Lou, Yanyan

9004 Background: Despite advances in first-line (1L) immunotherapy ± CT, most patients (pts) with aNSCLC experience disease progression, necessitating novel strategies. Dato-DXd is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized anti-TROP2 IgG1 monoclonal antibody covalently linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a plasma-stable tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. Dato-DXd had encouraging efficacy and manageable safety in heavily pretreated aNSCLC. Dato-DXd + immunotherapy yielded greater preclinical activity than either agent alone. Methods: TROPION-Lung02 (NCT04526691) is a phase 1b, global, dose-escalation and -expansion study evaluating Dato-DXd (4 or 6 mg/kg) + pembro 200 mg ± Pt-CT (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5) every 21 days across 6 cohorts. Pts in escalation may have received ≤2 prior lines of therapy for aNSCLC. Pts in expansion were primarily treatment (tx) naive (pts receiving Dato-DXd + pembro may have ≤1 prior Pt-based tx). The primary objective is to assess safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Secondary objectives include evaluation of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Results: As of the Oct 31, 2022, data cutoff (DCO), 120 pts were treated. All cohorts met DLT criteria to move to escalation. Median age was 65 years. PD-L1 expression was <1%, 1%-49%, and ≥50% in 40%, 33%, and 26% of pts, respectively. Median tx duration was 4.6 mo, with 55% receiving tx at DCO. The most frequent any-grade (gr) tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were nausea (45%) and stomatitis (45%). Gr ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61% of pts; most frequent were neutrophil count decreased (8%) and amylase increased (8%). TEAEs that were serious, associated with discontinuation, or associated with death occurred in 31%, 24% (16% associated with Dato-DXd), and 6% of pts, respectively. Dose reductions due to TEAEs associated with Dato-DXd occurred in 17%. Drug-related interstitial lung disease occurred in 12 pts (10%; 9 gr 1/2; 3 gr 3). The objective response rate (ORR) with 1L Dato-DXd + pembro doublet and Dato-DXd + pembro + Pt-CT triplet tx was 60% (95% CI, 36%-81%; 12 [2 unconfirmed]/20) and 55% (95% CI, 39%-70%; 23 [5 unconfirmed]/42), respectively. The ORR for any line of therapy was 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%; 18 [2 unconfirmed]/47) with doublet and 47% (95% CI, 34%-60%; 28 [5 unconfirmed]/60) with triplet tx. In both subsets, the disease control rate was 85% and median duration of response was not reached. Responses were observed in all 3 PD-L1 expression level subgroups. Although immature, median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 10.8 (8.3-15.2) and 7.8 mo (5.5-NE) with doublet and triplet tx, respectively. Conclusions: Dato-DXd + pembro ± Pt-CT demonstrated tolerable safety with notable 1L activity in this first and largest dataset with an ADC + immunotherapy ± Pt-CT in aNSCLC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT04526691 .

e20540 Background: Mesothelioma is an aggressive malignancy with few approved treatment options. Rare malignancies are often seen in higher volume at academic centers which are considered equipped with better expertise. Outcomes of mesothelioma in the novel therapeutic era and impact of initial treatment at academic versus community centers have not been reported. Methods: Mesothelioma cases from 2004-2019 were collected from The National Cancer Database (NCDB). Epidemiologic factors including sex, age, income, education, insurance status and location were assessed as well as overall survival across academic and community centers. Overall survival (OS) was plotted by type of treatment facility, accounting for several factors available in NCDB. Results: A total of 30136 mesothelioma patients were included in the analysis. 13482 (44.7%) were treated in academic centers and 16654 (55.3%) were treated in community practice locations. A higher proportion of patients with comorbidity scores of 2 or higher were seen in the community setting as compared to the academic setting (12.2% vs 7.6%). The distribution of diagnostic stages was similar between academic and community settings (14.1% vs 14.5% Stage I; 28.5% vs 30.7% Stage IV). A higher number of patients received surgery (39.6% vs 21.3%), chemotherapy (59% vs 45.3%), and immunotherapy (5.2% vs 3.5%) when presenting to academic rather than community settings, respectively (p value < 0.001). OS for all patients was 1.093 years (range: 0-16.47 years) for those treated in an academic center and 0.66 years (95% CI: 0-16.690; p < 0.001) for those treated in the community. Conclusions: Data from NCDB database shows that treatment of mesothelioma at academic centers was associated with improved overall survival when compared to receiving treatment in the community despite seeing similar proportions of early and late-stage disease at presentation. Patients were more likely to receive treatment of any kind if presenting to academic centers.

