Bible, Keith C.

TPS2618 Background: Tipifarnib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of farnesyltransferase (FT). FT catalyzes the post-translational attachment of farnesyl groups to signaling proteins that are requisite for localization to the inner cell membrane. While all RAS isoforms (KRAS/NRAS/HRAS) are FT substrates, only HRAS is exclusively dependent upon farnesylation for membrane localization and signaling activation, making HRAS mutant tumors uniquely susceptible to tipifarnib mediated inhibition of FT. Tipifarnib has demonstrated robust activity in HRAS mutant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and HRAS mutant squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient derived xenograft (PDX) models resistant to standard therapies. Methods: This is a multi-institutional, open-label Phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib for pts with HRAS mutant solid tumors. Pts must have either unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic non-hematological malignancies that harbor a missense HRAS mutation. The primary endpoint of the study is overall response rate. Secondary endpoints include safety and tolerability, PFS, duration of response. Two cohorts (N = 18 each) are enrolling, each being evaluated with a Simon two-stage design. Cohort 1 is for patients with malignant thyroid tumors of any histology. Cohort 2 was originally designated for pts with any other solid tumor. The prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual in Cohort 2 was met. Based on data observed in the first stage of this group, enrollment to the second stage of Cohort 2 has been limited to HRAS mutant HNSCC since August 2016. Enrolled patients are treated with tipifarnib 900 mg administered orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day treatment cycles until progression of disease or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02383927.

Abstract Background: HRAS is a proto-oncogene that is mutated in head and neck, bladder, thyroid, and salivary gland tumors, among others. While discovered over 40 years ago, no specific therapies have yet been developed targeting mutant HRAS. Tipifarnib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of farnesyltransferase, a critical enzyme requisite for HRAS activation. Over 5,000 patients (pts) have been treated with tipifarnib; although responses have been documented in several tumor indications, the mechanisms of response are still poorly understood. Tipifarnib has demonstrated robust activity in HRAS mutant patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and squamous non-small cell lung cancer that are resistant to standard therapies. This Phase 2 study (NCT02383927) was conducted to test the hypothesis that inhibition of mutant HRAS oncogenic activity with tipifarnib could translate to objective responses in HNSCC pts driven by the HRAS oncogene. Methods: The study was originally designed to enroll pts into 2 single-arm study cohorts: Cohort 1 (thyroid cancer) and Cohort 2 (other solid tumors), each one with a 2-stage design (11+7 evaluable pts) to determine overall response rate (ORR) as the primary objective. This design has 80% power to detect a difference between 10% and 30% ORR at one-sided significance level of 0.087. Two objective responses were needed to be observed in the first stage for each cohort to proceed to stage 2. The study is considered positive if at least 4 responses are observed in one of the 2 cohorts (N=18 each, stages 1 and 2 combined). The prespecified activity goal for the first stage of accrual in Cohort 2 was met and based on data observed in the first stage of this Cohort, ongoing enrollment to the second stage of Cohort 2 was limited to HRAS mutant HNSCC. For enrollment, pts must have an HRAS mutant, locally advanced/unresectable and/or metastatic solid tumor malignancy and RECIST v1.1 measurable disease. Tipifarnib is given at 900 mg orally twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycles. Response assessments are conducted every 8 weeks. Results: As of August 30, 2017, 28 pts have been enrolled. Tipifarnib was generally well tolerated with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting and diarrhea) and fatigue constituting the most common adverse events (≥30% of pts, all grades). Twenty four pts are currently evaluable for efficacy: 10 in Cohort 1 and 14 in Cohort 2. Stage 1 enrollment continues in Cohort 1. The primary objective was met for Cohort 2 prior to completing full enrollment, with 4 confirmed responses observed out of 14 evaluable pts. Notably, of the 6 pts in Cohort 2 with HNSCC currently evaluable for efficacy, 4 (67%) achieved a confirmed partial response. Three of these pts remain on treatment in cycles 3, 5, and 19, and one subject discontinued at Cycle 21. Two (33%) pts had disease stabilization as best response (4 cycles, ongoing and 7 cycles). Importantly, 4 of these pts were refractory to prior therapies, including regimens containing immunotherapy (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) or cetuximab +/- chemotherapy. None of the 6 HNSCC patients experienced an objective partial response on their last prior therapy. Conclusions: These data suggest that HRAS mutant HNSCC pts may be refractory to standard therapies but can derive prolonged clinical benefit from tipifarnib treatment. Based on the encouraging activity of tipifarnib in pts with HNSCC with HRAS mutations, enrollment continues in this cohort. Citation Format: Alan Ho, Nicole Chau, Deborah J. Wong, Maria E. Cabanillas, Jessica Bauman, Marcia S. Brose, Keith Bible, Valentina Boni, Irene Brana, Charles Ferte, Caroline Even, Francis Burrows, Linda Kessler, Vishnu Mishra, Kelly Magnuson, Catherine Scholz, Antonio Gualberto. Preliminary results from a phase 2 proof of concept trial of tipifarnib in tumors with HRAS mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2017 Oct 26-30; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17(1 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-A10.

