Lafky, Jacqueline M.

Abstract Background There are multiple known individual- and practice-level barriers to enrollment of older patients with cancer to clinical trials, but little is known about how the clinical research workforce feels about potential higher-level strategy changes aimed to promote increased enrollment of older patients. Subjects, Materials, and Methods We invited all 11,351 Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (“Alliance”) members to participate in an anonymous, web-based survey to examine awareness of current accrual patterns for older patients to clinical trials, to ascertain consensus on how to tackle enrollment challenges, and to provide the impetus for high-level changes to improve clinical trial accrual of older patients with cancer. Results During the period from February 28, 2017, to June 16, 2017, 1,146 Alliance members participated (response rate = 10%), including a national diverse sample of physicians, nurses, administrative/clinical research staff, and patient advocates with representation from community, academic, and rural sites. Overall, one third felt that >50% of clinical trial enrollees should be age ≥65, and 64.9% felt the Alliance could improve upon enrollment of older patients. The four most commonly ranked strategies to improve enrollment of older patients were creating more dedicated trials for this population (36.3%), minimizing exclusion criteria focused on comorbidity (35.5%), developing independent strategies for those aged ≥65 and for those aged ≥70 (33.2%), and requiring that most/all Alliance trials have a specific expansion cohort of older patients (30.0%). Conclusion We anticipate that the recommendations from >1,000 Alliance members will continue to propel important strategy changes aimed to improve accrual of older patients with cancer to clinical trials. Implications for Practice This survey of the Alliance for Clinical Trials membership sought opinions on potential, large-scale, national strategies to improve accrual of older adults with cancer. Consensus was found around multiple strategies, including creating more dedicated trials for older patients, developing less stringent eligibility criteria, and mandating expansion cohorts of older patients within broader Alliance trials. It is anticipated that the recommendations from >1,000 Alliance members will continue to propel important strategy changes aimed to improve accrual of older patients with cancer to clinical trials.

Abstract Previous studies have implicated estrogen as a regulator of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in breast tumors. We therefore speculated that estrogen might modulate serologic soluble EGFR (sEGFR) concentrations in breast cancer patients. Accordingly, we measured serum sEGFR concentrations in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor that blocks estrogen synthesis. Serum specimens were obtained prior to and following 1 and 3 months of letrozole therapy. We report that sEGFR concentrations do not differ between MBC patients prior to letrozole treatment and age- and postmenopause-matched healthy women (P = 0.468). In contrast, however, sEGFR concentrations decreased significantly in 76% of MBC patients after both 1 month (P = 0.006) and 3 months (P = 0.003) of letrozole therapy versus pretreatment concentrations. Within the limitations of this study, we found no evidence for an association between pretreatment sEGFR concentrations or decreased treatment sEGFR concentrations and either progression-free or overall survival. Nonetheless, we conclude that future prospective studies are warranted to determine if baseline and/or longitudinal serum sEGFR concentrations may be useful for predicting disease progression and survival, and/or for monitoring responsiveness to aromatase inhibitors or other endocrine therapies in breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND A nocebo is an inert substance associated with adverse events. Although previous studies have examined the positive (placebo) effects of such inert substances, few have examined negative (nocebo) adverse event profiles, particularly in older patients who have higher morbidity and can experience frequent and severe adverse events from cancer therapy. METHODS This study focused on placebo/nocebo‐exposed patients who participated in 2 double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cancer therapeutic studies, namely, North Central Cancer Therapy Group trial NCCTG 97‐24‐51 and American College of Surgeons Oncology Group trial Z9001, with the goal of reporting the comparative, age‐based adverse event rates, as reported during the conduct of these trials. RESULTS Among the 446 patients who received only placebo/nocebo and who were the focus of the current report, 161 were aged ≥65 years at the time of respective trial entry, and 5234 adverse events occurred. Unadjusted adverse event rates did not differ significantly between patients aged ≥65 years and younger patients (rate ratio, 1.01; 99% confidence interval, 0.47‐2.02), and the findings were similar findings for grade 2 or worse adverse events and for all symptom‐driven adverse events (for example, pain, loss of appetite, anxiety). Adjustment for sex, ethnicity, baseline performance score, and individual trial resulted in no significant age‐based differences in adverse event rates. Similar findings were observed with an age threshold of 70 years. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events are equally common in older and younger cancer patients who are exposed to nocebo and thus require the same degree of clinical consideration regardless of age. Cancer 2017;123:4193–4198. © 2017 American Cancer Society .

