Wee, Wen

TPS3159 Background: ELU001 is a novel first-in-class nanoparticle drug conjugate that consists of ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and a payload of ~22 molecules of the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, exatecan. Folic acid and exatecan are covalently bound by non-cleavable and cathepsin-B cleavable linkers, respectively, to short polyethylene glycol chains which surround the C’Dot’s silica core. CDCs are very small (~6 nm), allowing for more efficient penetration into solid tumors compared to ADCs and a rapid elimination by the kidneys, which is expected to lead to less toxicity than ADCs that have a longer half-life in circulation. ELU001’s high avidity is designed to promote binding to FRα on the surface of cancer cells that express any level of antigen (low to high). ELU001 then internalizes into the tumor cell and traffics to the lysosome where enzymatic cleavage releases the exatecan payload. ELU001 has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models with low, moderate and high levels of FRα. The first-in-human trial, ELU-FRα-1, is currently recruiting patients with ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma cancers, and, in the opinion of the Investigator, have no meaningful life-prolonging therapy option available. Methods: This is a Phase 1 / 2 multicenter, open label clinical trial with two parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Tumor Group Expansion Cohort(s). In Part 1, patients with cancer types with a high likelihood of having FRα overexpressing tumors, (ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma) will be enrolled. FRα expression is determined retrospectively. ELU001 is administered either weekly (QW) (once a week for 3 weeks, 1 week rest), every other week (Q2W, with no rest between cycles), or every three weeks (Q3W). Initial Part 2 expansion cohorts are planned in ovarian cancer with high FRα expression, ovarian cancer with moderate or low FRα expression, and endometrial cancer with any positive FRα expression. Here, FRα will be prospectively determined. Other cancer types may be assessed in the future. The primary objective for Part 1 is to identify the MTD/RP2D. The primary objective for Part 2 is to determine the ORR. Secondary objectives include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse events, PK, ADA, and FRα expression assessments. Part 1 Dose Escalation will recruit about 2-5 patients at each dose for each regimen (QW; Q2W; Q3W). Part 2 Stage 1 will recruit about 15 patients per tumor group expansion cohort and is expected to begin recruitment in the second half of 2023. The study is enrolling in Part 1 Q2W Cohort 301 and Q3W Cohort A in the US. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282 .

3109 Background: WSD0922-Fu is an oral, central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant, small molecule, ATP non-competitive, reversible EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and high-grade astrocytoma (HGA). We report initial results of a first-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT04197934) in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent HGA and NSCLC. Methods: Adult patients with either recurrent EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS metastases or recurrent EGFR mutant and/or EGFR amplified HGA were enrolled. WSD0922-Fu was orally administered, and dose escalated in cohorts based on a standard 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Toxicities were graded per CTCAE v5.0 and preliminary efficacy was based on modified RANO criteria or RECIST 1.1 as appropriate. Results: 25 patients (17 HGA, 8 NSCLC) were enrolled and treated in six cohorts (40 mg once daily to 320 mg twice daily, 28-day cycles). The median age was 57 years (range 39-75 years). 24% were female and 36% were ECOG 0. For patients with HGA, all patients were previously treated with radiation and temozolomide; the median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 1 (range 1-4). For patients with NSCLC, all patients were previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor (prior osimertinib 88%); the median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 1.5 (range 1-6). The median duration of exposure to WSD0922-Fu among all patients was 54 days (range 2-258 days). The most common (≥25%) treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (68%), acneiform rash (68%), diarrhea (52%), nausea (48%) and pruritis (28%). The frequency of severe AEs was dose dependent. The most common Grade 3+ AEs (≥10%) included lymphopenia (16%), acneiform rash (12%), headache (12%) and diarrhea (12%). The MTD was defined as 160 mg twice daily. At Cycle 1 Day 15 for patients treated at this dose level, the mean terminal elimination half-life (%CV) in the plasma was 31.6 h (102%) (median 14.5 h; range 6.2-78.7 h). The mean Cmax, Tmax, oral clearance at steady state, and AUC (0-12 h) (%CV) were 4513 ng/mL (50%), 2.0 hr (69%), 6.9 L/hr/m2 (42%), and 28084 h*ng/mL (52%), respectively. Oral clearance at steady state was inversely related with dose, suggesting either inhibition or saturation of clearance processes. Among patients treated at MTD or higher dose levels and with available response data, 100% (5/5) of patients with NSCLC demonstrated clinical benefit (SD + PR) while 60% of patients had partial responses (intracranial and extracranial). Furthermore, prolonged stable disease (9 cycles) was observed in a patient with EGFRvIII mutant GBM. Conclusions: The MTD for WSD0922-Fu monotherapy is 160 mg BID. Preliminary efficacy was observed in patients with osimertinib-resistant NSCLC and EGFRvIII mutant HGA. Enrollment to expansion cohorts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04197934 .