e20535 Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with about 600 new cases per million people diagnosed annually in the U.S. High incidence of germline mutations has been reported in MPM patients (pts) without asbestos exposure. However, the incidence rate of developing multiple primary cancers in this population is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of additional malignancies in MPM pts. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry, we identified 64 pts who were treated for MPM from January 2002-December 2022 with updated follow-up data until 01/15/2023. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Results: Among the patient cohort, 25 pts were male, and 39 pts were female. 14/64 (22%) pts were found to have at least one additional malignancy, including breast cancer (4/14, 29%), colon cancer (3/14, 21%), lymphoma (3/14, 21%), ovarian cancer (2/14, 14%), melanoma (2/14, 14%), anal squamous cell carcinoma (1/14, 7%), papillary thyroid cancer (1/14, 7%), Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (1/14, 7%), renal cell carcinoma (1/14, 7%), squamous cell carcinoma of tongue (1/14, 7%), hepatocellular carcinoma (1/14, 7%) and pituitary macroadenoma (1/14, 7%). 4/14 (29%) pts had more than one (2-4) non-MPM malignancies. The median age at diagnosis of MPM was 65 years (44-82). The median age at diagnosis of non-MPM malignancies was 66 years (18-81). Most of the patients (11/14) were diagnosed with non-MPM malignancy within 12 months of diagnosis of MPM. Most pts (11/14, 78%) were diagnosed with non-MPM malignancy first, among which 5 pts (45%) were found to have MPM on surveillance scans. Germline mutation information was not available except for 2 pts with known family history (FH) of Lynch syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. FH was available in 29 pts, out of which 28 pts had FH of cancer identified in first-degree relatives. Among the 14 pts with additional malignancies, 9 pts had FH of cancer in first-degree relatives. Among all pts, 15 (18%) pts had a history of asbestos exposure. Among pts who also had non-MPM malignancies, 3/14 (21%) pts had a history of asbestos exposure. Among the 21 non-MPM cancers, 1/21 (5%), 11/21(52%), 1/21(5%), 3/21(14%), and 5/21(24%) non-MPM malignancies were stage 0, stage I, II, and III, or unknown at the diagnosis respectively. All except 1 pt underwent curative treatment for their non-MPM malignancies, and 12 pts had no evidence of disease at death or the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: The rate of multiple primary malignancies in pts with MPM is high, indicating possible genetic predisposition associated with this disease. Early genetic consultation and evaluation for germline mutations may need to be considered for these pts to improve long-term outcomes.