176 Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of olanzapine (OLN) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was performed in chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving cisplatin, > 70 mg/m2, or cyclophosphamide-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, comparing OLN to placebo in combination with aprepitant (APR), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3), and dexamethasone (DEX). The OLN regimen was 10 mg of oral OLN, 125 mg APR, a 5-HT3, and oral DEX 12 mg pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and 10 mg/day of oral OLN and 8 mg DEX on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy plus 80 mg APR on days 2, 3 post-chemotherapy. The placebo (PLA) regimen was oral placebo, pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy; the APR, 5-HT3, and DEX pre- and post-chemotherapy were identical to that used in the OLN regimen. Fosaprepitant (150 mg IV), day 1 was allowed for substitution for the oral aprepitant. Palonosetron, ondansetron, or granisetron were the permitted 5-HT3 options. Nausea was measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, with 0 being “no nausea at all” and 10 being “nausea as bad as it can be”. No nausea was the primary endpoint and, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medications) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 401 patients (202 OLN, 199 PLA) were enrolled in the study. The proportion of patients who had no nausea was significantly greater for the OLN regimen compared to the PLA regimen for the acute period (24h post-chemotherapy) (74% vs. 45%, p < 0.0006), for the delayed period ( 24-120 h post-chemotherapy) (43% vs. 26%, p < 0.0006), and for the overall period (0-120 h) (39% vs. 22%, p < 0.0006). Complete response was significantly improved for the OLN patients compared to PLA patients for the acute (85% vs. 65%, p < 0.0001), the delayed (67% vs. 53%, p < 0.0078), and the overall periods (64% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusions: No nausea, the primary endpoint, and complete response, a secondary endpoint, were significantly improved with OLN, compared to PLA. Clinical trial information: NCT02116530.

Purpose Despite increasing awareness of accrual challenges, it is unknown if accrual of older patients to breast cancer treatment trials is improving. Methods We examined accrual of older patients to Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology systemic therapy breast cancer trials during 1985-2012 and compared disease characteristics and reasons for therapy cessation for older (age ≥ 65 years and ≥ 70 years) versus younger (age < 65 years and < 70 years) participants. To examine accrual trends, we modeled age as a function of time, using logistic regression. Results Overall, 17% of study participants were ≥ 65 years of age. Approximately 15%, 24%, and 24% of participants in adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic trials were age ≥ 65 years, and 7%, 15%, and 13% were age ≥ 70 years, respectively. The odds of a patient age ≥ 65 years enrolling significantly increased over time for adjuvant trials (odds ratio [OR] per year, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.05) but decreased significantly for neoadjuvant and metastatic trials (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.67 and OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00). Similar trends were seen for those age ≥ 70 years but these were statistically significant for adjuvant and neoadjuvant trials only (OR, 1.05, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.07; and OR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.62). In general, those age ≥ 65 years ( v those < 65 years) in adjuvant studies had a higher mean number of lymph nodes involved and more hormone receptor-negative tumors, although tumor sizes were similar. Early protocol treatment cessation was also more frequent in those age ≥ 65 years (50%) versus < 65 years (35.9%) across trials. Conclusion Older patients with breast cancer remain largely underrepresented in cooperative group therapeutic trials. We observed some improvement in accrual to adjuvant trials but worsening of accrual for neoadjuvant/metastatic trials. Novel strategies to increase accrual of older patients are critical to meaningfully change the evidence base for this growing patient population.

