Back to Authors

Gaines, Katherine

0009-0005-8038-8870

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Florida

Citations 10

Assessing distress in patients with gastrointestinal tumors during radiotherapy.
Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Habboush, Jacob, Kaleem, Tasneem , Tzou, Katherine S., Ko, Stephen, Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, May, Byron C. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18087-e18087

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18087 Get It

Patient reported distress in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.
Gaines, Katherine , Hollant, Laeticia, Smart, Bridget, Single, Megan Paige, Habboush, Jacob, Tzou, Katherine S., Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Wert, K. , May, Byron C. , Ko, Stephen J. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18086-e18086

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18086 Get It

Patient reported distress symptoms in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy.
Single, Megan Paige, Hollant, Laeticia, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Habboush, Jacob, Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Vallow, Laura A., Tzou, Katherine S., May, Byron C. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18085-e18085

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18085 Get It

Patient reported distress and survival after palliative radiotherapy.
Habboush, Jacob, Shannon, Robert P. , Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Buskirk, Steven J., Vallow, Laura A., Tzou, Katherine S., Peterson, Jennifer , Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, May, Byron C. , Ko, Stephen J. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18084-e18084

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18084 Get It

Patient-reported distress screening outcomes in breast cancer.
Smart, Bridget, Vallow, Laura A., Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Habboush, Jacob, Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Tzou, Katherine S., May, Byron C. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18083-e18083

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.e18083 Get It

Assessing distress in patients with gastrointestinal tumors during radiotherapy.
Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Habboush, Jacob, Kaleem, Tasneem , Tzou, Katherine S., Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Ko, Stephen J. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 524-524

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.524 Get It

524 Background: Psychosocial distress during radiotherapy (RT) for gastrointestinal tumors is poorly characterized. Since 2012, patients receiving RT in our clinic have been prospectively screened for causes of distress. The results of our screening were reviewed in order to elucidate concerns of GI cancer patients and to delineate patterns within patient reported distress (PRD). Methods: Patients treated with RT at our institution receive a 30 question PRD survey that also includes a linear analog measure of overall distress at the start and during RT. The PRD survey asks patients to rate forms of distress on a scale of 1 to 5 (5 being the most distressed). The survey also asks patients to rate overall distress according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Thermometer on a scale 0 to 10. The reported results were retrospectively reviewed in patients receiving definitive RT for GI cancers from 04/02/2012 to 08/05/2015. Results: PRD surveys were completed by 113 patients, 55 (48.7%) male and 58 (51.3%) female. Median age was 65 years (range 28 to 93). The most common tumor histology was adenocarcinoma, 67 (59.3%). 105 patients (93.0%) received chemotherapy and 66 (58.4%) underwent surgery. Overall, NCCN distress thermometer results ranged from 0 to 10, with a median of 4.3. The mean distress scores for the top five complaints ranged from 1.27 to 2.63. Top distresses were “How will I feel during treatment” (2.63), “Fatigue” (2.45), “Pain that affects daily functioning” (2.35), “Out of pocket medical costs” (2.31), and “Sleep difficulties” (2.31). The least concerning complaints were “Housing during treatment” (1.27), “A loved one relying on me for their physical care” (1.30), “Spirituality” (1.33),“Family communication about my illness”(1.37), and “Transportation” (1.38). Conclusions: Patients’ major concerns were aligned with daily quality of life, such as fatigue, pain and insomnia. Highest reported distress was linked with the process of RT and side effects associated with treatment. Medical expenses were also perceived as a burden. Medical providers should identify psychosocial stressors during RT in order to effectively communicate and provide resources to improve quality of life.
Patient-reported distress symptoms in patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy.
Single, Megan Paige, Hollant, Laeticia, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Habboush, Jacob, Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Vallow, Laura A., Tzou, Katherine S., Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 29_suppl | Pages: 75-75

10.1200/jco.2015.33.29_suppl.75 Get It

75 Background: The focus of palliative radiotherapy (RT) is on improving quality of life (QOL) for patients with serious illnesses by eliminating or decreasing physical symptoms. The importance of assessing distress levels in palliative care patients is recognized due to the relevance of QOL, as treatment is given to provide symptom-relief rather than curative results. We sought to identify the most common causes of patient reported distress during palliative RT. Methods: Retrospective review was performed for patients who received palliative RT from 11/1/2012 to 6/4/2015 for various types of metastatic cancer at our institution. All patients completed a Patient Reported Distress (PRD) questionnaire with 30 specific questions and an overall distress thermometer prior to beginning treatment. The PRD survey quantified 30 areas of current concern ranging in patient-reported values from 1 to 5 in addition to a linear analog measure from 0 to 10 of overall reported distress in the last month. Results: Completed PRD surveys were available for a total of 297 patients, 149 (50.2%) female and 148 (49.8%) male. All patients were undergoing external beam radiation therapy for treatment of metastatic disease. 49 (16%) received chemotherapy and 46 (9%) underwent surgery. Overall distress ranged from 0 to 10, with a median of 5.0. The mean distress scores for the top five concerns ranged from 1.4 to 2.7. Top distresses were “Fatigue” (2.7), “Pain that affects daily functioning” (2.6), “How will I feel during treatment” (2.5), “Sleep difficulties” (2.4), and “Out of pocket medical costs” (2.3). Least troubling symptoms were “Transportation” (1.4), “A loved one relying on me for their physical care” (1.5), “My job” (1.5), “Housing during treatment” (1.5), “Spirituality” (1.5), and “Anger” (1.5). Conclusions: Patients demonstrated concern for distress related to interruption of activities of normal life, such as tiredness and insomnia, pain, and overall burdens from treatment. Medical costs were also a major concern. Importantly, housing and transportation were not issues in the current study but could be of concern in other regions. Providers should be aware that patients’ primary concerns may not be directly related to the symptom being palliated.
Patient distress and survival in palliative radiotherapy.
Habboush, Jacob, Shannon, Robert P. , Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Smart, Bridget, Buskirk, Steven J., Vallow, Laura A., Tzou, Katherine S., Peterson, Jennifer , Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Ko, Stephen J. , Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 3_suppl | Pages: 211-211