e18097 Background: Sorafenib and lenvatinib are FDA-approved MKIs for locally recurrent or metastatic, progressive, DTC refractory to radioactive iodine treatment. Cabozantinib showed a survival benefit in radioiodine-refractory DTC previously treated with sorafenib and/or lenvatinib and was granted FDA approval. Our study aims to investigate the benefit of other MKIs in DTC beyond the first-line setting. Methods: DTC patients (pts) treated with multiple lines of MKIs from August 2018 to July 2022 at Mayo Clinic across all sites were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed. 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated for all lines of therapy using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Results: Among the 9 pts identified, 4 were male. The median age was 65 years (43-75). Most pts (60%) had papillary thyroid cancer. All pts received lenvatinib as first line treatment. The 6, 12 and 18-month PFS were 89%, 89%, and 55% respectively. 6 pts discontinued lenvatinib due to progression of disease (PD). 3 pts discontinued it due to adverse effects (AEs), which included hemoptysis (1 pt), severe rash (1 pt) and multiple psychiatric manifestations (1 pt). 8 pts received pazopanib, and 1 patient received cabozantinib with ipilimumab (1 dose) and nivolumab (6 months - discontinued due to myocarditis) as second-line therapy. Among them, 1 patient received pembrolizumab plus everolimus for 2 months before receiving pazopanib. The 6, 12 and 18-month PFS were 55%, 22%, and 11% respectively. All pts ceased treatment due to eventual PD, and there were no toxicity-related discontinuations. 5 pts subsequently received third-line MKIs, including cabozantinib (3 pts), pazopanib (1 pt), and lenvatinib (1 pt). The pt who received lenvatinib had discontinued it as first line therapy due to toxicity. The 2 pts treated with third-line cabozantinib and the pt rechallenged with lenvatinib showed no PD at 12-months and no toxicity related discontinuation. Conclusions: Pazopanib was associated with durable PFS and good tolerability when offered after PD or intolerance on lenvatinib in this retrospective analysis, warranting a randomized prospective study. [Table: see text]

e16621 Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an exceedingly rare aggressive endocrine malignancy with about 1 new case per million people diagnosed annually in the US. Higher incidence of ACC has been reported in patients (pts) with inherited syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. However, the incidence rate of developing multiple primary cancers in this population is unknown. The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of additional malignancies in ACC patients. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Registry, we identified 63 pts who were treated for ACC from 2010- 2018 with updated follow up data until 01/31/2023. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Results: Among the patient cohort, 22 pts were male. 18/63 (29%) pts were found to have at least one additional malignancy, including basal cell carcinoma (3/18, 17%), melanoma (3/18, 17%), thyroid cancer (3/18, 17%), prostate cancer (3/18, 17%), squamous cell carcinoma of skin (2/18, 11%), renal cell carcinoma (2/18, 11%), breast cancer (2/18, 11%), leukemia (2/18, 11%), lung cancer (1/18, 6%), transitional cell malignant neoplasm of kidney (1/18, 6%), squamous cell carcinoma of tonsil (1/18, 6%), ovarian cancer (1/18, 6%), seminoma (1/18, 6%) and bladder cancer (1/18, 6%). 8/18 (45%) pts had more than one (2-3) non-ACC malignancies. The median age at diagnosis of ACC was 56 years (02-83). The median age at diagnosis of non-ACC malignancies was 54 years (25-72). Most of the patients (13/18) were diagnosed with non-ACC malignancy within 5 years of diagnosis of ACC. Most pts (13/18, 72%) were diagnosed with non-ACC malignancy first. Germline mutation information was not available except for 2 pts with known family history (FH) of Lynch syndrome and 2 pt with a known FH of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. FH was available in 38 pts, out of which 29 pts had FH of cancer identified in first-degree relatives. Among the 18 pts with additional malignancies, 12 pts had FH of cancer in first-degree relatives. All except 2 pts underwent curative treatment for their non-ACC malignancies, and 14 pts had no evidence of disease at death or the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: The rate of other multiple primary malignancies in pts with ACC is high, indicating possible genetic predisposition associated with this disease; Early genetic consultation and evaluation for known and novel germline mutations may need to be considered for these pts to improve long-term outcomes.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type and is still incurable for most patients at the advanced stage. Targeted therapy is an effective treatment that has significantly improved survival in NSCLC patients with actionable mutations. However, therapy resistance occurs widely among patients leading to disease progression. In addition, many oncogenic driver mutations in NSCLC still lack targeted agents. New drugs are being developed and tested in clinical trials to overcome these challenges. This review aims to summarize emerging targeted therapy that have been conducted or initiated through first-in-human clinical trials in the past year.