Abstract Background: Older adults represent 50% or more of all newly diagnosed cancer patients annually; these patients have multiple morbidities, complicating treatment decision-making.. Discussions about the risks and benefits of cancer treatments might be improved by having data on estimated all-cause survival. ePrognosis (http://eprognosis.ucsf.edu/carey2.php) is an online tool validated in older adults without cancer. We compared survival estimates using ePrognosis to observed survival in a population of women with early stage breast cancer who volunteered for cooperative group studies. Methods: Participants in CALGB 49907 (n=194) and 369901 (n=809) who were age 70+ were included (total n=1003). Both studies had comparable eligibility: primary, newly diagnosed, invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer. In 49907, eligibly also included PS 0-2; in 369901 there were no PS restrictions, but women who failed a screening cognitive exam were excluded. The Carey 2-year Index from ePrognosis was used to estimate all-cause 2-year survival, based on age, sex, and daily function. Function (needing help from another person to bath and shop for groceries, difficulty walking several blocks and pushing or pulling a heavy object) was derived from the EORTC QLC-30. The Carey index from ePrognosis generates scores from 1-10, with higher scores indicating higher probability of death. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to obtain point estimates and confidence intervals for the observed 2-yr survival. A two sided z-test was used to test the hypothesis that the observed survival rate is equivalent to the predicted survival rate. Results: At two years from study entry, 921 women were alive; 56 had died, and 26 were lost to follow-up/withdrawn. The population was, on average, 76 years old (SD 4.8), primarily white (89.3%), and the majority had hormone receptor positive tumors (79.4%). In our population, the Carey 2-years index predicated survival was not significantly different than observed rates in the 0-2 points and underestimated the survival rates for patients who had 3-6 points and 7-10 points. ePrognosis Prediction49907 & 369901 PatientsPointsPredicted Probability of SurvivalNNumber of DeathsObserved Probability of Overall Survival at 2 years (%, 95% CI)p-value0-295%5332595% (93-97%)0.7433-688%4272394% (92-96%)&lt;0.0017-1064%43881% (65-90%)0.017 Conclusions: In this population of older women with breast cancer, using a few readily available data items, ePrognosis provided accurate survival estimates for women with a low probability of death (0-2 points) and underestimated all-cause survival in women with an increased probability of death (3-10 points). Further studies are needed to assess the validity of this tool in samples of cancer patients with higher risks of 2-year mortality. Extended follow-up to validate the tools in predicting 5- and 10-year all-cause and non-cancer mortality risk will further contribute to decision making in older patients. Citation Format: Kimmick G, Pitcher B, Mandelblatt J, Clapp J, Ballman K, Barginear M, Freedman R, Artz A, Klepin H, Lafky J, Hopkins J, Winer E, Hudis C, Muss H, Cohen H, Jatoi A, Hurria A. All-cause survival estimates compared to observed survival in older women with breast cancer in CALGB 49907 and 369901 (Alliance A151503). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-10.

Purpose Given that the clinical course of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy is not well defined, the current study was performed to better understand clinical parameters associated with its presentation. Methods Acute and chronic neuropathy was evaluated in patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) on study N08CB (North Central Cancer Treatment Group, Alliance). Acute neuropathy was assessed by having patients complete daily questionnaires for 6 days with each cycle of FOLFOX. Before each dose of FOLFOX and as long as 18 months after chemotherapy cessation, chronic neurotoxicity was assessed with use of the 20-item, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Results Three hundred eight (89%) of the 346 patients had at least one symptom of acute neuropathy with the first cycle of FOLFOX; these symptoms included sensitivity to touching cold items (71%), sensitivity to swallowing cold items (71%), throat discomfort (63%), or muscle cramps (42%). Acute symptoms peaked at day 3 and improved, although they did not always resolve completely between treatments. These symptoms were about twice as severe in cycles 2 through 12 as they were in cycle 1. For chronic neurotoxicity, tingling was the most severe symptom, followed by numbness and then pain. During chemotherapy, symptoms in the hands were more prominent than they were in the feet; by 18 months, symptoms were more severe in the feet than they were in the hands. Patients with more severe acute neuropathy during the first cycle of therapy experienced more chronic sensory neurotoxicity (P < .0001). Conclusion Acute oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy symptoms do not always completely resolve between treatment cycles and are only half as severe on the first cycle as compared with subsequent cycles. There is a correlation between the severities of acute and chronic neuropathies.

