Hundepool, Caroline A.

AbstractBackgroundIn nerve allograft development, currently used subjective histological scoring systems to evaluate nerve structure in experimental studies are not uniform and have not been validated.The aim of this study was to describe and validate a simple, fast and inexpensive method to compare structural properties of nerve allografts on a histological level.Materials and methodsA total of 113 histological sections of rat (sciatic nerves) and human peripheral nerve segments (thoracodorsal and long thoracic nerve for motor and sural for sensory nerve) treated with various decellularization protocols were analyzed. Slides were stained with Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E), Toluidine Blue and Laminin. A subjective scoring system using a 5‐point scale was used to score each nerve section by four independent researchers. For validation of this score both inter‐ and intra‐rater reliability were calculated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).ResultsOverall, an excellent correlation between the different observers was found for the Toluidine Blue (ICC = 0.919, 95% CI: 0.891–0.941), H&E (ICC = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.865–0.927) and Laminin staining (ICC = 0.897, 95% CI: 0.860–0.926). Intra‐rater reliability was good for all three staining techniques (ICC >0.8).ConclusionThis study demonstrates the validity of this simple scoring system to evaluate nerve structure after different processing protocols. All three evaluated staining techniques can reliably be used for both rat and human nerve tissue. We believe this method is suitable to compare different processing techniques to create processed nerve allografts, especially when the average scores of multiple raters are used.

Background: Processed nerve allografts are a promising alternative to nerve autografts, providing an unlimited, readily available supply and avoiding donor-site morbidity and the need for immunosuppression. Currently, clinically available nerve allografts do not provide satisfactory results for motor reconstruction. This study evaluated motor recovery after reconstruction of a long nerve gap using a processed nerve allograft and the influence of storage techniques. Methods: Nerve allografts were decellularized using elastase and detergents and stored at either 4° or −80°C. In 36 New Zealand White rabbits, a 3-cm peroneal nerve gap was repaired with either an autograft (group 1, control) or a cold-stored (group 2) or frozen-stored (group 3) processed nerve allograft. Nerve recovery was evaluated using longitudinal ultrasound measurements, electrophysiology (compound muscle action potentials), isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and histomorphometry after 24 weeks. Results: Longitudinal ultrasound measurements showed that the cold-stored allograft provided earlier regeneration than the frozen-stored allograft. Furthermore, ultrasound showed significantly inferior recovery in group 3 than in both other groups (p < 0.05). Muscle weight and isometric tetanic force showed similar outcomes in the autograft and cold-stored allograft groups [p = 0.096 (muscle weight) and p = 0.286 (isometric tetanic force)], and confirmed the inferiority of the frozen-stored allograft to the autograft [p < 0.01 (muscle weight) and p = 0.02 (isometric tetanic force)]. Conclusions: Frozen storage of the nerve allograft significantly impairs functional recovery and should be avoided. The cold-stored optimized nerve allograft yields functional recovery similar to the gold standard autograft in the reconstruction of a 3-cm motor nerve defect. Future studies should focus on further improvement of the nerve allograft.

Background: Elbow flexion after upper brachial plexus injury may be restored by a nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the biceps motor branch with an optional nerve transfer from the median nerve to the brachialis motor branch (single and double fascicular nerve transfer). This meta-analysis assesses the effectiveness of both techniques and the added value of additional reinnervation of the brachialis muscle. Methods: Comprehensive searches were performed identifying studies concerning restoration of elbow flexion through single and double fascicular nerve transfers. Only C5 to C6 lesion patients were included in quantitative analysis to prevent confounding by indication. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients reaching British Medical Research Council elbow flexion grade 3 or greater. Meta-analysis was performed with random effects models. Results: Thirty-five studies were included (n = 688). In quantitative analysis, 29 studies were included (n = 341). After single fascicular nerve transfer, 190 of 207 patients reached Medical Research Council grade 3 or higher (random effects model, 95.6 percent; 95 percent CI, 92.9 to 98.2 percent); and after double fascicular nerve transfer, 128 of 134 patients reached grade 3 or higher (random effects model, 97.5 percent; 95 percent CI, 95.0 to 100 percent; p = 0.301). Significantly more double nerve transfer patients reached grade 4 or greater if preoperative delay was 6 months or less (84 of 101 versus 49 of 51; p = 0.035). Conclusions: Additional reinnervation of the brachialis muscle did not result in significantly more patients reaching Medical Research Council grade 3 or higher for elbow flexion. Double fascicular nerve transfer may result in more patients reaching grade 4 or higher in patients with a preoperative delay less than 6 months. The median nerve may be preserved or used for another nerve transfer without substantially impairing elbow flexion restoration.

