Back to Authors

Gerritsen, Winald R.

Mayo Clinic

Radboud University Nijmegen

Citations 1

Results of subset analyses on overall survival (OS) from study CA184-043: Ipilimumab (Ipi) versus placebo (Pbo) in post-docetaxel metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Drake, Charles G. , Kwon, Eugene D., Fizazi, Karim , Bossi, Alberto , Eertwegh, Alfons J. van den, Scher, Howard I. , McHenry, Brent, Gerritsen, Winald R., Logothetis, Christopher J. , Beer, Tomasz M. , Liu, David M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 2-2

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.2 Get It

2 Background: The CA184-043 phase 3 study did not reach statistical significance for its primary endpoint of OS (HR=0.85, p=0.053). However, antitumor activity was observed in other efficacy endpoints, including progression-free survival. Prespecified subset analyses were performed to understand if any prognostic features may identify mCRPC patients (pts) more likely to benefit from Ipi treatment. Methods: 799 pts were randomized to receive a single dose of radiotherapy (RT) followed by either Ipi (N=399) or Pbo (N=400). Prespecified subset analyses based on Kaplan-Meier/Cox methodology were performed using known prognostic factors for OS in mCRPC. Results: Prespecified subset analyses suggested that Ipi may be more active in pts with favorable prognostic factors, including no visceral disease, alkaline phosphatase <1.5 ULN, and hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL (Table). The safety profile in this study was consistent with previous reports of Ipi. Conclusions: Based on these subset analyses, Ipi added to RT appears to have greater activity than RT alone in pts with a favorable prognostic profile. These results support continued investigation of Ipi in the ongoing CA184-095 study in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00861614. [Table: see text]