Kim, S. P.

354 Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has demonstrated equivalent cancer control to radical nephrectomy (RN) and has been associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, there continues to be wide variability in practice pattern in the treatment of renal masses. Specifically, the decision to perform PN or RN often depends on patient, surgeon and renal mass characteristics. By quantifying the renal tumor using the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system, collecting surgeon information, and providing defined clinical scenarios we attempt to evaluate factors important in surgeon decision-making. Methods: In June 2009, all members of the American Urological Association with a listed email address were invited to participate in a survey evaluating the management of renal masses. Respondents were asked their preferred treatment for 8 clinical scenarios. Each of these renal masses was given a nephrometry score (NS). The propensity to offer PN was evaluated by NS and surgical volume. High volume was defined as > 50 renal cases per year and low volume was defined as £ 10 cases per year. Results: 764 attending level urologic surgeons responded to each of the 8 scenarios providing 6112 evaluable clinical scenarios. NS ranged from 4-10; each unit increase was associated with 2-fold increased odds of a surgeon offering radical nephrectomy (OR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.93,2.06). PN was the preferred treatment for approximately 95% of patients with low complexity tumors (NS < 8) regardless of surgical volume. However, proposed treatment of high complexity tumors (NS ³ 8) demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in treatment choice. Controlling for all patient characteristics, high surgical volume significantly predicted whether PN would be offered to patients with high complexity tumors (OR 3.04 95% CI: 2.34,9.95), but not those with low complexity tumors (OR 1.95 95% CI: 0.87,4.38) compared to low volume surgeons. Conclusions: Increasing NS correlated with increased use of radical nephrectomy, particularly after a score of 8 among all surgeons. As renal surgical volume increased, surgeons were more willing to offer PN in high complexity tumors. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

348 Background: While the initial natural history after surgical resection for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been well-characterized, recurrence patterns for patients who experience late recurrence of disease continue to be defined. Here, we evaluated the clinical characteristics and survival of patients who experienced disease recurrence > 5 years following nephrectomy. Methods: We identified 1,454 patients who were treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) or nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for unilateral, sporadic pT1-4NxM0 RCC between 1970-2000 and who had remained free of disease for 5 years after surgery. Late (> 5 years) recurrence was then recorded and was classified as renal (ipsilateral/contralateral kidney) recurrence and distant (all other sites) recurrence. The incidence of late recurrence was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method, and clinicopathological variables subsequent disease relapse were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: Median follow-up after nephrectomy in the cohort here was 13.9 years (range 5.1-38.9). In total, 63 patients experience a late recurrence in the ipsilateral/contralateral kidney, at a median of 9.3 years (range 5.1-25.3) after surgery. 172 (11.8%) patients developed late distant metastases, at a median of 9.6 years (range: 5.1-26.6). Estimated recurrence-free survival at 10 and 15 years following nephrectomy was 97.3% and 95.2% for renal recurrence and 93.1% and 85.9% for distant recurrence, respectively. Increased tumor size (HR 1.1; p<0.001) was associated with a higher rate of late renal recurrence, while increased tumor size (HR 1.1; p=0.018), clear cell or collecting duct histology (HR 3.7; p<0.001), and tumor stage pT1b (HR 2.8; p<0.001), pT2a (HR 4.5; p<0.001), pT2b (HR 3.4; p=0.007), and pT3/4 (HR 5.1; p<0.001) were predictive of the development of late distant metastasis. Conclusions: Patients undergoing surgery for localized RCC remain at life-long risk of disease recurrence. Approximately 5% experience renal recurrence and 15% demonstrate distant relapse, during the ensuing 10 years. Continued investigation to identify potential site-specific predictors of late recurrence is necessary to guide postoperative surveillance regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

324 Background: The indications for the removal of the ipsilateral adrenal gland in patients with renal cell cancer (RCC) have not been well defined. Most continue to advocate ipsilateral adrenalectomy in patients with risky features such as a tumor thrombus, large, locally advanced tumors, and/or upper pole tumors. We evaluated the oncologic outcomes of concurrent adrenalectomy with either partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) in a large single institution cohort. Methods: From 1970–2006, 4,019 consecutive patients with RCC treated by RN (n=3,107) or PN (n=912) from Mayo Clinic were studied for adrenal involvement. Risk of asynchronous adrenal metastasis and cancer specific survival (CS) were also compared between those who underwent concomitant adrenalectomy (n=1,464) and those who did not (n=2,555) using multivariate cox models. Results: Median postoperative follow-up was 6 years. Synchronous ipsilateral adrenal involvement was rare even for those with large (>7cm) tumors (2.5%), upper pole (1.3%), and locally advanced (pT3/4) tumors (3.5%). The development of asynchronous adrenal metastasis occurred in 109 patients (2.7%) at a median of 3.7 years after initial surgery. The risk of developing an ipsilateral (1.4% 95% CI 0.8, 2.0) vs. contralateral (1.8% 95% CI 1.0, 2.6) asynchronous adrenal metastasis was equivalent at 10 years, in those who did not undergo adrenalectomy at initial surgery. At 10 years, 7.3% (99% CI: 4.4, 10.2) of patients with higher stage tumors (pT3/4) are predicted to develop a contralateral adrenal metastasis. On multivariate analysis, routine adrenalectomy was associated with a decreased risk of subsequent adrenal metastasis (HR 0.88: 99% CI 0.81, 0.95), but did not significantly impact CS (HR 1.15: 99% CI 0.99, 1.34). Conclusions: Asynchronous metastasis can usually be salvaged without apparent effect on CS. Ipsilateral adrenal involvement from RCC was uncommon even in large, locally advanced, and/or upper pole tumors. Routine adrenalectomy in these high risk patients may lead to an unacceptably high rate of adrenal insufficiency when a significant subset develops a contralateral adrenal metastasis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.