Ghimire, Krishna Bilas

8606 Background: The rapidity of response to initial therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) depends on a variety of factors. There is limited data on its implications on long term outcomes in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: We retrospectively examined the outcomes in a cohort of 454 pts with newly diagnosed MM between Jan 2000- Dec 2011 undergoing induction therapy. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 66 yrs (29-92). Pts had measurable serum M-spike (>= 1 g/dL), dFLC (>=10 mg/dl) or 24 hour urinary M protein excretion (UrM; >=200 mg) in 70, 63 and 39% respectively. We first examined the relationship between the response to first cycle of therapy and overall survival (OS). We divided pts into quartiles based on their % reduction in the serum M spike, dFLC or UrM. The median OS (Table) was poorest for pts with the least reduction of serum M protein (P<0.001) and of dFLC. The cutoffs for Q1 was 25, 40and 40% decrease for serum M spike, dFLC and 24 hr UrM respectively. Among various baseline characteristics only higher age was predictive of a poor (Q1) response. Given the trend toward worse OS among the Q 4 group (maximum decrease in serum M spike), we examined the relationship to cytogenetic risk. Among 232 pts with FISH data available, proportion of pts with high-risk disease was 27, 12, 22 and 31% respectively in quartiles 1 - 4). In a multivariate analysis, quartile 1 and 4 of serum M-protein response and the high-risk FISH were independent risk factors associated inferior OS. Conclusions: Both shallow and very deep response to therapy in cycle 1 is a strong indicator of eventual disease outcome and should be considered as marker of high-risk disease, likely through different mechanisms. For the shallow responders, prospective trials should assess if a change in therapeutic management will alter the outcome of these pts. The rapid deep responders also appear represent a different high-risk biology, emphasizing the fact that pts with high-risk disease often have excellent initial responses, but poor long term outcomes. [Table: see text]

383 Background: Sorafenib was approved by FDA for treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in November 2007. In this study, we update survival trends in advanced HCC using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Methods: We selected patients with advanced HCC diagnosed from January 2001 to December 2010 from SEER 18 registries. We excluded diagnosed at autopsy, from death certificate only, or those without survival date. We calculated 1- and 2- year relative survival rates in pre-sorafenib (2001-2007) and post-sorafenib (2008-2010) era by age, sex and ethnicity among using SEER*stat software. Results: The total number of advanced HCC patients during 2001-2010, 2001-2007 and 2008-2010 were 5,092, 2,747 and 2,345 respectively. The 1- and 2- year survival rates of patients improved significantly from pre-sorafenib era to post-sorafenib era (1 year RS: 17.20±0.7% to 19.90±0.80%, Z=2.63; 2 year RS: 8.00±0.5% to 8.7±0.60%, Z=2.31). Survival rates of male patients improved significantly in post-sorafenib era (1 year RS: 16.4±0.80 to 19.4±0.90%, Z=2.18; 1 year RS: 7.4±0.60% to 8.6±0.70%, Z=2.18). There was no improvement in survival rates of female patients. Similarly, younger patients had improvement in survival rates in post-sorafenib era compared to pre-sorafenib era (1 year Z value 2.46; 2 year Z value 2.23). There was no improvement in survival rates of older patients. Conclusions: Since FDA approval of sorafenib, survival rates of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma have improved. The improvement in survival rates is limited to males and younger patients