AbstractBackgroundA bridging nerve autograft is the gold standard for the repair of segmental nerve injury that cannot be repaired directly. However, limited availability and donor site morbidity remain major disadvantages of autografts. Here, a nerve allograft decellularized with elastase was compared with an autograft regarding functional motor outcome in a rat sciatic segmental nerve defect model. Furthermore, the effect of storage on this allograft was studied.MethodsSixty‐six Lewis rats (250–300 g) underwent a 10‐mm sciatic nerve reconstruction using either a cold‐ (n = 22) or frozen‐stored (n = 22) decellularized nerve allograft or an autograft (n = 22). Sprague–Dawley rats (300–350 g) served as full major histocompatibility complex‐mismatched donors. Functional motor outcome was evaluated after 12 and 16 weeks. Ankle angle, compound muscle action potential (CMAP), isometric tetanic force, wet muscle weight, and histomorphometry were tested bilaterally.ResultsFor CMAP and isometric tetanic force, no significant differences were observed between groups. In contrast, for ankle angle, histomorphometry and muscle weight, the cold‐stored allograft performed comparable to the autograft, while the frozen‐stored allograft performed significantly inferior to the autograft. At week 16, ankle angle was 88.0 ± 3.1% in the cold‐stored group, 77.4 ± 3.6% in the frozen‐stored group, and 74.1 ± 3.1% in the autograft group (P < .001); At week 16, the muscle weight showed a recovery up to 71.1 ± 4.8% in the autograft group, 67.0 ± 6.6% in the cold‐stored group, and 64.7 ± 3.7% in the frozen‐stored group (P < .05).ConclusionsA nerve allograft decellularized with elastase, if stored under the right conditions, results in comparable functional motor outcomes as the gold standard, the autograft.

IntroductionIn prior small animal studies, we maintained vascularized bone allotransplant viability without long‐term immunotherapy. Instead, an autogenous neoangiogenic circulation is created from implanted vessels, sufficient to maintain bone viability with only 2 weeks immunosupression. Blood flow is maintained despite rejection of the allogeneic vascular pedicle thereafter. We have previously described a large animal (swine) pre‐clinical model, reconstructing tibial defects with vascularized tibial allotransplants. In this manuscript, autologous angiogenesis is evaluated in this model and correlated with bone viability.Materials and methodsAllogeneic tibial segments were transplanted across a major swine leukocyte antigen mismatch. Microvascular repair of the bone VCA pedicle was combined with intraosseous implantation of an autogenous arteriovenous (AV) bundle. The bundle was ligated in group 1 (n = 4), and allowed to perfuse in group 2 (n = 4). Three‐drug immunotherapy was given for 2 weeks. At 16 weeks micro‐CT angiography quantified neoangiogenic vessel volume. Bone viability, rejection grade, and bone healing were analyzed.ResultsA substantial neoangiogenic circulation developed from the implanted AV‐bundle in group 2, with vessel density superior to ligated AV‐bundle controls (0.11 ± 0.05 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01, P = .029). Bone allotransplant viability was also significantly enhanced by neoangiogenesis (78.7 ± 4.4% vs. 27.7 ± 5.8%, P = .028) with higher bone healing scores (21.4 ± 2.9 vs. 12.5 ± 3.7, P = .029). Ligated control tibias demonstrated disorganized bone morphology and higher local inflammation (P = .143).ConclusionImplantation of autogenous AV bundles into vascularized bone allotransplants resulted in the rapid formation of a neoangiogenic autogenous blood supply in a swine tibia model that maintained bone viability, improved bone healing, and minimized rejection.

IntroductionVascularized bone allotransplantation may provide new options for reconstruction of segmental defects if problems of long‐term immune modulation can be solved. The current literature lacks an orthotopic large animal model, limited to bone and without the confounding effects of other tissue types, permitting a multifaceted evaluation before new methods are used clinically. The purpose of this study was to develop a large animal model for vascularized bone allotransplantation.Materials and methodsEight porcine hind limbs were dissected. Length, diameter, and location of all hindlimb vessels were measured and a single nutrient vessel supplying the tibial diaphysis identified enabling its use as a vascularized bone allotransplant. Four Yucatan minipigs were divided into two pairs with a major swine leukocyte antigen mismatch. A 3.5 cm tibial segment including its nutrient pedicle was raised simultaneously from each pig and transplanted into the matched defect of the other animal. Microarterial anastomosis of the pedicle and 3‐drug immunosuppression maintained VCA viability. Bone healing and limb function were followed for 16 weeks.ResultsA consistent tibia diaphyseal nutrient artery arose from the caudal tibial artery to enter bone a mean 2.8 mm distal to the tibial tubercle with a pedicle length of 6.6 ± 3.3 mm and diameter of 1.6 ± 0.2 mm. Using this pedicle, we reconstructed a 3.5 cm tibial defect with a vascularized bone allotransplant in four animals. Immediate weightbearing as well as progressive bone healing was demonstrated.ConclusionWe have developed a vascularized tibial bone allotranplantation large‐animal model suitable for future bone‐only allotranplantation research in mini‐pigs.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to identify which triple immunosuppressive protocols, currently used for vascularized composite allotransplantation in the clinic, will have the best effect on motor function recovery following nerve allograft reconstruction.MethodsEighty‐eight Lewis rats underwent a 1‐cm sciatic nerve allograft transplantation and skin graft from 44 Brown‐Norway rats. Group I received 0.9% isotonic saline (control); Group II, 2 mg/kg FK506; Group III, 1 mg/kg FK506 with 15 mg/kg mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); and Group IV, 2 mg/kg FK506 with 30 mg/kg MMF and prednisone. Each group consisted of 11 rats. After 12 weeks, motor function recovery was evaluated with isometric tetanic force, muscle mass, ankle contracture angle, electrophysiology, and nerve histomorphometry. Adequacy of immunosuppression was monitored with the transplanted skin graft. All data are expressed as a percentage of the contralateral side.ResultsIsometric tetanic force showed significantly better functional recovery in all groups treated with immunosuppression compared to control. Within the immunosuppression groups no significant difference was found: 42.1 ± 6.4% (Group I), 56.1 ± 12.4% (Group II), 58.4 ± 10.7% (Group III), and 61.3 ± 11.2% (Group IV). Group IV was superior to all other groups regarding ankle contracture (P < .05) and electrophysiology (P < .001). Skin graft rejection occurred in 41 and 0% (Groups III and IV, respectively).ConclusionsFK506 significantly enhanced motor recovery after allograft reconstruction. This effect was comparable between combination treatment (low‐dose FK506 and MMF) and triple therapy (high‐dose FK506 and MMF plus prednisolone). However, triple therapy was more effective in suppressing skin rejection.

