Back to Authors

Shen, Xiaowei

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3117-6028

Mayo Clinic

University of Toronto

Citations 1

Genomic determinants of prognosis in esophageal adenocarcinoma: Using computational methods to account for gene-gene interactions.
Morgen, Eric , Shen, Xiaowei , Vaughan, Thomas L. , Wu, Anna H. , Gammon, Marilie D. , Chow, Wong Ho, Romero, Yvonne , Investigators, on behalf of the BEAGESS, Whiteman, David C. , Stram, Daniel O. , Xu, Wei , Liu, Geoffrey , Investigators, on behalf of the BEAGESS

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3_suppl | Pages: 42-42

10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.42 Get It

42 Background: Methods of stratifying esophageal adenocarcinoma patients into prognostic groups are needed, as are new insights into genetic determinants of disease behaviour. Prognosis is likely to have non-negligible genetic influences, as mediated by host responses to tumor, resistance to therapeutic side-effects, and/or an influence on tumor development. Prior studies have used candidate-gene approaches. We took an alternative approach, using an unbiased, genome-wide approach, and novel analytic methods that may be better able to detect multi-gene interactions, which may contribute the majority of genetic effects for many clinical phenotypes. Methods: Germline DNA from a Toronto-based cohort of EAC patients (n=270) was analyzed by Omni1 Quad microarray as part of the BEAGESS initiative. Quality control and analysis was performed using PLINK, R, and GenABEL software packages. A Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model for progression-free survival tested each polymorphism for independent effects at a genome-wide significance level of P < 1E-07, adjusting for population stratification. While classical analysis has limited ability to detect gene-gene interactions, a Random Survival Forest algorithm was used to detect effects based on the complex interactions among top 1,000 polymorphisms by p-value ranking. Results: After data cleaning and standard GWAS quality control procedures, there were 735,309 SNPs and 245 patients remaining for analysis. The CPH model, adjusted for population stratification, produced a satisfactory Q-Q plot, and showed one SNP (rs7844673, Chr 8) that was significant at p=7.8E-8. In addition, Random Forest based variable selection produced a set of 20 polymorphisms that (1) reproduced 86% of the predictive ability of the full 1000 variables, and (2) also included the #3 ranked polymorphism by CPH modeling (rs9290822, Chr 3) upstream of the IGF2BP2 gene. Conclusions: A genome-wide approach has discovered two previously undescribed SNPs with a potential influence on EAC prognosis via a combination of independent and interactive effects. Validation in an independent cohort is currently being pursued.