Back to Authors

Abcejo, Arnoley S.

Mayo Clinic

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science

Citations 16

Neuroanesthesia Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations From Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SNACC)
Flexman, Alana M. , Abcejo, Arnoley S., Avitsian, Rafi , Sloovere, Veerle De , Highton, David , Juul, Niels, Li, Shu , Meng, Lingzhong , Paisansathan, Chanannait , Rath, Girija P. , Rozet, Irene

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | April 16, 2020 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 202-209

10.1097/ana.0000000000000691 Get It

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has several implications relevant to neuroanesthesiologists, including neurological manifestations of the disease, impact of anesthesia provision for specific neurosurgical procedures and electroconvulsive therapy, and health care provider wellness. The Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care appointed a task force to provide timely, consensus-based expert guidance for neuroanesthesiologists during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this document is to provide a focused overview of COVID-19 disease relevant to neuroanesthesia practice. This consensus statement provides information on the neurological manifestations of COVID-19, advice for neuroanesthesia clinical practice during emergent neurosurgery, interventional radiology (excluding endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke), transnasal neurosurgery, awake craniotomy and electroconvulsive therapy, as well as information about health care provider wellness. Institutions and health care providers are encouraged to adapt these recommendations to best suit local needs, considering existing practice standards and resource availability to ensure safety of patients and providers.
Recent Preoperative Concussion and Postoperative Complications: A Retrospective Matched-cohort Study
D’Souza, Ryan S. , Sexton, Matthew A. , Schulte, Phillip J. , Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Abcejo, Arnoley S., D'Souza, Ryan S

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | October 25, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 221-229

10.1097/ana.0000000000000654 Get It

Background: Physiological alterations during the perianesthetic period may contribute to secondary neurocognitive injury after a concussion. Methods: Patients exposed to concussion and who received an anesthetic within 90 days were matched to unexposed patients without concussion. Intraoperative and postoperative events were compared. Subgroup analyses assessed relationships among patients with a concussion in the prior 30, 31 to 60, and 61 to 90 days and their respective unexposed matches. To facilitate identification of potential targets for further investigation, statistical comparisons are reported before, as well as after, correction for multiple comparisons. Results: Sixty concussion patients were matched to 176 unexposed patients. Before correction, 28.3% postconcussion versus 14.8% unexposed patients reported postanesthesia care unit pain score≥7 (P=0.02); 16.7% concussion versus 6.5% unexposed patients reported headache within 90 days of anesthesia (P=0.02) and 23.5% of patients who received surgery and anesthesia within 30 days of concussion experienced headache within 90 days of anesthesia compared with 7.1% in the unexposed group (P=0.01). Patients who experienced concussion and had anesthesia between 31 and 60 days after injury had a postanesthesia care unit Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale score of −1.61±1.29 versus a score of −0.2±0.45 in unexposed patients (P=0.002). After adjusting the P-value threshold for multiple comparisons, the P-value for significance was instead 0.0016 for the overall cohort. Our study revealed no significant associations with application of adjusted significance thresholds. Conclusions: There were no differences in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients with recent concussion compared with unexposed patients. Before correction for multiple comparisons, several potential targets for further investigation are identified. Well-powered studies are warranted.
Anesthesia During Positive-pressure Myelogram: A New Role for Cerebral Oximetry
Gatica-Moris, Sebastian R., Abcejo, Arnoley S., Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Gatica-Moris, Sebastián, Welch, Tasha L. , Carr, Carrie M.

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | October 25, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 263-267

10.1097/ana.0000000000000651 Get It

Background: Positive-pressure myelogram (PPM) is an emerging radiologic study used to localize spinal dural defects. During PPM, cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFp) is increased by injecting saline with contrast into the cerebrospinal fluid. This has the potential to increase intracranial pressure and compromise cerebral perfusion. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review and analysis of 11 patients. The aim was to describe the periprocedural anesthetic management of patients undergoing PPM. Results: All patients underwent PPM with general anesthesia and intra-arterial blood pressure and near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring of regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation. Mean±SD maximum lumbar CSFp was 58±12 mm Hg. Upon intrathecal injection, mean systolic blood pressure increased from 115±21 to 142±32 mm Hg (P<0.001), diastolic blood pressure from 68±12 to 80±20 mm Hg (P≤0.001), and mean blood pressure from 87±10 to 98±14 mm Hg (P=0.02). Ten of 11 patients received blood pressure augmentation with phenylephrine to minimize the risk of reduced cerebral perfusion secondary to increased CSFp after intrathecal injection. The mean heart rate before and following injection was similar (68±15 vs. 70±15 bpm, respectively; P=0.16). There was a decrease in regional cerebral oxygen saturation after positioning from supine to prone position (79±10% to 74±9%, P=0.02) and a further decrease upon intrathecal injection (75±10% to 69±9%, P≤0.01). Conclusions: Systemic blood pressure increased following intrathecal injection during PPM, possibly due to a physiologic response to intracranial hypertension/reduced cerebral perfusion or administration of phenylephrine. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation decreased with the change to prone position and further decreased upon intrathecal injection. Cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy has a potential role to monitor the adequacy of cerebral perfusion and guide adjustment of systemic blood pressure during PPM.
Anesthesia With and Without Nitrous Oxide and Long-term Cognitive Trajectories in Older Adults
Abcejo, Arnoley S., Petersen, Ronald C. , Hanson, Andrew C. , Schroeder, Darrell R. , Schulte, Phillip J. , Martin, David P. , Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Schroeder, Darrell , Šprung, Juraj , Knopman, David S. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Weingarten, Toby N. , Warner, David O.