10.1200/jco.2016.34.3_suppl.211 Get It

211 Background: Distress is known to be elevated in patients receiving cancer therapy, such as palliative radiotherapy (PRT). Many patients will experience distress during treatment and it is not always addressed in part due to a lack of guidance regarding the significance of distress. Methods: All RT patients in our clinic are asked to complete a patient reported distress (PRD) survey during treatment course. PRD forms consist of 30 categorical questions that assess distress subscales. Patients have the option to rate each question from 1 (low distress) to 5 (high distress). The survey also includes the National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer, which allows patients to rate overall distress level from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). Patients’ records were retrospectively reviewed to abstract the needed information to assess survivorship. Results: 270 patients were included from 01/18/2012-08/07/2015. Overall PRD was analyzed as a continuous and a categorical variable (low: 0-3, moderate: 4-6, high: 7-10). Continuous and categorical variable PRD did not show a correlation of distress to survival (P = 0.26) and (P = 0.10) respectively. A correlation was noted in moderate distress category (RR: 1.51, P = 0.034), however, this was not noted in high distress category (RR: 1.25, P = 0.33). There was no statistical significant correlation with the adjusted variables. Patients with primary site of gastrointestinal cancer had worst prognosis (RR: 1.34, P: 0.14), while hematological origin had best prognosis (RR: 0.35, P: 0.038).Age had the strongest correlation with survival, as older patients receiving RT had poorer survival (RR: 1.13, P: 0.079). Conclusions: This study suggests that PRD is not predictive of survival in PRT. The primary goal of PRT is to improve quality of life (QoL) by assessing, anticipating and alleviating suffering; not necessarily improve survival. It also demonstrated that the most common stressors were related to reversible short-term side effects of RT such as fatigue and pain rather than long-term stressors related to daily activities and social measures which might affect QoL. It is imperative to explore assessment tools to mitigate suffering and improve strategies to enhance QoL in all medical disciplines.
Patient-reported distress screening outcomes in breast cancer.
Smart, Bridget, Vallow, Laura A., Hollant, Laeticia, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Habboush, Jacob, Biers, Heather, Day, Atiya, Tzou, Katherine S., Miller, Robert C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 24, 2017 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 28_suppl | Pages: 79-79

10.1200/jco.2015.33.28_suppl.79 Get It

79 Background: A significant percentage of cancer patients experience psychosocial distress with the highest prevalence observed in breast cancer patients. The importance of psychosocial distress screening and assessment in women with breast cancer has clearly been established. Patients in our clinic are screened for distress. The results were reviewed in an attempt to better understand the psychosocial distress of breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Methods: Patients treated curatively for breast cancer prospectively completed the 30 question patient reported distress (PRD) survey that also included a linear analog measure of overall distress. The recorded clinical results of the PRD survey were retrospectively assessed in patients receiving breast radiotherapy from June 1, 2013 to February 2, 2015. Results: Completed PRD questionnaires were available on 179 female patients. 21 (12%) were treated for ductal carcinoma in situ and 91 (51%), 35 (20%), and 32 (18%) were treated for invasive carcinoma Stages I, II, and III. 85 (47%) received chemotherapy. Overall distress ranged from 0 to 10, with a median value of 5. Mean distress scores per category ranged from a low of 1.25 to a high of 2.52. Top concerns in descending order of importance were: “How will I feel during treatment” (2.52), “Fatigue” (2.46), “Sleep difficulties” (2.32), “How will I feel about appearance related to treatment” (2.23), & “Pain that affects daily functioning” (2.19). Least distressing symptoms “Spirituality” (1.25), “Housing during treatment” (1.26), “Control of anger” (1.28), “End of life concerns” (1.32), & “Transportation” (1.34). Conclusions: Distress over tumor related issues ranked low among women’s concerns in comparison to distress related to the side effects of therapy concerning treatment related discomfort, fatigue, and changes in appearance, and anxiety. Pain was a significant concern, although in this group of patients receiving definitive, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, this was likely related to treatment associated discomfort rather than from disease progression. These findings highlight the importance of careful patient education and communication of the expected symptoms and effects of therapy.
Characteristics and Patterns of Rare Malignancies Published in Rare Tumors
Habboush, Jacob, Hollant, Laeticia, Smart, Brigit, Single, Megan Paige, Gaines, Katherine , Patel, Ajaykumar, Miller, Robert C. , Single, Megan

Rare Tumors | June 29, 2016 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 56-59

10.4081/rt.2016.6148 Get It

Rare Tumors is an international peer-reviewed medical journal established in 2009. The journal is focused on rare cancers and aims to expand upon current knowledge on their presentation, diagnosis, management, and outcomes. We reviewed the 335 case reports published from 2009 to 2015. We found great diversity in both the country of origin as well as specialty of first authors. Outside of the United States (US) and European Union (EU), there were 20 countries with contributions to the journal. Similarly, there was representation from twelve medical specialties with first authorship of reports. Rare Tumors continues to encourage involvement from physicians across the globe and from all medical disciplines.