Background: To understand the changing trends in reporting of race and sex as a demographic variable in phase III lung cancer clinical trials published over the last 35 years. Methods: A total of 426 articles reporting results of phase 3 lung cancer clinical trials published from 1984 to 2019 were identified in PubMed. Statistical analysis on trends over time on percentage of minority and female participation were performed. Results: Only 137 (32.2%) of the 426 studies analyzed reported race of participants. Among those studies, we found that the mean participation rate of white participants was significantly higher (82.65%) (p < 0.001). We found a decrease in African American participants and an increase in Asian participants over time. When looking at sex, we found that although the rate of male participation (69.02%) was significantly higher than that of female participation (30.98%), the female participation has improved with time at a rate of 0.65% per year. Conclusions: We found that the reporting and participation of minority races continues to lag that of other demographic factors like sex in phase III clinical trials in lung cancer. Especially in African Americans, where the participation in lung cancer phase III clinical trials has declined despite the rising incidence in lung cancer.

Abstract Introduction: Treatment modality selection for metastatic NSCLC patients (immunotherapy alone vs. combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy) relies mainly on determining the programmed cell death 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in the tumor. However, available assays are only moderately predictive. Here we set to develop PROphet®, a plasma proteomics-based predictive model for informing treatment decisions for NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. Methods: Pre-ICI plasma samples were collected in 12 centers in a clinical trial (NCT04056247) from 367 advanced-stage NSCLC patients. Clinical benefit (CB) was assessed at 12 months based on the occurrence of progression-free survival (PFS) until this time point. Deep proteomic profiling of the plasma samples was performed using aptamer-based technology. A novel machine learning model was developed to determine the CB probability for each patient, and the performance was successfully evaluated on an independent validation set, followed by training and prediction over the entire cohort using cross-validation. The resulting PROphet® score (positive or negative) was determined by setting the median CB rate probability as a threshold. The patients were divided into four subgroups based on their PD-L1 expression level combined with their PROphet® score prediction, and the overall survival (OS) was examined for each subgroup. Results: The PROphet® computational model was evaluated in a blinded manner on a subset of 85 patients and displayed strong predictive capability with area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) plot of 0.78 (p-value = 5.00e-05), outperforming a PD-L1-based predictive model (AUC = 0.62; p-value 2.76e-01). When combining PROphet® score with PD-L1 expression levels, four different outcome patterns were identified: (i) Patients with PD-L1 ≥50% and PROphet® negative score, who displayed significantly longer OS when treated with ICI-chemotherapy combination therapy compared to ICI monotherapy and may consider combination therapy. (ii) Patients with PD-L1 ≥50% and PROphet® positive score, who benefit similarly from either treatment modalities, and may consider monotherapy to avoid the potential toxicity of the combination therapy. (iii) Patients with PD-L1&lt;50% and PROphet® negative score, who do not benefit from either treatment modalities and may consider chemotherapy alone or treatment beyond standard of care. (iv) Patients with PD-L1&lt;50% and PROphet® positive score who benefit from combination therapy. Conclusions: Altogether, the PROphet® model, when combined with PD-L1 test, stratifies the patients into four subgroups, providing additional resolution to the PD-L1 biomarker currently used to guide treatment selection. Furthermore, the model accurately predicts CB at 12 months based on proteomic analysis of a pre-treatment plasma sample. Citation Format: Michal Harel, Petros Christopoulos, Coren Lahav, Itamar Sela, Nili Dahan, Niels Reinmuth, Ina Koch, Alona Zer, Mor Moskovitz, Adva Levy-Barda, Michal Lotem, Hovav Nechushtan, Rivka Katzenelson, Abed Agbarya, Mahmoud Abu-Amna, Maya Gottfried, Ido Wolf, Ella Tepper, Yanyan Lou, Raya Leibowitz, Adam P. Dicker, David Gandara, David P. Carbone. A pretreatment blood-based proteomic biomarker for enhanced decision-making in non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2159.