OBJECTIVE Commercially available processed nerve allografts have been shown to be inferior to autografts in previous animal studies. The authors hypothesized that combining different processing and storage techniques will result in improved nerve ultrastructure preservation, lower immunogenicity, and minimized cellular debris. Different processing protocols were evaluated using chemical detergents, enzymes, and irradiation, with the addition the of enzyme elastase, were used. Additionally, the difference between cold and frozen storage was investigated. The goal of this study was to create an optimized nerve allograft. METHODS Fifty rat nerves were decellularized with modifications of previous protocols and the addition of elastase. Subsequently, the nerve segments were stored at either 4°C or −80°C. Both processed and fresh control nerves were analyzed with confocal microscopy using immunohistochemical staining on the basal lamina (laminin γ-1), Schwann cells (S100 protein), and immunogenicity using major histocompatibility complex–I (MHCI) staining. Morphology of the ultrastructure and amount of cellular debris were analyzed on cross-sections of the nerves stained with toluidine blue and H & E, and by using electron microscopy. RESULTS Nerve ultrastructure was preserved with all decellularization protocols. Storage at −80°C severely altered nerve ultrastructure after any decellularization method. Elastase was found to significantly reduce the immunogenicity and amount of Schwann cells, while maintaining good structural properties. CONCLUSIONS Reduced immunogenicity, diminished cellular debris, and the elimination of Schwann cells was observed when elastase was added to the nerve processing while maintaining ultrastructure. Storage at −80°C after the decellularization process heavily damaged the nerve ultrastructure as compared with cold storage. Further in vivo studies are needed to prove the nerve regenerative capacity of these optimized allografts.

Objective: The current gold standard treatment for peripheral nerve gaps remains the use of nerve autografts. Decellularized nerve allografts provide a potential ideal alternative, avoiding important disadvantages of the autograft such as donor site morbidity and the limited supply without the need for immunosuppressive therapy. In the ideal decellularized nerve allograft, all cellular debris is removed while maintaining the nerves’ ultrastructure. For the optimization of processing techniques for nerve allografts, it is essential to compare the effect of different processing techniques on a histological level. Although several studies describe some form of (subjective) histological scoring system, evaluation techniques are not uniform and nothing has been validated yet. A validated method that is simple and could easily be adopted by other groups would allow for a more standardized comparison of nerve decellularization techniques. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and validate an easy, fast, and inexpensive method to compare different nerve decellularization strategies on a histological level. Materials and Methods: Fifty rat sciatic nerve and 70 human nerve segments (35 sensory and 35 motor) were used for this study. Nerve segments were processed using 5 different processing techniques and compared with unprocessed nerve segments (control). Three different stainings were used to visualize general morphology and different components of the nerve tissue. Toluidine blue was used for visualization of myelin sheaths, hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) for general morphology, and laminin y-l for visualization of the basal lamina. All slides were scored by 4 independent observers who were blinded for the different processing techniques used. Each slide was given a score from 1 to 5 where 5 resembles a “perfect” structure similar to the native nerve and 1 resembles severe structural damage or absence of the component. To validate this scoring system, the agreement between the observers was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The 4 different observers similarly scored the processed nerve segments. Significant differences between the processing groups could be identified. We found a good correlation between the different observers for the Toluidine Blue (ICC = .73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.79), H&E (ICC = .72, 95% CI, 0.64-0.78), and Laminin staining (ICC = .74, 95% CI, 0.67-0.80). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the validity of the scoring system to evaluate nerve tissue after different processing protocols. A good correlation was found for the scoring of the structural integrity (Toluidine Blue, H&E, and Laminin). This method is suitable to compare different processing techniques in vitro on the route to engineering the ideal nerve allograft. Use of this method by other groups will make it possible to compare results of different nerve processing studies. Using valid outcome measurements is essential when striving to create new innovative options for nerve reconstruction.