e16259 Background: Patients with KRAS mutant (mt) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PADC) have worse survival outcomes compared to KRAS wild-type (wt) PDAC patients. However, the prognostic implication of the KRAS mutation subtype (e.g. G12D, G12R, G12V and Q61) remains unclear. Furthermore, the clinical and molecular characteristics associated with these mutation subtypes remain not well defined. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients with KRAS PDAC who underwent Next Generation Sequencing at Mayo Clinic between December 1, 2018 and December 1, 2021. Their somatic mutations, RNA expression, demographics, disease characteristics, therapies offered, and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review. Results on KRAS wt were reported previously; KRAS mt are reported here. Results: A total of 158 KRAS mt patients (at diagnosis: average age 63.8 years, 57% male, 88 (56%) Stage IV) were included. 10% of patients had KRAS Q61 mutation, 14% G12R, 30% G12V and 46% G12D. G12R had a longer overall survival (OS) compared to the others (median 24.8 vs 17.5 months, unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.68, p=0.05), particularly in patients with localized disease at diagnosis (median 35.4 vs 28.3 months, p=0.08). Among patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, G12V had the lowest OS (median 9.8 vs 12.4 months, unadjusted HR 1.8, p=0.02). 137 (87%) patients had at least one pathogenic somatic variant, with statistically significant differences in SMAD4, TP53, MYC, RB1, KMT2D, RBM10, RNF43, KDM6A, KMT2C, RBM10, LRP1B, PIK3CA, and SMARC among the KRAS mt subtypes. 82 (52%) patients had at least one RNA expression variant, with statistically significant differences in CCND1, CCNE1, HRAS, MET, EGFR, and ERB3 among KRAS mt subtypes. Between these subtypes, there were no statistically significant differences in TMB value, location of PDAC or subsequent metastasis, lines of treatment (average 2.3), age at diagnosis, or gender. Conclusions: KRAS mt subtypes may confer different PDAC phenotypes. In our cohort, G12R is associated with improved OS while G12V correlates with worse prognosis in de novo metastatic disease. Additionally, there are differences in genomic variations and RNA expression between the KRAS mt subtypes. To further examine this, transcriptomic analysis is underway. [Table: see text]

Monoclonal antibody treatment initially heralded an era of molecularly targeted therapy in oncology and is now widely applied in modulating anti-cancer immunity by targeting programmed cell receptors (PD-1, PD-L1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and, more recently, lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3). Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) recently proved to be a valid approach to inducing anti-cancer immunity by directly modifying the host’s immune cells. However, such cell-based therapy requires extensive resources such as leukapheresis, ex vivo modification and expansion of cytotoxic T-cells and current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) laboratories and presents significant logistical challenges. Bi-/trispecific antibody technology is a novel pharmaceutical approach to facilitate the engagement of effector immune cells to potentially multiple cancer epitopes, e.g., the recently approved blinatumomab. This opens the opportunity to develop ‘off-the-shelf’ anti-cancer agents that achieve similar and/or complementary anti-cancer effects as those of modified immune cell therapy. The majority of bi-/trispecific antibodies target the tumor-associated antigens (TAA) located on the extracellular surface of cancer cells. The extracellular antigens represent just a small percentage of known TAAs and are often associated with higher toxicities because some of them are expressed on normal cells (off-target toxicity). In contrast, the targeting of intracellular TAAs such as mutant RAS and TP53 may lead to fewer off-target toxicities while still achieving the desired antitumor efficacy (on-target toxicity). Here, we provide a comprehensive review on the emerging field of bi-/tri-specific T-cell engagers and potential therapeutic opportunities.