Anesthesia & Analgesia | October 25, 2019 | Volume: 131 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 594-604

10.1213/ane.0000000000004490 Get It

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the hypothesis that the rate of postoperative decline in global cognition is greater in older adults exposed to general anesthesia with nitrous oxide (N 2 O) compared to general anesthesia without N 2 O. METHODS: Longitudinal measures of cognitive function were analyzed in nondemented adults, 70–91 years of age, enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging. Linear mixed-effects models with time-varying covariates assessed the relationship between exposure to surgery with general anesthesia (surgery/GA) with or without N 2 O and the rate of long-term cognitive changes. Global cognition and domain-specific cognitive outcomes were defined using z scores, which measure how far an observation is, in standard deviations, from the unimpaired population mean. RESULTS: The analysis included 1819 participants: 280 exposed to GA without N 2 O following enrollment and before censoring during follow-up (median [interquartile range {IQR}] follow-up of 5.4 [3.9–7.9] years); 256 exposed to GA with N 2 O (follow-up 5.6 [4.0–7.9] years); and 1283 not exposed to surgery/GA (follow-up 4.1 [2.5–6.4] years). The slope of the global cognitive z score was significantly more negative following exposure to surgery/GA after enrollment (change in slope of −0.062 [95% confidence interval {CI}, −0.085 to −0.039] for GA without N 2 O, and −0.058 [95% CI, −0.080 to −0.035] for GA with N 2 O, both P < .001). The change in slope following exposure to surgery/GA did not differ between those exposed to anesthesia without versus with N 2 O (estimated difference −0.004 [95% CI, −0.035 to 0.026], P = .783). CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to surgery/GA is associated with a small, but statistically significant decline in cognitive z scores. Cognitive decline did not differ between anesthetics with and without N 2 O. This finding provides evidence that the use of N 2 O in older adults does not need to be avoided because of concerns related to decline in cognition.
The first CT in a SAH: a picture tells a story
Guerra, Hilda , Abcejo, Arnoley S., Gobeske, Kevin T. , Wijdicks, Efm, Abcejo, Arnoley, Gobeske, Kevin

Practical Neurology | May 12, 2017 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 235-236

10.1136/practneurol-2017-001639 Get It

Finding the cause of acute neurological deterioration in the hours following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage remains challenging. The presence of blood casts in the ventricles proves that deterioration is secondary to acute hydrocephalus and prompts immediate external ventricular drain placement.
Contemporary analysis of the intraoperative and perioperative complications of neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position
Mallory, Grant W., Abcejo, Arnoley S., Pasternak, Jeffrey J., Atkinson, John L. D., Meyer, Fredric B. , Marsh, W. Richard , Link, Michael J. , Perkins, William J., Pasternak, Jeffrey, Perkins, William, Himes, Benjamin , Clarke, Michelle J. , Gompel, Jamie J. Van

Journal of Neurosurgery | August 5, 2016 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 182-188

10.3171/2016.5.jns152328 Get It

OBJECTIVE Historically, performing neurosurgery with the patient in the sitting position offered advantages such as improved visualization and gravity-assisted retraction. However, this position fell out of favor at many centers due to the perceived risk of venous air embolism (VAE) and other position-related complications. Some neurosurgical centers continue to perform sitting-position cases in select patients, often using modern monitoring techniques that may improve procedural safety. Therefore, this paper reports the risks associated with neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position in a modern series. METHODS The authors reviewed the anesthesia records for instances of clinically significant VAE and other complications for all neurosurgical procedures performed in the sitting position between January 1, 2000, and October 8, 2013. In addition, a prospectively maintained morbidity and mortality log of these procedures was reviewed for instances of subdural or intracerebral hemorrhage, tension pneumocephalus, and quadriplegia. Both overall and specific complication rates were calculated in relation to the specific type of procedure. RESULTS In a series of 1792 procedures, the overall complication rate related to the sitting position was 1.45%, which included clinically significant VAE, tension pneumocephalus, and subdural hemorrhage. The rate of any detected VAE was 4.7%, but the rate of VAE requiring clinical intervention was 1.06%. The risk of clinically significant VAE was highest in patients undergoing suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy with a rate of 2.7% and an odds ratio (OR) of 2.8 relative to deep brain stimulator cases (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2–70, p = 0.04). Sitting cervical spine cases had a comparatively lower complication rate of 0.7% and an OR of 0.28 as compared with all cranial procedures (95% CI 0.12–0.67, p < 0.01). Sitting cervical cases were further subdivided into extradural and intradural procedures. The rate of complications in intradural cases was significantly higher (OR 7.3, 95% CI 1.4–39, p = 0.02) than for extradural cases. The risk of VAE in intradural spine procedures did not differ significantly from sitting suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy cases (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.09–5.4, p = 0.7). Two cases (0.1%) had to be aborted intraoperatively due to complications. There were no instances of intraoperative deaths, although there was a single death within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS In this large, modern series of cases performed in the sitting position, the complication rate was low. Suboccipital craniotomy/craniectomy was associated with the highest risk of complications. When appropriately used with modern anesthesia techniques, the sitting position provides a safe means of surgical access.