Mostafa, Ahmed

Many clinical laboratories supporting solid organ transplant programs use multiple HLA genotyping technologies, depending on individual laboratory needs. Sequence‐specific primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) serve the rapid turnaround necessary for deceased donor workup, while sequence‐specific oligonucleotide probe (SSOP) technology is widely employed for higher volumes. When clinical need mandates high‐resolution data, Sanger sequencing‐based typing (SBT) has been the “gold standard.” However, all those methods commonly yield ambiguous typing results that utilize valuable laboratory resources when resolution is required. In solid organ transplantation, high‐resolution typing may provide critical information for highly sensitized patients with donor‐specific anti‐HLA antibodies (DSA), particularly when DSA involve HLA alleles not discriminated by SSOP typing. Arguments against routine use of SBT include assay complexity, long turnaround times (TAT), and increased costs. Here, we compare a next generation sequencing (NGS) technology with SSOP for accuracy, effort, turnaround time, and level of resolution for genotyping of 11 HLA loci among 289 specimens from five clinical laboratories. Results were concordant except for SSOP misassignments in eight specimens and 21 novel sequences uniquely identified by NGS. With few exceptions, SSOP generated ambiguous results while NGS provided unambiguous three‐field allele assignments. For complete HLA genotyping of up to 24 samples by either SSOP or NGS, bench work was completed on day 1 and typing results were available on day 2. This study provides compelling evidence that, although not viable for STAT typing of deceased donors, a single‐pass NGS HLA typing method has direct application for solid organ transplantation.

Abstract The oncolytic reovirus (RV) has demonstrated clinical efficacy and minimal toxicity in a variety of cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM). MM is a malignancy of plasma cells that is considered treatable but incurable because of the 90% relapse rate that is primarily from drug resistance. The systemic nature of MM and the antitumor immunosuppression by its tumor microenvironment presents an ongoing therapeutic challenge. In the present study, we demonstrate that RV synergizes with the standard-of-care MM drug bortezomib (BTZ) and, importantly, enhances its therapeutic potential in therapy-resistant human MM cell lines in vitro. Using the syngeneic Vk*MYC BTZ-resistant immunocompetent transplantable MM murine model, we also demonstrate that mice harboring BTZ-insensitive MM tumors respond to the RV/BTZ combination treatment in terms of decreased tumor burden and improved overall survival (P < .00001). We demonstrate that BTZ augments RV replication in tumor-associated endothelial cells and myeloma cells, leading to enhanced viral delivery and thereby stimulating cytokine release, immune activity, apoptosis, and reduction of the MM-associated immune suppression. We conclude that combined RV/BTZ is an attractive therapeutic strategy with no safety signals for the treatment of MM.

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells that is still considered incurable due to the 90% relapse rate in patients. Despite the advent of new agents the majority of MM patients relapse secondary to therapy resistance. The potential of reovirus (RV) as a novel therapeutic agent for MM under in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo conditions has been demonstrated by us and a phase I clinical trial of MM with RV therapy has shown indications of efficacy. Recently we have shown that RV could synergize with several standard of care MM drugs such as bortezomib (BTZ), carfilzomib (CFZ) and dexamethasone and importantly, enhance its therapeutic potential in therapy resistant human MM cell lines in vitro. Utilizing the syngeneic Vk*MYC BTZ resistant transplantable MM mouse model, we demonstrate that mice harbouring BTZ insensitive MM tumors significantly respond to RV treatment. Our data indicate that this RV treatment sensitivity is manifested via, direct oncolysis in conjunction with immune modulatory effects. Methods: Vk*MYC myeloma cells (Vk12598) were injected via tail vein (IV) into 3 groups of C57BL/6 wt recipient mice. Seven days post tumor injection, mice were treated with PBS (vehicle) or live (LV) or dead reovirus (DV) (5×10⁁8 PFU) administered IV every 6 days in a total of 5 doses. Serum gamma globulins (M-spike) were assessed weekly by serum protein electrophoresis. Mice were sacrificed on day 35 post tumour injection and their spleens and bone marrow (BM) were harvested. Splenic and BM cells were stained for CD45+/CD45R-/CD138+ (MM tumors), CD4+/CD8+ (T cells), CD3+/NKG2D+ (NKT cells), CD11b+Ly6C+ (monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (Mo-MDSC) and CD11b+Ly6G+ (polymorphonuclear (PMN) - MDSCs) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Mice treated with RV demonstrated highly significant (P<0.001) reductions in their M-spikes at 4 and 5 weeks post treatment. RV treatment led to a significant NKT cell accumulation in splenic and BM of RV treated mice in comparison to vehicle treated mice suggestive of immune activation due to RV. Further, RV treatment led to a significant increase in BM Mo-MDSC number but not PMN-MDSC numbers. Interestingly, significant down regulation of splenic PMN-MDSCs was seen with RV treatment. Conclusions: Our results indicate reovirotherapy is successful in a validated syngeneic BTZ resistant MM model. These results have important implications for future clinical trials. Currently we are conducting further experiments to assess the immune modulatory (such as T - memory and T - regulatory cells) contributions of RV in this model. Citation Format: Chandini M. Thirukkumaran, Zhong Qiao Shi, Joanne Luider, Karen Kopciuk, Marta Chesi, Leif Bergsagel, Yuan Dong, Chunfen Zhang, Ahmed Mostafa, Kathy Gratton, Satbir Thakur, Don Morris. Successful oncolytic virotherapy in a bortezomib resistant syngeneic mouse model of multiple myeloma: Implications for translational significance. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 541.