Back to Authors

Conde-Moreno, Antonio J.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1024-0924

Mayo Clinic

Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe

Citations 3

A New Clinical Instrument for Estimating the Ambulatory Status after Irradiation for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression
Rades, Dirk , Al-Salool, Ahmed , Staackmann, Christian, Cremers, Florian , Cacicedo, Jon , Lomidze, Darejan, Grošelj, Blaž , Jankarashvili, Natalia , Conde-Moreno, Antonio J. , Ciérvide, R. , Kristiansen, Charlotte , Jankarashvili, Natalia , Ciervide, Raquel , Kristiansen, Charlotte , Schild, Steven E. , Šegedin, Barbara

Cancers | August 7, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 3827

10.3390/cancers14153827 Get It

Estimating post-treatment ambulatory status can improve treatment personalization of patients irradiated for malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC). A new clinical score was developed from data of 283 patients treated with radiotherapy alone in prospective trials. Radiotherapy regimen, age, gender, tumor type, interval from tumor diagnosis to MSCC, number of affected vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, time developing motor deficits, ambulatory status, performance score, sensory deficits, and sphincter dysfunction were evaluated. For factors with prognostic relevance in the multivariable logistic regression model after backward stepwise variable selection, scoring points were calculated (post-radiotherapy ambulatory rate in % divided by 10) and added for each patient. Four factors (primary tumor type, sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction, ambulatory status) were used for the instrument that includes three prognostic groups (17–21, 22–31, and 32–37 points). Post-radiotherapy ambulatory rates were 10%, 65%, and 97%, respectively, and 2-year local control rates were 100%, 75%, and 88%, respectively. Positive predictive values to predict ambulatory and non-ambulatory status were 97% and 90% using the new score, and 98% and 79% using the previous instrument. The new score appeared more precise in predicting non-ambulatory status. Since patients with 32–37 points had high post-radiotherapy ambulatory and local control rates, they may not require surgery.
Role of the overall treatment time of radiotherapy with 10 × 3 Gy for outcomes in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression
Rades, Dirk , Conde-Moreno, Antonio J. , Cacicedo, Jon , Metz, Michaela, Veninga, Theo, Rudat, Volker , Schild, Steven E. , Janssen, Stefan , Šegedin, Barbara

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology | November 2, 2016 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 388-393

10.1111/1754-9485.12553 Get It

AbstractIntroductionRadiotherapy alone still is the most commonly delivered treatment modality for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). MSCC is an emergency situation, which requires treatment as soon as possible. When radiotherapy is performed with the most commonly used approach 10 × 3 Gy (30 Gy in 10 fractions) over 2 weeks, the question has been asked whether an overall treatment time (OTT) of 14–15 days including two weekends without irradiation leads to worse outcomes than OTT of 12 days (beginning of radiotherapy on a Monday resulting in only one weekend break)?MethodsA total of 412 patients with MSCC were included in this retrospective study. Ninety‐two patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy over 12 days were compared to 320 patients with an OTT of 14–15 days. Ten additional factors were investigated.ResultsOn multivariate analysis, functional outcome was associated with tumour type (P < 0.001), time developing motor deficits (P < 0.001), ambulatory status (P = 0.018) and performance score (P < 0.001); OTT had no significant impact (P = 0.40). On univariate analysis of local control of MSCC (freedom from recurrence in irradiated spinal parts), no factor was significant including OTT (P = 0.66). On multivariate analysis, visceral metastases (P < 0.001), tumour type (P < 0.001), time developing motor deficits (P < 0.001), ambulatory status (P < 0.001) and performance score (P < 0.001) were associated with survival, OTT not even on univariate analysis (P = 0.55).ConclusionsSince an OTT of 14–15 days had no negative impact on outcomes compared to 12 days, compensation in form of an additional radiation fraction or continuation of radiotherapy during weekends is not required, if radiotherapy cannot be started on a Monday.
Excellent outcomes after radiotherapy alone for malignant spinal cord compression from myeloma
Rades, Dirk , Conde-Moreno, Antonio J. , Cacicedo, Jon , Rudat, Volker , Schild, Steven E. , Šegedin, Barbara

Radiology and Oncology | August 22, 2016 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 337-340

10.1515/raon-2016-0029 Get It

Abstract Background Uncertainty exists whether patients with spinal cord compression (SCC) from a highly radiosensitive tumor require decompressive spinal surgery in addition to radiotherapy (RT). This study addressed the question by evaluating patients receiving RT alone for SCC from myeloma. Patients and methods Data of 238 patients were retrospectively analyzed for response to RT and local control of SCC. In addition, the effect of RT on motor function (improvement, no further progression, deterioration) was evaluated. Overall response was defined as improvement or no further progression of motor dysfunction. Prior to RT, patients were presented to a neurosurgeon for evaluation whether upfront decompressive surgery was indicated (e.g. vertebral fracture or unstable spine). Results In the entire cohort, the overall response rate was 97% (53% improvement plus 44% no further progression). Following RT, 88% of the patients were able to walk. Of the 69 non-ambulatory patients 44 patients (64%) regained the ability to walk. Local control rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 93%, 82% and 82%, respectively. A trend towards better local control was observed for patients who were ambulatory before starting RT (p = 0.08) and those with a more favorable performance status (p = 0.07). Conclusions RT alone provided excellent response rates, functional outcomes and local control in patients with SCC from myeloma. These results should be confirmed in a prospective randomized trial.