)2 (29%) Negative (<1%)23 (74%)8 (26%) Angiolymphatic Invasion 0.002No26 (87%)4 (13%) Yes2 (25%)6 (75%) Dominant Histology 0.65Adenosquamous2 (100%)0 (0%) Matrix producing4 (80%)1 (20%) Spindle cell14 (74%)5 (26%) Squamous*8 (67%)4 (33%) *any squamous component Conclusion Our study is the first to specifically address AUS and SLNB for patients with metaplastic breast cancer. AUS had 100% sensitivity and 78% specificity, while one patient without a preoperative AUS had a falsely negative SLNB. Further, AUS with FNA of suspicious LNs was useful for staging at the time of diagnosis and informing treatment. We recommend this approach for patients with MBC. Citation Format: Murphy BL, Fazzio RT, Hoskin TL, Glazebrook KN, Keeney MG, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ. Management of the axilla in metaplastic breast carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-01-01.

Abstract Introduction: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay has been shown in retrospective studies to predict benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in node positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts). This study evaluates the trends and patterns of use of RS assay in N+, ER+/HER2-breast cancer and the impact of RS on decision to use AC in a real-world multi-institutional database. Methods: Pts with T1-T4c, N1mi-N3, ER+/HER2- BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2013, included in the National Cancer Data Base were analyzed. Pts who received neo-AC were excluded. Analyses included Cochrane-Armitage tests for trends and multivariable logistic regression assessing factors influencing RS testing and AC recommendations based on RS. Results: Among 73,049 pts, RS was obtained in 20.6%, increasing from 14.9% in 2010 to 24.4% in 2013 (p<0.001). RS testing was most common in N1mi (43.6%) and N1 (22.0%) and rare in N2/N3 (3.3%) BC. Of the 12,540 BC with quantitative RS results, 61.1% were low RS, 32.3% intermediate RS and 6.6% high RS. AC recommendation was less frequent in pts with RS testing compared to pts not tested (50.4% recommended AC vs 80.9%, p<0.001). In pts with N1mi/N1 BC, recommendation rates for AC were higher with higher RS (see table), however in N2/N3 BC, AC was recommended in the majority (71-88%) regardless of RS. Most pts (>85%) with RS 26-30 or high risk RS were recommended AC regardless of N stage. For pts with low risk RS, recommendation for AC increased significantly with increasing N stage (see table). On multivariable analysis, in pts with low risk RS, AC was more likely to be recommended in those with N1/N2+ stage (OR 2.3 and 9.1 vs N1mi), T2 and T3/T4 tumors (OR 1.3 and 2.2 vs T1 tumors), poorly differentiated tumors (OR 1.6) and younger age (OR 3.4 and 1.7, respectively, for <40 and 40-49 vs 50-59) (all p<0.001). Among pts with RS 18-25, AC was more likely to be recommended in those with higher tumor grade, younger age but the effect of N stage was less pronounced. Histology (IDC vs ILC) did not influence AC recommendation in any RS subset. Path N StageRS Risk GroupLow RiskIntermediate RiskHigh RiskRS<18RS 18-25RS 26-30RS>30N1mi AC No1,854 (75.9%)389 (36.9%)36 (14.6%)16 (7.0%)N1mi AC Yes590 (24.1%)666 (63.1%)210 (85.4%)212 (93.0%)N1 AC No3,000 (60.6%)699 (33.0%)75 (14.8%)33 (6.0%)N1 AC Yes1,954 (39.4%)1,422 (67.0%)431 (85.2%)518 (94.0%)N2/N3 AC No76 (29.0%)17 (16.7%)3 (12.5%)7 (14.9%)N2/N3 AC Yes186 (71.0%)85 (83.3%)21 (87.5%)40 (85.1%)p-value<0.001<0.0010.880.16 Conclusions: RS was obtained in about one fifth of pts with N+ ER+/HER2- BC, predominantly for N1mi and N1 disease. Overall, RS testing decreased frequency of recommendation of AC in N+ BC pts. The RS influenced use of AC particularly in N1mi and N1 pts, likely avoiding overtreatment of those with low risk RS and RS 18-25. Prospective data regarding RS to direct AC in N+ BC are awaited. Citation Format: Peethambaram PP, Hoskin TL, Heins CN, Habermann EB, Boughey JC. How 21-gene recurrence score assay is being used to individualize adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations in ER+/HER2 -node positive breast cancer -A national cancer data base study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD7-05.

Abstract Background: Negative margins are important in decreasing risk of local recurrence after breast conservation surgery. Further, positive margins on final pathology require a second operation, burdening patients and increasing costs. We identified factors predicting positive margins at lumpectomy prompting intraoperative re-excision in a large referral center. Methods With IRB approval we reviewed all breast cancer lumpectomy cases from January 2012 to December 2013. Associations between rates of positive margin (defined as tumor at ink) and patient and tumor factors were assessed using chi square tests and univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression, overall and stratified by DCIS or invasive cancer. Results 385 patients (105 DCIS and 280 invasive disease) were identified. Overall positive margin rate at lumpectomy requiring intraoperative re-excision was 62.3% and was higher in DCIS than in invasive disease (78.1% vs 56.4%, OR=2.78, p=0.001). Positive margin rates did not vary by surgeon, patient age, ER, PR or HER2 status of the tumor. On univariate analysis higher tumor grade was associated with a higher margin positive rate (grade 3 vs grade 1, OR=1.71, p=0.049). Within the 105 DCIS cases, no factors had statistically significantly different odds of positive margins on univariate or multivariable analysis. Within the 280 cases of invasive breast cancer, factors independently associated with lower odds of margin positivity were neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.30, p=0.037, relative to no neoadjuvant therapy) and seed localized excision (OR 0.24, p=0.03, relative to no localization). Multivariable Logistic Regression* Modeling DCISInvasive DiseaseVariableOdds RatioP-valueOdds RatioP-valueAge 50+ vs Age <502.860.111.590.23Grade 2 vs Grade 10.940.921.500.21Grade 3 vs Grade 13.250.121.580.37Estrogen Receptor Positive vs Negative3.950.221.640.42Progesterone Receptor Positive vs Negative0.840.871.110.84Her2 Positive vs Negative 1.270.68Stage T2 vs T1 2.540.45Stage T3 vs T1 2.180.69Ki67 <15% vs 15%+ 0.570.09Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs None 0.300.04Seed Localization vs No Localization 0.240.03Wire Localization vs No Localization 0.330.13Intraoperative Ultrasound vs No Localization 0.670.53*adjusted for individual surgeons (all p >0.05) Conclusion DCIS was associated with higher rate of positive margins at lumpectomy than invasive breast cancer. Within invasive disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and seed localization were associated with lower rates of margin positivity. Strategies to decrease positive margins would be best employed in cases of lumpectomy for DCIS and for invasive disease treated without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Seed localization may be one strategy to lower positive margin rates. Citation Format: Boughey JC, Keeney MG, Glasgow AE, Keeney GL, Habermann EB. Tumor and procedural factors associated with positive margins at lumpectomy in women undergoing breast conservation surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-08.