6087 Background: NTRK1-3 fusions, identified in pediatric radiation-associated thyroid cancers, are low frequency oncogenic drivers that can trigger constitutive activation of TrK1-3 tyrosine kinase domains with responsively heightened downstream signaling through RAS-MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and/or PLCγ-PKC. NTRK point mutations are rare and of largely uninvestigated oncogenic potential, but some appear oncogenic. Methods: Advanced thyroid cancer (TC) patients (pts) requiring systemic therapy at Mayo Clinic sites underwent tumor genetic interrogation using Foundation One analyses with the goal of informing salvage therapeutic strategies. In this IRB-approved study, data from pts with TCs bearing NTRK point mutations were retrospectively analyzed, as this occurrence was unexpected but potentially of prognostic and/or therapeutic relevance. Results: Five of 55 pts (9%) with advanced TCs subject to Foundation One tumor interrogation had NTRK1-3 point mutations (allele frequency, AF, 15-49%); none had fusions. All 5 tumors had microsatellite stability; 4/5 had low tumor mutation burden (2-5 mutations/megabase). NTRK mutations in 3 anaplastic TC (ATC) pts (15% prevalence) were: NTRK3 I749M (AF 15%; overall survival, OS, 15 mos), NTRK1 R744H (AF not available; OS 9.5 mos), and NTRK1 R583H (AF 20.1%; OS > 4.9 mos); NTRK2 S167Y (AF 49%; OS > 51 mos) or NTRK1 R6W (AF 42%; OS > 60 mos) were found in one papillary (PTC) and one Hürthle cell (HCC) TC pt respectively (summary table below). Conclusions: NTRK point mutations, but not fusions, were unexpectedly identified in 9% of assessed advanced TCs - but remarkably in 15% of ATCs. Mutated NTRKs, along with oncogenic p53 and TERT, may contribute to TC progression, especially in ATC, consequent to downstream activation of MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways. We posit that NTRK point mutations may have therapeutic implications for treatment of refractory disease. [Table: see text]

Background: Historical anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) outcomes have been terrible, with a median survival of only five months and <20% one-year survival. Improved outcomes are now achieved with aggressive initial therapy in stages IVA and IVB disease, but patients with distant metastatic disease (stage IVC) still do poorly; improved therapies are sorely needed. Kinase inhibitors have emerged as promising agents in the therapy of advanced medullary and differentiated thyroid cancer, but there are limited data regarding the use of lenvatinib in ATC. The aim of this study was to delineate clinical outcomes in a series of patients with advanced ATC in response to lenvatinib therapy. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted involving all lenvatinib-treated Mayo Clinic ATC patients in 2015. Results: Of 28 distinct ATC patients seen in 2015, three (11%) with metastatic disease of ECOG performance status 2–3 were treated with lenvatinib. Two patients were male; age range at ATC diagnosis was 57–84 years. All three patients attained successful local control of their disease with surgery and/or combined chemoradiotherapy. Lenvatinib was offered as the second, third, or fourth line of therapy at the time of metastatic disease progression. Two patients incurred minor responses to therapy, with structural regression of distant metastatic tumor disease soon after starting lenvatinib treatment (at one to two months), while one patient achieved stable disease, but no Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors partial responses resulted. Overall survival after starting lenvatinib was two, six, and seven months. Fatigue and hypertension were prominent, and one patient developed pulmonary emboli while on lenvatinib. Conclusion: This initial single-institution experience suggests that lenvatinib may have some disease-modifying activity in metastatic ATC that is otherwise refractory to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Unfortunately, observed benefits were transient, and toxicities were prominent. Clinical trials are required to ascertain better the utility of lenvatinib in the management of advanced ATC.