AbstractBackgroundStudies point to a direct association between social support and better cancer outcomes. This study examined whether baseline social support is associated with better survival and fewer chemotherapy‐related adverse events in older, early‐stage breast cancer patients.MethodsThis study is a pre‐planned secondary analysis of CALGB 49907/Alliance A171301, a randomized trial that compared standard adjuvant chemotherapy versus capecitabine in breast cancer patients 65 years of age or older. A subset reported on the extent of their social support with questionnaires that were completed 6 times over 2 years.ResultsThe median age of this 331‐patient cohort was 72 years (range: 65, 90); 179 (55%) were married, and 210 (65%) lived with someone. One hundred forty‐five patients (46%) described a social network of 0–10 people; 110 (35%) of 11–25; and 58 (19%) of 26 or more. The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) social support survey revealed that the median scores (range) for emotional/informational, tangible, positive social interaction, and affectionate social support were 94 (3, 100), 94 (0, 100), 96 (0, 100), and 100 (8, 100), respectively. Social support scores appeared stable over 2 years and higher (more support) than in other cancer settings. No statistically significant associations were observed between social support and survival and adverse events in multivariate analyses. However, married patients had smaller tumors, and those with arthritis reported less social support.ConclusionAlthough social support did not predict survival and adverse events, the exploratory but plausible inverse associations with larger tumors and arthritis suggest that social support merits further study. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

BACKGROUNDPostmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors are at an increased risk of bone loss. The current study was undertaken to determine whether upfront versus delayed treatment with zoledronic acid (ZA) impacted bone loss. This report described the 5‐year follow‐up results.METHODSA total of 551 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who completed tamoxifen treatment and were undergoing daily letrozole treatment were randomized to either upfront (274 patients) or delayed (277 patients) ZA at a dose of 4 mg intravenously every 6 months. In the patients on the delayed treatment arm, ZA was initiated for a postbaseline bone mineral density T‐score of <‐2.0 or fracture.RESULTSThe incidence of a 5% decrease in the total lumbar spine bone mineral density at 5 years was 10.2% in the upfront treatment arm versus 41.2% in the delayed treatment arm (P<.0001). A total of 41 patients in the delayed treatment arm were eventually started on ZA. With the exception of increased NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 1/2 elevated creatinine and fever in the patients treated on the upfront arm and cerebrovascular ischemia among those in the delayed treatment arm, there were no significant differences observed between arms with respect to the most common adverse events of arthralgia and back pain. Osteoporosis occurred less frequently in the upfront treatment arm (2 vs 8 cumulative cases), although this difference was not found to be statistically significant. Bone fractures occurred in 24 patients in the upfront treatment arm versus 25 patients in the delayed treatment arm.CONCLUSIONSImmediate treatment with ZA prevented bone loss compared with delayed treatment in postmenopausal women receiving letrozole and these differences were maintained at 5 years. The incidence of osteoporosis or fractures was not found to be significantly different between treatment arms. Cancer 2015;121:2537–2543. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Purpose: Polymorphisms in genes involved in the angiogenesis pathway have been investigated as predictive markers for efficacy and tolerability to anti-angiogenesis treatment, such as BEV. This study examines single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF, VEGFR2, and HIF-1α for their potential association with outcome and safety in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the combined vertical blockade of VEGF signaling (i.e., sorafenib and BEV) as salvage therapy. Experimental procedures: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood for 78/79 evaluable patients in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Phase II study, N054C (Grothey, et al., ASCO 2010). TaqMan or direct sequencing was used for genotyping VEGF (rs25648, rs3025039, rs2010963, rs1005230, rs833061, rs699947, rs1570360), VEGFR2 (rs2305948, rs2219471, rs2071559, rs1870377), and HIF-1α (rs11549465, rs11549467) SNPs. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to determine genotype associations with the study's primary endpoint, progression-free rate at 3 months of follow-up, as well as genotype associations with the most common grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related (AE rels) to treatment (i.e., fatigue, hypertension, skin reaction). Results summary: The presence of a mutant T allele in the 5’ UTR of VEGF (rs25648; C534T) was associated with fewer successes in progression-free rate at 3 month follow-up (Fisher's exact test, p=0.0187). In addition, the presence of a C allele in the promoter region of VEGFR2 (rs2071559, T-604C) was associated with fewer grade 3+ hypertension AE rels (Fisher's exact test, p=0.0101). However, after correcting for multiple comparisons using the method of Benjamini & Hochberg none of the p-values were significant at a 0.05 level. At the same time, no differences were observed between the genotype subgroups and either progression-free rate at 3 months or the most common grade 3+ AE rels for the remaining SNPs that were analyzed, before or after correction. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that mCRC patients with the VEGF C534T (rs25648) variant may not benefit from combined treatment of sorafenib and BEV, whereas patients with the VEGFR2 T-604C (rs2071559) polymorphism may experience fewer grade 3+ AE rels. Further prospective validation of these SNPs and their association with this treatment combination in mCRC is warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4131. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4131