Bollin, Kathryn

Immunotherapy has significantly affected cancer treatment and survival rates, accompanied by an increase in immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring new management strategies. irAEs can affect various organ systems and have varying severity levels, with higher rates observed when combining immune checkpoint inhibitors. National organizations such as ASCO, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer, and the European Society for Medical Oncology have created guidelines for managing irAEs. This chapter expands on these guidelines by discussing practical strategies to improve the multidisciplinary management in irAE care, focusing on the who, what, and how to bridge gaps in care and enhance collaboration between academic and community oncology practices. Effective irAE management involves early recognition and guideline-adherent approaches using a multidisciplinary team, including oncologists, other subspecialists, primary care clinicians, and all care team members. Institutions are developing methods to integrate irAE care into clinical workflows, such as incorporating urgent care clinics and e-consults for efficient irAE management and developing hub-and-spoke models to extend specialized care from academic centers to community hospitals for equitable care delivery. Additionally, effective patient education is critical for improving irAE recognition and health literacy. The new ASCO Community of Practice called the Alliance for Support and Prevention of Immune-Related Adverse Events consortium and patient advocacy group Standing Together to Optimize Research, Interventions, and Education in irAEs initiatives aim to advance irAE clinical care, research, and education through global collaboration, standardized data collection, and improved outreach to patients and caregivers.

AbstractPurposeStem cell transplant (SCT) recipients commonly undergo bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) collection as an infectious pulmonary work‐up. Previous studies report the utility and overall diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy with BAL in this vulnerable population, though none focused purely on microbiologic yield or made comparisons with less invasive means of pathogen detection. We sought to determine and elaborate on the microbiologic yield of BAL in SCT recipients, assess a correlation between BAL studies and less invasive means of pathogen detection, and assess the utility of repeating a BAL within 30 days.MethodsBetween January 1, 2009, and July 31, 2013, we reviewed medical records of 125 SCT recipients who underwent 179 BALs. In addition to demographic information and details pertaining to their SCT, a comprehensive review of their microbiologic data was performed and recorded.ResultsOur study showed an overall BAL microbiologic yield of 40%, despite 92% of patients receiving broad‐spectrum antimicrobial therapy at the time of the BAL procedure.ConclusionsAlthough an initial BAL sample in this population provides crucial microbiologic information, repeating the procedure within 30 days may have minimal additional microbiologic yield. BAL continues to be an essential diagnostic tool in SCT recipients undergoing an infectious pulmonary work‐up.