Corral, Juan E.

ObjectivesStudies suggest that adults diagnosed with celiac disease (CD) are at higher risk of developing acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between CD and AP in terms of inpatient prevalence, mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization in the past decade.MethodsRetrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2007–2016). The primary outcome was the occurrence of AP in CD patients. Secondary outcomes were the trend in AP cases in CD patients, and mortality, morbidity, length of stay, and total hospital charges and costs.ResultsOf 337,201 CD patients identified, 7372 also had AP. The mean age was 53 years, 71% were women. The inpatient prevalence of AP in CD was 2.2% versus 1.2% in non-CD cohort (P< 0.01). Patients with CD displayed increased odds of having AP (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92;P< 0.01). Patients with AP and CD displayed lower odds of morbidity and mortality than non-CD patients with AP.ConclusionsThe inpatient prevalence of AP is higher in CD patients, and increased from 2007 to 2016. Patients with CD and AP displayed lower morbidity and mortality, which may suggest that they have a less severe form of AP or lower baseline comorbidity.

Objective The aim of the study was to compare incidence and outcomes of acute pancreatitis among advanced heart failure therapies. Methods Two retrospective cohorts are as follows: A, patients with heart failure presenting to our hospitals and B, the US National Inpatient Sample. Three groups were compared: left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients, transplant recipients, and controls who did not qualify for advanced therapies. Primary outcomes were pancreatitis incidence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included kidney failure, multiorgan failure, shock, and health care utilization. Results Cohort A included 1344 heart failure patients, and cohort B included 677,905 patients with acute pancreatitis. In cohort A, annual pancreatitis incidence was 6.7 cases per 1000 LVAD recipients, 4.1 per 1000 LVAD bridge-to-transplant, 2.3 per 1000 transplant recipients, and 3.2 per 1000 heart failure controls ( P = 0.03). Combined, the incidence was 5.6 per 1000 LVAD users and 2.7 in 1000 non-LVAD users (relative risk, 2.1; P = 0.009). In cohort B, increased mortality was seen in LVAD users, but not in transplant recipients. Left ventricular assist device patients had higher odds of kidney failure, multiorgan failure, shock, and intensive care. Conclusions Patients with LVAD have double risk of pancreatitis, worse clinical outcomes, and increased healthcare utilization. Studies elucidating the mechanisms behind pancreatic injury in advanced heart failure are suggested.

Objective Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) affects all ethnicities worldwide. The Hispanic population being the leading ethnic minority in the United States, its importance to the healthcare system cannot be understated. This study aims to assess the occurrence and outcomes of CCA in Hispanic patients in the United States. Methods This is a case-control study using the National Inpatient Sample 2014. All patients with ICD-9 CM codes for CCA were included. Hispanic patients were identified from the ethnic categories within the database. The primary outcomes were the occurrence and odds of CCA in the Hispanic population when compared with other ethnicities. Secondary outcomes were inpatient mortality, morbidity, ICU stay, multiorgan failure, and resource utilization. Results A total of 13 965 patients with CCA were identified, of which 2750 were propensity-matched to controls (1480 Hispanic). The inpatient occurrence of CCA in Hispanics relative to the national population was 2.73/100 000 persons, compared to 4.82/100 000 persons (39.9/100 000 relative to inpatient population) of all other ethnicities. After adjusting for confounders on multivariate analysis, Hispanic patients displayed adjusted propensity-matched odds of 1.28 (P < 0.01) of having CCA when compared with other ethnicities. Hispanics did not display different propensity-matched odds of inpatient mortality, morbidity, hospital length of stay, or resource utilization compared to non-Hispanic patients. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the odds of CCA in admitted patients are higher for the Hispanic population. This difference with the prevalence potentially suggests the presence of social factors such as disparities in cancer prevention or detection in this group.