Abstract Background: ELU001 is a novel, first-in-class, new molecular entity described as a C’Dot Drug Conjugate (CDC). ELU001 consists of ~13 folic acid targeting moieties and a payload of ~22 molecules of the topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, exatecan. Folic acid and exatecan are covalently bound by non-cleavable and cathepsin-B cleavable linkers, respectively, to short polyethylene glycol chains which surround the C’Dot’s silica core. CDCs are very small (~6 nm), allowing greater ability to penetrate more efficiently into solid tumors compared to ADCs. CDCs are rapidly eliminated by the kidneys, which is expected to lead to less toxicity than ADCs that have a longer half-life in circulation. ELU001’s high avidity is designed to promote binding to FRα on the surface on FRα overexpressing cancer cells with a wide range of antigen expression including high, moderate and low expressing tumor cells. Following antigen binding, ELU001 internalizes into the tumor cell, and traffics to the lysosome where enzymatic cleavage releases the exatecan payload. The first-in-human trial, ELU-FRα-1, is currently recruiting patients that have advanced, recurrent or refractory tumors associated with indications that are known to potentially overexpress FRα and have been shown to be topoisomerase 1 inhibitor-sensitive, and, in the opinion of the Investigator, have no satisfactory therapeutic options available. Methods: This is a Phase 1/2 multicenter, open label clinical trial with two parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Tumor Group Expansion Cohort(s). Part 1 is a basket trial enrolling patients with cancer types with a high likelihood of having FRα overexpressing tumors, (specifically, ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, gastric, gastroesophageal junction, triple negative breast, or non-small cell lung cancers, or cholangiocarcinoma). Patients are receiving ELU001 weekly (QW) (once a week for 3 weeks, 1 week rest), every other week (Q2W, with no rest between cycles), or every three weeks (Q3W). Analysis of FRα expression will be retrospectively determined. Part 2 will use Simon’s Two-Stage design to evaluate 4-6 Expansion Cohorts, comprised of tumor histologies anticipated to have greatest activity to ELU001 treatment. FRα will be prospectively determined. The primary objective for Part 1 is to identify the MTD/RP2D. The primary objective for Part 2 is to determine the ORR. Secondary objectives include DOR, PFS, TFST, PFS2, OS, frequency, severity and tolerability of adverse events, PK, ADA, and FRα expression assessments. Part 1 Dose Escalation will recruit about 25 patients per dose regimen (QW; Q2W; Q3W). The first stage of Part 2 (Dose Expansion) will recruit about 15 patients per tumor group expansion cohort. The study is actively enrolling in the US and currently recruiting in Q2W Cohort 201 and Q3W Cohort A. QW Cohorts 1-3 and Q2W Cohort 101 are complete. Clinical trial information: NCT05001282. Citation Format: Wen Wee Ma, Anthony Tolcher, Cesar A. Perez, Douglass Orr, Erika Hamilton, Yujie Zhao, Yonina Murciano-Goroff, Carey Anders, Gregory P. Adams, Catherine W. Reddick, Eliel Bayever. ELU-FRα-1: a study to evaluate ELU001 in patients with solid tumors that overexpress folate receptor alpha (FRα) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT255.

TPS780 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a limited number of therapeutic options. One subset of patients (up to 15%) carries germline and/or somatic mutations in homologous recombination repair genes, most notably BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 amongst others, that confer sensitivity to PARP inhibition. Combinations of PARP inhibitors with anti-PD1 immunotherapy have shown activity in breast and ovarian cancer and have not yet been thoroughly studied in pancreatic cancer. Methods: We designed a single-arm phase 2 investigator-initiated study utilizing the combination of niraparib, a highly selective PARP inhibitor and a dostarlimab, an anti PD1 antibody, in the subset of pancreatic cancer patients with germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C, or RAD51D. Additional inclusion criteria include metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, receipt of a platinum agent in 1st or 2nd line unless contraindicated, and at least 1 but not more than 2 prior lines of systemic therapy not including maintenance. Prior PARP inhibition is allowed, but not immediately prior to enrollment. Exclusion criteria include active unstable autoimmune disease or prior malignancy requiring active treatment within 2 years. Patients are treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily on days 1 through 21 of a 21 day cycle. Dostarlimab is administered IV 500 mg every 3 weeks for the 1st 4 cycles and then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks subsequently. The primary endpoint of the study is the disease control rate at 12 weeks using standard iRECIST criteria. Twenty patients will be enrolled to ensure 19 evaluable. The design has 80% power to detected improvement in disease control rate from 25-50% with significance level of 0.10. Descriptive factors include gene mutated for inclusion, germline/somatic, and platinum refractoriness. Given the size of the study along with genetic heterogeneity there will be no interim analysis. Patients are being enrolled at 3 Mayo clinic sites in Rochester Minnesota, Phoenix Arizona, Jacksonville Florida. To date, 13 patients have been enrolled across all 3 sites. Full accrual is anticipated by early 2023. Correlative studies include genomic characterization of baseline tumors, assessment of immune infiltration of tumor microenvironment, tumor collection for organoid/xenograft, and serial circulating cell-free DNA and immune biomarkers. Trial Identifiers: NCT04493060, Mayo: MC1841. Supported by Glaxo Smith Kline. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

