Ban, Vin Shen

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)–venous fistulas are an increasingly recognized source of spontaneous intracranial hypotension, for which endovascular embolization has emerged as an effective treatment option.1–3 Advances in diagnostic imaging have improved detection of CSF–venous fistulas throughout the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine; however, identification of lesions at the cranial and caudal extremes of the spine remains challenging.4 In video 1, we present the novel case of an anterior condylar confluence CSF–venous fistula arising from a hypoglossal canal nerve root sleeve diverticulum. We demonstrate the diagnostic evaluation, preprocedural planning, and transvenous embolization of the fistula using the pressure cooker technique, highlighting key technical considerations for navigating this uncommon venous anatomy. Finally, we review the patient’s postprocedural course and imaging findings demonstrating radiographic resolution of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Video 1 Endovascular embolization of a cerebrospinal fluid–venous fistula arising from a hypoglossal canal nerve root sleeve diverticulum using a transvenous pressure cooker technique.

The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) was approved for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms from the petrous to the superior hypophyseal segment of the internal carotid artery. However, since its approval, its use for treatment of intracranial aneurysms in other locations and non-sidewall aneurysms has grown tremendously. The authors report on a cohort of 15 patients with 16 cerebral aneurysms that incorporated an end vessel with no significant distal collaterals, which were treated with the PED. The cohort includes 7 posterior communicating artery aneurysms, 5 ophthalmic artery aneurysms, 1 superior cerebellar artery aneurysm, 1 anterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysm, and 2 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. None of the aneurysms achieved significant occlusion at the last follow-up evaluation (mean 24 months). Based on these observations, the authors do not recommend the use of flow diverters for the treatment of this subset of cerebral aneurysms.