INTRODUCTION: Immunocompromised liver transplant (LT) recipients are at increased risk of de novo malignancy. Data regarding oral and oropharyngeal malignancy following liver transplantation is limited, and recommendations for oral cancer screening are lacking. The impact of these malignancies on patient survival in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database has not been assessed. We aim to evaluate the rates of oral and oropharyngeal malignancy among LT recipients in the US and estimate patient survival. METHODS: We examined the UNOS database and identified patients with oral and oropharyngeal malignancy who underwent LT between 1988 and 2016. Patients greater than 18 years of age were included. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: In the UNOS database, survival data regarding 142,488 patients was available and the cause of death was identified in 14,533 LT recipients.83 patients had oral and oropharyngeal malignancy. 23 patients had cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Mean age 55 years (SD ± 8), mean BMI 26 (SD ± 4), males were 74%, white 83%. 49 patients had tonsillar and oropharyngeal cancer. Mean age 54 years (SD ± 7), mean BMI 25 (SD ± 4), males were 86%, white 80%. 11 patients had oral and palate cancer. Mean age 56 years (SD ± 6), mean BMI 26 (SD ± 5), males were 55%, white 100%. Compared to all LT indications, those who developed oral and oropharyngeal malignancy were more likely to have alcoholic liver disease ( P < 0.001). The mean patient survival time in the study population ranged between 5 and 7.5 years. However, patient survival was significantly lower among patients who developed oral and oropharyngeal malignancy compared to other LT recipients (Log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the UNOS database showed that oral and oropharyngeal malignancy is more common among male recipients with a history of alcoholic liver disease. Better outcomes should be expected if such patients were diagnosed earlier, prolonging their life expectancy. Having a history of heavy alcohol use should raise awareness among dentists, gastroenterologists and transplant physicians regarding the increased risk of oral cancers after LT.

INTRODUCTION: Gender in ulcerative colitis (UC) is a well-studied topic with contradicting results with a slight male predominance seen in large population based studies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, while other studies have shown a slight female predominance. Yet, the relationship between UC and gender is not well-understood. Hence, it is unclear what is responsible for differences in gender. The aim of this study is to assess the inpatient prevalence and inpatients outcomes of UC by gender. METHODS: Case-control study using the NIS 2016, the largest public inpatient database in the US. All patients with ICD9-10CM codes for UC were included. None were excluded. Female patients were identified within the database using the female gender indicator. The primary outcome was determining the odds of UC in female patients compared to males. Secondary outcomes included determining inpatient morbidity, mortality, resource utilization, colectomy rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and inflation-adjusted total hospital costs and charges. Propensity score matching was used to create a matching population for Charlson Comorbidity Index and age. Multivariate regression analyses were used to adjust for income in patient zip code, hospital region, location, size and teaching status. RESULTS: A total of 38, 950 patients with UC were identified and propensity matched for selected covariates. The mean patient age was 45, and 47.2% were female. For the primary outcome, females had decreased adjusted odds (aOR: 0.92, P < 0.01) of being admitted for UC. For secondary outcomes, female patients displayed lower adjusted odds of multi-organ failure, being placed on TPN, and undergoing colectomy. Females also had lower adjusted mean hospital costs, charges, and length of stay (LOS). All adjusted odds and means are displayed in Table 1. CONCLUSION: Females have lower inpatient prevalence of UC, complications, and economic burden compared to males. This reinforces the slight male predominance that was seen in the older Olmstead County population-based studies. One can speculate that the difference in complications, costs, charges, and LOS indicate that females have less severe disease at hospital admission. Numerous studies have examined the effect of gender on disease severity and outcomes, and there continues to be conflicting data. Thus, future studies are needed to determine what contributes to the variation in disease prevalence and course by gender, and possibly better tailor treatment regimens by gender.