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most prevalent form of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a leading cause of cancer death. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) of programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) signaling induce tumor regressions in a subset of LUAD, but many LUAD tumors exhibit resistance to ICI therapy. Here, we identified Prkci as a major determinant of response to ICI in a syngeneic mouse model of oncogenic mutant Kras / Trp53 loss (KP)–driven LUAD. Protein kinase Cι (PKCι)–dependent KP tumors exhibited resistance to anti–PD-1 antibody therapy (α-PD-1), whereas KP tumors in which Prkci was genetically deleted (KPI tumors) were highly responsive. Prkci- dependent resistance to α-PD-1 was characterized by enhanced infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and decreased infiltration of CD8 + T cells in response to α-PD-1. Mechanistically, Prkci regulated YAP1-dependent expression of Cxcl5 , which served to attract MDSCs to KP tumors. The PKCι inhibitor auranofin inhibited KP tumor growth and sensitized these tumors to α-PD-1, whereas expression of either Prkci or its downstream effector Cxcl5 in KPI tumors induced intratumoral infiltration of MDSCs and resistance to α-PD-1. PRKCI expression in tumors of patients with LUAD correlated with genomic signatures indicative of high YAP1-mediated transcription, elevated MDSC infiltration and low CD8 + T cell infiltration, and with elevated CXCL5 / 6 expression. Last, PKCι-YAP1 signaling was a biomarker associated with poor response to ICI in patients with LUAD. Our data indicate that immunosuppressive PKCι-YAP1-CXCL5 signaling is a key determinant of response to ICI, and pharmacologic inhibition of PKCι may improve therapeutic response to ICI in patients with LUAD.

e21131 Background: Solid organ transplant recipients have increased risk for malignancies. Lung cancer is the second most common malignancy in this population. Those patients are usually on long-term immunosuppressive medications that may affect tumorigenesis, cancer characteristics, and treatment response. Previous studies have investigated the characteristics and outcomes of post-transplant patients with lung cancer in small-sized cohorts. However, the tumor mutational profile and detailed treatment response at different stages have not been reported. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study from a cohort of 52 solid organ transplant recipients who were diagnosed with lung cancer at Mayo Clinic from 2018 to 2021. We examined tumor molecular alteration using next generation sequencing (NGS), analyzed the treatment modalities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) and compared those to the general population with lung cancer using historical data in previous large trials. Results: In our study, most transplanted solid organs are kidney (N = 28, 53.8%), followed by liver (N = 12, 23.1%) and heart (N = 9, 17.3%). The adenocarcinoma (N = 28, 53.8%) represented the most common histology, followed by squamous cell carcinoma (N = 19, 36.5%). It consisted of Stage I (30.8%), stage II (15.4%), stage III (25%), and stage IV (26.9%). The most common site of metastasis is bone (64.3%). Transplant recipients with lung cancer have a significantly high frequency of somatic BRCA 1/2 mutations (30.4%), compared to the general population with advanced lung cancer (2.1%, p < 0.001). The frequencies of TP53 mutations (52.2%) and EGFR mutations (30.4%) are also increased. For stage I patients who received surgery or radiation therapy, the disease-free survival (DFS) is 16.5 months. 9 of 14 stage IV patients received chemotherapy. The median number of cycles received is 4. The median PFS is 4.9 months, and the median OS of all stage IV patients is 6.1 months. 4 patients were found to have actionable EGFR mutations, and 3 of them were initially diagnosed with stage IIIA and received Osimertinib after progression. One stage IV patient who was post-liver transplant received pembrolizumab for up to 5 cycles before he developed aspiration pneumonia and then pursued hospice. The PFS is 3.7 months. No immune-related adverse event was reported. Conclusions: In our cohort of solid organ transplant recipients who developed lung cancer, we observed a much higher frequency of somatic BRCA 1/2 mutations, compared to the general population with lung cancer. In addition, our data suggested post-transplant patients with stage I lung cancer have a shorter disease-free survival, and patients with stage IV lung cancer have a shorter overall survival, compared to the general population with lung cancer. Further study containing a high number of solid transplant patients to validate these findings is warranted.