TPS623 Background: Despite advances in treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), long-term survival rates remain poor. The combination of bevacizumab (Bev) and atezolizumab (Atezo) is the preferred frontline therapy for advanced HCC, but a minority of patients (pts) respond, and secondary resistance usually occurs within months. HCC has an immune-suppressed tumor microenvironment, mediated by activated immune checkpoint signaling and angiogenesis pathways, which may contribute to therapeutic resistance. RP3 is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) that expresses the fusogenic GALV-GP R- protein, an anti–CTLA-4 antibody-like molecule, CD40 ligand, and 4-1BB ligand. The direct oncolytic effect coupled with immune stimulation by RP3 in the tumor microenvironment is intended to provide systemic anti-tumor activity and reverse therapeutic resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Pre-clinical data has demonstrated improved distribution of oncolytic HSV within tumors in combination with Bev supporting the clinical combination of RP3 with Bev. RP3 combined with anti-PD1 therapy has demonstrated clinical activity and safety in pts with various malignant solid tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP3 combined with Atezo and Bev as 1st (1L) and 2nd (2L) line systemic therapies for inoperable and advanced HCC. Methods: The 1L and 2L cohorts will each enroll up to 30 pts with advanced, unresectable HCC. Pts in the 1L cohort may not have received prior systemic treatment; pts in the 2L cohort must have progressed on or following one prior line of systemic therapy, which must have included a PD-(L)1 directed agent. Key inclusion criteria include advanced unresectable HCC with at least 1 measurable tumor of ≥1 cm in longest diameter, Childs-Pugh Class A, and ECOG Score of 0 or 1. Important exclusion criteria include untreated esophageal and/or gastric varices with bleeding or at high risk for bleeding, and macroscopic invasion of tumor into major blood vessels and/or main bile ducts. Pts with a history of medically refractory hepatic encephalopathy and/or hepato-renal syndrome are also excluded. Pts in 1L cohort will receive 1200 mg Atezo and 15mg/kg Bev Q3W together with RP3 intratumorally (IT) Q3W for a total of up to 8 doses. In 2L pts will receive RP3 Q2W for 4 doses with Bev Q3W starting on C1D1, then RP3 and Bev Q3W for up to 4 more doses with Atezo Q3W being added on C4D1. The primary endpoint includes overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints are safety, ORR using HCC mRECIST, duration of response, complete response rate, and progression-free survival.

424 Background: Understanding the impact of anticancer therapies on immune system is critical to successful design and incorporation of immunotherapies. We developed a novel immune monitoring platform that measures the relative amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells. We previously showed that this assay can differentiate patients’ clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Here, we applied this assay to patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GGEA) who received chemoradiation or chemotherapy-based therapies. Methods: Patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline and during follow-up. Levels of circulating effector T cells (CX3CR1+NKG7+/CD3+CD8+) were quantified by flow cytometry using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Antitumor cytotoxicity of circulating immune cells was evaluated by co-culturing CD3/CD28 activated PBMCs with calcein-AM labeled GGEA tumor cells (FLO-1). Antitumor cytotoxicity of individual patients’ PBMCs was calculated based on the amount of calcein released by dead tumor cells. Results: In a pilot study of 8 patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) GGEA, the changes in the frequency of effector T cells appeared to be associated with radiographic response to treatment based on RECIST (3 partial response [PR], 3 stable disease [SD], and 2 progressive disease [PD]). The median interval between sequential blood collections was 64 days and an increase in effector T cells was observed in patients with PD. Antitumor cytotoxicity was evaluated in 4 patients who did not receive targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors. Two of these patients (a, b) had blood collected at the time of diagnosis (treatment naïve) and after neoadjuvant therapy. One developed pulmonary metastases after chemoradiation while the other had significant tumor shrinkage after chemotherapy. The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with PD (-19.4%) than the one with PR (-48.5%). Two patients (c, d) had blood collected twice while receiving the same chemotherapy for metastatic disease (not treatment naïve). The decrease in antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs was less in the patient with SD (-0.3%) than the one with PR (-14.5%). Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of using PBMCs to monitor immune response to anticancer therapies. Our data raise the possibility that the amount of circulating effector T cells and antitumor cytotoxicity of PBMCs may be associated with tumor burden in patients with pMMR solid tumors. [Table: see text]