INTRODUCTION: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of de novo malignancies, in some cases up to 15.6%. Data regarding pancreatic cancer following liver transplantation is limited. We aim to evaluate the incidence of pancreatic adenocarcinoma among liver transplant recipients in the United States. Describe survival in those patients and identify subgroup of patients at increased risk. METHODS: We examined the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) database and identified patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent liver transplant between 1988 and 2016. Patients 18 years of age and older were included. Demographics, primary diagnosis and survival data were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests were performed. RESULTS: In the UNOS database, survival data regarding 142,488 patients was available and the cause of death was identified in 14,533 liver transplant recipients. A total of 140 patients developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma after liver transplantation. Most common indications for transplantations were Hepatitis C, alcohol cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (25 [17.9%], 24 [17.1%] and 9 [6.4%] respectively). Annual incidence was 16 pancreatic cancer cases per 100,000 transplant recipients. Compared to national annual incidence of 12.9 cancer cases per 100,000 patients, the relative risk was 1.23 (95% CI 0.59–2.56). Compared to other liver transplant recipients, those who developed pancreatic cancer were older and transplanted earlier in the time period evaluated ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). Gender, ethnicity, BMI, and primary diagnosis (i.e., transplant indication) were not significantly different among groups. Patient survival was significantly lower in patients who developed pancreatic adenocarcinoma (Log-rank test P < 0.001) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: Analysis of the UNOS database showed that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is increased among liver transplant recipients without reaching statistical significance. Primary indications for transplantation and demographics were similar among both groups. Our findings suggest that pancreatic adenocarcinoma is more likely associated to long-standing immunosuppression and non-traditional risk factors rather than alcohol consumption or obesity. Further studies describing the natural history of pancreatic cancer after solid organ transplantation are suggested.

AbstractBackground/objectivesSeveral epidemiologic studies have suggested that patients with celiac disease may be at an increased risk of sarcoidosis but the results were inconsistent. This systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted with the aim to better characterize this risk by summarizing all available data.MethodsA literature review was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE database from inception to February 2019. Studies that compared the risk of sarcoidosis among patients with celiac disease versus individuals without celiac disease were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a random‐effect, generic inverse variance method.ResultsOf 426 retrieved studies, four studies with 693 639 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in meta‐analysis. The risk of sarcoidosis among patients with celiac disease was higher than individuals without celiac disease with the pooled OR of 7.16 (95% CI, 1.48‐34.56). The statistical heterogeneity of this study was high (I2 = 95%).ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta‐analysis found a significantly higher risk of sarcoidosis among patients with celiac disease.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate a deep learning protocol to identify neoplasia in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN) in comparison to current radiographic criteria. Methods A computer-aided framework was designed using convolutional neural networks to classify IPMN. The protocol was applied to magnetic resonance images of the pancreas. Features of IPMN were classified according to American Gastroenterology Association guidelines, Fukuoka guidelines, and the new deep learning protocol. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using surgically resected cystic lesions or healthy controls. Results Of 139 cases, 58 (42%) were male; mean (standard deviation) age was 65.3 (11.9) years. Twenty-two percent had normal pancreas; 34%, low-grade dysplasia; 14%, high-grade dysplasia; and 29%, adenocarcinoma. The deep learning protocol sensitivity and specificity to detect dysplasia were 92% and 52%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity to identify high-grade dysplasia or cancer were 75% and 78%, respectively. Diagnostic performance was similar to radiologic criteria. Areas under the receiver operating curves (95% confidence interval) were 0.76 (0.70–0.84) for American Gastroenterology Association, 0.77 (0.70–0.85) for Fukuoka, and 0.78 (0.71–0.85) for the deep learning protocol ( P = 0.90). Conclusions The deep learning protocol showed accuracy comparable to current radiographic criteria. Computer-aided frameworks could be implemented as aids for radiologists to identify high-risk IPMN.

Objective The aim of the study was to perform an economic analysis to identify the clinical and cost determinants of pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance in high-risk individuals (HRIs). Methods A Markov model was created to compare the following 3 strategies: no screening, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening. Patients were considered HRIs according to the Cancer of the Pancreas Screening consortium recommendations. Risk for developing PC, survival, and costs data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases. Surveillance effectiveness was obtained from a recent meta-analysis. Results Analysis of a cohort with fivefold relative risk of PC higher than the US population showed that MRI is the most cost-effective strategy. For those with the highest risk (>×20 relative risk), EUS became the dominant strategy. Our model was impacted by cost and imaging performance, but still cost-effective within the range reported in literature. Threshold analysis showed that if MRI increases greater than US $1600, EUS becomes more cost-effective. Once patients reached the age of 76 years, “no screening” was favored. Both surveillance strategies were cost-effective over a wide range of willingness to pay. Conclusions Abdominal imaging followed by pancreatectomy is cost-effective to prevent PC in HRIs, favoring MRI in moderate risk cases but EUS in those with highest risk.